Top 10 Testlify Alternatives & Competitors

Why might hiring teams explore alternatives to Testlify?

That's a great question! I've done some digging to understand the reasons why recruiters and hiring managers consider options beyond Testlify. Here’s what I discovered.

Limited SQL and Excel Assessment Capabilities: While Testlify offers programming assessments, it lacks dedicated SQL coding questions and Excel workbook questions. These are frequently asked for skills, so teams might seek platforms that offer a broader range of practical skill assessments, especially for data-heavy roles.

Lack of Device Fingerprint Proctoring: Testlify offers webcam, window, tab, IP, and location proctoring, but it misses device fingerprint proctoring. Device fingerprinting adds another layer of security by identifying unique device attributes, which can be handy in detecting potential cheating attempts, especially when candidates try to use different internet connections.

Limited Customization and Branding. While Testlify provides some level of customization, it might not extend to fully branding the assessment experience with company colors or customizing invitation/rejection templates. Companies often want assessments to reflect their brand identity and deliver a seamless candidate experience. With Adaface, you can customize the platform to match your brand, making the assessment process feel like a natural extension of your company.

1. Adaface

Best for: Assess candidates for both technical and non-technical roles with one platform.

Looking for a strong alternative to Testlify? Adaface provides a comprehensive assessment platform designed to streamline your hiring process and ensure you're selecting the best candidates.

Testlify's limitations in customizability can be a bottleneck for companies seeking tailored assessments. Adaface addresses this by offering highly customizable assessments that align precisely with your job descriptions, ensuring you evaluate candidates on the skills that matter most to your organization. This level of detail and relevance enhances the accuracy and fairness of your hiring process.

Adaface stands out with features designed to enhance the screening process and provide deeper insights into candidate skills:

Robust Proctoring Suite

Adaface provides a strong proctoring suite to maintain test integrity. We employ a range of measures to prevent cheating, including webcam proctoring, window & tab tracking, IP & device fingerprint logging, and copy-paste disabling.

We also incorporate measures like full-screen mode enforcement and Chat GPT detection. These features ensure a secure testing environment for reliable results.

All of these proctoring features are included in every pricing plan.

Extensive Test Library for Diverse Roles

Adaface boasts a library of over 500 skills tests, covering a wide spectrum of roles. This includes not only technical skills like programming and IT, but also business skills like finance, accounting, and excel. We don't just focus on developers; we make sure that all skills are covered.

Our library also has aptitude, personality, typing, and language tests. This wide variety ensures that you can assess candidates for any role within your organization using a single platform.

Adaface also has AI tests, which Testlify does not have.

Adaface vs Testlify Attributes

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests covering technical, aptitude, personality, and business roles.
• Highly customizable assessments to match specific job descriptions.
• Robust proctoring suite to ensure test integrity.
• Used by clients from 70+ countries.
• Pricing depends only on credits; all proctoring features included.
• Focus on candidate experience and company branding.
• Comprehensive scorecards, reporting, and analytics.

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit different needs. Start with a free trial that includes 2 sample tests and 5 credits to explore the platform before purchasing. No credit card is required to start. Our self-serve platform includes all proctoring features and 500+ tests in all plans. Plans include: Individual ($180/yr), Starter ($500/yr), Pro ($900/yr), Scale ($3000/yr), Growth ($5500/yr), Enterprise ($20,000/yr), and Unlimited ($50,000/yr).

2. Evalart

Best for: Skills Assessment and Tracking

Evalart offers a platform designed to assess and monitor employee skills. It provides tools for creating and conducting tests, with a focus on identifying strengths and areas for development. It's like giving your team a report card, but instead of grades, you get insights into their abilities.

While both Evalart and Testlify offer assessment solutions, Evalart leans heavily towards skills tracking after hiring. Testlify offers custom questions, but lacks in custom tests per job description. Evalart lets you add your own questions, but doesn't offer customized tests tailored to specific job roles.

This is where Adaface shines. Adaface designs custom tests by deeply analyzing job descriptions, ensuring each assessment accurately reflects the required skills. This saves time and resources by focusing on the skills that genuinely matter for each position.

How Evalart compares to Testlify?

Key Features

• Wide range of tests: Aptitude, languages, and personality.
• Candidate ranking: Compare candidates based on test results.
• Custom coding questions: Add your own coding challenges.

Evalart Pros

• Extensive test library.
• Supports webcam proctoring.
• Offers a free trial.
• Custom coding questions.
• Integrates with other platforms via API.

Evalart Cons

• Lacks job-specific tests.
• No custom-built tests based on job descriptions.
• No multiple test sets to prevent cheating.
• The platform doesn't offer a conversational assessment experience, making it less engaging for candidates.

Evalart Pricing

Evalart provides a one-month free trial to test out the platform. However, pricing information is not readily available on their website. You'll need to contact their sales team to discuss your specific needs and get a quote, which can be a bit of a hassle.

