10 123test Alternatives: Top Picks by Features, Usability, and Pricing

Why are companies seeking alternatives to 123test for their hiring needs?

I did some digging to understand why HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers are exploring options beyond 123test. Turns out, there are a few common sticking points.

Limited test types and topics. 123test primarily focuses on aptitude and personality assessments, potentially leaving gaps in evaluating candidates for roles requiring specific skills like programming, finance, or even typing. If you need to assess a broader range of skills, you might find yourself needing multiple platforms or settling for incomplete evaluations.

Lack of advanced proctoring. While 123test does offer timed tests, it lacks more advanced proctoring features like webcam monitoring, screen recording, or copy-paste disabling. This can be a concern if you're hiring for roles where test integrity is paramount and you want to minimize the risk of cheating.

Limited customization and branding. 123test does not offer options to add your company logo, use brand colors, or customize invitation templates. This can result in a generic candidate experience, potentially missing opportunities to reinforce your brand during the assessment process. A branded experience makes it professional.

1. Adaface

Best for: Skill-based hiring for technical, aptitude, business and personality roles.

123test is popular for offering personality and aptitude tests, but it lacks the depth and breadth required for skill-based hiring. If you're seeking a strong alternative, Adaface offers a more versatile and reliable solution.

One major drawback of 123test is its limited anti-cheating measures. In today's remote hiring landscape, ensuring test integrity is paramount. Adaface addresses this concern with a suite of proctoring features, including webcam monitoring, window and tab tracking, IP address logging, and copy-paste disabling. This provides recruiters with confidence in the assessment results.

Adaface provides more than just basic aptitude and personality assessments. Consider these features that make Adaface a stronger alternative:

• Extensive test library covering 500+ skills and roles.
• Tests for technical skills, business acumen, aptitude, and personality.
• Advanced proctoring features to maintain test integrity.
• Company branding to create a better candidate experience.
• Detailed scorecards and reporting for data-driven decisions.
• Integration with popular ATS platforms for seamless workflows.

Advanced Proctoring for Secure Assessments

Adaface's proctoring suite ensures test integrity and minimizes cheating. It includes webcam proctoring, which records the candidate's video during the test, and window/tab tracking, which detects if a candidate navigates away from the test window.

Additionally, Adaface logs the IP address of the candidate and offers copy-paste protection to prevent plagiarism. These measures combine to provide a secure and reliable assessment experience, giving recruiters confidence in the results.

Extensive Test Library for Diverse Roles

Adaface offers a wide array of tests beyond the aptitude and personality assessments offered by 123test. Our test library covers 500+ skills and roles, including technical skills, business skills, and aptitude.

For instance, we have tests for Excel, Finance, Accounting, and various software proficiencies. We also support multiple language tests, including English, French, German, Italian, and Spanish, across all proficiency levels. Whether you're hiring for a developer role requiring Coding Tests or a business role, Adaface has you covered.

Adaface vs 123test Attributes

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests on technical skills, cognitive abilities, language proficiency, and more
• Extensive ATS integrations and the possibility to build custom integrations
• Customizable assessments
• Excellent anti-cheating measures
• Bulk candidate management
• Tests available in multiple languages
• Regular updates and quality checks on tests

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and tiered Adaface Assessments Pricing plans to suit different hiring needs. A free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits is available to explore the platform. All pricing plans include all proctoring features and access to 500+ tests. The self-serve plans include Individual ($180/yr), Starter ($500/yr), Pro ($900/yr), Scale ($3000/yr), Growth ($5500/yr), Enterprise ($20,000/year), and Unlimited ($50000/yr). No credit card is required to start the free trial.

2. Alva Labs

Best for: Data-driven talent acquisition platform

Alva Labs offers a platform combining behavioral science and data to help companies make better hiring decisions. They aim to predict candidate success using personality and aptitude assessments.

Unlike 123test, which focuses primarily on aptitude and personality tests, Alva Labs attempts to provide a more in-depth analysis. While 123test offers general assessments, Alva Labs includes coding questions, web framework questions, and mobile framework questions that provide hands-on data.

