Top 10 remote coding interview tools

Why Use Skills Assessment Tools?

Let's face it, sifting through piles of resumes can feel like searching for a needle in a haystack. You want to find top talent quickly, but traditional methods often fall short. That's where skills assessment tools come in – they help recruiters identify qualified candidates with the right skills, making the hiring process faster and more effective.

These tools address key challenges in talent acquisition. Firstly, they provide a standardized way to evaluate candidates, removing bias and ensuring fair comparison. Secondly, online assessment platforms can assess a wide range of skills, from coding tests to aptitude, providing a holistic view of each candidate's capabilities.

By using tools like pre-employment assessment tests, you can say goodbye to gut-feeling hiring and hello to data-driven decisions. The reality is that candidate assessment platforms enable recruiters to focus on candidates who truly possess the skills needed to succeed.

What Makes a Great Skills Assessment Software?

When choosing a skills assessment tools, recruiters need to ensure that the tool accurately gauges candidate skills. Here are a few key features to consider:

• Wide Range of Skills: The ideal platform should assess candidates across various skills, including programming, aptitude, business acumen, and even language proficiency. This provides a complete picture of the candidate's abilities.
• Detailed Reporting: Look for platforms that offer skill-wise analysis and comprehensive overviews. These features enable recruiters to pinpoint specific strengths and areas for improvement, making for informed hiring decisions. Also, the platform should provide reports in different formats so it becomes easy for recruiters to share it internally.
• Proctoring and Security: The software must maintain test integrity through features like webcam proctoring, IP tracking, and copy-paste protection. This will help reduce the chances of cheating. This ensures a fair and reliable assessment process.

Skills Assessment Tools: A Quick Comparison

Choosing the right skills assessment tool can feel like navigating a maze. This table offers a bird's-eye view, highlighting key features to help you select the perfect tool.

1. Adaface: Best for Broad Skill Assessment with Strong Proctoring

Let's talk about Adaface. It's designed to help you quickly assess skills across various roles, thanks to its ready-made tests and seamless ATS integrations. It’s your go-to for running skills, cognitive, language, and personality checks at scale.

Why we picked Adaface

Adaface provides recruiters with a better way to gauge a candidate's abilities, offering a database of 500+ skill tests. It goes beyond just the final result, evaluating the approach, logic, design, and even those all-important soft skills.

Think of Adaface as your tool for seeing how people will do in the long run, not just what they can do right now. It helps you design custom tests based on job descriptions, making sure the assessment is spot-on instead of using a generic test for everyone. You can also use Adaface's online assessment platform to assess candidate skills.

The top pros of using Adaface include its high test library and its strong proctoring suite. It works for all sorts of roles, from aptitude and finance to personality, business, typing, AI, technical, and coding.

Key Features of Adaface

• Extensive skill assessment library: Access a wide range of 500+ tests covering programming, IT, business, Excel, aptitude, personality, finance, and role-specific skills.
• Customizable tests: Adjust test duration, cut-off scores, and programming languages to fit specific hiring needs, or have Adaface experts tailor the test to your job descriptions.
• Scenario-based on-the-job skill questions: Evaluate candidates with questions that mirror real-world job experiences, focusing on practical knowledge rather than just theory.
• Multiple question types: Assess skills in Excel, SQL, and coding through simulators, and evaluate role-based abilities using scenario-based MCQs.
• Advanced proctoring features: Maintain test integrity with webcam proctoring, video monitoring, ChatGPT proctoring, and off-tab activity tracking.
• Comprehensive reporting: Get detailed scorecards with skill-wise analysis, benchmarking against other candidates, and audit timelines for thorough evaluation.

Pros of Adaface

• High test library: Offers 500+ tests, covering a wide range of skills including technical, cognitive, language, and personality.
• Versatile assessment: Works for aptitude, finance, personality, business, typing, AI, technical, and coding roles.
• Strong proctoring: Comes with a suite of proctoring features to ensure test integrity.
• Global reach: Used by clients in 70+ countries.

