Skills assessments are a great way to make sure you're hiring the best people. But, like choosing the right ice cream flavor, finding the perfect assessment platform is key. Hire Success is one option, but it might not be the perfect fit for everyone. Maybe you're looking for a platform that has a wider range of tests or more customization options. This article will explore the top Hire Success alternatives to consider.
Before we dive deep, here's a sneak peek at the alternatives we'll be exploring:
- Adaface: For assessing candidates across various skills with a focus on candidate experience.
- CodeSignal: Ideal for companies looking to evaluate coding skills through challenges and competitions.
- Pymetrics: Best for companies looking for game-based assessments to evaluate cognitive and personality traits.
- Devskiller: Suited for companies that want to test developers with realistic coding tasks and project simulations.
- HackerRank: A good choice for companies needing to assess technical skills with coding challenges.
- iMocha: Useful for companies needing a broad assessment library covering diverse skills and domains.
- Evalart: Perfect for companies that need a simple and affordable assessment solution.
- AssessFirst: Designed for companies focusing on predictive hiring through personality and motivation assessments.
- Prevue Assessments: For companies that require pre-employment testing for aptitude, personality, and skills.
- Aon: Caters to enterprises that need global assessment solutions for large-scale hiring and development.
Adaface is a great alternative, especially if you're aiming to elevate your candidate experience while ensuring accurate skill evaluation. With a test library of 500+ tests covering aptitude, finance, personality, business roles, typing, AI, technical and coding skills, it's a versatile choice. Plus, its strong proctoring suite and use by clients in 70+ countries make it a reliable option for global and secure remote hiring.
Table of contents
Why are companies seeking alternatives to Hire Success?
I've been doing some digging to figure out what makes HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers look beyond Hire Success. Here's what I discovered:
Limited test types and skills coverage. Hire Success primarily focuses on aptitude and personality assessments, leaving gaps in areas like programming, finance, AI, and specific business roles. Companies needing to assess a broader range of skills may find this limiting.
Lack of advanced proctoring features. While Hire Success offers basic proctoring, it lacks advanced features like webcam monitoring, IP tracking, and copy-paste prevention. For roles requiring high levels of trust and integrity, this might not provide sufficient security during the pre-employment assessment test.
Inflexible customization options. Hire Success offers limited customization options for creating tailored assessments. Organizations with unique hiring needs or those wanting to assess candidates against specific job descriptions might seek platforms allowing for more custom questions and test formats.
Navigating the assessment landscape can be tricky. Here's a quick comparison to help you find the perfect Hire Success alternative.Name | Usecase | Standout feature | G2 rating | Pricing |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adaface | Skills tests for 500+ roles | Tests aptitude, coding, typing, finance |
4.6 | Starts from $180, no seat-based pricing |
CodeSignal | Technical skill assessment platform | Ideal for coding challenges |
4.5 | Contact CodeSignal for pricing |
Pymetrics | Gamified cognitive assessment | Uses neuroscience-based games |
3.5 | Contact Pymetrics for pricing |
DevSkiller | Coding and IT skill screening | Detailed coding project assessments |
0 | Contact DevSkiller for pricing |
Hackerrank | Technical hiring assessments | Large developer community platform |
4.5 | $100 per month onwards |
iMocha | Versatile skills assessment platform | Wide range of tests |
4.5 | Contact iMocha for pricing |
Evalart | Skills testing for various roles | Custom coding question support |
Less reviews on G2 | Contact Evalart for pricing |
AssessFirst | Predictive talent assessment | Personality and motivation focus |
4.6 | Contact AssessFirst for pricing |
Prevue Assessments | Aptitude, personality, and skills | Focus on workplace fit |
4.5 | Contact team for pricing quote |
Aon | End-to-end talent solutions | Global assessment provider |
3.5 | Quotes available by request |
1. Adaface
Best for: Go beyond aptitude and personality – assess role-specific skills with ease.
Looking for a strong alternative to Hire Success? Adaface offers a user-friendly platform designed to help you screen candidates faster and more accurately.

