Top 10 Qualified Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why are companies seeking alternatives to Qualified? Let's explore the reasons why hiring teams might be looking for a different solution.

I've done my homework to figure out why HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers are shopping around for options other than Qualified. Here's what I discovered.

Limited scope of assessments. Qualified primarily focuses on technical skills assessments. If your hiring needs extend beyond IT roles to include areas like aptitude, finance, or personality, you might find their test library lacking.

Lack of customization can be a pain. While Qualified offers ready-to-use tests, they don't provide much flexibility to tailor questions to your specific job descriptions or company culture. This can lead to a generic assessment experience that doesn't truly reflect the nuances of the role.

No built-in webcam proctoring. Maintaining test integrity is super important, especially in remote hiring. While Qualified offers web proctoring, it lacks webcam proctoring to monitor candidates during the assessment. This could make it harder to prevent cheating.

1. Adaface

Best for: Assess candidates across both technical and business roles with ease.

Looking for a strong alternative to Qualified? Adaface offers a well-rounded assessment platform that caters to a wide range of hiring needs.

Qualified is known for its focus on technical skills assessments. However, this can leave recruiters seeking a broader solution wanting more. Adaface bridges this gap by providing assessments for both technical and business roles, ensuring you can evaluate candidates across all departments with a single platform. From coding skills to aptitude and even personality traits, Adaface offers a more complete picture of your potential hires.

Adaface stands out with its commitment to candidate experience and comprehensive skill assessment. Here are a few of its key strengths:

• Extensive Test Library: 500+ tests covering technical, aptitude, business, and personality skills.
• Strong Proctoring Suite: Webcam, window, tab, IP, and device fingerprint proctoring to ensure test integrity.
• Company Branding: Customizable assessments with your logo and brand colors.
• Role-Based Access: Securely manage team access with role-based permissions.
• Multiple Question Sets: Minimize cheating with multiple sets of similar questions.
• Pricing Transparency: Clear and upfront pricing with a free trial to explore the platform.

Robust Proctoring for Reliable Results

Adaface understands the importance of test integrity. That's why we've implemented a suite of proctoring measures to prevent cheating and ensure accurate results.

Our proctoring suite includes webcam monitoring, screen recording, IP address tracking, and copy-paste disabling. We even offer Chat GPT protection to detect if candidates are using AI tools during the assessment. These features work together to provide a secure and fair testing environment, so you can trust the results you're seeing.

Furthermore, Adaface provides a detailed audit timeline, giving you complete transparency into the candidate's testing session. You can review all proctoring logs and identify any suspicious activity.

Transparent and Flexible Pricing

Unlike some assessment platforms that hide their pricing or charge per seat, Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans. We believe in making skills assessment accessible to businesses of all sizes.

Our pricing is based on credits, not seats, so you can invite as many team members as you need without incurring extra costs. All pricing plans include access to all proctoring features and our entire test library of 500+ assessments. Check out our pricing page for more details.

Plus, we offer a free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits, so you can try out the platform and see if it's the right fit for your hiring needs. No credit card required to get started!

Adaface vs Qualified Attributes

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests on technical skills, cognitive abilities, language proficiency, and more
• Extensive ATS integrations and the possibility to build custom integrations
• Customizable assessments
• Excellent anti-cheating measures
• Bulk candidate management
• Tests available in multiple languages
• Regular updates and quality checks on tests
• Customer and candidate feedback integration

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit your hiring needs. You can start with a free trial (no credit card required!) to explore the platform with 2 sample tests and 5 credits.

Our paid plans include:

• Individual: $180/year
• Starter: $500/year
• Pro: $900/year
• Scale: $3000/year
• Growth: $5500/year
• Enterprise: $20,000/year
• Unlimited: $50,000/year

All plans include all proctoring features and access to our entire test library. No seat-based pricing!

2. Alva Labs

Best for: Assessments with personality insights

Alva Labs offers a platform that combines aptitude and personality assessments to give you a broad picture of your candidates. They aim to predict job performance and cultural fit, streamlining your hiring process.

While Qualified primarily focuses on coding skills, Alva Labs broadens the scope to include personality assessments. This is useful to gauge whether a candidate will thrive in a specific team and company culture.