Cons of Adaface

One con of using Adaface is that it does not have live video interviews.

Pricing of Adaface

Adaface offers a free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits, allowing you to explore the platform before committing. It's a self-serve platform, and no credit card is required to start. All pricing plans include all proctoring features and access to all 500+ tests. The plans include:

• Individual ($180/year)
• Starter ($500/year)
• Pro ($900/year)
• Scale ($3000/year)
• Growth ($5500/year)
• Enterprise ($20,000/year)
• Unlimited ($50,000/year)

2. Coderbyte: Coding Challenges and Assessments

Coderbyte is a platform focused on coding skill development and assessments. Let's examine its features and how it stacks up as a technical assessment solution.

Why we picked Coderbyte

Coderbyte provides coding challenges and assessments primarily used to evaluate programming skills. Recruiters can use Coderbyte to assess candidates' abilities in various programming languages and frameworks. The platform supports custom coding questions, allowing for tailored evaluations.

However, Coderbyte is largely focused on technical skills, particularly coding. It lacks broader assessment capabilities like aptitude, personality, or business skills testing, which are important for many roles beyond software development.

Key Features of Coderbyte

• Coding challenges in multiple languages
• Custom assessment creation
• Code playback for review

Pros of Coderbyte

• Large library of coding challenges.
• Supports multiple programming languages.
• Offers code playback for detailed analysis.
• Provides automated scoring for coding questions.

Cons of Coderbyte

• Lacks assessments for aptitude, business skills or personality tests.
• No support for mobile framework questions.
• Tests can be time consuming, taking up to 2 hours.
• Limited ATS integrations.

Pricing of Coderbyte

Coderbyte offers tiered pricing plans, including a free trial. The Starter plan begins at $199/month. Subscription plans are available at $1,699/year or a Pay as you go plan at $500 for 50 candidates or $350 for 30 candidates. Contact them for Enterprise pricing.

3. iMocha: Large Skill Test Library

Let's explore iMocha, a platform focused on skills assessment and management. Here's a detailed look at its features and capabilities.

Why we picked iMocha

iMocha is skills assessment platform, offering a wide range of tests and skills intelligence features. It helps companies evaluate candidate skills and identify skill gaps within their workforce.

The platform supports video interviews and live coding interviews, which are useful for tech roles. iMocha positions itself not only as an assessment tool but also a solution for managing and developing skills within an organization.

Key Features of iMocha

• Large test library with 2500+ skills.
• AI-powered skills gap analysis.
• Remote proctoring features.

Pros of iMocha

• Extensive library of skill assessments.
• Strong focus on proctoring and security.
• Offers skill analytics and reporting.
• Integrates with various ATS platforms.

Cons of iMocha

• Lacks conversational assessments, potentially impacting candidate experience.
• Customization options for assessments are limited.
• No custom API for deeper integrations with existing systems.
• Questions are easily googleable.

Pricing of iMocha

iMocha does not publicly display pricing details. You need to contact their sales team for a custom quote. Unlike some platforms, there's no free trial or transparent pricing tiers available for immediate evaluation. Check out Adaface Assessments Pricing for a more transparent approach.

4. Qualified: Skills assessment for developers

Let's explore Qualified, a platform designed to assess developer skills through coding challenges and projects. Here's a closer look at its features, strengths, and limitations.

Why we picked Qualified

Qualified is primarily used for evaluating the coding abilities of software engineers and developers. It offers a range of coding assessments that simulate real-world development scenarios. Recruiters can use Qualified to identify candidates who possess the practical coding skills needed for specific roles. It lets you evaluate a candidate's proficiency in specific programming languages, frameworks, and technologies.

However, Qualified mainly focuses on technical skills. Unlike Adaface, it doesn't offer assessments for other crucial job skills such as aptitude, personality, or business acumen. This narrow focus might require you to use additional tools to create a well-rounded candidate profile.

