Why you should use SOLID, Technical Aptitude & Coding Online Test?

The Solid, teknisk evne og kodingstest makes use of scenario-based questions to test for on-the-job skills as opposed to theoretical knowledge, ensuring that candidates who do well on this screening test have the relavant skills. The questions are designed to covered following on-the-job aspects: Bruke solide prinsipper i programvareutvikling Designe og implementere objektorienterte designmønstre Demonstrerer ferdighet i teknisk egnethet Bruke forskjellige datastrukturer i problemløsing Implementering av ren kodepraksis Utføre enhetstesting og testdrevet utvikling Optimalisering av kode for ytelse og skalerbarhet Feilsøkings- og feilsøkingsprogrammer Samarbeid med tverrfunksjonelle team Bruke versjonskontrollsystemer

SOLID, Technical Aptitude & Coding Online Test

Q: What topics are covered in the SOLID, Technical Aptitude & Coding Online Test?

Solide prinsipper Objektorientert design Teknisk egnethet Datastrukturer

About the test:

Den solide tekniske evnen online testen bruker scenariobaserte MCQ-er for å evaluere kandidater om deres forståelse av programvaredesignprinsipper basert på solide prinsipper. Testen vurderer kandidater på sin kunnskap om enkeltansvar, åpen/lukket, Liskov -substitusjon, grensesnittsegregering og inversjonsprinsipper, samt deres evne til å anvende disse prinsippene i utforming og implementering av programvaresystemer. Den evaluerer også deres kjennskap til designmønstre, refactoring-teknikker, kodelukt og antimønder relatert til faste prinsipper.

Covered skills:

Solide prinsipper
Teknisk egnethet

Objektorientert design
Datastrukturer

Try practice test

Start 14-day free trial

9 reasons why

Adaface SOLID, Technical Aptitude & Coding Test is the most accurate way to shortlist Programvare ingeniørs

Reason #1

Tests for on-the-job skills

The SOLID, Technical Aptitude & Coding Online Test helps recruiters and hiring managers identify qualified candidates from a pool of resumes, and helps in taking objective hiring decisions. It reduces the administrative overhead of interviewing too many candidates and saves time by filtering out unqualified candidates at the first step of the hiring process.

The test screens for the following skills that hiring managers look for in candidates:

Forstå og anvende solide prinsipper
Designe og implementere objektorienterte designkonsepter
Demonstrerer teknisk egnethet i problemløsing
Arbeide med forskjellige datastrukturer
Skrive ren og vedlikeholdbar kode
Forstå og implementere designmønstre
Håndtere unntak og feil effektivt
Optimalisering av kode for ytelse
Arbeide med relasjonsdatabaser
Bruke versjonskontrollsystemer effektivt

Reason #2

No trick questions

Traditional assessment tools use trick questions and puzzles for the screening, which creates a lot of frustration among candidates about having to go through irrelevant screening assessments.

View sample questions

The main reason we started Adaface is that traditional pre-employment assessment platforms are not a fair way for companies to evaluate candidates. At Adaface, our mission is to help companies find great candidates by assessing on-the-job skills required for a role.

Why we started Adaface

Try practice test

Start 14-day free trial

Reason #3

Non-googleable questions

We have a very high focus on the quality of questions that test for on-the-job skills. Every question is non-googleable and we have a very high bar for the level of subject matter experts we onboard to create these questions. We have crawlers to check if any of the questions are leaked online. If/ when a question gets leaked, we get an alert. We change the question for you & let you know.

How we design questions

Dette er bare en liten prøve fra biblioteket vårt med 10.000+ spørsmål. De faktiske spørsmålene om dette Solid, teknisk evne og kodingstest vil være ikke-googlable.

