Top 10 Pulsifi Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why the Quest for Pulsifi Alternatives?

I've dug around and spoken to many folks in HR and recruiting to understand why they're scouting for alternatives to Pulsifi. It seems like there are a few common sticking points.

Limited Assessment Types. Pulsifi primarily focuses on personality and aptitude assessments. Companies seeking to assess a broader range of skills, such as coding, finance, or even typing speed, might find this limiting.

Lack of Customization. While Pulsifi offers ready-to-use tests, the inability to add custom questions or tailor assessments to specific job descriptions can be a significant drawback. Companies often need to assess skills that are unique to their industry or role. This calls for a solution that allows for tailored assessments that accurately mirror the demands of the job.

Limited Proctoring Features. Ensuring test integrity is paramount. Without features like webcam proctoring, IP tracking, or copy-paste prevention, companies might struggle to prevent cheating. Companies want to be sure that the candidate sitting for the pre-employment assessment test library is actually the one being evaluated.

1. Adaface

Best for: Assess candidates across business, aptitude, personality, typing, AI, technical, and coding roles.

Looking for a strong alternative to Pulsifi? Adaface offers a comprehensive assessment platform designed to streamline your hiring process and identify top talent.

One of the biggest limitations of Pulsifi is its lack of coding assessments. Adaface solves this by providing coding questions as well as scenario-based MCQs to assess both practical coding skills and understanding of programming concepts, making it a more versatile solution for tech hiring.

Adaface addresses other gaps found in Pulsifi and some of its other alternatives by offering features such as:

• A test library with 500+ tests
• Assessments for aptitude, finance, and business roles, in addition to technical roles
• A strong proctoring suite to maintain test integrity
• Customization options for company branding
• Detailed scorecards for reporting and analytics
• Transparent and startup-friendly pricing

Advanced Proctoring for Secure Assessments

Adaface has a strong proctoring suite to ensure the integrity of assessments. We understand that cheating can be a significant concern, so we've implemented features like webcam proctoring, window and tab tracking, IP address logging, and copy-paste protection.

These measures help to create a secure testing environment and ensure that you're evaluating candidates fairly. Our system also detects the use of tools like Chat GPT, adding an extra layer of security in an age where AI assistance is readily available. Plus, you can force candidates to use fullscreen mode during the test.

Transparent and Flexible Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit various hiring needs. Unlike some platforms with seat-based pricing, Adaface's pricing depends only on credits, making it scalable for growing teams.

All pricing plans include all proctoring features and access to our 500+ test library. You can also explore the platform with a free trial that includes 2 sample tests and 5 credits. No credit card is required to start.

Adaface vs Pulsifi Attributes

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests on technical skills, cognitive abilities, language proficiency, and more
• Extensive ATS integrations and the possibility to build custom integrations
• Customizable assessments to match specific job requirements
• Strong anti-cheating measures, including webcam and window proctoring
• Pricing only depends on credits
• Used by clients from 70+ countries
• Customizable invitation, shortlist and rejection templates

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers clear pricing plans to suit different needs. A free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits is available to explore the platform. No credit card is required to start. The self-serve plans include Individual (180$/yr), Starter (500$/yr), Pro (900$/yr), Scale (3000$/yr), Growth (5500$/ yr), Enterprise (20,000$/ year), and Unlimited (50000$/ yr). All plans include all proctoring features and access to all 500+ tests.

2. Alva Labs

Best for: Skills & personality assessment

Alva Labs is another alternative to Pulsifi offering a platform that combines aptitude and personality assessments. It aims to give recruiters a more rounded view of candidate potential, though primarily caters to IT roles.

Unlike Pulsifi, Alva Labs does provide coding assessments, enabling a more technical evaluation of candidates. However, Alva Labs does not offer support for custom questions or tests tailored to a specific job description. This makes it difficult to assess role-specific skills beyond general aptitude and personality traits.

Alva Labs assessments can also be rather lengthy. While Pulsifi doesn't state the assessment length, Alva Labs tests can be around 2 hours long. This can lead to a drop off in candidate completion rates, especially when assessing a large pool of applicants. In contrast, shorter, engaging assessments like Adaface's aptitude tests can improve candidate experience and completion rates.