Key Features of Qualified

• Coding challenges in various languages
• Real-time code playback
• Automated scoring for coding tasks
• Integrations with applicant tracking systems (ATS)

Pros of Qualified

• Wide array of coding challenges.
• Automated scoring saves time for recruiters.
• Code playback feature allows for detailed review.
• ATS integrations streamline the hiring process.

Cons of Qualified

• Limited to technical skills assessment.
• No support for custom questions.
• Lacks assessments for soft skills or aptitude.
• No phone or chat support for candidates.

Pricing of Qualified

Qualified does not publicly display pricing information. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote, which can be a barrier for smaller companies wanting to quickly evaluate the platform. Also, they do not offer a free trial.

5. TestGorilla: Huge test library

Now, let's explore TestGorilla. It's a platform designed to offer a wide variety of pre-employment tests.

Why we picked TestGorilla

TestGorilla is known for its extensive library of tests, covering various skills and job roles. It aims to provide a broad assessment solution for recruiters. Recruiters can use TestGorilla to screen candidates using pre-made tests. They offer a range of assessments from personality to cognitive ability.

Key Features of TestGorilla

• Large test library covering diverse skills.
• Webcam proctoring for test integrity.
• Integration with popular ATS platforms.

Pros of TestGorilla

• Wide range of tests available, covering many job roles.
• Offers features like video interviews.
• Provides a free plan to get started.
• Good for quickly screening a large pool of candidates.

Cons of TestGorilla

• Lacks AI and cloud skill assessments.
• Customization is limited; you can't design tests from scratch.
• No custom API for integrations with other tools.
• Doesn't offer features like excel simulations.

Pricing of TestGorilla

TestGorilla's pricing varies based on company size and starts from $75 per month (billed annually). They offer a free plan with limited features. For larger teams, you'll need to contact them for a custom quote. Keep in mind that unlimited plans may have fair use restrictions.

6. CodeSignal: Coding skills focused platform

Let's explore CodeSignal. It is a platform primarily known for its coding assessments and technical screening solutions.

Why we picked CodeSignal

CodeSignal specializes in evaluating coding skills through challenges and competitions. It's often used by companies to screen software engineering candidates, assessing their coding proficiency and problem-solving abilities. The platform provides coding tests and interview tools, which are helpful in identifying skilled developers.

While CodeSignal offers a range of coding assessments, it is important to consider whether it aligns with your broader assessment needs. If you're looking to evaluate additional skills such as aptitude, personality, or role-specific knowledge, you may want to explore platforms like Adaface that offer a wider variety of assessment types.

Key Features of CodeSignal

• Coding Assessments: Focuses on coding challenges and skill-based evaluations.
• Technical Interview Tools: Provides features for conducting live coding interviews.
• Skill Certification: Offers certifications to validate coding skills.
• Talent Matching: Connects companies with skilled developers.

Pros of CodeSignal

• Strong focus on coding skill assessment.
• Good for technical roles with coding requirements.
• Provides a structured environment for coding tests.
• Automated scoring for coding challenges.

Cons of CodeSignal

• Limited assessment types beyond coding.
• May not suit roles requiring diverse skill sets.
• Lacks assessments for personality and aptitude.
• No custom questions to address customer usecases.

Pricing of CodeSignal

CodeSignal's pricing is not readily available on their website. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a custom quote tailored to your specific needs. They do not offer a free trial.

7. HackerRank: Solid coding skill assessment

Let's get into the details of HackerRank. It's a well-known platform, especially for evaluating coding skills.

Why we picked HackerRank

HackerRank is primarily used for assessing developers and technical talent. The platform provides coding challenges and tests to evaluate a candidate's proficiency in various programming languages and problem-solving skills.