This can be particularly helpful when you need more than just a surface-level understanding of a candidate's capabilities, especially for technical roles. However, remember that Alva Labs does not offer custom questions, unlike platforms like Adaface that allow tailoring assessments.

How Alva Labs compares to 123test?

Key Features

• Aptitude and Personality Assessments: Evaluation of cognitive abilities and personality traits.
• Coding assessments: Tests for evaluating programming skills, including web and mobile frameworks.
• Automated scoring: Efficient, AI driven scoring for objective candidate comparison.

Alva Labs Pros

• Good ATS integrations to streamline workflows.
• Skills Profile: Easy to understand overview of candidate strengths.
• Benchmarking: Enables easy comparison of candidate performance.
• Multiple Invite options: Flexible sending of invites via email or public link.
• Reporting: Automated report generation for quick analysis

Alva Labs Cons

• No custom questions to test role-specific skills.
• Lengthy Assessments: Candidates could be taking assessments for upto 2 hours, leading to drop offs.
• Limited proctoring capabilities: No webcam, window or IP proctoring.
• Lack of social listening: No plagiarism checks to ensure high quality tests.

Alva Labs Pricing

Alva Labs offers a tiered pricing structure. Starter plans begin at $289 per month, with scale plans at $799 per month. For larger enterprise solutions, you'll need to contact Alva Labs directly for pricing details.

3. CodeSignal

Best for: Tech skill screening precisely

CodeSignal focuses on technical assessment, offering a platform to evaluate coding skills. While 123test offers a breadth of general aptitude and personality tests, CodeSignal dives deep into the world of code, algorithms, and system design. Time to put on your coding glasses!

If you're laser-focused on hiring developers and tech talent, CodeSignal brings some serious heat to the table. Unlike 123test, which lacks coding assessments, CodeSignal lets you assess candidates' coding abilities with coding challenges and integrated development environments (IDEs).

This can be particularly helpful for roles where hands-on coding experience is needed. If you are looking for candidates with business acumen, aptitude, and personality, consider using Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests.

How CodeSignal compares to 123test?

Key Features

• Coding Assessments: Evaluate candidates on coding skills with challenges in various languages.
• Integrated Development Environment (IDE): Provides a real-world coding environment for candidates.
• Skills-Based Badges: Candidates can earn badges to show proficiency in specific skills.

CodeSignal Pros

• Strong focus on technical skills assessment.
• Offers a coding environment that mimics real-world scenarios.
• Automated scoring saves time and resources.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.
• Public reports offer ease of sharing

CodeSignal Cons

• Lacks assessments for soft skills and personality traits.
• No support for custom question creation, limiting test tailoring.
• Focus is primarily on coding, missing other business skill assessments.
• Pricing is not transparent, requiring a sales call to obtain a quote.

CodeSignal Pricing

CodeSignal does not offer transparent pricing on their website. You need to contact their sales team for a custom quote. They also do not offer a free trial, making it hard to test the platform before committing.

4. TalView

Best for: Versatile talent assessment platform

TalView offers a platform designed to streamline your hiring process through assessments, video interviewing, and remote proctoring. It aims to provide a unified solution for evaluating candidates across various skills and competencies.

Unlike 123test, which mainly focuses on aptitude and personality tests, TalView offers a broader range of assessment types, including programming and job-specific tests. This makes TalView a better choice when you need to assess candidates on more technical or role-specific skills.

TalView's features such as video interviewing and remote hiring capabilities also give it an edge over 123test, offering a more interactive and comprehensive evaluation process. This is particularly useful for roles that require strong communication or collaboration skills.

How TalView compares to 123test?

Key Features

• Video Interviewing: Conduct one-way or live video interviews to assess communication and soft skills.
• Remote Proctoring: Ensure test integrity with features like webcam monitoring and browser lock-down.
• Skills Assessment: Evaluate candidates across a range of skills, including coding, aptitude, and personality.

