Top 10 Testgorilla Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why are companies exploring options beyond TestGorilla?

I've done some digging to understand why HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers are searching for alternatives to TestGorilla. Here's what I uncovered:

Limited Customization. While TestGorilla boasts a wide range of tests, tailoring questions to perfectly match your specific role or industry needs can be tricky. If you need assessments that truly reflect your company's unique challenges, this lack of flexibility might be a deal-breaker.

Proctoring limitations. While TestGorilla offers proctoring features, some users may find the level of detail and control lacking compared to platforms with more advanced features. For instance, features like detailed audit timelines or social listening for question leaks may not be available, potentially impacting test integrity.

Seat-based pricing can inflate costs. TestGorilla's pricing structure is based on company size, which might include charging per user/seat. This can become quite pricey for larger organizations even if they are not using all seats. Companies might be looking for tools that offer unlimited team seats, so everyone in their team can access the tool without incurring extra costs. Consider Adaface's pricing which is transparent and based on credits and not seats.

1. Adaface

Best for: Screening for both technical and non-technical roles with a single platform.

A strong alternative to Testgorilla is Adaface, offering a balanced approach to skills assessment. Adaface provides a comprehensive platform, catering to various roles and industries.

Testgorilla's fixed pricing tiers can be a hurdle for smaller teams or those with fluctuating hiring needs. Adaface addresses this with its credit-based pricing, offering flexibility and scalability. You only pay for what you use, making it suitable for companies of all sizes, whether you're a startup or an enterprise recruitment software.

Adaface stands out with its focus on accuracy and candidate experience. Here are some reasons why it is better than Testgorilla:

• Wider test library with 500+ skills
• Tests for technical, aptitude, finance, personality, typing and business roles.
• Strong proctoring suite
• Focus on candidate experience and company branding
• Detailed scorecards and reporting
• Flexible pricing based on credits

Extensive Test Library

Adaface has an extensive test library of over 500 skills, covering a wide range of roles. You can use Adaface to evaluate:

• Technical skills for roles like software engineers using coding tests.
• Cognitive abilities and soft skills using aptitude tests.
• Business skills for roles in finance, accounting, sales, customer service, and more.
• Personality traits and cultural alignment with psychometric tests.

This ensures you can assess candidates across various dimensions relevant to the job.

Robust Proctoring Suite

Adaface has strong proctoring features to maintain test integrity. These include:

• Webcam proctoring to ensure the candidate is who they say they are.
• Window and tab proctoring to prevent candidates from accessing external resources.
• IP and device fingerprint proctoring to identify suspicious activity.
• Copy-paste protection to discourage plagiarism.
• Chat GPT protection to check if candidate is using AI tools.

These features give you confidence in the accuracy and reliability of the assessment results.

Adaface vs Testgorilla Attributes

Adaface Pros

• Wide range of tests including aptitude, finance, personality, typing and business roles.
• Strong proctoring suite, including webcam, window, IP, and device fingerprint tracking.
• Customizable assessments tailored to specific job descriptions
• Detailed scorecards with skill-wise analysis
• Flexible credit-based pricing, suitable for all company sizes
• Candidate-friendly conversational assessments
• Integrations with popular ATS systems

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers flexible credit-based pricing plans to suit different hiring needs. A free trial is available with 2 sample tests and 5 credits, allowing you to explore the platform and get comfortable before purchasing. No credit card is required to start the free trial. Pricing plans include all proctoring features and access to all 500+ tests. Available plans: Individual ($180/year), Starter ($500/year), Pro ($900/year), Scale ($3000/year), Growth ($5500/year), Enterprise ($20,000/year), and Unlimited ($50,000/year).

2. Hackerrank

Best for: Technical skill focused roles

HackerRank focuses on technical skill assessments, offering a platform primarily for evaluating coding skills. It is geared towards companies looking to assess developers and engineers.

Unlike Testgorilla, HackerRank zeroes in on coding skills, providing an IDE for candidates to showcase their abilities in a practical setting. Testgorilla provides a breadth of assessments, HackerRank gives in-depth coding assessments.

For companies laser-focused on tech roles, HackerRank offers a specialized environment. Whereas, if your hiring extends beyond tech, you might need other tools in your arsenal to cover the other skills.

