Top 10 Equip Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why the Equip-ment Isn't Always the Right Fit?

So, you're on the hunt for an Equip alternative? Good call! I've done a little digging to understand why HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers like yourself might be exploring other options. Turns out, while Equip has its strengths, it's not always a one-size-fits-all solution. Let's look at some of the common reasons why companies seek alternatives.

Limited Test Library. Equip may not have tests for every role or skill you need to assess. If you're hiring for niche positions or require assessments for specialized skills like accounting, finance, or even typing speed, you might find Equip's offerings a bit... well, equipped for your requirements. A broader range ensures you can accurately evaluate candidates across diverse roles.

Lacking Customization. Sometimes, off-the-shelf assessments just don't cut it. Equip doesn't allow you to add your own questions or create custom tests tailored to your specific job descriptions and company culture. This can be a problem because the tests might not accurately reflect the actual skills and knowledge needed for the role, leading to mismatches.

Proctoring limitations. While Equip does offer proctoring features, they might not be as extensive as some other platforms. Features like location logging, IP proctoring, and device fingerprinting are missing which can make it easier for candidates to cheat. A more thorough proctoring suite helps maintain the integrity of the assessment process and ensures fair results. Platforms like Adaface include these features.

1. Adaface

Best for: Skills assessments for technical, aptitude, and business roles

Equip offers a wide range of assessments, but to ensure you're getting the most accurate and insightful evaluation of your candidates, it's worth exploring alternatives. Adaface provides a strong solution for skills-based hiring, offering a balance of breadth and depth in its assessments.

One potential drawback of Equip is the limited ability to customize assessments. Adaface solves this by allowing you to tailor tests to your specific job descriptions. This means you can assess the exact skills and knowledge needed for the role, leading to more relevant and accurate hiring decisions. Stop settling for generic tests, and create assessments that truly reflect your needs.

Adaface addresses another key area where Equip falls short: test library coverage. Adaface boasts a wider selection of tests including:

• Aptitude tests (logical, numerical, verbal etc.)
• Business skills tests (Excel, project management, etc.)
• Typing tests
• Personality assessments
• Finance & Accounting tests
• AI & Data Science tests
• Language proficiency tests

Extensive and Diverse Test Library

Adaface provides a test library of 500+ tests covering a wide range of skills and roles. Whether you're looking for programming tests, aptitude tests, or even niche skills like typing proficiency, Adaface has you covered.

This extensive library ensures that you can find the right assessment for any role, from entry-level positions to leadership roles. Plus, with tests for both technical and non-technical skills, Adaface is a versatile solution for all your hiring needs.

We're constantly expanding our library, adding new tests and updating existing ones to keep pace with the evolving demands of the job market.

Robust Proctoring and Anti-Cheating Measures

Adaface understands the importance of test integrity. That's why we've implemented a suite of proctoring and anti-cheating measures to ensure fair and reliable results.

Our platform includes webcam proctoring, which records candidates during the assessment, as well as window and tab tracking to detect suspicious behavior. We also use IP address and device fingerprint logging to prevent candidates from taking the test multiple times or colluding with others.

Additionally, Adaface employs measures to protect against the use of tools like ChatGPT. These features ensure that you can trust the results of our assessments and make informed hiring decisions.

Adaface vs Equip Attributes

Adaface Pros

• Wide range of tests: technical, aptitude, business, and more
• Strong proctoring features
• Customizable assessments
• Used by clients in 70+ countries
• Pricing depends on credits, not seats
• Excellent candidate experience and company branding
• Detailed scorecards and reporting

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans. Plans range from Individual ($180/yr) to Unlimited ($50,000/yr), with options for Starter, Pro, Scale, Growth and Enterprise in between. All plans include all proctoring features and access to our 500+ test library. A free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits is available, allowing you to explore the platform before committing. No credit card is required to start your trial!

2. CodeSignal

Best for: Technical skills assessment platform

CodeSignal offers a platform focused on technical assessment, primarily catering to coding skills. It aims to provide a standardized environment for evaluating developers and technical talent, making it a contender in the skills assessment market. The platform uses a unique scoring system called the Coding Score.