One major drawback of Hire Success is its lack of webcam proctoring. Adaface solves this by offering a suite of proctoring features, including webcam, window & tab proctoring, ensuring test integrity and preventing cheating.
Adaface stands out with its wide range of assessments and features designed for modern hiring:
- 500+ skills tests, covering technical, aptitude, and business roles.
- Strong proctoring features to maintain test integrity.
- Custom assessment creation based on job descriptions.
- Company branding options for a better candidate experience.
- Detailed scorecards and analytics for data-driven decisions.
- Integrations with popular ATS platforms for seamless workflow.
Extensive Test Library for Diverse Roles
Adaface boasts a test library with over 500 assessments, catering to a wide array of roles. From coding tests and IT skills to aptitude tests, finance, and even personality tests, Adaface has you covered.
This breadth allows you to assess candidates across various departments and skill sets, all within a single platform. Whether you're hiring for a software engineer, a marketing manager, or an accountant, Adaface provides the tools you need for skill-based hiring.

Elevated Candidate Experience with Company Branding
With Adaface, you can create a branded assessment experience that reflects your company's identity. Add your company logo and brand colors to the assessment platform, creating a seamless and engaging experience for candidates.
Customizable invitation and rejection templates let you tailor your messaging, ensuring a consistent brand voice throughout the hiring process. This feature not only enhances your company's image but also improves candidate engagement and completion rates.

Adaface vs Hire Success Attributes
Attribute | Adaface | Hire Success |
---|---|---|
Test Library | 500+ skills tests (technical, aptitude, business, personality) | Limited; Primarily aptitude and personality |
Customized Assessments | Yes, tailored per job description | No |
Webcam Proctoring | Yes | No |
AI Tests | Yes | No |
Business Skills Tests | Yes | No |
Custom API | Yes | No |
Pricing Transparency | Pricing details available on the website | Contact for quote |
Free Trial | Yes | No |
Adaface Pros
- Wide range of assessments, including technical, aptitude, and business roles
- Strong proctoring features for test integrity
- Customizable assessments based on job descriptions
- Company branding options for candidate experience
- Detailed scorecards and analytics for data-driven decisions
- Used by clients in 70+ countries
- Transparent pricing with no seat-based fees
Adaface Cons
- No live video interviews
- No take-home assignment support
Adaface Pricing
Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit different hiring needs. You can start with a free trial that includes 2 sample tests and 5 credits to explore the platform. No credit card is required to begin. All pricing plans include all proctoring features and access to all 500+ tests. Plans include: Individual ($180/yr), Starter ($500/yr), Pro ($900/yr), Scale ($3000/yr), Growth ($5500/yr), Enterprise ($20,000/year), and Unlimited ($50,000/yr).
2. CodeSignal
Best for: Coding skill assessment platform

CodeSignal offers a technology-driven platform focused on assessing coding skills. It aims to help companies streamline their technical hiring process by providing tools to evaluate candidates' coding abilities.
Unlike Hire Success, which lacks dedicated coding assessments, CodeSignal specializes in this domain. If your primary need is to evaluate a candidate's coding proficiency, CodeSignal offers a targeted solution.
CodeSignal's strength lies in its coding-centric approach. While Hire Success may offer a broader range of assessments, CodeSignal gives in-depth insights into a candidate's coding capabilities, complete with code playback and automated scoring that Hire Success doesn't provide.
How CodeSignal compares to Hire Success?
Key Features
- Coding assessments with a focus on real-world scenarios.
- Integrated development environment (IDE) for coding tests.
- Skills-based scoring and reporting.
CodeSignal Pros
- Strong focus on coding skill assessment.
- Automated scoring saves time in evaluation.
- Offers a platform for both coding challenges and technical interviews.
- Public reports via unique links to share scorecards.
- ATS integrations for workflow.
CodeSignal Cons
- Limited assessment types beyond coding. No aptitude, behavioral, or business tests available.
- Lacks custom question creation, restricting adaptability. Consider Adaface's platform for customisation.
- No custom data location support.
- No role based access.
CodeSignal Pricing
CodeSignal does not have publicly available pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. Also, there's no free trial.