🧐 Question
Easy Paint says Bye!	Try practice test
Which SOLID principle is followed by the given code snippet?
Medium Decryptor Strings	Try practice test
What does the following pseudo code print?
Hard Fibonacci codes Time Complexity Pseudo Code	Try practice test
Here are three pseudocodes for calculating the Nth Fibonacci number. Which of the following statements about these codes are true? A: Time complexity/efficiency of CODE 1, CODE 2, CODE 3 is the same. B: CODE 2 is more space-efficient than CODE 3. C: CODE 3 is more space-efficient than CODE 2. D: CODE 2 is more time-efficient than CODE 1. E: CODE 3 is more time-efficient than CODE 1.
Hard Palindrome Test cases Strings	Try practice test
Go through the following faulty palindrome detection pseudocode and test cases. For which of the test cases would the code return true? Testcases A: a B: aba C: aaa D: aac
Medium Rewards Activities Order Database Connection	Try practice test
A new popular app tracks the activities performed by its users and grants them rewards based on each individual's total activities performed in a year. This data is maintained in a database table (activitesinfo), with the following columns: userid, totalactivities, reward. This year, due to fundraising activity, the company has decided to further reward its users by enhancing the reward as per the following formula: If reward < = 4000, increase it by 2%, If 4000 < reward <= 8000, increase it by 4%, If reward > 8000, increase it by 6%. The tech team has written three different scripts to calculate increment for each slab, each script is to run as a separate transaction. Here are the three scripts: Script 1: For users with reward <= 4000, set reward = reward * 1.02 Script 2: For users with reward > 4000 and reward <= 8000, set reward = reward * 1.04 Script 3: For users with reward > 8000, set reward = reward * 1.06 Each script is to be executed separately. Which of the following options will update the rewards as expected: A: Execute Script 1 followed by Script 2 followed by Script 3 B: Execute Script 2 followed by Script 3; Script 1 running concurrently throughout C: Execute Script 3 followed by Script 2; Script 1 running concurrently throughout D: Execute Script 3 followed by Script 2 followed by Script 1 E: Execute Script 2 followed by Script 3 followed by Script 1

	🧐 Question	🔧 Skill
	Easy Paint says Bye!	2 mins SOLID	Try practice test
Which SOLID principle is followed by the given code snippet?
	Medium Decryptor Strings	2 mins Technical Aptitude	Try practice test
What does the following pseudo code print?
	Hard Fibonacci codes Time Complexity Pseudo Code	2 mins Technical Aptitude	Try practice test
Here are three pseudocodes for calculating the Nth Fibonacci number. Which of the following statements about these codes are true? A: Time complexity/efficiency of CODE 1, CODE 2, CODE 3 is the same. B: CODE 2 is more space-efficient than CODE 3. C: CODE 3 is more space-efficient than CODE 2. D: CODE 2 is more time-efficient than CODE 1. E: CODE 3 is more time-efficient than CODE 1.
	Hard Palindrome Test cases Strings	2 mins Technical Aptitude	Try practice test
Go through the following faulty palindrome detection pseudocode and test cases. For which of the test cases would the code return true? Testcases A: a B: aba C: aaa D: aac
	Medium Rewards Activities Order Database Connection	3 mins Technical Aptitude	Try practice test
A new popular app tracks the activities performed by its users and grants them rewards based on each individual's total activities performed in a year. This data is maintained in a database table (activitesinfo), with the following columns: userid, totalactivities, reward. This year, due to fundraising activity, the company has decided to further reward its users by enhancing the reward as per the following formula: If reward < = 4000, increase it by 2%, If 4000 < reward <= 8000, increase it by 4%, If reward > 8000, increase it by 6%. The tech team has written three different scripts to calculate increment for each slab, each script is to run as a separate transaction. Here are the three scripts: Script 1: For users with reward <= 4000, set reward = reward * 1.02 Script 2: For users with reward > 4000 and reward <= 8000, set reward = reward * 1.04 Script 3: For users with reward > 8000, set reward = reward * 1.06 Each script is to be executed separately. Which of the following options will update the rewards as expected: A: Execute Script 1 followed by Script 2 followed by Script 3 B: Execute Script 2 followed by Script 3; Script 1 running concurrently throughout C: Execute Script 3 followed by Script 2; Script 1 running concurrently throughout D: Execute Script 3 followed by Script 2 followed by Script 1 E: Execute Script 2 followed by Script 3 followed by Script 1