TalView Pros

• Wide Range of Assessments: Supports varied assessment types, including programming, aptitude, and personality tests.
• Video Interviewing: Facilitates virtual interviews for assessing soft skills and communication.
• Remote Proctoring: Helps maintain test integrity and prevent cheating.
• ATS Integrations: Integrates with various Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) for seamless workflow.
• Comprehensive Overview: Provides a consolidated view of candidate performance across different skills.

TalView Cons

• No Typing Tests: Lacks support for evaluating typing skills.
• Mobile Unfriendly: The secure browser requirement limits mobile accessibility.
• Pricing Transparency: Pricing information is not readily available on their website, requiring you to contact sales.
• Limited Test Customization: Doesn't support customized tests per job description unlike Adaface Assessments Pricing.

TalView Pricing

TalView does not publicly list its pricing. To get a quote, you need to fill out a form on their website and speak with their sales team. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly assess whether TalView fits your budget, especially when compared to platforms with readily available pricing.

5. Testgorilla

Best for: Skills assessment for various roles

TestGorilla provides a wide array of pre-employment tests to assess candidates across various skills and job roles. It aims to streamline the hiring process by offering a platform to screen candidates based on skills, personality, and cognitive abilities.

Unlike 123test, TestGorilla offers a more extensive range of tests, including coding assessments and role-specific evaluations, making it suitable for diverse hiring needs. While 123test primarily focuses on personality and aptitude tests, TestGorilla dives deeper into practical skills.

This makes TestGorilla a better choice for companies seeking a more thorough evaluation of candidates' abilities beyond basic aptitude. Where 123test offers a surface-level assessment, TestGorilla aims to provide a more complete picture of a candidate's capabilities, although customisation is limited.

How Testgorilla compares to 123test?

Key Features

• Wide range of tests covering cognitive ability, programming, and personality.
• Video interviews to assess soft skills and communication.
• Automated scoring to streamline the evaluation process.

Testgorilla Pros

• Large test library covering various skills.
• Offers coding tests to assess technical skills.
• Provides video interviews for better candidate understanding.
• ATS integrations for streamlined workflow.
• GDPR compliant.

Testgorilla Cons

• Lacks custom question creation.
• No dedicated AI and data science skill tests.
• Questions can be solved easily by GPT models.
• No custom data location support.

Testgorilla Pricing

TestGorilla's pricing scales with company size. For smaller teams, plans start at $75/month (billed annually). For larger organizations (31-50 employees), plans range from $208 to $310 per month (billed annually). For enterprise-level solutions, you'll need to contact TestGorilla directly for a custom quote. They do offer a free trial to get a feel for the platform.

6. Evalart

Best for: Skills assessment and certifications

Evalart is another platform offering pre-employment assessments, focusing on evaluating candidates across diverse skill sets. It provides tools for creating and conducting tests, aiming to streamline the hiring process.

Unlike 123test, Evalart supports coding assessments, allowing you to test candidates' programming skills. However, these are limited to coding questions only.

If you're seeking a platform that assesses both theoretical knowledge and practical application through scenario-based questions and coding challenges, Evalart might fall short.

How Evalart compares to 123test?

Key Features

• Skills Testing: Offers a range of pre-built tests and the ability to add your own questions.
• Candidate Management: Manages candidates and tracks their progress through the assessment process.
• Reporting: Provides reports on candidate performance.

Evalart Pros

• Supports webcam proctoring for enhanced test security.
• Offers a one-month free trial to explore the platform.
• Allows adding custom questions to tailor assessments.
• Provides integrations with other platforms (details unknown).
• Supports multiple invite options for candidates.

Evalart Cons

• Lacks scenario-based questions, limiting the depth of skill assessment.
• Does not offer custom test creation based on job descriptions.
• No company branding options are available.
• No social listening for task leaks or candidate feedback integration.

Evalart Pricing

Evalart does offer a free trial for one month. However, they don't publicly list their pricing. To get a quote, you'll need to contact their sales team. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly assess whether Evalart fits your budget, unlike Adaface Assessments Pricing.

7. iMocha

Best for: Skills-based talent assessments

iMocha offers skill assessment and skill intelligence features that enable companies to evaluate the current skills of their workforce. This also includes planning for future needs, and closing skill gaps through recruitment. Unlike 123test, iMocha helps manage and develop skills within your organization through its skill intelligence system.