Equip offers limited options for customization. CodeSignal, on the other hand, offers a wider array of coding-focused assessments. If your primary need is to assess coding skills and you need flexibility in evaluating candidates, CodeSignal might be a better fit, but it is worth noting that CodeSignal doesn't assess for aptitude, personality, or business skills.

However, CodeSignal's tests can be lengthy, sometimes taking up to 2 hours. While this might provide a more detailed evaluation, it can also lead to candidate fatigue and lower completion rates, which is the problem Adaface solves with shorter tests.

How CodeSignal compares to Equip?

Key Features

• Coding Score: Provides a standardized score for assessing coding skills.
• Integrated Development Environment (IDE): Offers a real-time coding environment for candidates.
• Certified Assessments: Ready-made tests for various programming languages and skills.

CodeSignal Pros

• Focus on Coding Skills: Strong emphasis on assessing coding abilities.
• Real-time IDE: Candidates can code in a realistic environment.
• Automation: Automates the evaluation of coding assessments saving time.
• Reporting: Provides a score for each candidate based on their performance.
• Plagiarism Detection: Provides a plagiarism score to check the originality of the answers.

CodeSignal Cons

• Limited Scope: Lacks assessments for aptitude, personality, and business skills, which are crucial for a complete candidate profile.
• No Custom Questions: Does not allow you to add your own custom questions, unlike platforms like Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests.
• Lengthy Tests: Assessments can be time-consuming, potentially impacting candidate experience.
• Lacks Situational Judgement questions: Does not test for how candidates respond to work place situations.

CodeSignal Pricing

CodeSignal doesn't publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote tailored to your specific needs. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly compare costs with other assessment platforms, and there is no free trial offered.

3. Hackerrank

Best for: Technical skill screening at scale

HackerRank offers a platform designed to evaluate technical skills, primarily catering to software development roles. It provides coding challenges and assessments to help recruiters gauge a candidate's programming abilities and problem-solving skills. In short, it helps you see if a candidate can actually code.

Equip may offer some coding assessments, but HackerRank is heavily focused on this area, offering a wide range of languages and problem types. If your primary need is to thoroughly assess coding skills, HackerRank might seem like a stronger fit at first glance.

However, remember that Equip's lack of breadth means you might need another tool for aptitude, behavioral, or job-specific assessments. HackerRank also focuses on technical skills only. Consider if you need a more well-rounded assessment.

How Hackerrank compares to Equip?

Key Features

• Coding Challenges: A vast library of coding problems across various languages and skill levels.
• Skill Certification: Candidates can earn certifications to showcase their proficiency.
• Live Coding Interviews: Facilitates real-time coding sessions with candidates.

Hackerrank Pros

• Large Developer Community: Widely recognized and used by developers, increasing candidate familiarity.
• Supports Many Languages: Offers assessments in a wide array of programming languages.
• Automated Scoring: Automatically evaluates code submissions, saving time.
• Plagiarism Detection: Helps maintain the integrity of coding assessments.
• Real-World Coding Questions: You can see how candidates perform in a sandboxed environment.

Hackerrank Cons

• Limited Scope: Lacks assessments for non-technical skills like personality or business acumen.
• No Focus on Job-Specific Scenarios: While it tests coding, it doesn't assess how candidates apply skills in real-world job scenarios.
• Lengthy Assessments: Tests can be time-consuming, impacting candidate experience.
• No Custom API: It lacks custom API, which means it does not integrate seamlessly with all HR systems.

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank's pricing is tiered, with a free trial not available. Paid plans start around $100/month, but enterprise pricing requires contacting them for a custom quote. Be sure to factor in the cost of add-ons and potential limitations when evaluating overall value.

4. Prevue Assessments

Best for: Assess aptitude, personality, skills

Prevue Assessments offers tools to evaluate candidates on aptitude, personality, and skills. It aims to provide insights into a candidate's potential fit within an organization.

Unlike Equip, Prevue Assessments provides situational judgment tests, offering a glimpse into how candidates might handle real-world scenarios. This is valuable for roles requiring strong decision-making skills.