3. Pymetrics
Best for: Bias-free personality assessment
Pymetrics offers a unique approach to talent assessment by focusing on cognitive and personality traits through a series of engaging games. Unlike traditional methods, Pymetrics uses neuroscience-based games to evaluate candidates, aiming to reduce bias and improve hiring decisions.
Pymetrics aims to remove unconscious bias in hiring, a space where Hire Success may fall short. While Hire Success uses traditional assessments, Pymetrics banks on gamified neuroscience tasks to evaluate candidates on potential, not just past experiences.
This method allows companies to identify candidates who might have been overlooked using conventional methods. By assessing traits linked to job performance, Pymetrics helps organizations build diverse teams.
How Pymetrics compares to Hire Success?
Key Features
- Gamified Assessments: Candidates play a series of games that measure cognitive and emotional traits.
- Bias Mitigation: Algorithms designed to reduce bias in the hiring process.
- Predictive Analytics: Uses data to predict job performance and fit.
Pymetrics Pros
- Innovative Approach: Gamified assessments offer a refreshing candidate experience.
- Focus on Potential: Evaluates candidates based on inherent traits, not just learned skills.
- Data-Driven Insights: Provides data to inform hiring decisions.
- Custom API: Has custom API support.
- Benchmarking: Pymetrics does benchmarking.
Pymetrics Cons
- Limited Skills Coverage: Lacks assessments for specific technical skills like programming tests or finance.
- Black Box Concerns: The underlying science behind the games may not be transparent to all users.
- No Custom Questions: Does not allow you to add your own questions.
- No Proctoring: Lacks proctoring features like webcam, location or IP tracking.
Pymetrics Pricing
Pymetrics doesn't list pricing on their website, requiring potential customers to contact their sales team for a quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to compare costs with other assessment solutions and plan your budget accordingly. They also do not have a free trial.

4. DevSkiller
Best for: Tech skill assessment platform
DevSkiller is a tech skill assessment platform designed to evaluate developers and IT professionals. It focuses on coding skills and offers a range of tests to assess candidates' abilities.
Unlike Hire Success, which lacks coding questions, DevSkiller emphasizes coding skills. If you're primarily hiring for tech roles, this focus could be valuable.
However, keep in mind that DevSkiller specializes in technical skills. If you need to assess a broader range of skills, including aptitude, business acumen, or personality traits, you might need additional tools. For a more versatile solution, consider how Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests can help.
How DevSkiller compares to Hire Success?
Key Features
- Task-based coding assessments
- Online code editor
- Automated test scoring
DevSkiller Pros
- Good for assessing coding skills.
- Wide range of technologies supported.
- Automated scoring saves time.
- Plagiarism detection helps maintain test integrity.
- Integration with popular ATS platforms.
DevSkiller Cons
- Lacks assessments for non-technical skills.
- No support for typing, language, or aptitude tests unlike Adaface.
- No built-in conversational interface resulting in bad candidate experience.
- No custom data location support, raising compliance concerns for some enterprises.
DevSkiller Pricing
DevSkiller doesn't publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote tailored to your needs. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to compare costs upfront. They also do not have a free trial.