However, Alva Labs lacks the depth of skill coverage that other platforms like Adaface offer. They focus on aptitude and personality, potentially missing critical skills like typing, language proficiency, or job-specific knowledge. This can lead to an incomplete assessment of a candidate's true capabilities.

How Alva Labs compares to Qualified?

Key Features

• Aptitude Tests: Assess cognitive abilities with standardized tests.
• Personality Assessments: Evaluate personality traits and cultural fit.
• Automated Scoring: Receive instant results and candidate rankings.

Alva Labs Pros

• Free Trial Available: Test the platform before committing.
• ATS Integrations: Connects with your existing hiring tools.
• Company Branding: Customize the platform with your logo and colors.
• Skills Profile: Provides insights into candidate skills.
• Role based access: Ensures data privacy and security.

Alva Labs Cons

• No Custom Questions: You can't add your own questions.
• Limited Skill Coverage: Focuses on aptitude and personality, missing other job-related skills. Adaface provides a wider range of skill tests.
• Lacks Proctoring Features: No webcam, IP, or device fingerprint proctoring. This can lead to cheating and inaccurate results.
• No Coding scenario based MCQs: Lacks coding questions with MCQs on programming based scenarios.

Alva Labs Pricing

Alva Labs offers a free trial, with paid plans starting at $289 per month. For larger organizations, you'll need to contact them for enterprise pricing. This lack of transparent pricing can make budgeting difficult.

3. CoderPad

Best for: Live coding interviews simplified

CoderPad is a platform designed primarily for conducting technical interviews. It offers a collaborative coding environment where interviewers and candidates can write and execute code in real-time. This tool aims to simulate a real-world coding scenario, making it easier to assess a candidate's practical coding abilities during the hiring process.

Unlike Qualified, CoderPad's strength lies in its live coding interview capabilities. While Qualified focuses on automated assessments, CoderPad provides a more interactive approach, which is valuable when you need to understand the candidate's thought process and problem-solving skills in real-time.

If you want a platform to simulate real-world coding scenarios where you can interact directly with the candidate, CoderPad is for you. It allows you to observe how the candidate approaches coding challenges, debugs, and communicates their solutions, providing richer insights than automated assessments alone.

How CoderPad compares to Qualified?

Key Features

• Collaborative Code Editor: Candidates and interviewers can write and run code together.
• Multi-Language Support: Supports a wide range of programming languages.
• Playback Feature: Review the coding session to analyze the candidate's approach.

CoderPad Pros

• Real-time Collaboration: Fosters better interaction and understanding during interviews.
• Wide Language Support: Accommodates various tech stacks and coding preferences.
• Code Playback: Enables a detailed review of the candidate's coding process.
• Custom Questions: Ability to add your own coding challenges.
• Integrates with ATS: Seamlessly connects with your ATS to streamline your hiring workflow.

CoderPad Cons

• Lacks pre-made tests: Requires you to create your own interview questions or use existing ones, increasing prep time.
• No skill diversity: Focuses mainly on coding skills, neglecting other relevant skills like aptitude or personality.
• Limited assessment types: Doesn't offer a variety of question formats beyond coding, like scenario-based MCQs or Excel simulations.
• No custom branding: You can't customize the platform with your company logo or colors, impacting the candidate experience.

CoderPad Pricing

CoderPad offers a free trial to get started. Paid plans begin at $70/month (billed annually) for the Starter plan and $325/month (billed annually) for the Scale plan. For higher plans, you'll need to contact CoderPad directly.

4. Testgorilla

Best for: Versatile skills assessment platform

TestGorilla is an assessment platform offering a wide range of pre-employment tests. They aim to help businesses screen candidates for skills, personality, and culture fit. They provide a library of tests to assess candidates across various roles and industries.

Qualified focuses on coding skills, TestGorilla broadens the scope with a wider variety of tests. If you need to assess aptitude, personality, or even language proficiency, TestGorilla might be a better fit.

TestGorilla also lets you add your own questions, which you cannot do with Qualified. This is super helpful for tailoring the assessment to your specific needs and adding company-specific scenarios.

How Testgorilla compares to Qualified?

Key Features

• Diverse Test Library: Access a wide array of tests, from cognitive ability to personality assessments.
• Customization: Add your own questions to tailor assessments.
• Candidate Experience: Aim for a user-friendly experience for candidates.