How Hackerrank compares to Testgorilla?

Key Features

• Candidate Screening: Structured assessments to screen tech talent efficiently.
• Live Coding Interviews: Real-time coding environment to evaluate developer skills.
• SkillUp: AI-driven talent directory to filter candidates based on specific tech skills.

Hackerrank Pros

• Developer Community: Widely recognized platform among developers for skill enhancement.
• Certified Assessments: Quick launch of role-based tests with support for 40+ programming languages.
• Plagiarism Detection: Machine learning to maintain assessment integrity.
• Real-World Coding Questions: Assesses candidates in a practical coding environment.
• Strong focus on technical skills: Excels with strong focus on technical skills in particular.

Hackerrank Cons

• Lacks Emotional Intelligence Screening: No specific tools to test for soft skills.
• Limited ATS Integration: Advanced integration is restricted to custom plans.
• Not Mobile Friendly: Candidates cannot take the tests on their mobile phone.
• Questions are easily googleable: The default questions are easily found on google, leading to candidates copying answers and passing tests.

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank offers tiered pricing plans. Starter is $100 per month (1200$ per annum). Scale plan is $250 per month (3000$ per annum). For larger organizations needing custom features, you'll need to contact HackerRank directly for an Enterprise quote. They do offer a free trial, but without signing up, you can't explore all the features. For a transparent pricing structure, you might want to check out Adaface Assessments Pricing.

3. Coderbyte

Best for: Technical hiring coding challenges

Coderbyte is a platform focused on helping companies assess technical skills, primarily through coding challenges and assessments. It provides a range of coding problems and challenges to evaluate a candidate's programming abilities.

Unlike Testgorilla, which offers a broader range of tests, Coderbyte dives deep into the realm of technical skills. This makes it a better fit if your primary focus is on evaluating coding proficiency. Coderbyte's strength lies in its ability to provide in-depth coding assessments.

Where Testgorilla offers ready-to-use tests, Coderbyte allows for tailored assessment creation. This is useful for companies that need to evaluate unique skillsets. While Testgorilla has a wider range of tests, Coderbyte provides detailed insights into coding skills, making it a strong alternative for tech-heavy roles. Adaface's pre-employment assessments cover a wide range of skills and cognitive abilities.

How Coderbyte compares to Testgorilla?

Key Features

• Coding challenges across multiple languages
• Real-time code evaluation and feedback
• Customizable assessments for specific roles

Coderbyte Pros

• Strong focus on technical skills assessment
• Offers a wide range of coding challenges
• Provides code playback for better evaluation
• Supports custom coding questions
• Plagiarism detection to maintain test integrity

Coderbyte Cons

• Lacks assessments for non-technical roles
• No support for aptitude, business skills, or finance tests
• Limited integrations with ATS platforms
• No custom data location support for enterprise clients

Coderbyte Pricing

Coderbyte offers various pricing tiers, including a free trial to explore the platform. Subscription plans start at $199/month. They also offer pay-as-you-go plans, giving you flexibility in how you use their service. Contact Coderbyte directly for detailed enterprise pricing.

4. DevSkiller

Best for: Coding skills, realistic testing

DevSkiller focuses on assessing tech skills with a strong emphasis on coding. They aim to provide realistic job simulations to evaluate a candidate's practical abilities, providing a different approach compared to platforms offering broader assessment types.

DevSkiller's primary use case revolves around assessing coding skills through work sample simulations. Unlike Testgorilla, DevSkiller leans heavily into mirroring real-world coding tasks.

This approach is particularly useful when you need to see how a candidate performs under conditions that closely resemble their day-to-day work. However, if you need to assess a wider range of skills beyond coding, you might want to check out Adaface's assessment test library .

How DevSkiller compares to Testgorilla?

Key Features

• Online code editor: Provides a real coding environment for candidates.
• Task-based assessments: Focuses on practical coding challenges.
• Automated evaluation: Automatically grades coding submissions.

DevSkiller Pros

• Strong focus on coding skill assessment.
• Realistic job simulation tasks.
• Automated scoring saves time on manual reviews.
• Supports multiple programming languages.
• Web and webcam proctoring to prevent cheating.