	🧐 Question	🔧 Skill	💪 Difficulty	⌛ Time
	Paint says Bye!	SOLID	Easy	2 mins	Try practice test
Which SOLID principle is followed by the given code snippet?
	Decryptor Strings	Technical Aptitude	Medium	2 mins	Try practice test
What does the following pseudo code print?
	Fibonacci codes Time Complexity Pseudo Code	Technical Aptitude	Hard	2 mins	Try practice test
Here are three pseudocodes for calculating the Nth Fibonacci number. Which of the following statements about these codes are true? A: Time complexity/efficiency of CODE 1, CODE 2, CODE 3 is the same. B: CODE 2 is more space-efficient than CODE 3. C: CODE 3 is more space-efficient than CODE 2. D: CODE 2 is more time-efficient than CODE 1. E: CODE 3 is more time-efficient than CODE 1.
	Palindrome Test cases Strings	Technical Aptitude	Hard	2 mins	Try practice test
Go through the following faulty palindrome detection pseudocode and test cases. For which of the test cases would the code return true? Testcases A: a B: aba C: aaa D: aac
	Rewards Activities Order Database Connection	Technical Aptitude	Medium	3 mins	Try practice test
A new popular app tracks the activities performed by its users and grants them rewards based on each individual's total activities performed in a year. This data is maintained in a database table (activitesinfo), with the following columns: userid, totalactivities, reward. This year, due to fundraising activity, the company has decided to further reward its users by enhancing the reward as per the following formula: If reward < = 4000, increase it by 2%, If 4000 < reward <= 8000, increase it by 4%, If reward > 8000, increase it by 6%. The tech team has written three different scripts to calculate increment for each slab, each script is to run as a separate transaction. Here are the three scripts: Script 1: For users with reward <= 4000, set reward = reward * 1.02 Script 2: For users with reward > 4000 and reward <= 8000, set reward = reward * 1.04 Script 3: For users with reward > 8000, set reward = reward * 1.06 Each script is to be executed separately. Which of the following options will update the rewards as expected: A: Execute Script 1 followed by Script 2 followed by Script 3 B: Execute Script 2 followed by Script 3; Script 1 running concurrently throughout C: Execute Script 3 followed by Script 2; Script 1 running concurrently throughout D: Execute Script 3 followed by Script 2 followed by Script 1 E: Execute Script 2 followed by Script 3 followed by Script 1

Reason #4

1200+ customers in 75 countries

Med Adaface var vi i stand til å optimalisere den første screeningsprosessen vår med oppover 75 %, og frigjorde dyrebar tid for både ansettelsesledere og vårt talentanskaffelsesteam!

Brandon Lee, Leder for mennesker, Love, Bonito

Try practice test

Start 14-day free trial

Reason #5

Designed for elimination, not selection

The most important thing while implementing the pre-employment Solid, teknisk evne og kodingstest in your hiring process is that it is an elimination tool, not a selection tool. In other words: you want to use the test to eliminate the candidates who do poorly on the test, not to select the candidates who come out at the top. While they are super valuable, pre-employment tests do not paint the entire picture of a candidate’s abilities, knowledge, and motivations. Multiple easy questions are more predictive of a candidate's ability than fewer hard questions. Harder questions are often "trick" based questions, which do not provide any meaningful signal about the candidate's skillset.

Science behind Adaface tests

Reason #6

1 click candidate invites

Email invites: You can send candidates an email invite to the Solid, teknisk evne og kodingstest from your dashboard by entering their email address.

Public link: You can create a public link for each test that you can share with candidates.

API or integrations: You can invite candidates directly from your ATS by using our pre-built integrations with popular ATS systems or building a custom integration with your in-house ATS.

Reason #7

Detailed scorecards & benchmarks

Vis eksempler på scorecard

Try practice test

Start 14-day free trial

Reason #8

High completion rate

Adaface tests are conversational, low-stress, and take just 25-40 mins to complete.

This is why Adaface has the highest test-completion rate (86%), which is more than 2x better than traditional assessments.

Reason #9

Advanced Proctoring

Learn more

Preview this test

Vis eksempler på scorecard

About the SOLID, Technical Aptitude & Coding Assessment Test

Why you should use Pre-employment SOLID, Technical Aptitude & Coding Online Test?

The Solid, teknisk evne og kodingstest makes use of scenario-based questions to test for on-the-job skills as opposed to theoretical knowledge, ensuring that candidates who do well on this screening test have the relavant skills. The questions are designed to covered following on-the-job aspects:

Bruke solide prinsipper i programvareutvikling
Designe og implementere objektorienterte designmønstre
Demonstrerer ferdighet i teknisk egnethet
Bruke forskjellige datastrukturer i problemløsing
Implementering av ren kodepraksis
Utføre enhetstesting og testdrevet utvikling
Optimalisering av kode for ytelse og skalerbarhet
Feilsøkings- og feilsøkingsprogrammer
Samarbeid med tverrfunksjonelle team
Bruke versjonskontrollsystemer

Once the test is sent to a candidate, the candidate receives a link in email to take the test. For each candidate, you will receive a detailed report with skills breakdown and benchmarks to shortlist the top candidates from your pool.

What topics are covered in the SOLID, Technical Aptitude & Coding Online Test?