Testgorilla Pros

• Extensive test library covering a broad range of skills and job roles.
• Offers personality and culture fit tests in addition to skill-based assessments.
• Allows for some test customization, including adding your own questions.
• Provides applicant tracking system (ATS) integrations to streamline the hiring process.
• Offers webcam proctoring, location and IP address logging to prevent cheating.

Testgorilla Cons

• Does not offer custom coding questions. If you need to test on very specific coding scenarios, you may have limited options.
• Lacks AI specific tests. Companies evaluating AI roles might need to supplement with other tools.
• No option to create custom tests based on job description unlike Adaface.
• Doesn't offer plagiarism detection for coding questions.

Testgorilla Pricing

TestGorilla's pricing varies depending on company size. For smaller teams (1-15 FTEs), it starts at $75 per month (billed annually). For larger companies, plans scale upwards, with enterprise pricing available upon request. They do offer a free trial to explore the platform. Keep in mind that unlimited invites has fair use policy restrictions.

5. TestGrid

Best for: Aptitude and Personality assessments

TestGrid offers a platform focused on aptitude and personality assessments. It aims to provide tools for evaluating candidates on cognitive skills and behavioral traits.

TestGrid, unlike Qualified, doesn't focus on programming skills. If your hiring needs extend beyond IT roles, TestGrid can offer some aptitude and personality insights, something Qualified doesn't provide.

However, TestGrid lacks support for custom questions and coding challenges, which limits the ability to assess specific skills or tailor assessments to unique job requirements. This is where a platform like Adaface would work better since it supports custom questions as well as assessing across a wider variety of roles.

How TestGrid compares to Qualified?

Key Features

• Aptitude Tests: Assess candidates' cognitive abilities with a range of aptitude tests.
• Personality Assessments: Evaluate personality traits and behavioral characteristics.
• Reporting & Analytics: Gain insights into candidate performance with reports.

TestGrid Pros

• ATS Integrations: Integrates with applicant tracking systems.
• GDPR Compliant: Adheres to data privacy regulations.
• Role based access: Provides role based permissions for different users.
• Email and Help Center Support: Support via email and a help center.
• Quality Checks: Provides quality checks on questions.

TestGrid Cons

• No Programming Assessments: Lacks coding assessments.
• Limited Customization: Doesn't allow custom questions or tailored assessments.
• No Coding Assessments: No coding assessments for developer roles. This is where you'd miss out on assessing practical coding skills.
• Question Quality: Sample questions available online are simple and easily googleable, raising concerns about test integrity. Unlike Adaface's non-googleable questions.

TestGrid Pricing

TestGrid does not provide pricing details on their website. You need to sign up to receive pricing information, which can add an extra step to your evaluation process. This lack of transparency contrasts with platforms that offer clear, upfront pricing, like Adaface Assessments Pricing.

6. iMocha

Best for: Skills intelligence for workforce

iMocha provides skill assessments and skills intelligence, helping companies understand their workforce's current capabilities, plan for future needs, and address skill gaps through hiring. Unlike Qualified, iMocha extends beyond assessments, offering tools to manage and cultivate skills within your organization.

Qualified primarily focuses on assessing coding skills, potentially missing out on a holistic evaluation of a candidate's abilities. iMocha, on the other hand, offers a broader range of assessments including aptitude, business skills, and even personality tests. This makes iMocha a better alternative when you are hiring for roles beyond IT or need a more well-rounded view of your candidates.

Another aspect where iMocha shines is its support for situational judgment tests. Qualified lacks this feature, which is useful in understanding how a candidate would react to real-world scenarios. If your hiring process benefits from gauging a candidate's judgment and decision-making skills, iMocha could be a stronger fit.

How iMocha compares to Qualified?

Key Features

• Extensive skill assessment library covering diverse domains.
• Skills intelligence feature for workforce planning.
• Live coding interviews with a collaborative coding environment.

iMocha Pros

• Wide range of assessments beyond just coding skills, including aptitude, business, and personality tests.
• Supports situational judgment tests to assess candidate behavior in realistic scenarios.
• Offers a skills intelligence platform for managing and developing employee skills.
• Provides integrations with popular ATS systems for streamlined workflows.
• Company logo & brand colors can be added to the assessment.

iMocha Cons

• No custom coding questions: No Option to add your own coding questions.
• Questions easily googleable and GPT-able: Questions are not designed to be non-googleable or non-GPT-able, which can compromise test integrity.
• No public API Access: Lacks custom API for integrations with other systems.
• Shorter test lengths: Test lengths 15-60 min is not enough to guage candidates accurately. In contrast, Adaface is a more comprehensive tool.

iMocha Pricing

iMocha does not publicly display its pricing. You need to contact their sales team to get a quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly evaluate whether iMocha fits within your budget. No free trial is offered either, hindering the option to test the platform before committing.