DevSkiller Cons

• Limited assessment types beyond coding. If you are looking for Aptitude Tests For Employment, Personality tests then you need other platforms
• No mobile-friendly testing experience.
• Lacks features like custom branding and invitation templates.
• No options for bulk actions like mass inviting candidates, which you might need if you are doing campus recruitment

DevSkiller Pricing

DevSkiller does not publicly display its pricing. You need to contact their sales team to get a quote. Also, they don't offer a free trial, which means you can't explore the platform before committing.

5. Alva Labs

Best for: Psychometric and coding skills

Alva Labs offers a platform combining psychometric and cognitive assessments with coding challenges. It aims to predict candidate success by evaluating personality traits and problem-solving abilities. They believe in data-driven approach to identify top talent.

Alva Labs primary use case is to predict candidate success with psychometric tests and cognitive ability tests. While Testgorilla offers a wide array of skills tests, Alva Labs zeroes in on personality and logical prowess. This may work for companies who want to guage candidate's underlying behavioral and problem solving capabilities.

However, if you want more than personality tests. If you are looking for a platform that dives deep into candidate's coding skills with scenario based questions, or if you want to test a range of business skills, or even assess candidates on job-specific tasks, platforms like Adaface will be a better alternative.

How Alva Labs compares to Testgorilla?

Key Features

• Personality Assessments: Measures key personality traits relevant to job performance.
• Cognitive Ability Tests: Assesses logical reasoning and problem-solving skills.
• Coding Assessments: Evaluate coding proficiency, supports code playback.

Alva Labs Pros

• Science-backed assessments.
• Focus on predicting job performance.
• Good for roles where personality is paramount.
• Automated scoring saves time.
• ATS integrations available.

Alva Labs Cons

• Limited skills assessment coverage compared to Testgorilla. Doesn't support a vast array of tests like finance, language, typing etc.
• No support for custom questions. This makes it hard to adapt to your company's specific needs.
• No plagiarism detection, making it vulnerable to cheating. Ideal assessment solution should have a plagiarism checker to make sure two coding answers are similar
• Lacks robust anti-cheating features like device fingerprinting and Chat GPT detection.

Alva Labs Pricing

Alva Labs has a tiered pricing structure. They have a starter plan at $289 per month and a scale plan at $799 per month. For enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact Alva Labs directly. There is a free trial, so you can try before you buy, but expect to engage with sales to get a full picture of the cost.

6. iMocha

Best for: Skills intelligence for workforce

iMocha's skill assessments and skills intelligence features help employers understand their workforce's current skills, plan for future needs, and close skill gaps through recruitment. While TestGorilla focuses solely on skills assessment through pre-made tests, iMocha goes further by helping you manage and develop skills within your organization through its skill intelligence system.

TestGorilla relies heavily on ready-to-use tests, limiting the ability to tailor assessments to specific roles or company needs. iMocha offers a wider range of customization options, including the ability to add your own questions, giving you more control over the assessment process.

However, iMocha still falls short of providing fully customized tests based on job descriptions. For truly tailored assessments that adapt to your unique requirements, consider platforms like Adaface which analyzes job descriptions and creates matching tests.

How iMocha compares to Testgorilla?

Key Features

• Candidate Screening: Screen talent with structured assessments and a scalable system.
• Live Coding Interviews: A fully functional IDE during live coding interviews.
• SkillUp: Use AI to filter candidates by skills and certifications.

iMocha Pros

• Extensive Skill Library: Offers a vast library of skills and assessments.
• AI-Powered Insights: Leverages AI to provide skills insights and analytics.
• Integrations: Integrates with applicant tracking systems (ATS) for streamlined workflows.
• Proctoring Features: Includes webcam and window proctoring to maintain test integrity.
• Reporting and Analytics: Provides detailed reports on candidate performance.

iMocha Cons

• Limited Customization: Lacks the ability to create fully customized tests based on job descriptions.
• No Custom Coding Questions: You cannot add your own coding questions
• Language Support: It only supports English, German, and Portuguese which limits candidate reach.
• No Free Trial: Doesn't offer a free trial, making it harder to test the platform before committing.

iMocha Pricing

iMocha does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. They also do not offer a free trial. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to compare costs upfront.

