Top 10 Realcoderz Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why are hiring teams seeking alternatives to Realcoderz?

If you're exploring options beyond Realcoderz, you're not alone. I've done a bit of digging to understand what's driving HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers to look elsewhere. Here are a few common sticking points:

Limited test types beyond coding. While Realcoderz focuses on coding assessments, many roles require a broader evaluation. If you need to assess aptitude, personality, or even typing skills, you might find their offerings restrictive. An ideal assessment platform should offer a wide range of tests to cover various skills.

Lack of customization can be a problem. Realcoderz may not offer the ability to add your own questions or customize tests based on specific job descriptions. This can be limiting if you need to assess skills specific to your company or industry. Being able to tailor the assessment to your unique needs is key for accurate evaluation.

Limited ATS integrations. Integrating your assessment platform with your Applicant Tracking System (ATS) can streamline your hiring process. Without these integrations, you might be stuck with manual data entry and a clunkier workflow. Seamless integration is a game-changer for larger organizations and those focused on maximizing their remote hiring process.

1. Adaface

Best for: Assess candidates across both technical and business roles

Looking for a strong Realcoderz alternative? Adaface offers a versatile and reliable platform to assess your candidate pool effectively.

One significant limitation of Realcoderz is its limited scope, primarily focusing on programming skills. Adaface addresses this gap by providing a wider test library, encompassing aptitude, personality, and business-related skills. This allows for a more thorough evaluation of candidates, irrespective of their role, leading to better hiring decisions.

Adaface stands out with its range of features designed for a seamless screening process:

• 500+ skills tests, covering technical skills, aptitude, and personality
• Assessments for both developer and business roles
• A strong proctoring suite for cheating detection
• Company branding to enhance candidate experience
• Scorecards reporting and analytics to assess candidate performance
• Pricing options suitable for enterprises and startups

A Robust Proctoring Suite

Adaface offers a complete proctoring suite to ensure test integrity. This includes webcam proctoring, which records the candidate's video, and web proctoring, which tracks browser tab and window activity.

Additionally, the platform incorporates IP address and device fingerprint tracking to flag suspicious activity. Copy-paste protection and the option for full-screen proctoring further enhance security, preventing candidates from cheating and ensuring accurate results. With our protection, you can focus on finding the best fit.

Transparent and Fair Pricing

Adaface believes in pricing that scales with your needs, not your team size. Unlike some competitors, we don't charge per seat, making it more affordable for growing companies.

Our pricing is credit-based, giving you the flexibility to assess as many candidates as you need without surprise costs. Plus, all pricing plans include all proctoring features and access to all 500+ tests, so you don't have to compromise on quality. Check out our pricing page to learn more.

Adaface vs Realcoderz Attributes

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests on technical skills, cognitive abilities, language proficiency, and more
• Extensive ATS integrations and the possibility to build custom integrations
• Customizable assessments to match specific job descriptions
• Strong proctoring measures for cheating detection
• Candidate-friendly conversational assessments
• Tests available in multiple languages
• Regular updates and quality checks on tests

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit your hiring needs. You can try out the platform with a free trial, which includes 2 sample tests and 5 credits, no credit card required. Our self-serve platform offers various plans, including Individual ($180/yr), Starter ($500/yr), Pro ($900/yr), Scale ($3000/yr), Growth ($5500/yr), Enterprise ($20,000/yr), and Unlimited ($50,000/yr). All pricing plans include all proctoring features and access to 500+ tests.

2. TestDome

Best for: Skills assessment diverse roles

TestDome offers a platform for assessing candidates across various skills, including programming, data science, and general aptitude. It allows for customization of tests, focusing on evaluating specific skill sets for different roles.

Unlike Realcoderz, TestDome provides a broader range of assessments beyond just programming skills. This makes it suitable for evaluating candidates for diverse roles within an organization.

While Realcoderz focuses mainly on coding skills, TestDome helps assess candidates for roles requiring aptitude, business acumen, and even personality traits. This is a more practical approach to pre-employment screening, ensuring a better fit.

How TestDome compares to Realcoderz?

Key Features

• Customizable Tests: Tailor assessments to fit specific job requirements.
• Video and Live Coding Interviews: Conduct virtual interviews and coding sessions.
• Wide Range of Skills: Evaluate candidates on programming, aptitude, and more.

TestDome Pros

• Extensive Test Library: A wide variety of tests across different skill domains.
• Affordable Pricing: Cost-effective, starting at $20 per candidate.
• Video Interview Support: Integrated video interviewing capabilities.
• Customizable Questions: Add your own questions to tailor assessments.
• Strong Focus on Skills: Evaluates applicants' abilities in many areas.

