Top 10 AI Proctoring Tools for 2025

Why Use AI Proctoring Tools?

Imagine this: You're a recruiter staring at a mountain of resumes. Sifting through them feels like searching for a needle in a haystack. How do you ensure you're not just picking the shiniest needle, but the one that's actually the sharpest? That's where AI proctoring tools come in.

These tools address key challenges in talent assessment. They help maintain test integrity by detecting cheating, ensuring a fair evaluation for all candidates. Plus, they can analyze candidate behavior to provide insights beyond just the answers, helping you understand their problem-solving approach.

Here's why you need these tools:

• Scale: Evaluate more candidates online assessment platform quickly and fairly.
• Objectivity: Reduce bias with data-driven insights into candidate skills.
• Security: Protect against cheating and ensure test security.

What to Look for in AI Proctoring Tools?

When picking an AI proctoring tool, recruiters need one thing above all: a platform that accurately measures candidate skills. This means going beyond surface-level knowledge to assess how candidates apply what they know.

A great tool offers a diverse assessment library, including aptitude tests, personality tests, and job-specific challenges. The best platforms also allow customization, enabling recruiters to tailor tests to fit specific roles and company needs. This ensures the assessment process is relevant and insightful.

Here are some features to look for:

• Customizable Tests: The ability to tweak assessments for specific roles.
• Multiple Invite Options: Recruiters should be able to invite candidates via email or public links.
• Detailed Audit Timeline: A timeline of proctoring logs for in-depth analysis and transparency.

Top AI Proctoring Tools: At a Glance

Choosing the right AI proctoring tool can feel like finding a needle in a haystack. Here's a cheat sheet to help you quickly compare the top contenders and pick the perfect online assessment platform for your needs.

1. Adaface: Best for Wide Range of Skills and Strong Proctoring

Let's talk about Adaface. It's designed for quick skills checks across many roles, complete with ready-made tests and ATS integrations. A single platform to handle skills, cognitive abilities, language skills, and personality assessments at scale.

Why we picked Adaface

Adaface gives recruiters a solid handle on a candidate's abilities with its library of 500+ skill tests. It checks not just what they can do, but also how they think, their logic, design sense, and even soft skills.

In the context of screening for the right skills, Adaface provides accurate, on-the-job skill questions to make sure you're testing for real-world experience, not just textbook knowledge. Plus, you can test Excel, SQL, and coding skills with simulators and scenario-based MCQs to see how they'd handle the role.

Adaface stands out with its commitment to test integrity and breadth of assessment types. This ensures that you're getting a true picture of a candidate's potential for success in your organization. With its strong proctoring and skill checks, it ensures credible results.

Key Features of Adaface

• Extensive skill assessment library: Access a vast collection of 500+ tests across programming, IT, business, Excel, aptitude, personality, finance and role-specific skills.
• Customizable tests: Tailor assessments by adjusting test duration, cut-off scores, and programming languages to suit specific hiring needs or get Adaface experts to customize the test according to your job descriptions. Customized assessments ensure right fit for skills based hiring
• Scenario based on-the-job skill questions: Screen accurately with questions designed to screen for on-the-job experience instead of theoretical knowledge.
• Multiple question types: Test Excel, SQL, Coding skills using simulators and role-based skills using scenario based MCQs.
• Ensure test integrity with advanced proctoring features such as webcam proctoring, video monitoring, ChatGPT proctoring and off-tab activity tracking.
• Multiple question sets: Minimize cheating and ensure fairness with multiple sets of questions for the same skills, allowing for varied assessments across candidates.

Pros of Adaface

• High test library with 500+ tests
• Works for aptitude, finance, personality, business roles, typing, AI, technical and coding roles
• Strong proctoring suite to ensure test integrity
• Pricing covers all proctoring features, making it budget-friendly

Cons of Adaface

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support
• Not the cheapest in the market.

Pricing of Adaface

Check out the platform with a free trial of 2 sample tests and 5 credits, no credit card needed to start. It's self-serve, so you can dive right in. All pricing plans include all proctoring features and all 500+ tests.