3. Testgorilla

Best for: Quick skills assessment for roles

TestGorilla offers a wide range of pre-employment assessment tests to help businesses evaluate candidates across various skills and personality traits. It aims to streamline the hiring process by providing tools to screen applicants and identify top talent.

TestGorilla, like Testlify, offers a library of ready-to-use tests. However, neither platform allows for deeply customized assessments tailored to specific job descriptions. This can be limiting if you need to assess skills unique to your company or role.

Unlike TestGorilla, Adaface creates custom tests based on the job description, ensuring the assessment accurately reflects the required skills and provides a more relevant evaluation for each candidate.

How Testgorilla compares to Testlify?

Key Features

• Skills testing: Offers a range of pre-built tests to assess skills.
• Personality assessments: Includes tests to evaluate personality traits.
• Candidate ranking: Ranks candidates based on their test scores.

Testgorilla Pros

• Large test library: Offers a diverse selection of pre-built tests.
• User-friendly interface: Easy to navigate and use.
• Video interviews: Option to conduct video interviews.
• Automated scoring: Saves time with automated test scoring.
• Integration: Offers integration with various ATS platforms.

Testgorilla Cons

• Limited customization: Cannot fully customize tests to assess specific scenarios.
• Lacks AI tests: No assessments for artificial intelligence skills.
• No custom API: Doesn't offer a custom API for deeper integrations.
• Questions easily GPT-able: Shorter questions formats are easily solvable by GPT tools

Testgorilla Pricing

TestGorilla's pricing is based on company size, with monthly or annual subscription options. Plans scale as your company grows, and pricing varies accordingly. Contact TestGorilla for enterprise pricing. They do offer a free trial to explore the platform.

4. Xobin

Best for: Skills assessment, talent screening

Xobin offers a platform for conducting skills assessments and video interviews. It aims to help businesses streamline their hiring process by providing tools to evaluate candidates across various skills and competencies.

While both Xobin and Testlify provide skills assessments, Xobin falls short on customisation. Testlify doesn't allow custom tests per JD. With Adaface, you can tailor tests to match specific job descriptions, ensuring a more relevant and accurate assessment of candidate skills.

Another key difference lies in the breadth of skills assessed. While Testlify covers a good range of skills, it lacks in AI, Excel and other key areas. Adaface shines by offering tests across a wider spectrum, including AI, finance, and language proficiency, providing a more complete view of a candidate's capabilities.

How Xobin compares to Testlify?

Key Features

• Skills Assessments: Evaluate candidates using pre-built tests and coding assessments.
• Video Interviews: Conduct and record video interviews for asynchronous evaluation.
• Reporting & Analytics: Gain insights into candidate performance with detailed reports.

Xobin Pros

• Wide range of ready-made tests.
• Supports coding assessments and video interviews.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.
• Offers proctoring features to maintain test integrity.
• Provides customizable branding options.

Xobin Cons

• Lacks custom question creation.
• No custom data location support. Your data may be in different location.
• No support for excel workbook questions.
• Lacks some integrations and white labeling capabilities without addtional payments.

Xobin Pricing

Xobin doesn't publicly display its pricing. You'll need to sign up for a demo and contact their sales team to get a quote. This lack of transparent pricing can make it difficult to quickly evaluate whether Xobin fits your budget.

5. Coderbyte

Best for: Coding challenges for tech roles

Coderbyte focuses on assessing coding skills through challenges and coding bootcamps. It offers a platform to evaluate developers and engineers using coding problems, making it a strong contender for companies prioritizing coding proficiency in their hiring process.

Unlike Testlify, Coderbyte hones in on coding prowess, providing a more specialized environment for evaluating technical candidates. Where Testlify casts a wider net with diverse assessment types, Coderbyte goes deep into coding challenges, offering a focused evaluation experience.

If your primary need is to assess coding skills rigorously, Coderbyte's specialized approach might be a better fit, especially with features like code playback to see how candidates arrived at their solutions. This can provide a more detailed understanding of a candidate's coding process than a general skills assessment.

How Coderbyte compares to Testlify?

Key Features

• Coding challenges across multiple languages
• Code playback feature for detailed analysis
• Custom coding questions support

Coderbyte Pros

• Large library of coding challenges.
• Supports multiple programming languages.
• Code playback feature allows for detailed review.
• Customizable coding questions to tailor assessments.
• Caters to various skill levels, from beginner to advanced.

Coderbyte Cons

• Lacks breadth in assessment types beyond coding, unlike Adaface's aptitude tests and personality assessments.
• No ATS integrations, which can streamline the hiring process.
• Limited proctoring features compared to platforms offering webcam and screen monitoring.
• No support for assessing skills beyond technical abilities.