7. Evalart

Best for: Versatile skill assessment platform

Evalart offers a platform for creating and conducting online assessments. It supports various question types, including coding challenges, aptitude tests, and personality questionnaires, aiming to provide a broad overview of a candidate's abilities.

Unlike Qualified, which focuses primarily on technical roles, Evalart aims to assess a wider range of skills beyond just coding.

While Qualified excels in coding assessments with features like code playback, Evalart offers a broader suite of tests, including language proficiency and aptitude, potentially catering to companies with diverse hiring needs. However, it lacks the in-depth coding assessment focus of Qualified. If you want to quickly assess multiple skills at once, Evalart might be a good fit.

How Evalart compares to Qualified?

Key Features

• Aptitude and Language Tests
• Webcam Proctoring
• Custom coding question support

Evalart Pros

• Supports a wide array of assessment types, including aptitude, personality, and language skills.
• Offers a free trial to explore the platform's functionalities.
• Allows adding custom coding questions to tailor assessments.
• Provides email and live chat support.
• Supports webcam proctoring for added test integrity.

Evalart Cons

• Lacks scenario-based MCQs, limiting the ability to assess practical, real-world application of skills. Adaface excels here.
• Does not offer code playback for detailed analysis of coding assessments.
• Lacks reporting features like benchmarking and skill-wise analysis for detailed insights.
• No custom branding options, such as adding company logos or brand colors to assessments.

Evalart Pricing

Evalart offers a free trial. However, they don't have transparent pricing on their website. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote, which might not be ideal if you prefer knowing the costs upfront.

8. Talentoday

Best for: Aptitude and personality insights

Talentoday offers a suite of assessments focused on aptitude and personality traits. It helps companies understand a candidate's potential and how well they might fit within a team or company culture. Unlike Qualified, Talentoday doesn't offer coding assessments, focusing instead on cognitive skills and behavioral insights.

Talentoday shines when you need to evaluate a candidate's soft skills and cognitive abilities. While Qualified excels at technical skills assessments, it lacks the depth of personality and aptitude testing that Talentoday provides. This makes Talentoday a solid choice for roles where these attributes are key to success.

For example, if you are hiring for a sales or marketing role, Talentoday's personality assessments can provide valuable insights into a candidate's communication style, persuasiveness, and ability to build relationships – aspects less emphasized in platforms like Qualified.

How Talentoday compares to Qualified?

Key Features

• Aptitude Tests: Measures cognitive abilities like logical reasoning and numerical skills.
• Personality Assessments: Evaluates personality traits relevant to job performance and team dynamics.
• Career Guidance: Provides insights into potential career paths based on assessment results.

Talentoday Pros

• Offers assessments for both aptitude and personality.
• Provides insights into candidate's potential and fit.
• GDPR compliant.
• Role-based access control.
• Generates PDF reports.

Talentoday Cons

• Lacks coding assessments, limiting its use for technical roles.
• No custom question creation.
• Does not provide plagiarism detection.
• No question sets.

Talentoday Pricing

Talentoday's pricing includes a Starter plan at $400 per year and a Scale plan at $3000 per year. For Growth plans, you'll need to contact Talentoday directly for a quote. They do not offer a free trial, making it difficult to fully explore the platform before committing.

9. XBInsight Talent Assessments

Best for: Behavioral insights for better hiring

XBInsight Talent Assessments provides behavioral assessments to help companies understand candidates' work styles, thinking styles, and values. It aims to predict job performance and cultural fit, offering insights beyond just skills.

Unlike Qualified, which focuses heavily on coding skills, XBInsight aims at behavioral assessment i.e. cultural fitment. This means evaluating candidates for roles where team dynamics and personality alignment are keys to success.

Consider a role where collaboration and communication are more important than technical skills. XBInsight's insights into work styles and values can be invaluable in identifying candidates who will thrive in that environment. For checking pure technical competence, you can always rely on a platform like Adaface or the like.