• Individual: $180/year
• Starter: $500/year
• Pro: $900/year
• Scale: $3000/year
• Growth: $5500/year
• Enterprise: $20,000/year
• Unlimited: $50,000/year

2. Willo: Asynchronous video interviews focused

Let's explore Willo, a platform designed for asynchronous video interviews. It offers a way to screen candidates remotely using pre-recorded questions and video responses.

Why we picked Willo

Willo is primarily used for conducting asynchronous video interviews, allowing recruiters to review candidate responses at their convenience. It simplifies the initial screening stage by enabling candidates to record answers to preset questions, reducing the need for initial live calls. This can save time and resources in early-stage recruitment.

The platform allows customization with your own questions. However, it lacks the capability to create custom assessments tailored to specific job descriptions or roles. For teams seeking to assess skills beyond personality fit, additional tools might be required. For a more complete assessment of skills, consider Adaface's online assessment platform.

Key Features of Willo

• Asynchronous Video Interviews: Conduct interviews where candidates record responses at their own pace.
• Question Customization: Add your own questions to the video interview process.
• Candidate Management: Track candidates and their video submissions within the platform.

Pros of Willo

• Easy to Use: The platform is intuitive and simple for both recruiters and candidates.
• Time-Saving: Reduces the time spent on initial phone screenings.
• Remote-Friendly: Facilitates screening of candidates across different locations.
• Automated scorecards: Provides automated scorecards after the tests

Cons of Willo

• Limited Assessment Types: Focuses solely on video interviews, lacking skills-based assessments.
• No Coding Questions: Does not support coding assessments, limiting its suitability for technical roles.
• Lacks Proctering: There is no web proctoring for cheating detection
• No Custom API

Pricing of Willo

Willo offers different monthly pricing plans. Individual plans start at $310/month and Starter plans at $399/month. For enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact Willo directly, as they don't list their enterprise plan details on their website. A free trial is not available, so you'd need to book a demo to explore the features.

3. TalView: AI-powered Talent lifecycle

Now, let's take a look at TalView. This platform aims to streamline your hiring process from sourcing to onboarding using AI.

Why we picked TalView

TalView offers a unified platform for talent acquisition, covering various stages like recruitment, proctoring, and employee lifecycle management. It leverages AI to automate tasks such as candidate screening and interview scheduling, intending to reduce time-to-hire and improve the candidate experience.

With features like video interviewing and remote proctoring, TalView supports remote hiring needs. It aims to provide a single platform to manage the talent lifecycle, from initial assessment to onboarding, potentially simplifying HR processes.

Key Features of TalView

• Video Interviewing: Conduct and analyze video interviews with AI-powered insights.
• Remote Proctoring: Ensure test integrity with features like webcam monitoring and browser lockdown.
• Talent Lifecycle Management: Manage candidates from sourcing to onboarding on a single platform.

Pros of TalView

• Wide range of assessments: Offers tests for aptitude, programming, and personality.
• AI-powered automation: Helps automate tasks like candidate screening and interview scheduling.
• Video interviewing: Facilitates remote interviews and provides AI-driven analysis.
• Code playback: Feature to see candidates code in a timeline for accurate evaluation

Cons of TalView

• Lacks Typing Tests: Doesn't offer typing tests, which are beneficial for certain roles.
• No Customization: Offers limited options for customized tests based on specific job descriptions.
• Limited Language Support: Primarily focuses on English language assessments, potentially restricting global reach. Online Assessment Platform | Assessment Software by Adaface can help provide a wider range of language support.
• No GenAI support: Does not use GenAI for optimizing recruiter workflows.

Pricing of TalView

TalView does not offer transparent pricing on their website. Interested users need to fill out a form to request pricing details and discuss their specific requirements with a sales representative. There is no mention of a free trial.

4. Qualified: Coding Skills Validation

Next up, let's peek at Qualified. It's all about validating coding skills and is used by many companies to find their next tech hire.

Why we picked Qualified

Qualified is a platform focused on assessing coding skills. It helps companies identify strong developers through coding challenges and real-world simulations. By focusing on practical coding ability, Qualified aims to provide a clear picture of a candidate's proficiency.