Coderbyte Pricing

Coderbyte's pricing includes a subscription plan at $1,699/year. They also provide a Pay as you go plan - $500 (50 candidates) or $350 (30 candidates). Contact Coderbyte for Enterprise pricing.

6. TestGrid

Best for: Aptitude tests and personality

TestGrid offers a platform primarily focused on aptitude and personality assessments. While it aims to streamline the hiring process, it's important to understand its strengths and limitations compared to more versatile solutions.

TestGrid shines when you need to quickly evaluate candidates on aptitude and personality traits. However, unlike Adaface's online assessment platform, it lacks in-depth skill assessment capabilities like coding tests, AI tests, finance tests, and business-related skill evaluations.

For companies seeking a broader range of assessment types beyond aptitude and personality, a platform like Adaface provides a more complete picture of a candidate's abilities.

How TestGrid compares to Testlify?

Key Features

• Aptitude Tests: Assesses logical, numerical, and verbal reasoning.
• Personality Tests: Evaluates personality traits relevant to job performance.
• ATS Integration: Connects with applicant tracking systems for easier workflow.

TestGrid Pros

• User-friendly interface for easy navigation.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.
• Provides basic reporting and analytics.
• Offers a free plan with limited features.
• Good for initial screening based on aptitude.

TestGrid Cons

• Lacks coding and technical skill assessments.
• No support for custom question creation. So you are stuck with their question bank.
• Limited assessment types beyond aptitude and personality.
• No custom API support for advanced integrations. This will require you to manually work with data and you cannot programmatically create your own workflows

TestGrid Pricing

TestGrid does not publicly display its pricing. Interested users need to sign up to receive pricing details. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly compare it with other assessment providers. There is no free trial.

7. Equip

Best for: Affordable Skills Testing Solution

Equip offers a skills testing platform that aims to provide an affordable way to assess candidates. While Testlify offers a wide range of tests, Equip focuses on providing budget-friendly options, which can be attractive for companies watching their bottom line.

Equip's primary use case is to offer a cost-effective solution for companies that need to test candidates' skills without breaking the bank. Unlike Testlify, which may be more expensive due to its extensive features, Equip provides a simplified approach to skills assessment.

However, this affordability comes at a cost. While Testlify provides customized tests per job description to make the test accurate, Equip gives a ready to use test library. Consider investing in a platform like Adaface to design custom assessments to test skills relevant for the JD all in one single test.

How Equip compares to Testlify?

Key Features

• Coding assessments with a real IDE.
• Webcam and window proctoring.
• Custom branding options.

Equip Pros

• Budget-friendly pricing.
• Coding questions supported.
• Offers webcam and window proctoring.
• Ready to use tests.
• Company branding available.

Equip Cons

• No custom questions or add your own questions.
• Lacks job-specific tests.
• Limited test library.
• Sample questions are easily googleable.

Equip Pricing

Equip offers straightforward pricing at $1 per candidate. This makes it one of the most affordable options in the market. However, this also means the test quality may suffer. There are no clearly defined plans for larger teams or enterprises, so contact them to learn more. If you are looking for a free trial, Equip offers 10 free test invites.

8. iMocha

Best for: Skills assessment, skill development

iMocha offers skill assessments and skill intelligence to help companies understand their workforce's skills, plan for future skill needs, and bridge skill gaps through hiring and development. Unlike Testlify, iMocha provides tools for managing and developing skills within an organization.

Testlify offers ready-to-use tests, but lacks the ability to deeply customize assessments to match specific job descriptions. iMocha, while also offering a test library, allows for more tailored assessments, enabling recruiters to evaluate candidates with greater precision.

However, iMocha falls short when compared to platforms like Adaface that offer a higher degree of customization. Adaface creates a custom test based on the job description, ensuring the assessment accurately evaluates candidates across all relevant skills.

How iMocha compares to Testlify?

Key Features

• Large skill library with diverse assessments.
• AI-powered skill gap analysis.
• Candidate skill benchmarking.

iMocha Pros

• Wide range of skills tests available.
• Skill intelligence features for workforce planning.
• Integrations with popular ATS platforms.
• Code playback feature for detailed analysis.
• Mobile-friendly assessments.

iMocha Cons

• Lacks custom question creation.
• No Excel workbook question support.
• Questions are easily googleable and solvable by GPT.
• No custom data location support.

iMocha Pricing

iMocha does not publicly display pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a personalized quote. They also do not offer a free trial.

9. Equalture

Best for: Team role fitment analysis

Equalture offers a team of neuroscientists and data scientists who focus on predicting team role fitment using games. They aim to improve hiring decisions and team dynamics through data-driven insights.

Equalture focuses on predicting team role fitment using games, a unique approach compared to Testlify's general skills assessment. While Testlify provides a broad range of tests, Equalture zooms in on team compatibility, which could be useful if that's your priority.