However, Prevue Assessments lacks programming tests, limiting its utility for tech roles. For a broader range of skills assessment, including coding, consider Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests.

How Prevue Assessments compares to Equip?

Key Features

• Aptitude testing: Measures cognitive abilities.
• Personality assessments: Evaluates behavioral traits.
• Skills testing: Assesses job-related knowledge.

Prevue Assessments Pros

• Measures cognitive abilities.
• Assesses behavioral traits.
• Evaluates job-related knowledge.
• Offers customizable invitation templates.
• Integrates with ATS systems.

Prevue Assessments Cons

• Lacks coding assessments for technical roles.
• No social listening for question leaks, compromising test integrity.
• Doesn't support custom question creation.
• No mobile-friendly testing experience.

Prevue Assessments Pricing

Prevue Assessments does not offer transparent pricing on its website. To obtain a quote, you'll need to contact their team directly. They also do not offer a free trial, so you will not be able to test the product before speaking to sales.

5. TalView

Best for: Skills and Behavioral Assessments

TalView offers a suite of solutions aimed at streamlining the hiring process, from initial screening to final selection. They provide tools for video interviewing, coding assessments, and behavioral analysis. It's like giving your recruitment process a turbo boost, helping you zoom in on the best candidates faster.

While Equip focuses on skills, Talview brings in behavioral insights. Equip is good for coding skills, but struggles to assess a candidate's fit. Talview bridges the gap by offering tools to gauge a candidate's personality and soft skills, ensuring they're not just skilled but also a good fit for your team.

Talview also has good support for custom APIs. So you can integrate with ATS or HR systems easily. Recruiters can use the API themselves to have a tighter integration into their workflows. Equip doesn't provide this feature.

How TalView compares to Equip?

Key Features

• Video Interviewing: Conduct remote interviews, saving time and resources.
• Coding Assessments: Evaluate coding skills with a built-in IDE.
• Behavioral Insights: Understand candidate personality and fit.

TalView Pros

• Good support for video interviewing.
• It supports coding assessments.
• It supports behavioral assessment, unlike Equip.
• Has a large question bank to choose questions from.
• Provides custom APIs for enterprise users.

TalView Cons

• No support for typing tests. If you need to test typing skills, you will need an alternative.
• Doesn't support creating custom questions. If you have your own questions, you will need an alternative.
• No ready to use Excel assessment workbooks. So if you need to test skills like Financial Modeling, you will need an alternative.
• Mobile unfriendly. Secure browser is required which means tests cannot be taken on mobile.

TalView Pricing

TalView doesn’t publicly list its pricing. You'll need to fill out a form or contact their sales team to get a quote. This lack of transparency can be a bit of a hurdle if you're just trying to get a quick idea of costs. Also, they don't offer a free trial so you can't just try out the platform yourself.

6. HireVue

Best for: Video interviews and assessments

HireVue is known for its video interviewing platform, which also offers assessment capabilities. It aims to streamline the hiring process using video technology and AI-driven insights.

Unlike Equip, HireVue incorporates asynchronous video interviews. This allows candidates to record their responses to pre-set questions, which recruiters can then review at their convenience. This feature can be particularly beneficial for initial screening stages to save time and effort.

However, it's worth noting that HireVue lacks the ability to create custom questions and doesn't offer custom tests based on job descriptions. This means that while HireVue offers a ready-to-use test library, the tests might not always be perfectly aligned with the specific requirements of each role.

How HireVue compares to Equip?

Key Features

• Video Interviewing: Enables asynchronous and live video interviews for remote candidate screening.
• AI-Driven Insights: Utilizes AI to analyze candidate responses and provide insights into their suitability for the role.
• Assessment Library: Offers a range of pre-built assessments to evaluate candidate skills and competencies.

HireVue Pros

• Strong focus on video interviewing capabilities.
• AI-driven insights can help streamline the screening process.
• Integrates with various ATS platforms.
• Offers mobile-friendly assessments.
• Provides automated scorecard generation.

HireVue Cons

• Lacks custom question creation.
• No support for custom data location.
• No custom API for integrations.
• Limited proctoring features compared to other platforms like Adaface.