How Alva Labs compares to Pulsifi?

Key Features

• Aptitude tests: Evaluate cognitive abilities with standardized tests.
• Personality assessments: Understand candidate traits and work styles.
• Coding assessments: Assess technical skills (limited scope).

Alva Labs Pros

• Offers both aptitude and personality assessments.
• Includes coding assessments for technical roles.
• Integrates with popular ATS systems.
• Provides skill-wise analysis in reports.
• Customizable invitation templates and company branding.

Alva Labs Cons

• Lacks support for custom questions and job-specific tests.
• Does not offer typing, language, or finance tests.
• No plagiarism detection.
• Lengthy assessments can lead to candidate fatigue.

Alva Labs Pricing

Alva Labs provides transparent pricing on their website. Their starter plan begins at $289 per month, and the scale plan at $799 per month. For growth and enterprise plans, you'll need to contact Alva Labs directly. It's worth noting there is no unlimited plan.

3. Pymetrics

Best for: Bias-free talent discovery

Pymetrics leverages behavioral science and AI to assess candidates based on cognitive and personality traits. They use gamified assessments to predict job performance and potential. It's like a personality quiz, but for jobs!

Pymetrics shines where traditional assessments fall short, particularly in removing bias. Unlike Pulsifi, which may rely on resume keywords and subjective evaluations, Pymetrics uses neuroscience-based games to evaluate candidates on a more level playing field.

This approach helps companies discover hidden talent and build more diverse teams. While Pulsifi offers a general assessment platform, Pymetrics specializes in predicting potential through unique cognitive and personality assessments. However, Pymetrics does not offer skill based tests like coding, aptitude, finance and other role based skills which Adaface excels at.

How Pymetrics compares to Pulsifi?

Key Features

• Gamified Assessments: Candidates play games that measure cognitive and personality traits.
• AI-Driven Matching: Uses algorithms to match candidates with suitable roles.
• Bias Mitigation: Aims to reduce bias in the hiring process by focusing on inherent traits.

Pymetrics Pros

• Data-Driven Insights: Provides objective data on candidate potential.
• Improved Diversity: Helps discover talent from diverse backgrounds.
• Candidate Engagement: Gamified assessments can be more engaging than traditional tests.
• Predictive Validity: Aims to predict job performance based on cognitive and personality traits.
• ATS Integration: Integrates with applicant tracking systems for streamlined workflows.

Pymetrics Cons

• Limited Skill Assessment: Doesn't assess specific hard skills like coding or finance.
• Lack of Customization: Limited ability to tailor assessments to specific job requirements.
• Black Box Algorithm: The AI-driven matching process can be opaque.
• No Proctoring: Pymetrics doesnt support proctoring features like webcam, window, tab, IP and copy paste protection. This makes it very easy to cheat during tests.

Pymetrics Pricing

Pymetrics does not offer transparent pricing on their website. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote. This lack of transparency can make it hard to compare costs upfront and is something to consider before investing time in demos.

4. TestGrid

Best for: Aptitude test for entry-level

TestGrid provides a platform to conduct aptitude and personality assessments. It aims to help recruiters screen candidates, however, its capabilities are limited compared to more versatile platforms.

Unlike Pulsifi, TestGrid does offer aptitude tests to evaluate candidates on logical reasoning, numerical ability and verbal ability. However, what sets apart Adaface's aptitude tests is the ability to customize assessments to the specific role and industry. This ensures that you're not just testing general aptitude, but also the specific skills needed for the job.

Furthermore, TestGrid lacks support for coding tests, finance tests, AI tests, and other domain-specific skills. Adaface offers a wide range of assessments beyond aptitude, allowing you to assess candidates across various dimensions and get a more complete picture of their abilities.

How TestGrid compares to Pulsifi?

Key Features

• Aptitude Assessments: Evaluate candidates’ aptitude skills.
• Personality tests: Judge candidate personality traits.
• ATS Integration: Connects with various applicant tracking systems.