How XBInsight Talent Assessments compares to Qualified?

Key Features

• Behavioral Assessments: Measures work styles, thinking styles, and values.
• Job Fit Analysis: Matches candidates to specific job roles based on behavioral traits.
• Team Compatibility Reports: Assesses how well a candidate will integrate into an existing team.

XBInsight Talent Assessments Pros

• Focus on Behavioral Insights: Provides a deeper understanding of candidate fit.
• Team Compatibility Assessments: Helps build cohesive and productive teams.
• Integration with ATS: Streamlines the hiring process.
• Helps in leadership assessments
• Helps evaluate culture.

XBInsight Talent Assessments Cons

• No Coding Assessments: Lacks the ability to assess technical skills directly.
• Limited Customization: May not allow for creating custom assessments tailored to specific roles.
• Pricing Not Public: Requires contacting the company for pricing details.
• No Coding questions.

XBInsight Talent Assessments Pricing

XBInsight does not publicly list its pricing. To get a quote, you'll need to contact their sales team directly. They also do not offer any free trials.

10. TestDome

Best for: Skills across various domains

TestDome is a platform that offers a wide array of tests to evaluate candidates across various skill sets. From programming and data science to aptitude and accounting, TestDome aims to be a one-stop shop for skills assessment. It's designed to help you identify top talent by testing job-related skills.

One of the biggest limitations with Qualified is its lack of support for custom questions. TestDome solves this by allowing you to add your own questions. This is very helpful since you can assess candidates on the exact skills your company needs.

While Qualified focuses primarily on coding skills, TestDome covers a broader spectrum, including aptitude, business, and even personality tests. So, if you're looking to assess a wider range of skills, TestDome might be a better fit.

How TestDome compares to Qualified?

Key Features

• Ready-to-use tests for various skills.
• Option to add your own questions.
• Webcam proctoring to prevent cheating.

TestDome Pros

• Extensive test library covering diverse skills.
• Ability to add custom questions, tailoring assessments to specific needs.
• Offers webcam proctoring features.
• Supports programming, aptitude, and personality tests.
• Provides automated scoring for programming tests.

TestDome Cons

• No custom test creation based on job descriptions. Adaface excels at this.
• Lacks features like conversational assessments, making the candidate experience less engaging.
• Doesn't offer detailed skill-wise analysis in reports beyond IT skills.
• No options for custom branding, missing the opportunity for enhanced candidate experience.

TestDome Pricing

TestDome offers a free trial. Their pricing starts at $100, which includes assessments for 5 candidates ($20 per candidate). They have different pricing tiers based on the number of candidates you want to assess. For detailed pricing, you can visit their website.

Found Your Perfect Qualified Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface offers a vast test library with 500+ tests, covering aptitude, finance, personality, and technical roles, used by clients from 70+ countries and comes with strong proctoring suite and transparent pricing.
• Alva Labs is known for its focus on personality and aptitude assessments, providing insights into candidate behavior and cognitive abilities.
• CoderPad is a solid choice for live coding interviews and assessments, offering a collaborative coding environment.
• TestGorilla provides a wide range of tests, including cognitive ability, personality, and job-specific skills, with flexible pricing plans.
• TestGrid offers aptitude and personality assessments, useful for initial screening and evaluating candidate fit.
• iMocha is a skills assessment platform with a library of tests, covering technical, aptitude, and language skills.
• Evalart provides coding assessments and aptitude tests, useful for evaluating technical skills and problem-solving abilities.
• Talentoday focuses on aptitude and personality assessments, designed to help identify candidate strengths and potential.
• XBInsight Talent Assessments offers a range of assessments, including personality and aptitude tests, to evaluate candidate fit and potential.
• TestDome provides a variety of tests, including programming, aptitude, and personality assessments, with a focus on technical skills.

We've explored a variety of alternatives to Qualified, each offering unique strengths. Qualified excels in coding assessments but may fall short if you need to assess a broader range of skills beyond tech.

Fortunately, there are several strong contenders in the market. Many platforms provide wider skill coverage, strong proctoring features, and flexible pricing models.

Whether you're seeking aptitude tests, personality assessments, or custom-built evaluations, options like Adaface stand out. No matter your specific use case, relying on these alternatives will help streamline your hiring process.

Ready to see how Adaface can transform your remote hiring process? Try Adaface today!