TestDome Cons

• No Custom Test Creation: You can't create new tests from scratch.
• Limited Candidate Support: Lacks live chat and phone assistance for candidates.
• No Detailed Skill Analysis: Doesn't break down candidate performance skill-wise.
• Lacks Advanced Proctoring: Lacks device fingerprint and IP proctoring, unlike Adaface's proctoring.

TestDome Pricing

TestDome's pricing is based on a per-candidate model, starting at $20 per candidate with a minimum purchase. While they do provide a free trial, they do not offer unlimited plans or custom enterprise pricing.

3. Testgorilla

Best for: Quick, broad skill assessment

TestGorilla offers a wide range of pre-employment assessment tests designed to evaluate candidates across various skills and competencies. It aims to streamline the hiring process by providing tools to screen candidates early on.

While Realcoderz focuses mainly on coding skills, TestGorilla broadens the spectrum. It provides assessments for personality, aptitude, and even language proficiency, giving you a more complete picture of your candidates.

However, TestGorilla doesn't offer custom questions or tailor tests to specific job descriptions. This can be a drawback if you need assessments that mirror the exact challenges a candidate will face in their role. For truly tailored pre-employment assessment tests, other solutions might be a better fit.

How Testgorilla compares to Realcoderz?

Key Features

• Ready-made test library: Extensive selection of tests covering cognitive ability, personality, and job-specific skills.
• Candidate ranking: Automatically ranks candidates based on test scores.
• Video interviews: Integrated video interviewing to assess soft skills.

Testgorilla Pros

• Large test library covering a variety of skills.
• User-friendly interface that's easy to navigate.
• Offers webcam proctoring to prevent cheating.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.
• Reasonably priced, especially for smaller teams.

Testgorilla Cons

• Limited customization options for creating unique tests.
• Lacks AI specific assessments.
• Doesn't offer coding questions in excel workbooks.
• No custom API to build a tighter integration into your workflows.

Testgorilla Pricing

TestGorilla's pricing is based on company size. Plans range from $75/month for very small teams (1-15 employees) to custom pricing for larger enterprises. While they offer a free trial, unlimited assessments are restricted by a fair use policy. The pricing scales w.r.t your employee size.

4. Codility

Best for: Technical skill screening at scale

Codility focuses on assessing coding skills, primarily catering to tech companies seeking to evaluate developers. It provides a platform to test coding skills, offering coding tasks and project-based assessments.

Unlike Realcoderz, Codility provides the ability to add your own questions.

However, Codility assessments are lengthy. So if you are looking for a comprehensive library across skills like aptitude, personality, communication along with coding skills, you might need to look for other options.

How Codility compares to Realcoderz?

Key Features

• Coding skill assessment
• Custom task creation
• Automated scoring

Codility Pros

• Wide range of coding tasks and languages supported.
• Automated scoring saves time in evaluation.
• Integrates with some popular ATS platforms.
• Offers a developer certification program.
• Provides detailed reporting on candidate performance.

Codility Cons

• Focuses almost exclusively on coding skills, neglecting other important aspects like aptitude or personality.
• Assessments can be time-intensive for candidates, leading to drop-offs.
• Lacks support for custom data locations which enterprises need for compliance.
• No support for Excel or workbook questions, limiting the scope of skill assessment.

Codility Pricing

Codility's pricing isn't publicly available for all plans. They have a starter plan at $1200 per annum and a scale plan at $5000 per annum. For custom or growth plans, you need to contact their sales team to discuss your specific needs. They do offer a free trial, but you have to fill out a form and wait for approval, unlike Adaface Assessments Pricing.

5. Qualified

Best for: Technical Hiring, Cloud roles

Qualified is a platform focusing on assessing technical skills, particularly in software development and cloud-related roles. It aims to help companies identify top engineering talent through coding challenges and projects.

While Realcoderz offers coding assessments, Qualified expands this with a focus on real-world scenarios and cloud skills. Qualified helps assess not just coding abilities, but also the practical application of those skills in a cloud environment.

Unlike Realcoderz, Qualified, however, does not support custom questions or tailored assessments per job description. If you need to test candidates on unique business scenarios, tools like Adaface might be a better fit.

How Qualified compares to Realcoderz?

Key Features

• Real-world coding challenges
• Assessment of cloud skills
• Code playback feature

Qualified Pros

• Strong focus on technical skills.
• Supports assessment for cloud-related roles.
• Has code playback feature for accurate evaluation.
• Offers integrations with applicant tracking systems (ATS).
• Provides PDF reports for easy sharing.

Qualified Cons

• Limited scope beyond technical roles.
• No support for custom questions.
• Lacks assessments for aptitude and personality.
• Doesn't offer plagiarism detection.

Qualified Pricing

Qualified does not publicly display its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. They also do not have a free trial.