TestGrid Pros

• Offers aptitude and personality assessments.
• Provides integrations with multiple ATS platforms.
• Has email and help center support.
• Provides PDF and Excel reports.
• It has user authentication.

TestGrid Cons

• Lacks coding, AI, finance, language, typing, business and job-specific tests.
• No custom questions or coding questions can be added.
• No webcam or web proctoring, IP or device fingerprint tracking.
• Limited features for candidate funnel management and bulk actions.

TestGrid Pricing

TestGrid does not publicly display its pricing. You need to sign up to receive pricing information. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to compare TestGrid with other assessment platforms like Adaface Assessments Pricing.

5. TestDome

Best for: Skills assessment for various roles

TestDome is another assessment platform that helps you evaluate candidates across various skills. From coding and data to aptitude and personality, TestDome aims to be a one-stop shop. Let's dive into its offerings and see how it stacks up.

Pulsifi primarily focuses on personality and aptitude assessments, often missing the mark when it comes to hard skills like coding. TestDome bridges this gap by offering coding tests and other skill-based assessments, making it a more versatile option for companies seeking to evaluate a broader range of abilities.

However, TestDome lacks the ability to create custom questions tailored to your specific needs. While they offer a wide range of ready-to-use tests, you're limited to their existing library, which can be a constraint if you need to assess skills unique to your organization. For highly specific roles, a platform like Adaface that allows for custom question creation might be a better fit.

How TestDome compares to Pulsifi?

Key Features

• Wide range of tests: Covers programming, data science, aptitude, and personality.
• Live coding interviews: Facilitates real-time evaluation of coding skills.
• Automated scoring: Reduces manual effort with automated assessment scoring.

TestDome Pros

• Offers a free trial to test out the platform.
• Supports webcam and screen proctoring.
• Provides coding questions and automated scoring.
• Has skills profile to give you an overview.
• Provides API access

TestDome Cons

• No option for custom questions. You're stuck with their test library.
• Lacks detailed reporting and skill-wise analysis.
• No phone assistance, live chat or dedicated support.
• No company branding available.

TestDome Pricing

TestDome's pricing starts at $100.00 which includes tests for 5 candidates. For higher volume needs, they have a $400 option for 25 candidates, and a $4200 option for 600 candidates. They do offer a free trial so you can try before you buy.

6. Codility

Best for: Technical Hiring for Developers

Codility focuses on assessing coding skills, primarily used for identifying and ranking engineering talent. It offers a platform to evaluate developers through coding tests and challenges.

Unlike Pulsifi, which focuses on personality and aptitude, Codility hones in on hard coding skills. If you're seeking a platform that lets candidates write code and be evaluated on it, Codility might be your choice.

However, bear in mind that Codility focuses on coding questions and does not have scenario based MCQs. If you wish to test beyond coding, consider Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests which includes role-specific, aptitude, and even personality assessments.

How Codility compares to Pulsifi?

Key Features

• Coding Challenges: Evaluate candidates with real-world coding tasks.
• Automated Scoring: Get coding tests scored automatically.
• Tech Skill Focus: Primarily aimed at assessing technical skills.

Codility Pros

• Wide Variety of Coding Languages: Supports assessments in numerous programming languages.
• Code Playback: Review the candidate's coding process step-by-step.
• Integrated Development Environment (IDE): Offers a realistic coding environment for candidates.
• Strong Focus on Security: Prioritizes test integrity with features like plagiarism detection.
• Integrates with ATS: Has ATS Integrations for an easy candidate workflow.

Codility Cons

• Limited Scope: Lacks assessments for non-technical skills like personality, aptitude, or business acumen.
• No Mobile Support: Candidates cannot take assessments on mobile devices.
• Test Length: Tests may require candidates to spend two hours.
• No Custom Support: There is no phone support for candidates.

Codility Pricing

Codility offers a free trial, but you need to fill out a form and wait for approval. Their pricing starts at $1200 per year for the basic plan and goes up to $5000 per year. For higher plans, you'll need to contact their sales team for a quote.

7. Hackerrank

Best for: Technical Skills Assessment Platform

HackerRank is a well-known platform primarily focused on assessing technical skills. It provides a range of coding challenges and assessments designed to evaluate a candidate's programming abilities and problem-solving skills.