7. The Predictive Index

Best for: Behavioral assessments and team building

The Predictive Index (PI) offers behavioral assessments, workforce analytics, and leadership development tools. Unlike Testgorilla, which focuses on a wider range of skills, PI hones in on understanding and predicting workplace behavior to improve team dynamics and leadership.

Testgorilla excels in assessing a broad range of skills with ready-to-use tests. However, if your primary goal is to deeply understand team dynamics and predict candidate behavior, The Predictive Index takes a different approach. It gives insights into behavioral traits, which can be invaluable for team building and leadership development.

PI’s strength lies in helping companies align talent with strategy by understanding individual behavioral drives and predicting job performance. While Testgorilla offers skills-based insights, PI focuses on the 'why' behind performance, offering a different perspective for talent optimization.

How The Predictive Index compares to Testgorilla?

Key Features

• Behavioral Assessments: Understand candidate and employee behavioral patterns.
• Workforce Analytics: Gain insights into team dynamics and organizational structure.
• Leadership Development: Develop leadership skills based on behavioral data.

The Predictive Index Pros

• Focus on behavioral insights.
• Tools for team building and leadership development.
• Integrates with various ATS platforms.
• Provides data-driven insights for talent management.
• Helps align talent with organizational strategy.

The Predictive Index Cons

• Limited scope beyond behavioral assessments.
• Lacks skills-based assessments like coding or AI tests that Adaface offers.
• No custom question creation.
• No proctoring features.

The Predictive Index Pricing

The Predictive Index does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact them directly for a quote. This lack of transparency can make it harder to compare with other solutions. Also, there is no free trial offered.

8. Sprockets

Best for: Personality-driven hiring decisions

Sprockets.ai focuses on personality assessments. It uses AI to understand candidate personalities and predict their fit within a company culture. If you're big on gut feelings and want some AI to back it up, Sprockets might be your jam. It helps you see if a candidate's personality aligns with your team's vibe.

While Testgorilla offers a broad spectrum of skill assessments, Sprockets narrows in on personality, which it pitches as a key ingredient for team harmony. But let's be real, can personality alone guarantee a superstar employee?

Testgorilla provides a more balanced approach by testing a wider range of skills, from coding to cognitive abilities. This allows for a more holistic assessment, rather than banking solely on whether someone's personality gels with the office.

How Sprockets compares to Testgorilla?

Key Features

• AI-powered personality analysis
• Culture fit prediction
• Team compatibility scoring

Sprockets Pros

• Focuses on culture fit.
• Easy to use interface.
• AI insights for personality.
• Helps visualize team dynamics.
• Can improve team collaboration.

Sprockets Cons

• Lacks coding or aptitude tests.
• No proctoring features to prevent cheating.
• No custom question support.
• Limited reporting capabilities.

Sprockets Pricing

Sprockets.ai doesn't list pricing publicly. You'll need to fill out a contact form on their site to get a quote. This lack of transparency can make it tough to compare with other platforms that offer upfront pricing, like Adaface Assessments Pricing.

9. Priority Bridge

Best for: Basic skills assessment quickly

Priority Bridge offers a library of pre-built assessments designed to quickly evaluate candidates on fundamental skills. It's like having a toolbox with a few standard instruments – handy for basic tasks, but maybe not for complex projects.

Testgorilla, like Priority Bridge, provides ready-made tests. However, neither platform lets you create custom questions tailored to your specific needs. Want to assess a candidate's familiarity with your company's proprietary software or a unique situational challenge they'll face? You're out of luck!

This is where Adaface's online assessment platform shines. Adaface allows you to design assessments that precisely match your job descriptions, ensuring you're evaluating candidates on the skills that truly matter to your organization.

How Priority Bridge compares to Testgorilla?

Key Features

• Personality assessments.
• Ready-to-use tests.
• Candidate benchmarking.

Priority Bridge Pros

• Offers email support to candidates.
• Provides candidate benchmarking.
• Has a ready-to-use test library.
• Offers personality tests.
• Has user authentication for tests.