Qualified is primarily used for tech roles, providing a range of assessments tailored to various programming languages and frameworks. It's a tool designed to help hiring teams make data-driven decisions when evaluating technical talent. However, it lacks the breadth of assessments for non-technical roles that you'd find in a platform like Adaface.

Key Features of Qualified

• Coding challenges in multiple languages
• Real-time collaboration tools
• Automated scoring and reporting

Pros of Qualified

• Strong focus on coding skills
• Supports popular programming languages
• Offers real-time coding environments
• Integrates with applicant tracking systems (ATS)

Cons of Qualified

• Limited assessment types beyond coding
• No webcam proctoring is available, making it prone to cheating
• Lacks custom question creation features
• No support for assessing personality or soft skills

Pricing of Qualified

Qualified doesn't offer transparent pricing on their website. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a custom quote. They also do not provide a free trial to explore all of the features before making the purchase decision.

5. HackerRank: Coding skill mastery

Let's explore HackerRank, a platform known for its focus on technical skill assessment.

Why we picked HackerRank

HackerRank positions itself as a developer skills platform where businesses can source and assess tech talent. The platform is centered around coding challenges and technical skill assessments, providing a way for recruiters to gauge a candidate's coding prowess. HackerRank's assessments focus primarily on coding skills, offering a range of coding problems and challenges.

With HackerRank, you can identify skilled developers through coding tests. It's used for running coding contests and challenges to engage the developer community, assess a wider pool of talent, and see how candidates perform in competitive coding environments.

Key Features of HackerRank

• Coding Challenges: Large library of coding challenges across different languages and skill levels.
• Live Coding Interviews: Collaborative coding environment for real-time assessment.
• Plagiarism Detection: Detect code plagiarism using automated tools.

Pros of HackerRank

• Developer Community: Popular platform amongst developers to improve their skills.
• Role-Based Tests: Assess candidates across 40+ programming languages.
• Real-World Coding Questions: Evaluate candidates in practical coding scenarios.
• Automated Scoring: Automatically grade coding assessments reducing manual effort.

Cons of HackerRank

• Limited Test Variety: Limited in scope, mostly focusing on coding skills. Lacks assessments for aptitude, personality, or business-related roles.
• No Situational Judgment Tests: Doesn't offer tests that assess how candidates handle real-world job scenarios.
• Lengthy Assessments: Tests tend to be longer, impacting candidate experience. Typical assessment length is 2 hours.
• Default Googleable Questions: Default questions are easily googleable.

Pricing of HackerRank

HackerRank's pricing includes a free trial. They have two main plans: Starter at $100/month and Pro at $250/month. For custom needs, you'll need to contact them for a pricing quote. No free trial is available and you cannot explore all features before getting on a sales call with them. For enterprise pricing, a custom quote is required. Adaface offers a free trial.

6. TestGorilla: Volume Skills Assessments

Before we get started, let's briefly touch on TestGorilla. It's known for its extensive library of pre-made tests.

Why we picked TestGorilla

TestGorilla is primarily used for skills assessments, offering a wide array of tests designed to evaluate candidates across various domains. Recruiters leverage TestGorilla to screen applicants efficiently, using its ready-made tests to gauge skills like aptitude, personality, and job-specific knowledge.

The platform allows you to add your own questions and create tests. While it offers a range of assessments, it's worth noting that it lacks AI tests. For companies seeking highly customizable assessments tailored to specific job descriptions, a solution like Adaface's online assessment platform could be a better fit.

Key Features of TestGorilla

• Extensive test library: A wide range of pre-built tests.
• Webcam proctoring: Monitors candidates during assessments.
• ATS integrations: Connects with applicant tracking systems.

Pros of TestGorilla

• Wide range of tests available, covering various skills and roles.
• Offers webcam proctoring to maintain test integrity.
• Integrates with several popular ATS platforms.
• Has coding questions to assess developer skills.

Cons of TestGorilla

• Lacks custom question creation for specific use cases.
• Does not offer AI skills tests.
• No custom data location support for security and compliance.
• Limited plagiarism detection for coding assessments.