While 123test offers a limited scope of assessment types, primarily focusing on aptitude and personality, iMocha provides a broader spectrum, including programming, AI, cloud, and business skills assessments. This makes iMocha a more viable option for companies seeking a versatile tool to evaluate candidates across diverse roles.

Moreover, iMocha incorporates features like coding questions and web/webcam proctoring, which are absent in 123test. These additional layers of assessment and security make iMocha suitable for roles requiring advanced technical skills and a high level of test integrity.

How iMocha compares to 123test?

Key Features

• Wide range of assessments: Access a broad library covering technical, aptitude, and business skills.
• Coding assessments: Evaluate candidates' coding skills with a built-in IDE and automated scoring.
• Proctoring features: Ensure test integrity with webcam, window, and IP proctoring.

iMocha Pros

• Extensive skill assessment library, including niche tech skills.
• Strong proctoring features to maintain test integrity.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms for smooth workflow.
• Offers skill analytics to identify skill gaps.
• Customizable invitation templates to reflect company branding.

iMocha Cons

• Lacks custom question creation.
• No free trial is available, making it difficult to test the platform before committing.
• Limited language support compared to some alternatives.
• Doesn't provide candidate feedback or social listening for task leaks, which is important for test quality.

iMocha Pricing

iMocha does not publicly display pricing; you'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. This lack of transparency can make comparing costs tricky. Unlike platforms like Adaface Assessments Pricing which offer clear, tiered pricing, you won't know where you stand until you connect with sales.

8. Otomeyt

Best for: Technical Hiring Assessments Simplified

Otomeyt specializes in technical assessments, providing a platform to evaluate candidates' coding abilities. While 123test offers a broader range of tests, Otomeyt hones in on programming skills, making it suitable for organizations primarily focused on tech roles.

Otomeyt helps in assessing the practical coding skills of candidates, a feature absent in 123test. This is achieved through coding questions that evaluate a developer's ability to write and debug code.

Unlike 123test, Otomeyt gives the option to add custom questions. This allows the company to validate coding skills for in-house softwares. With Adaface's online assessment platform, you get coding questions and scenario based questions for complete understanding of candidate's programming knowledge.

How Otomeyt compares to 123test?

Key Features

• Coding Assessments: Evaluate candidates with coding challenges in various programming languages.
• Custom Questions: Add your own questions to the platform.
• ATS Integrations: Otomeyt can be integrated to most Applicant Tracking Systems.

Otomeyt Pros

• Strong focus on coding skills.
• Ready-to-use tests available.
• Automated scoring saves time.
• Offers custom coding questions.
• GDPR Compliant.

Otomeyt Cons

• Lacks assessments for business, finance, or other non-technical roles.
• No mobile-friendly testing experience.
• No support for Excel or SQL coding questions. With Adaface assessments pricing, you are empowered with excel and sql tests as well.
• No conversational assessments.

Otomeyt Pricing

Otomeyt does not publicly display its pricing. To get a quote, you'll need to contact their team for a custom pricing plan. No free trial, so testing the waters before diving in isn't an option.

9. Cangrade

Best for: Predictive Talent Selection Solution

Cangrade positions itself as more than just an assessment platform; it aims to predict candidate success using AI and data-driven insights. While 123test offers a range of tests, Cangrade focuses on predicting job performance and employee retention.

One key area where Cangrade differentiates itself is in its predictive capabilities. Unlike 123test, which primarily measures skills and personality traits, Cangrade uses AI to analyze how candidates will perform and stay at a company. This can be useful for companies looking to reduce turnover and improve hiring outcomes.

Furthermore, Cangrade emphasizes its ability to customize assessments based on job descriptions, similar to how Adaface crafts tailored assessments. This focus on customization ensures that the assessments are relevant to the specific role and company, providing a more accurate prediction of candidate success.

How Cangrade compares to 123test?