Recruiters can use HackerRank to screen candidates early in the hiring process, ensuring that only those with the required coding abilities advance. While it's strong in coding assessments, remember that a complete evaluation also considers other skills, and this is where platforms like Adaface shine.

Key Features of HackerRank

• Coding Challenges: Offers a wide range of coding problems across multiple languages.
• Real-time IDE: Candidates can write and execute code in a browser-based IDE.
• Plagiarism Detection: Helps in identifying instances of code plagiarism.

Pros of HackerRank

• Large Developer Community: HackerRank is a familiar platform for many developers.
• Wide Language Support: Supports a broad selection of programming languages.
• Good Proctoring: Webcam and window proctoring.
• Code Playback: Assessors can view the candidate's coding process.

Cons of HackerRank

• Limited Scope: Focuses mainly on coding skills, missing other key skills like aptitude and personality.
• Lengthy Tests: Tests can be time consuming for candidates, impacting completion rates. Typical assessment length is 2 hours.
• Generic Questions: Default questions may be easily found online.
• No custom test creation: You cannot create a custom test based on job descriptions.

Pricing of HackerRank

HackerRank's pricing includes a free trial. Paid plans starts at $100 per month (billed annually). Enterprise pricing is available upon request, requiring a direct consultation with their sales team.

8. DevSkiller: Deep coding skill checks

Let's explore DevSkiller, a platform designed to assess the coding skills of developers. It offers a range of features aimed at evaluating technical abilities.

Why we picked DevSkiller

DevSkiller is a platform mainly used to evaluate programming skills through coding tasks and project-based assessments. It aims to replicate real-world coding scenarios, allowing recruiters to observe how candidates perform under pressure. The platform is also used for gauging a candidate's practical coding abilities.

DevSkiller allows customization of tests and coding assignments, enabling recruiters to tailor assessments to job requirements. The platform provides features like code playback, automated scoring, and plagiarism detection to facilitate the evaluation process.

Key Features of DevSkiller

• Coding assessments in multiple languages.
• Code playback for detailed analysis.
• Automated scoring to speed up evaluation.

Pros of DevSkiller

• Wide range of supported programming languages.
• Code playback feature for detailed review.
• Plagiarism detection to ensure test integrity.
• Good for companies focused on development roles.

Cons of DevSkiller

• Lacks assessments for aptitude, personality, and other critical skills.
• No custom API for integration with various systems.
• No support for mobile-friendly assessments.
• Limited options for customizing the candidate experience, like adding company branding.

Pricing of DevSkiller

DevSkiller does not publicly display its pricing. You need to contact their sales team to get a quote. Also, they don't offer a free trial, so you won't be able to explore the platform's features before committing to a purchase. In contrast, consider exploring Adaface's pricing for transparent and accessible options.

9. HireVue: Best for video interviews

Let's explore HireVue. It is known for its video interviewing and assessment platform.

Why we picked HireVue

HireVue focuses on using video interviews to streamline the hiring process. Recruiters can conduct interviews remotely, allowing for wider candidate reach and scheduling flexibility.

The platform offers on-demand and live interview options. Candidates record responses to pre-set questions, and recruiters review these at their convenience. The video format can help assess communication skills and personality, in addition to qualifications. However, it's worth considering how skills like coding are assessed since HireVue doesn't provide coding questions, unlike platforms like Adaface.

Key Features of HireVue

• On-demand video interviews
• Live video interviews
• Automated candidate ranking

Pros of HireVue

• Structured interviews ensure all candidates answer the same questions.
• AI-driven insights can help identify top candidates.
• Integrates with many Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS).
• Location logging helps with candidate verification.

Cons of HireVue

• Lacks support for custom questions, limiting assessment flexibility.
• No support for typing tests or language proficiency tests.
• Does not provide coding questions, restricting technical skill assessment.
• No option for custom data location, posing potential compliance issues.