Pricing of TestGorilla

TestGorilla's pricing depends on the size of your company. For example, a company with 31-50 employees would pay $208 USD per month ($2,496 per annum) for the Starter plan and $310 USD per month ($3,720 per annum) for the Scale plan. For Enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact TestGorilla directly for a quote. They offer a free trial, but there is no plan with unlimited candidate assessments.

7. CodeSignal: Coding skills assessment platform

Let's explore CodeSignal, a platform focused on evaluating coding skills. It offers a range of assessments and proctoring features to help companies find tech talent.

Why we picked CodeSignal

CodeSignal specializes in assessing coding abilities through coding tests and live coding interviews. It's designed to help recruiters and hiring managers evaluate candidates' practical coding skills. The platform is primarily used for technical roles, focusing on identifying individuals with strong programming skills through their coding tests.

CodeSignal's core strength lies in its coding assessment capabilities. The platform's features include a coding environment, automated scoring, and tools to help prevent cheating. While it offers value for tech-focused roles, it may not cover the broad spectrum of skills that some companies need to assess during hiring.

Key Features of CodeSignal

• Candidate Screening: Offers structured assessments for consistent evaluation.
• Live Coding Interviews: Provides a functional IDE for real-time coding assessments.
• SkillUp: Allows filtering of candidates by skills and certifications.

Pros of CodeSignal

• Developer Community: Well-known platform among developers.
• Certified Assessments: Ready-made tests for various tech skills.
• Plagiarism Detection: Detects similarities in code submissions.
• Real-World Coding Questions: Assesses candidates in a practical coding environment.

Cons of CodeSignal

• Lacks Broad Skill Assessment: Limited in assessing skills beyond coding, like aptitude or personality. Adaface on the other hand offers a comprehensive test library.
• No Custom Questions: Unable to create custom questions tailored to specific company needs.
• No Business Skills Tests: Does not offer assessments for business-related skills.
• Limited Test Types: Primarily focuses on coding challenges, missing other assessment formats.

Pricing of CodeSignal

CodeSignal does not publicly display its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote. Also, they do not offer a free trial.

8. HireVue: Best for Video Interviews

Let's talk about HireVue. This platform focuses on video interviewing, aiming to streamline the initial screening process.

Why we picked HireVue

HireVue leverages video interviews and AI to assess candidates. Recruiters can set up structured interviews with pre-determined questions, and candidates record their responses. The AI analyzes these videos, looking at factors like speech patterns and body language, to provide a score and ranking.

This approach helps companies sift through large applicant pools quickly. However, it's worth noting that relying heavily on AI for subjective assessments can raise concerns about bias and fairness. For a balanced approach, consider platforms like Adaface that offer a blend of skills-based assessments and objective evaluations.

Key Features of HireVue

• On-demand video interviews
• AI-driven analysis of candidate responses
• Structured interview templates

Pros of HireVue

• Streamlines initial screening of large applicant pools
• Provides a structured and consistent interview process
• Offers AI-driven insights into candidate behavior
• Integrates with various ATS platforms

Cons of HireVue

• Relies heavily on subjective AI analysis, raising bias concerns
• Lacks custom coding questions, limiting technical assessment depth
• Does not support assessments across business, finance or AI
• Limited proctoring, lacking features such as copy paste protection

Pricing of HireVue

HireVue does not publicly list its pricing. You need to contact them for a custom quote, which can be a hurdle if you're just looking to explore options quickly. Platforms like Adaface offer transparent pricing plans, making it simpler to get started.

9. Mercer | Mettl: Extensive Assessment Library

Let's explore Mercer | Mettl, a platform offering a wide range of assessments and proctoring solutions. They aim to cater to diverse hiring needs with their extensive library.

Why we picked Mercer | Mettl

Mercer | Mettl is an online assessment platform offering a large test library covering aptitude, programming, personality, and job-specific skills. It is designed to help organizations evaluate candidates across various domains. The platform is often used for large-scale hiring processes where a breadth of skills needs assessment.

Key Features of Mercer | Mettl

• Wide range of assessments: Covers diverse skills and domains.
• AI-powered proctoring: Webcam, browser and window proctoring to prevent cheating.
• Reporting and analytics: Provides insights into candidate performance.