HackerRank excels where Pulsifi falls short: evaluating coding prowess. While Pulsifi focuses on personality and aptitude, HackerRank dives deep into the technical, offering coding tests, live coding interviews, and a robust environment for developers.

If your primary need is to assess coding skills, especially for developer roles, HackerRank offers a more specialized toolkit than Pulsifi. It enables you to rigorously evaluate coding abilities in a practical, hands-on manner, something Pulsifi doesn't offer.

How Hackerrank compares to Pulsifi?

Key Features

• Candidate Screening: Enables screening with structured assessments for consistent hiring, whether it's for one or a thousand developers.
• Live Coding Interviews: Offers a fully functional IDE during live coding interviews.
• SkillUp: Uses AI to filter candidates by skills and certifications.

Hackerrank Pros

• Developer Community: Widely used by developers, making it a trusted platform for tech talent.
• Certified Assessments: Launch role-based tests supporting 40+ programming languages.
• Plagiarism Detection: Uses machine learning to ensure assessment integrity.
• Real-World Coding Questions: Assesses candidates in an environment that mirrors actual job conditions.
• Strong Focus on Coding: Allows for in-depth evaluation of coding skills, a key requirement for many tech roles.

Hackerrank Cons

• No Emotional Intelligence Screening: Lacks tailored assessments for emotional intelligence or soft skills.
• Limited Business Skill Tests: Tests mostly focus on IT roles. No business skill tests like sales assessment tests for example.
• Default Questions Are Googleable: Default questions are easily googleable, which impacts the assessment quality.
• No Conversational Assessments: Lacks conversational assessments, unlike Adaface.

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank offers tiered pricing plans. The Starter plan begins at $100 per month (billed annually at $1200). For more advanced features, the Professional plan is available at $250 per month (billed annually at $3000). For enterprise-level needs, you'll need to contact HackerRank directly for a custom quote. Note that you cannot sign up for a free trial to explore all the features.

8. Realcoderz

Best for: Technical Hiring Assessments, Coding Skills

Realcoderz specializes in technical assessments, focusing primarily on coding skills. While Pulsifi offers a broader approach to talent assessment, Realcoderz hones in on evaluating coding proficiency, making it a contender for companies with focused technical recruitment needs.

Pulsifi lacks in-depth programming assessments, whereas Realcoderz offers coding tests and job-specific assessments. For organizations prioritizing hands-on coding skills, Realcoderz presents a viable alternative.

However, Realcoderz has some limitation which might make Pulsifi a better option in some cases.

How Realcoderz compares to Pulsifi?

Key Features

• Coding skill assessments across various languages.
• Job-specific tests targeting technical roles.
• Automated scoring for coding questions.

Realcoderz Pros

• Focuses on coding skills, useful for technical roles.
• Automated scoring helps save time.
• Offers job-specific assessments.
• Provides assessments across coding languages.
• Has webcam and window proctoring

Realcoderz Cons

• Lacks aptitude and business skill tests, limiting its scope.
• No custom question creation, restricting test personalization.
• No ATS integrations, adding manual effort for recruiters.
• Doesn't offer multiple test sets, increasing risk of question leaks.

Realcoderz Pricing

Realcoderz does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. A free trial isn't available readily, requiring a request through a form.

9. Prevue Assessments

Best for: Personality, aptitude, and skills

Prevue Assessments offer tools to evaluate candidates across personality, aptitude, and skills. These assessments help companies gain insights into a candidate's potential fit and performance.

Unlike Pulsifi, which focuses on a narrower range of assessments, Prevue provides a broader spectrum, including situational judgment tests and business-related assessments. This makes Prevue a more versatile option for companies seeking a more complete picture of their candidates.

While Prevue Assessments offers a range of features, it's important to note that they don't offer programming tests. For companies needing to assess coding skills, a solution like Adaface might be a better fit.

How Prevue Assessments compares to Pulsifi?

Key Features

• Personality assessments to gauge candidate fit.
• Aptitude tests covering verbal, numerical, and abstract reasoning.
• Job-specific assessments for various roles.