Pricing of HireVue

HireVue does not offer pricing details publicly. Interested users need to contact HireVue directly for pricing information. They also do not have a free trial or a way to sign up and explore the platform before contacting sales.

10. WeCP: Focused IT Skill Assessment

Let's examine WeCreateProblems (WeCP), a platform designed to assess technical skills. Here's a breakdown of its features, strengths, and weaknesses.

Why we picked WeCreateProblems (WeCP)

WeCP specializes in evaluating candidates for IT roles. The platform offers ready-made tests and the ability to customize assessments based on job descriptions. It supports various programming languages, web frameworks, and data structure concepts. However, WeCP's strength lies primarily in technical skill evaluation, potentially missing opportunities to assess a broader range of skills like aptitude or personality that contribute to overall job success.

While WeCP offers features like code playback and automated scoring for programming assessments, its capabilities are concentrated on IT skills. This focus may limit its effectiveness for companies seeking a single assessment solution for diverse roles across different departments. Companies looking for pre-employment assessment tests across various skills may need to look elsewhere.

Key Features of WeCreateProblems (WeCP)

• Coding assessments with code playback.
• Webcam and web proctoring features.
• Ready-to-use tests for IT roles.

Pros of WeCreateProblems (WeCP)

• Strong focus on technical skill assessment.
• Code playback and automated scoring for coding tests.
• Offers web and webcam proctoring features.
• ATS integrations and custom API

Cons of WeCreateProblems (WeCP)

• Lacks assessments for aptitude, business skills, or personality.
• No support for custom question creation.
• Limited reporting, offering only CSV exports instead of Excel.
• No location or IP proctoring

Pricing of WeCreateProblems (WeCP)

WeCP offers a free trial and a starter plan at $240 per month (or $2,388 per year). For enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact WeCP directly for a quote. Unlike some platforms, WeCP does not offer unlimited plans or custom data location support.

Found the perfect tool?

We've explored a range of assessment platforms, each offering distinct features and catering to diverse hiring needs. But with so many options, the real challenge lies in pinpointing the one that aligns perfectly with your organization's specific requirements.

One of the biggest hurdles in candidate assessment is ensuring the questions are relevant and not easily found online. Generic, easily 'googleable' questions offer little insight into a candidate's actual skills or problem-solving abilities. You want assessments that truly gauge a candidate's capabilities.

While there are several tools to consider, like Adaface, each comes with its own strengths and limitations. The ideal choice depends on factors like the skills you need to test, the size of your candidate pool, and your budget.

Ultimately, the best assessment tool is the one that streamlines your hiring process and helps you identify top talent that fits your company's culture and needs. Consider your specific use case and remember that the right tool can make all the difference.

• Adaface provides a quick, customizable assessment experience. Focuses on role-specific knowledge, coding skills and aptitude, and soft skills. Offers strong anti-cheating measures, bulk actions and multiple question sets.
• Coderbyte is focused on assessing developers, but lacks support for business skills and aptitude tests.
• iMocha offers a wide array of tests but lacks custom questions and does not provide custom test creation per job description. Questions are known to be easily 'googleable'.
• Qualified-io specializes in IT roles. It does not provide company branding and custom test creation per job description.
• TestGorilla offers a range of tests, but lacks AI tests and doesn't allow custom questions, making personalization difficult. It depends on company employee size for pricing.
• CodeSignal is primarily for coding assessments. It lacks business tests and custom question support and requires speaking with the sales team in order to sign-up.
• HackerRank is geared towards technical roles but the default questions are easily googleable.
• DevSkiller focuses on coding skills, lacks business and aptitude tests, and requires contacting the sales team for pricing.
• HireVue has conversational interface, but lacks AI tests, cloud tests, job specific tests, custom questions, code playback, and a large question bank.
• WeCP offers programming, AI, and cloud tests, it requires contacting them for a personalized enterprise quote. It doesn't offer custom questions.

Ready to elevate your online assessment platform? Give Adaface a try today!