Pros of Mercer | Mettl

• Large test library to assess candidates across different roles.
• Strong proctoring features for secure online assessments.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms for streamlined workflows.
• Offers coding assessments with code playback functionality.

Cons of Mercer | Mettl

• Lacks custom question creation capabilities.
• No support for excel simulation based questions.
• Limited language support with only English tests available.
• Pricing details not readily available, requires contacting sales.

Pricing of Mercer | Mettl

Mercer | Mettl does not offer transparent pricing on their website. You'll need to contact their sales team for a custom quote, which can add time to your decision-making process. Unlike some platforms, they do not offer a free trial to explore the platform's features beforehand. This can make it difficult to assess the platform's suitability for your specific needs without engaging in a sales call.

10. McQuaig: Good for personality insights

Let's explore McQuaig! It's known for offering personality assessments to help understand candidates better.

Why we picked McQuaig

McQuaig focuses on providing insights into a candidate's personality and behavioral traits. It uses questionnaires to assess how well an individual fits a specific role or company culture. The platform helps in understanding a candidate's work style, adaptability, and leadership potential, which can be valuable in making hiring decisions.

McQuaig assessments are designed to predict job performance based on personality traits. It helps recruiters identify candidates who are likely to succeed and stay with the organization. While it offers aptitude tests, it lacks many skills assessments, like programming or AI, which are increasingly important in today's job market. For comprehensive pre-employment assessment tests, you might want to explore other options.

Key Features of McQuaig

• Personality assessments to gauge candidate fit.
• Behavioral insights for predicting job performance.
• Customizable branding.
• Benchmarking against existing employees.

Pros of McQuaig

• Provides insights into candidate personality.
• Helps in assessing cultural fit.
• Offers candidate benchmarking.
• Provides customizable invitation templates.

Cons of McQuaig

• Lacks coding and technical skill assessments.
• No custom question creation.
• No free trial.
• No custom API.

Pricing of McQuaig

McQuaig doesn't publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote that fits your specific needs. Keep in mind there is no free trial, so budget accordingly.

Top AI Proctoring Tools for 2025: Conclusion - Did You Find the One?

We've journeyed through a landscape of AI proctoring tools, each offering a unique approach to candidate assessment. Selecting the right tool is like finding the perfect piece of a puzzle; it needs to fit seamlessly into your hiring process.

One major aspect to consider is whether the tool can accurately assess role-specific skills. Many platforms offer generic assessments, but few provide the ability to create custom tests tailored to specific job descriptions. This is where platforms such as Adaface shine, ensuring you're evaluating candidates on the skills that matter most.

While several tools offer proctoring capabilities, a select few stand out. Adaface is among those, offering a balance of security and a focus on role-specific skill assessment. Other tools like HackerRank and TestGorilla are also worth considering.

Ultimately, the best AI proctoring tool depends on your unique hiring needs. Consider your priorities, test volume, and the types of skills you need to assess to make the right choice.

• Adaface excels in role-specific assessments, offering customizable tests and webcam proctoring. It stands out with a large question bank and detailed audit timelines, ensuring a secure and in-depth candidate evaluation.
• Willo provides video interviews, but lacks coding questions and situational judgment tests.
• Talview offers programming tests and webcam proctoring, but has limited language support, offering only English tests.
• Qualified-io specializes in IT role assessments but lacks personality tests and the ability to add custom questions.
• HackerRank is known for coding assessments. The default questions are easily googleable, impacting test integrity.
• TestGorilla offers a range of tests, including aptitude and personality, but their questions can be easily solved by AI.
• CodeSignal focuses on coding skills but has limited options, and requires contacting sales for pricing.
• HireVue incorporates video interviews and AI analysis but lacks coding playback and custom coding questions.
• Mercer | Mettl provides varied assessments but lacks a user-friendly interface and detailed pricing on their website.
• McQuaig emphasizes personality assessments but offers limited information about assessment options.

Ready to transform your hiring with precise and secure skill assessments? Explore Adaface today!