Prevue Assessments Pros

• Benchmarking feature helps compare candidates.
• Skills profile provides insights into candidate strengths.
• Offers PDF reports for easy sharing.
• Provides skill-wise analysis of candidate performance.
• ATS Integrations to streamline hiring workflow

Prevue Assessments Cons

• No coding assessments are available.
• Lacks custom question creation.
• No plagiarism detection features.
• Pricing is not transparent, requiring contact with sales.

Prevue Assessments Pricing

Pricing information is not publicly available; you need to contact Prevue Assessments directly for a quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly assess whether Prevue fits within your budget.

10. Ensize

Best for: Personality Assessments and Culture

Ensize focuses on understanding people through personality assessments, values assessments, and culture fit analysis. They aim to help companies build teams that work well together.

Unlike Pulsifi, which offers a broader range of assessments but lacks depth in specific areas, Ensize zooms in on personality and cultural alignment. If you're primarily concerned with ensuring that new hires mesh well with your existing team's dynamics and values, Ensize could be a contender.

However, remember that focusing only on personality can miss out on crucial hard skills. A balanced approach, like what you'd find with Adaface's skills tests, ensures you're evaluating the whole candidate.

How Ensize compares to Pulsifi?

Key Features

• Personality assessments to understand candidate traits.
• Values assessments to see alignment with company values.
• Culture fit analysis to predict team compatibility.

Ensize Pros

• Focuses on personality and culture fit.
• Provides insights into team dynamics.
• Can help improve employee retention.
• Offers a way to measure alignment with company values.
• GDPR Compliant

Ensize Cons

• Lacks skills assessments beyond personality.
• No coding, aptitude, or finance tests.
• No custom questions or coding questions.
• No proctoring or plagiarism detection features.

Ensize Pricing

Ensize doesn't publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact them directly to get a quote. This lack of transparency can make it harder to quickly compare costs with other platforms, including those with readily available pricing like Adaface Assessments Pricing.

Found Your Perfect Pulsifi Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface stands out with its high test library of 500+ tests covering aptitude, finance, personality, business, typing, AI, technical and coding roles, strong proctoring suite, and pricing model without seat based pricing.
• Alva Labs offers personality and aptitude tests, suitable for predicting job performance and cultural fit, with monthly subscription based pricing.
• Pymetrics utilizes neuroscience-based games to assess cognitive and personality traits, offering a unique approach to candidate evaluation, but requires contacting them for pricing.
• TestGrid provides aptitude and personality tests, focusing on identifying the right talent for various roles, though pricing details require signing up.
• TestDome offers a range of skill tests, including programming, aptitude, and personality assessments, with a focus on practical skills assessment and has tests for almost all roles.
• Codility specializes in coding assessments, helping evaluate developers' programming skills and problem-solving abilities, but is limited to technical roles.
• Hackerrank focuses on technical skill assessment, offering coding challenges and assessments for developers and engineers, with a free trial available.
• Realcoderz offers coding assessments, primarily focused on evaluating programming skills, with custom coding questions, but you need to contact them to try it out.
• Prevue Assessments combines aptitude, personality, and skills testing to provide a well-rounded view of candidates, offering customizable invitation templates and support for multiple invite options.
• Ensize delivers personality assessments, emphasizing behavioral insights and team dynamics, but has no mention of proctoring or anti-cheating features on the website.

We've explored a range of assessment platforms, each with its own strengths. Now, let's wrap things up and see if you've discovered your perfect Pulsifi alternative.

Pulsifi shines with its focus on aptitude and personality assessments. However, it lacks support for programming, business, or finance skills, and doesn't offer strong proctoring features. This may not be a fit for many usecases.

Thankfully, there are solid alternatives to consider. Platforms like Adaface offer a wide test library, strong proctoring, and no seat-based pricing. Plus, it works across aptitude, finance, personality, business, typing, AI, technical, and coding roles.

Ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific needs. Whether you prioritize coding skills, business acumen, or a broad assessment suite, these alternatives provide options to rely on.

Ready to elevate your hiring game? Explore Adaface today and discover how skills tests can transform your candidate screening!