Priority Bridge Cons

• Lacks coding, aptitude, and job-specific tests, limiting its scope.
• No custom questions or coding questions, so you're stuck with off-the-shelf options.
• No integrations with ATS platforms, adding manual steps to your workflow.
• No webcam or web proctoring features, making it difficult to prevent cheating. Adaface's proctoring features are missed

Priority Bridge Pricing

Priority Bridge does not offer pricing information publicly. You need to contact their sales team to get a quote. Also, they don't have a free trial, so you can't test the waters before diving in.

10. Pymetrics

Best for: Bias-free talent matching

Pymetrics offers a unique approach to talent assessment by using neuroscience-based games to evaluate cognitive and personality traits. This aims to provide a bias-free method of matching candidates to roles.

Unlike Testgorilla, which relies on skills-based assessments, Pymetrics focuses on potential and aptitude through gamified challenges. This can be valuable for identifying candidates with the inherent abilities to succeed, even if they lack specific experience.

However, Pymetrics lacks the ability to create custom questions and assess job-specific skills, which can be limiting if you need to evaluate candidates on very specific technical knowledge or situational judgment. Companies looking for skills assessment tools should consider this carefully.

How Pymetrics compares to Testgorilla?

Key Features

• Uses neuroscience-based games.
• Focuses on cognitive and personality traits.
• Aims for bias-free talent matching.

Pymetrics Pros

• Claims to reduce bias in hiring.
• Assesses potential beyond current skills.
• Can identify candidates with unique cognitive strengths.
• Offers a different perspective compared to traditional skills tests.
• Has integrations with existing ATS platforms.

Pymetrics Cons

• Lacks skills-based assessments like coding tests or finance tests.
• Doesn't allow for custom questions or tailored assessments.
• No support for web proctoring or plagiarism detection, making it difficult to prevent cheating.
• Doesn't provide skill-wise analysis or audit timelines for candidate evaluations.

Pymetrics Pricing

Pymetrics does not publicly display pricing information. You need to contact their sales team to get a quote. The lack of transparent pricing can make it difficult to evaluate its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions and there is no free trial.

Found Your Perfect Testgorilla Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface offers a vast library of 500+ tests including aptitude, finance, personality and AI, strong proctoring, and serves 70+ countries without seat-based pricing.
• HackerRank is a strong choice for technical assessments, particularly for hiring developers, but lacks in aptitude, business, and AI tests when compared to Adaface.
• Coderbyte is focused on technical skills assessment, offering coding challenges and assessments, but falls short in providing a broader range of tests like aptitude, business, or finance compared to Adaface.
• Devskiller is tailored for tech recruitment, with a focus on coding skills, but lacks assessments for business acumen, personality, and other non-technical skills that Adaface covers.
• Alva Labs combines personality and aptitude tests, but doesn't offer the breadth of skills assessment, such as coding or finance, that Adaface provides.
• iMocha provides a wide range of skill assessments, similar to Testgorilla, but lacks the customizability and social listening for task leaks that Adaface offers.
• The Predictive Index focuses on behavioral assessments and team dynamics, useful for culture fit, but it doesn't assess technical or job-specific skills like Adaface does.
• Sprockets uses AI to match candidates with company culture, but does not offer the same level of skills assessment across technical, aptitude, or business domains like Adaface.
• Priority Bridge focuses on personality assessments but lacks the broader skills assessment capabilities, such as coding and AI, that Adaface provides.
• Pymetrics uses neuroscience-based games to assess cognitive and personality traits, but doesn't evaluate specific job skills like coding, finance, or typing, as Adaface does. It does offer API unlike most other competitors.

We've explored a range of Testgorilla alternatives and competitors, each offering distinct features and catering to various hiring needs. Now, let's wrap things up!

Testgorilla shines with its diverse test library, but its seat-based pricing and limited customization can be a deal-breaker for many, especially those looking for more tailored assessments or remote hiring solutions.

Thankfully, there are excellent alternatives to consider. Adaface stands out with its high test library of 500+ tests, covering aptitude, finance, personality, typing, AI, and technical roles. Plus, it offers a robust proctoring suite and serves clients in over 70 countries, all without seat-based pricing.

No matter your specific use case, whether it's assessing technical skills, evaluating personality traits, or ensuring test integrity, you can rely on these Testgorilla alternatives to make smarter hiring decisions.

Ready to elevate your hiring process with comprehensive and cheat-proof skill assessments? Try Adaface today!