5. Hackerrank
Best for: Technical Skills Hiring Platform
HackerRank provides a platform to assess technical skills, primarily focusing on coding and developer roles. It's widely known for its coding challenges and is used by many companies to screen and interview developers.
Hire Success lacks the capacity to evaluate coding skills effectively, which is a significant gap in tech recruitment. HackerRank fills this void by offering a strong suite of coding tests and challenges, catering specifically to assess programming abilities.
While Hire Success offers aptitude and personality tests, HackerRank hones in on technical skills. This makes it particularly useful when the primary need is to identify and vet developers or engineers with specific coding expertise. It also helps evaluate hands on coding which Hire Success can't.
How Hackerrank compares to Hire Success?
Key Features
- Coding Assessments: Evaluate candidates' coding skills across various languages and domains.
- Live Coding Interviews: Conduct real-time coding sessions with candidates.
- Skill Certification: Offers certification programs to validate developers' skills.
Hackerrank Pros
- Large Developer Community: A well-known and trusted platform among developers.
- Coding Challenges: Candidates get to showcase thier skills with real-world problems
- Plagiarism Detection: Helps maintain integrity during assessments.
- Wide Range of Languages: Supports many coding languages.
- Automated Scoring: Saves time with instant evaluation of coding tests.
Hackerrank Cons
- Lacks Versatility: Primarily focused on coding skills, missing aptitude tests, personality tests and business skills.
- No Emotional Intelligence Screening: Does not assess soft skills or emotional intelligence.
- Limited Customer Support: No live chat or phone assistance available.
- Questions Are Googleable: Many default coding questions can be easily found online.
- Test Length: Tests are longer compared to other platforms.
Hackerrank Pricing
HackerRank offers a tiered pricing structure. The basic plan starts at $100 per month (billed annually). For enterprise level, you will need to contact them for a quote. They do offer a free trial, so you can kick the tires before committing.

6. iMocha
Best for: Skills assessment and intelligence
iMocha offers skill assessments and skills intelligence to help companies understand their workforce's skills, plan for future needs, and address skill gaps through targeted recruitment. While Hire Success focuses on aptitude and personality, iMocha goes beyond by offering a broader range of tests and skills management.
iMocha differentiates itself from Hire Success with its extensive skill assessment library, which includes programming, AI, cloud, and finance-specific tests. Unlike Hire Success, iMocha supports coding questions, which is an advantage if you're hiring for technical roles.
Additionally, iMocha provides skills intelligence to help organizations understand the skills within their workforce. This is something Hire Success doesn't offer, making iMocha a better option for companies focused on skills development and gap analysis, but if you are looking for customized tests based on job description, Adaface is a better choice.
How iMocha compares to Hire Success?
Key Features
- Wide range of assessments: Covering aptitude, technical and business skills.
- Live coding interviews: A real-time coding environment to assess developers.
- Skills intelligence: AI-driven insights into your workforce's skill set.
iMocha Pros
- Extensive test library: Includes programming, AI, and other technical skills.
- Skills intelligence: Helps identify skill gaps and plan for future needs.
- Customizable branding: Allows you to add your company logo and colors.
- Automated scoring: Saves time and ensures consistent evaluation.
- Good ATS integrations: Integrates with popular applicant tracking systems.
iMocha Cons
- Limited custom question support: Cannot create custom questions for specific use cases.
- No custom data location support: Data location is not customizable.
- Questions are easily googleable: Questions seem simple and easily found online.
- Lacks social listening: Does not listen to social media pages to detect question leaks.
iMocha Pricing
iMocha does not publicly display its pricing. You need to contact their sales team for a quote. This lack of pricing transparency can be a barrier for companies that prefer to evaluate costs upfront. Also, they do not offer a free trial for users unlike Adaface Assessments Pricing.

7. Evalart
Best for: Skills assessment with coding

Evalart offers a platform for assessing candidate skills, including aptitude, personality, and language proficiency. They also provide coding assessments, setting them apart from Hire Success, which lacks coding tests.
While Hire Success offers aptitude and personality tests, it falls short in technical assessments. Evalart bridges this gap with coding questions, allowing you to evaluate a candidate's practical coding abilities. This is especially useful for tech roles where hands-on experience is key.
However, Evalart focuses solely on coding questions and doesn't provide scenario-based multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for programming concepts. A solution like Adaface combines coding questions with scenario-based MCQs, offering a more versatile assessment of programming skills.
How Evalart compares to Hire Success?
Key Features
- Coding assessments with SQL support
- Aptitude and personality tests available
- Custom questions can be added
Evalart Pros
- Supports a wide range of assessments including aptitude, personality, and languages.
- Offers coding assessments, which is a plus for technical roles.
- Allows adding custom questions to tailor assessments.
Evalart Cons
- No support for business tests or job-specific tests.
- Lacks coding questions with scenario-based MCQs which Adaface offers.
- Important enterprise features like custom API, priority support and multiple question sets are not supported.
- Key proctoring features such as location logging, IP proctoring, device fingerprinting and chat GPT protection are missing.
Evalart Pricing
Evalart offers a free trial for one month. However, pricing details are not publicly available; you need to contact their sales team to get a quote.