6. DevSkiller

Best for: Coding skill assessment platform

DevSkiller is a platform designed to assess the coding skills of developers. It provides a range of tests and tools to evaluate candidates' abilities in various programming languages and technologies, allowing recruiters to identify top tech talent. It offers coding tests, but that is it.

Realcoderz focuses on coding skills, however you are unable to add your own questions to diversify the skill assessment. DevSkiller lets you add your questions.

Compared to Realcoderz, DevSkiller allows custom tests per job description.

How DevSkiller compares to Realcoderz?

Key Features

• Online coding tests
• Task-based assessments
• Automated evaluation

DevSkiller Pros

• Supports multiple programming languages.
• Provides a variety of coding tasks.
• Offers automated scoring and reporting.
• Has integrations with some ATS platforms.
• Allows for custom questions to be added.

DevSkiller Cons

• Lacks assessments for aptitude, personality, and business skills. If you want a full picture of the candidate, you might need other tools.
• No support for excel/workbook simulation questions.
• No support for typing tests or language proficiency tests.
• No free trial available, making it difficult to evaluate the platform before committing.

DevSkiller Pricing

DevSkiller doesn't have pricing details on their website. You need to contact their team to get a quote. This lack of transparency can make it harder to budget and compare with other online assessment platform options.

7. Symphony Talent

Best for: End-to-end hiring solutions

Symphony Talent offers a platform designed to streamline the entire recruitment process, from employer branding to candidate assessment and onboarding. It aims to provide a unified experience for both recruiters and candidates.

Unlike Realcoderz, Symphony Talent extends beyond just coding assessments, offering a wider range of tools for talent acquisition. While Realcoderz focuses on technical skills, Symphony Talent includes features for marketing your employer brand and nurturing candidate relationships.

However, Symphony Talent lacks coding questions, SQL and Excel questions and more. If you are looking for a solution to cover all business skills, aptitude skills, coding skills, you should consider a platform like Adaface.

How Symphony Talent compares to Realcoderz?

Key Features

• Employer Branding: Tools to build and promote your company's brand to attract talent.
• Candidate Relationship Management (CRM): Features to nurture relationships with potential candidates.
• Talent Assessment: Aptitude, business and personality tests.

Symphony Talent Pros

• Offers a broad suite of tools covering many aspects of recruitment.
• Includes CRM capabilities for managing candidate interactions.
• Provides tools for employer branding to attract top talent.
• Ready-to-use tests are available for quick assessments.
• Good for businesses looking for a single platform to manage their entire hiring process.

Symphony Talent Cons

• Lacks coding questions and excel/sql evaluation, limiting its use for technical roles.
• Does not support custom data locations, which might be a concern for some enterprises.
• Doesn't provide a way for companies to have their logo and brand colors on the assessment platform to improve company branding.
• No free trial and pricing is scaled based on company size rather than usage, making it difficult for smaller companies to estimate costs.

Symphony Talent Pricing

Symphony Talent's pricing is scaled based on your company size, not usage. Starter plans begin at $990/year for companies with 1-15 employees. For companies with 101-200 employees, the cost is $13,200/year. Contact them directly for detailed enterprise pricing. They do not offer a free trial, so you'll need to schedule a consultation to learn more.

8. Alva Labs

Best for: Personality and Aptitude Assessments

Alva Labs offers a platform focused on personality and aptitude assessments, combined with coding tests for tech roles. It aims to predict candidate success by evaluating cognitive abilities and personality traits.

Realcoderz primarily focuses on coding assessments, potentially missing out on insights into a candidate's overall aptitude and personality. Alva Labs brings personality and aptitude assessments to the table, complementing their coding evaluations.

However, Alva Labs still lags behind solutions like Adaface in breadth. Alva Labs doesn't offer assessments for areas like situational judgment, business skills, or language proficiency. They also lack the ability to create custom questions, limiting adaptability for unique hiring scenarios.

How Alva Labs compares to Realcoderz?

Key Features

• Personality assessments based on the Big Five model.
• Cognitive ability tests to measure logical reasoning.
• Coding tests with code playback for review.

Alva Labs Pros

• Includes personality and aptitude testing.
• Supports coding assessments with playback.
• ATS integrations streamline workflow.
• Offers a free trial for exploration.
• Company branding options available.

Alva Labs Cons

• Lacks custom question creation.
• Assessment length can be up to 2 hours.
• No built-in plagiarism detection for code.
• Limited proctoring features compared to Adaface.

Alva Labs Pricing

Alva Labs offers a free trial and lists pricing for starter ($289/month) and scale ($799/month) plans on their website. For growth and enterprise plans, you'll need to contact Alva Labs directly.

9. Interviewer AI

Best for: AI-driven interview simulations

Interviewer AI offers a unique approach by simulating interviews using AI. Instead of relying solely on pre-set questions, it dynamically adjusts the conversation based on the candidate's responses, mimicking a real-world interview experience. It aims to assess not just skills, but also communication and problem-solving abilities in a more natural setting.