HireVue Pricing

HireVue does not have publicly available pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote tailored to your specific needs. Also, they do not offer any free trials.

7. Sova

Best for: Assess personality, aptitude, potential

Sova Assessment offers a platform designed to evaluate candidates using psychometric and aptitude assessments. They aim to predict job performance and identify high-potential employees through personality questionnaires, situational judgement tests, and ability assessments.

Unlike Equip, Sova emphasizes psychometric assessments more than skills testing. While Equip provides coding assessments, Sova focuses on personality traits, cognitive abilities, and situational judgment. This makes Sova suitable for roles where personality and behavior are critical for success, such as leadership positions or customer-facing roles.

However, if you need to test coding skills, database knowledge, or Excel proficiency, Sova might not be the best fit. Platforms like Adaface provide scenario-based questions to evaluate these skills and job-specific abilities.

How Sova compares to Equip?

Key Features

• Personality questionnaires to gauge behavioral traits.
• Aptitude tests to measure cognitive abilities.
• Situational judgment tests for realistic scenarios.

Sova Pros

• Solid focus on psychometric assessments.
• Benchmarking available to compare candidates.
• Reporting available to have skills profile.
• Provides role based access.
• ATS Integrations exist.

Sova Cons

• Lacks coding assessments for technical roles. Adaface is the way to go.
• No built in protection against cheating or plagiarism.
• No custom API to integrate with new ATS or HR systems easily.
• No Custom data location support.

Sova Pricing

Sova's pricing is on the higher end, starting at £833 per month for Sova, £1667 per month for Sova Plus, and £2500 per month for Sova Pro. They do not offer a free trial, and you need to contact them to get started. This can be a barrier for smaller companies or those looking for a quick test run before committing.

8. iMocha

Best for: Skills validation at scale

iMocha is a skills assessment platform designed to help companies evaluate and understand their workforce's skill levels. It provides tools for assessing candidate skills during recruitment and identifying skill gaps within existing teams.

iMocha goes beyond basic skills testing by offering features to manage and develop skills throughout your organization. Unlike Equip, which has limitations in custom questions and tailored assessments, iMocha offers a wider range of tests, including situational judgment and business skills, to provide a more complete evaluation.

While Equip provides ready-to-use tests, iMocha's broader assessment library allows you to assess a wider array of skills. However, neither platform offers the ability to create custom questions easily, a feature that can be valuable for assessing unique skills specific to your company's needs. For a truly tailored approach, consider platforms like Adaface's online assessment platform, which allows customized tests based on specific job descriptions.

How iMocha compares to Equip?

Key Features

• Extensive Skill Library: Access a wide range of assessments covering technical, aptitude, and job-specific skills.
• Coding Assessments: Evaluate coding skills with a built-in IDE and automated scoring.
• Skills Intelligence: Identify skill gaps and plan for future training needs.

iMocha Pros

• Wide range of assessment types, including aptitude, technical, and role-based skills.
• Supports coding assessments with code playback for better evaluation.
• Offers skill benchmarking to compare candidates against industry standards.
• Integrates with popular ATS systems for a streamlined hiring process.
• Provides detailed reporting and analytics on candidate performance.

iMocha Cons

• Lacks custom question creation, limiting the ability to assess niche skills.
• No support for excel simulation based questions.
• No Free trial is available.
• Does not use GenAI for optimizing recruiter workflows.

iMocha Pricing

iMocha does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a custom quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly compare costs with other solutions.

9. Qualified

Best for: Skills for tech roles

Qualified is a platform focused on assessing technical skills. It offers coding assessments, live interviews, and skill-based evaluations for developers and other tech professionals. Qualified aims to help you identify top tech talent through practical skills testing.

Qualified sets itself apart from Equip with its emphasis on providing a real-world coding environment. While both platforms offer coding assessments, Qualified leans into a fully functional IDE (Integrated Development Environment) during live coding interviews. This lets developers show off their skills in a setting that closely mirrors their daily work.

However, Qualified, like Equip, doesn't provide support for business skills, situational judgment, or personality tests. If you're looking for a platform that can assess a broader range of skills beyond just tech, you might need to consider other options like Adaface.