However, this narrowed focus means Equalture lacks the breadth of assessment types offered by competitors like Adaface, which provides a wider range of tests, including aptitude, programming, and job-specific skills. If you need a solution that covers all bases, Equalture might leave you wanting more.

How Equalture compares to Testlify?

Key Features

• Team Fit Prediction: Uses games to assess how well a candidate will integrate into a team.
• Culture Fit Analysis: Evaluates candidates based on company culture values.
• Data-Driven Insights: Provides data on candidate strengths and weaknesses.

Equalture Pros

• Focus on team dynamics and culture fit.
• A unique, game-based assessment approach.
• Provides insights beyond just skills assessment.
• Good for companies prioritizing team cohesion.
• GDPR Compliant

Equalture Cons

• Lacks assessment variety (no coding, AI, finance or language tests).
• No custom question creation.
• No webcam, window, IP, location, device fingerprint proctoring, or plagiarism detection.
• Limited reporting (no skills profile, benchmarking or audit timeline).

Equalture Pricing

Equalture doesn't publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact them for a quote, which means a sales call. There is no free trial available, which is less than ideal if you want to test the platform before committing.

10. Brillium

Best for: Customized assessment creation platform

Brillium is a platform focused on allowing you to create your own assessments. It provides the tools to build and deliver tests, quizzes, and surveys, making it a fit for organizations needing tailored assessments.

Unlike Testlify, which offers a library of pre-built tests, Brillium lets you build assessments from scratch. This is handy when you have niche or role-specific requirements not covered by off-the-shelf solutions. Think of it like this: Testlify gives you a ready-made meal, while Brillium provides the kitchen and ingredients for you to cook your own recipe.

However, this also means you're responsible for the content and quality of your assessments. While Testlify offers immediate testing capabilities, Brillium requires a heavier upfront investment in content creation. If you're looking for instant results and a wide range of pre-validated tests across skills, explore Adaface's pre-employment assessment test library.

How Brillium compares to Testlify?

Key Features

• Assessment Builder: Create tests with various question types and scoring options.
• Delivery Options: Deliver assessments online with customization features.
• Reporting: Track and analyze results to measure learning and performance.

Brillium Pros

• Highly customizable assessment creation.
• Flexible delivery options to suit different needs.
• Detailed reporting and analytics.
• Supports various question formats.
• Integrates with other learning management systems.

Brillium Cons

• Requires significant upfront investment in content creation.
• Lacks a built-in question bank or pre-made assessments.
• No coding questions or advanced assessment types like Excel simulations.
• No built-in proctoring or anti-cheating features.

Brillium Pricing

Brillium's pricing starts at $69 per month (billed annually) for a single user. They also have a plan at $205 per month (billed annually) for 3 users. For larger teams and custom needs, you'll need to contact their sales team to discuss enterprise recruitment software pricing. They do offer a free trial to explore the platform.

Found Your Perfect Testlify Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface is trusted across 70+ countries for its 500+ tests for aptitude, finance, personality, typing, AI, technical and coding roles with strong proctoring, all under a transparent credit-based pricing model.
• Evalart is a straightforward assessment tool that focuses on coding and aptitude tests, offering custom coding questions but lacking in business skills assessments.
• TestGorilla provides a wide range of tests including personality and culture fit assessments, but their pricing scales with company size and they do not provide custom questions.
• Xobin offers assessments across various domains like aptitude, coding and business skills, but it lacks language tests and custom coding questions.
• Coderbyte specializes in coding assessments with a focus on software-related roles, offering code playback and custom coding questions, but lacks ATS integrations.
• TestGrid provides aptitude and personality tests, with some proctoring capabilities, but lacks coding tests and details on test libraries.
• Equip is known for its affordable pricing, but has a limited test library and lacks in-depth reporting features.
• iMocha provides a wide array of assessments including AI and cloud tests, but its questions are easily googleable and they don't provide custom coding questions.
• Equalture focuses on aptitude and personality assessments, offering mobile-friendly tests, but lacks coding assessments and custom questions.
• Brillium is a platform where you bring your own questions, ideal if you have existing content, but doesn't provide a ready-to-use test library.

Choosing the right assessment platform is a big deal for your hiring. We've looked at several options, each with its own strengths.

Testlify shines with its diverse test library. However, its seat-based pricing and limited customization might not fit every company's needs. You see, imagine paying for each seat, and its gets expensive if you have more recruiters.

Good news! There are many alternatives. Adaface, for example, offers a vast test library covering various roles and skills, strong proctoring, and transparent, credit-based pricing. This makes it a strong contender. It's like having 500+ different roles and skills at your disposal.

No matter your specific needs, from technical assessments to personality tests, the right Testlify alternative is out there. You just need to find the perfect match.

Ready to elevate your hiring process? Explore Adaface's pre-employment assessment test library to find the perfect skills tests for your needs.