While Realcoderz focuses primarily on coding skills, Interviewer AI expands the scope to assess soft skills and communication alongside technical knowledge. This makes it suitable for roles where interaction and adaptability are important.

Unlike Realcoderz, Interviewer AI lets you add your custom questions, allowing tailoring the assessment to your specific needs. While it might not dive as deep into coding specifics without coding questions, it provides a broader evaluation for roles where coding is not the only important factor.

How Interviewer AI compares to Realcoderz?

Key Features

• AI-powered interview simulations
• Customizable interview questions
• Assesses communication and soft skills
• Generates detailed candidate reports

Interviewer AI Pros

• Simulates real-world interview scenarios.
• Assesses communication and soft skills along with technical knowledge.
• Provides detailed candidate reports.
• Integrates with existing ATS systems, streamlining the hiring process.
• Offers customizable assessments to fit specific job requirements.

Interviewer AI Cons

• Lacks coding questions to assess programming skills.
• Does not cover aptitude, finance, typing, language, and AI-specific skills like Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests.
• Pricing is not transparent and requires contacting sales.
• Limited question bank compared to other assessment platforms.

Interviewer AI Pricing

Interviewer AI does not publicly list its pricing. Interested users must sign up and contact their team to receive pricing details. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly evaluate whether it fits within your budget. Unlike some platforms, there's no option for a free trial to test out the full functionality, though they do offer mock interviews that you can try as a candidate.

10. Plum

Best for: Personality-based candidate matching

Plum offers a unique approach to pre-employment assessments by focusing on personality traits and cognitive abilities. Instead of skills-based assessments, Plum uses a personality survey to match candidates to jobs based on their fit with the role's requirements.

While Realcoderz primarily focuses on coding skills, Plum emphasizes understanding a candidate's inherent traits and how they align with the job and company culture. This is particularly useful for roles where personality and soft skills are important.

Unlike Realcoderz, Plum helps companies see beyond just technical proficiency and gauge whether a candidate possesses the behavioral traits needed for success. However, if you are looking for a platform to test for technical skills, you may be better served looking at platforms like Adaface.

How Plum compares to Realcoderz?

Key Features

• Top Performer Match: Identifies candidates with traits similar to the company's top performers.
• Personality Assessments: Evaluates candidates based on personality, not just skills.
• Talent Mapping: Visualizes team strengths and gaps based on personality data.

Plum Pros

• Focus on personality and fit.
• Integrates with popular ATS systems.
• Provides insights into team dynamics.
• Helps reduce unconscious bias in hiring.
• Streamlines hiring process.

Plum Cons

• Limited skills-based assessment options.
• May not be suitable for all roles.
• Relies heavily on personality assessments.
• No coding or technical skill assessments. Plum lacks in testing finance, typing, and language proficiency.

Plum Pricing

Plum does not publicly display its pricing. You need to contact them to get pricing information for your specific use case, which might be a hassle for smaller teams looking for quicker solutions. This also means there is no free trial to explore the platform's features before committing to a purchase.

Found Your Perfect Realcoderz Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface offers a high test library of 500+ tests covering aptitude, finance, personality, and technical roles, plus strong proctoring and transparent pricing that's not seat-based, making it ideal for global teams. It is used by clients from 70+ countries.
• TestDome provides diverse tests, including aptitude and business skills, but lacks custom questions.
• TestGorilla offers a wide range of tests, including typing and language skills, but doesn't allow custom questions.
• Codility focuses on coding skills with detailed code playback but lacks assessments beyond programming.
• Qualified-io offers coding skill assessment but lacks in aptitude, business, personality and other key skills.
• Devskiller assesses tech skills with custom questions but doesn't cover aptitude or business roles.
• Symphony Talent focuses on aptitude and business skills, providing custom questions, but lacks coding tests.
• Alva Labs offers programming and aptitude tests but lacks assessments for business and finance skills.
• Interviewer.ai is strong in custom questions and uses AI-powered interviews, but doesn't offer coding tests.
• Plum centers around aptitude and personality assessments but misses coding and business skill evaluations.

We've explored a range of alternatives to Realcoderz, each with its strengths. Realcoderz shines in programming assessments, offering coding challenges to evaluate tech skills.

However, its limited scope beyond coding, lack of customisation options, and unknown pricing can be a hurdle for many. Luckily, there are great options out there.

Consider platforms like Adaface, which provide a wide array of tests, including aptitude, finance, and even AI. These platforms offer customisation and integrations, which can make your hiring process much smoother.

No matter what your specific requirements are, you can find a tool that fits like a glove and will help you hire the best talent.

Ready to enhance your hiring process? Explore Adaface Assessments Pricing today!