Key Features

• AI-powered predictive analytics
• Customized assessments based on job descriptions
• Candidate fit scoring

Cangrade Pros

• Claims improved hiring outcomes through predictive analytics.
• Helps reduce employee turnover.
• Offers some level of job-specific customization.
• Provides insights into candidate fit beyond just skills.
• Integrates background and personality assessments.

Cangrade Cons

• Limited transparency in AI algorithms (a black box).
• Focus is primarily on predicting ‘fit,’ potentially overlooking skill gaps.
• No coding questions, SQL tests or excel tests.
• Lack of social listening for task leaks and candidate feedback for test improvement

Cangrade Pricing

Cangrade does not offer transparent pricing on their website. You must contact them for a consultation to receive a quote. They also don't provide a free trial for users to test out their platform before commiting to a subscription.

10. Plum

Best for: Personality-based talent matching

Plum offers a unique approach to pre-employment assessments by focusing on personality traits and matching candidates to roles where they're most likely to thrive. It aims to predict job performance and team fit based on a candidate's behavioral patterns.

Unlike 123test, which primarily focuses on skills and aptitude, Plum emphasizes personality assessments to determine how well a candidate aligns with a company's culture and values. This can be useful for roles where soft skills and interpersonal abilities are paramount.

However, Plum lacks the ability to assess specific skills like coding, finance or language proficiency. So, if you need to evaluate a candidate's hard skills, you might need to look for a different solution like Adaface.

How Plum compares to 123test?

Key Features

• Personality assessments: Evaluates candidates based on personality traits and behavioral tendencies.
• Job matching: Matches candidates to specific roles based on personality alignment.
• Team fit analysis: Assesses how well a candidate will integrate into an existing team.

Plum Pros

• Predicts job performance based on personality.
• Helps in identifying candidates who are a good fit for the company culture.
• Provides insights into a candidate's strengths and weaknesses.
• Integrates with various ATS platforms.
• Offers a user-friendly interface.

Plum Cons

• Limited ability to assess technical skills.
• Focuses heavily on personality, which may not be relevant for all roles.
• Lacks proctoring features, raising concerns about test integrity.
• Doesn't provide options for custom questions to assess beyond personality.

Plum Pricing

Plum does not publicly display its pricing. You'll need to contact them directly for a quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to compare Plum with other assessment solutions without investing time in a sales call.

Found Your Perfect 123test Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface stands out with its extensive test library of 500+ tests, covering aptitude, finance, personality, business, technical and coding roles. Plus, enjoy strong proctoring and transparent credit-based pricing.
• Alva Labs is a fit for IT roles, offering programming tests and customisable branding. Keep in mind the assessments can be quite lengthy, around 2 hours.
• CodeSignal focuses on tech skills, offering coding assessments and integration with ATS. Note that you need to contact the sales team to even explore the tool.
• Talview offers a broad range of tests, including aptitude, business skills and finance. Their API allows integrations with other systems.
• TestGorilla has a large test library including aptitude, personality, and skill-based assessments, and offers customisable tests.
• Evalart provides coding assessments, including SQL coding questions, and supports multiple languages.
• iMocha features a library covering a wide array of skills from aptitude to AI. However, their questions tend to be easily googleable.
• Otomeyt is mainly for assessing coding skills, focusing on coding-related job-specific tests.
• Cangrade provides coding and aptitude tests, customisable tests, and support for mobile-friendliness.
• Plum focuses on aptitude and personality assessments, with the ability to integrate with ATS systems.

Choosing the right assessment platform is a big deal for your hiring. We've explored several alternatives to 123test, each bringing something unique to the table.

123test shines with its straightforward approach and free tests. However, its limited features like lack of coding questions, customisation, and proctoring might leave you wanting more, especially if you're serious about skills-based hiring.

But hey, the good news is there are great alternatives waiting to be explored. Take Adaface, for instance, with its wide range of tests and strong proctoring, its a stellar fit.

No matter what you're looking for – coding skills, aptitude, or even personality insights – remember, there's a 123test alternative out there ready to make your hiring process a whole lot smoother, Adaface being one of them.

Ready to ditch the ordinary and embrace hiring? Give Adaface a whirl today!