8. AssessFirst
Best for: Personality-driven talent acquisition

AssessFirst offers a suite of personality assessments designed to predict job performance and fit. They aim to help businesses make better hiring decisions by understanding candidate traits, motivations, and potential.
While Hire Success focuses on aptitude and personality, AssessFirst aims at providing personality insights. However, AssessFirst doesn't offer coding, AI, finance, language and other skill based assessments making it limited to certain roles.
AssessFirst's tests are also quite short, around 10 minutes, which might not provide enough data to create a complete candidate profile. For a more thorough and accurate picture of a candidate's abilities, a slightly longer assessment, like the 40-minute assessments offered by Adaface, can be more insightful.
How AssessFirst compares to Hire Success?
Key Features
- Personality assessments to predict job fit.
- Gamified candidate experience.
- Reporting and analytics to understand team dynamics.
AssessFirst Pros
- Offers insights into candidate personality and motivations.
- Provides a user-friendly interface for candidates.
- Includes reporting features to analyze team composition.
- Integrates with various ATS platforms for streamlined workflows.
- Helps reduce hiring bias by focusing on personality traits.
AssessFirst Cons
- Lacks skills-based assessments like coding, finance, and AI. Meaning you might need to use it with other tools.
- Shorter assessment length (10 minutes) may not provide a complete candidate profile.
- No custom question support.
- No proctoring features to prevent cheating during assessments.
AssessFirst Pricing
AssessFirst doesn't publicly display its pricing, requiring potential customers to contact them for a quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to compare costs upfront. If you are someone who's keen on pricing being straight forward with no need for sales calls, this could be something to keep in mind.

9. Prevue Assessments
Best for: Personality & aptitude assessments
Prevue Assessments offers personality, abilities, and engagement assessments to help you identify the right fit for your organization. They aim to provide insights into a candidate's potential success and job satisfaction.
Unlike Hire Success, Prevue provides situational judgment tests. This allows to assess how candidates might react to real-world scenarios, offering a glimpse into their problem-solving and decision-making skills.
However, Prevue Assessments does not offer programming tests. When hiring for technical roles, assessing coding skills is a must. For companies needing to evaluate coding skills, a platform like Adaface becomes a necessity to ensure a thorough evaluation.
How Prevue Assessments compares to Hire Success?
Key Features
- Personality assessments: Measure traits relevant to job performance.
- Aptitude tests: Evaluate cognitive abilities like numerical and verbal reasoning.
- Engagement surveys: Gauge employee satisfaction and identify areas for improvement.
Prevue Assessments Pros
- Offers a wide range of assessments including personality, aptitude and engagement.
- Provides reports with insights into candidate fit and potential.
- ATS integrations are available for streamlined workflows.
- Customizable invitation templates for better branding.
- Benchmarking feature to compare candidates.
Prevue Assessments Cons
- No coding assessments for technical roles.
- Lacks web and webcam proctoring for test security.
- No custom question creation.
- Limited language support.
Prevue Assessments Pricing
Prevue Assessments does not publicly display its pricing. You'll need to contact their team for a quote, which can add an extra step to your evaluation process. This can make it harder to quickly compare costs with other online assessment platform vendors.