How Qualified compares to Equip?

Key Features

• Live coding interviews with a full IDE.
• Skill-based candidate filtering using AI.
• Candidate engagement to showcase company culture.

Qualified Pros

• Strong focus on evaluating technical skills.
• Functional IDE for live coding interviews.
• Plagiarism detection to maintain test integrity.
• Automated scoring to save time.
• ATS integrations for workflow.

Qualified Cons

• Lacks assessments for non-technical roles.
• No support for custom coding questions.
• Limited features for employer branding compared to others.
• No support for skill benchmarking across candidates.

Qualified Pricing

Qualified does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact them to get a quote tailored to your specific needs. The lack of transparent pricing and absence of a free trial might make it difficult to quickly evaluate if it fits your budget before investing time in a sales call. In contrast, Adaface Assessments Pricing is readily available.

10. Brillium

Best for: Custom exams, compliance training

Brillium offers a platform to create and deliver custom exams and training. It's designed to help organizations assess knowledge and skills, primarily for compliance and certification purposes.

Unlike Equip, which provides a ready-made test library, Brillium lets you build your own assessments from scratch. This is super useful if you have very specific training or compliance needs. However, this also means you'll need to invest time and resources in creating and maintaining your own question bank.

Think of it this way: Equip is like ordering a pizza, while Brillium is like making one from scratch. Both get you fed, but one requires more effort and expertise on your part. If you need a highly customized test that no pre-built library can offer, then Brillium might be a fit.

How Brillium compares to Equip?

Key Features

• Exam building and delivery
• Certification management
• Reporting and analytics

Brillium Pros

• Highly customizable exam creation.
• Strong reporting features.
• Integrates with other learning management systems.
• Supports multimedia content in assessments.
• Offers features for compliance tracking.

Brillium Cons

• Requires creating your own question bank, which can be time-consuming.
• Lacks built-in proctoring features for secure testing.
• No coding or excel simulation questions.
• Limited language support.

Brillium Pricing

Brillium offers tiered pricing, starting at $69 per month (billed annually) for a single user. For more users, the price increases to $205 per month (billed annually) for 3 users. For enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact their sales team. They offer a free trial, so you can kick the tires before committing. This could be a good way to see if their online assessment platform fits your requirements.

Found Your Perfect Equip Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface: Offers 500+ tests across aptitude, finance, personality, and technical roles, plus strong proctoring and global reach, without seat-based pricing unlike Equip.
• CodeSignal: A coding assessment platform that requires speaking with the sales team to access the platform unlike Equip.
• HackerRank: Primarily for tech roles. Offers custom questions, which Equip lacks.
• Prevue Assessments: Focuses on aptitude, personality, and job-specific tests, but lacks programming assessments that Equip provides.
• Talview: Offers a range of assessments, including coding and aptitude, but lacks custom test creation unlike Equip.
• HireVue: Combines assessments with video interviews for a more personal touch, but does not provide an open API unlike Equip.
• Sova: Focuses on psychometric assessments and offers custom questions but lacks custom coding questions which Equip provides.
• iMocha: Offers a wide range of tests, including AI and coding, but the questions are easily searchable making it non-reliable.
• Qualified-io: Specializes in technical assessments but does not offer company branding unlike Equip.
• Brillium: Provides the software to conduct tests, but requires you to bring your own question bank, unlike Equip.

So, we've journeyed through a landscape of Equip alternatives, each with its own strengths. Equip shines with its coding assessments, but it might not be the perfect fit for everyone. Its limited scope beyond technical skills can be a real deal-breaker.

Luckily, there are plenty of fish in the sea (or should we say, tools in the cloud!). Alternatives exist that offer a wider range of assessment types, from aptitude to personality, and can even be tailored to specific roles. Adaface stands out with its extensive test library and strong proctoring, making it a solid contender.

Whether you need to screen for specific skills, assess cultural fit, or simply streamline your hiring process, these Equip alternatives offer something for everyone. You can always rely on these alternatives, with Adaface being a strong one to consider.

No matter your usecase, you should pick the right one that works for you.

Take the skills based hiring approach, head over to Adaface today.