10. Aon
Best for: End-to-end talent solutions
Aon offers a suite of assessment solutions designed to help organizations identify and develop talent. Unlike Hire Success, which primarily focuses on skills assessment, Aon provides a broader range of services that extend beyond initial screening.
Aon's strength lies in its ability to deliver end-to-end talent solutions. While Hire Success offers a limited scope with no programming tests or situational judgment tests, Aon provides a wider variety of assessments, including programming and situational judgment. This allows for a more complete evaluation of a candidate's potential.
Furthermore, Aon's assessment tools are designed to integrate into larger talent management strategies, offering insights that inform hiring, development, and succession planning. This makes Aon a strong consideration for organizations seeking a partner for complete talent management needs.
How Aon compares to Hire Success?
Key Features
- Aptitude, personality, and skills assessments
- Leadership assessment and development tools
- Data-driven insights for talent decisions
Aon Pros
- Wide variety of assessments, covering aptitude, personality, and job-specific skills.
- Strong focus on data-driven insights to inform talent decisions.
- ATS Integrations to streamline hiring workflows.
- Assessments are mobile-friendly, increasing candidate accessibility.
- Multiple question sets to minimize question leakage.
Aon Cons
- No typing tests are available.
- No custom questions or custom coding questions.
- Limited customer support options with no live chat.
- No PDF reports or public reports available.
Aon Pricing
Aon does not publicly disclose pricing details. Interested users need to contact Aon's sales team to get a quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult for organizations to compare Aon's pricing with other assessment providers quickly. Unlike Adaface Assessments Pricing, which offers transparent pricing plans, Aon requires a direct inquiry.

Found Your Perfect Hire Success Alternative?
Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:
- Adaface stands out with its extensive test library (500+ skills!), covering everything from aptitude and personality to technical, AI, and even typing skills. It's used by clients across 70+ countries and offers a strong proctoring suite, all without seat-based pricing. Tests are designed with science to be non-googleable and non-GPT-able.
- CodeSignal is focused on technical assessments, offering coding tests and automated scoring. However, it lacks assessments for aptitude, personality, or business skills, and tests can be lengthy (2 hours).
- Pymetrics uses neuroscience-based games to assess aptitude and personality, but it doesn't offer coding or job-specific skill tests.
- Devskiller is another tech-focused platform with coding questions and project-based tasks. Unlike Hire Success, it assess cloud skills, but doesn't offer personality or aptitude tests.
- Hackerrank is a popular platform for technical hiring, offering coding challenges and assessments for IT roles. Tests can be lengthy, and the default questions can be easily found online.
- iMocha offers a broad range of assessments, including aptitude, business, and technical skills. However, their questions can be easily searchable on Google, potentially compromising test integrity.
- Evalart provides coding, aptitude, and personality tests, but lacks scenario-based MCQs for programming skills.
- AssessFirst focuses on personality and aptitude assessments, offering insights into candidate behavior. However, it doesn't offer coding or job-specific skill tests.
- Prevue Assessments combines aptitude, personality, and situational judgment tests for a broad candidate overview. However, they do not have programming tests.
- Aon provides aptitude, personality, and coding assessments, but lacks details on custom questions and test customization.
We've explored a variety of Hire Success alternatives, each with its own strengths. Selecting the right assessment tool is key to streamlining your hiring process.
Hire Success shines with its aptitude and personality tests. However, it lacks in key areas like programming, business, AI and finance skill assessment. It also doesn't offer webcam proctoring, a critical feature for maintaining test integrity.
Thankfully, there are strong contenders in the market. Many of the alternatives (first among them being Adaface) can help you achieve your goals. Adaface and others provide a broader spectrum of assessment types, robust proctoring, and features tailored to diverse hiring needs.
No matter your specific use case - whether it's technical roles, aptitude, personality or even typing, you can rely on the alternatives to Hire Success.
Ready to elevate your hiring game? Explore Adaface Assessments Pricing and see how you can screen candidates with 500+ skills!

40 min skill tests.
No trick questions.
Accurate shortlisting.
We make it easy for you to find the best candidates in your pipeline with a 40 min skills test.
Try for free