Solide prinsipper
De faste prinsippene er et sett med fem designprinsipper i objektorientert programmering som tar sikte på å gjøre programvaresystemer mer vedlikeholdbare og utvidbare. De inkluderer Single Responsibility Principle (SRP), Open/Closed Principle (OCP), Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP), Interface Segregation Principle (ISP) og Dependency Inversjonsprinsipp (DIP). Ved å måle denne ferdigheten kan rekrutterere vurdere en kandidats forståelse av disse prinsippene og deres evne til å anvende dem i programvaredesign.
Objektorientert design
Objektorientert design er et programmeringsparadigme som Organiserer programvareapplikasjoner i modulære komponenter kalt objekter, som har tilstand, atferd og identitet. Det fremmer kode gjenbrukbarhet, vedlikeholdbarhet og skalerbarhet. Måling av denne ferdigheten hjelper rekrutterere med å evaluere en kandidats ferdighet i utforming av programvaresystemer ved å bruke prinsippene for objektorientert programmering.
Teknisk egnethet
Teknisk egnethet refererer til en kandidats evne til å forstå og anvende teknisk teknisk Konsepter og prinsipper i problemløsning og beslutningsscenarier. Det innebærer ferdigheter som logisk resonnement, analytisk tenking, oppmerksomhet på detaljer og problemløsningsevne. Vurdering av teknisk egnethet i denne testen lar rekrutterere måle en kandidats generelle tekniske kompetanse og deres potensial til å utmerke seg i en teknisk rolle.
Datastrukturer
Datastrukturer er de grunnleggende byggesteinene for organisering og lagre data i dataminne. De gir effektive måter å utføre operasjoner på som å søke, sortere og manipulere data. Måling av denne ferdigheten gjør det mulig for rekrutterere å vurdere en kandidats kunnskap og evne til å velge passende datastrukturer for effektiv algoritmisk problemløsning og programvareutvikling.
Full list of covered topics
The actual topics of the questions in the final test will depend on your job description and requirements. However, here's a list of topics you can expect the questions for Solid, teknisk evne og kodingstest to be based on.
Enkelt ansvar
Åpen lukket
Liskov -substitusjon
Grensesnittsegregering
Avhengighetsinversjon
Arv
Polymorfisme
Abstraksjon
Innkapsling
Aggregering
Sammensetning
Statiske metoder
Java strømmer
Rekursjon
Sorteringsalgoritmer
Stor o notasjon
Binær søk
Stabler
Køer
Koblede lister
Binære trær
Grafer
Hashbord
Samtidig programmering
Søppelsamling
Minnehåndtering
Database Normalisering
SQL -spørsmål
Indekser
Lagrede prosedyrer
Normaliseringsformer
Datamodellering
Transaksjonsstyring
Testteknikker
Refactoring
Kodeanmeldelser
Feilsøking
Kodeoptimalisering
Designmønstre
Samtidig mønstre
Kreasjonsmønstre
Strukturelle mønstre
Atferdsmønstre
Kodeversjonering
Forgrening og sammenslåing
Git -kommandoer
Github
Gitlab
Kontinuerlig integrering
Kontinuerlig levering
Bygg automatisering
Enhetstesting
Integrasjonstesting
Kodedekning
Agile metodikk
Scrum Framework
Kanban -tavler
Par programmering
Teknisk dokumentasjon

Try practice test

Start 14-day free trial

What roles can I use the SOLID, Technical Aptitude & Coding Online Test for?

Programvare ingeniør
Full Stack Developer
Backend Developer

How is the SOLID, Technical Aptitude & Coding Online Test customized for senior candidates?

For intermediate/ experienced candidates, we customize the assessment questions to include advanced topics and increase the difficulty level of the questions. This might include adding questions on topics like

Bruke designprinsipper for utvikling av brukergrensesnitt
Arbeide med relasjonsdatabaser og SQL
Bruke algoritmer og datastrukturer for effektiv koding
Implementering av kodesikkerhetstiltak
Integrering av tredjepartsbiblioteker og APIer
Forstå og optimalisere databasespørsmål
Utvikle og vedlikeholde dokumentasjon
Analysere og løse programvarefekter
Bruke smidige og Scrum -metodologier
Hold følge med bransjetrender og beste praksis

Preview this test

Vis eksempler på scorecard

Ansettelseslederne mente at de gjennom de tekniske spørsmålene de stilte under panelintervjuene, var i stand til å fortelle hvilke kandidater som scoret bedre, og differensierte med de som ikke skåret like godt. De er svært fornøyd med kvaliteten på kandidatene som er på listen med Adaface-screeningen.

85%

Reduksjon i screeningstid

Se hele casestudien

SOLID, Technical Aptitude & Coding Hiring Test Vanlige spørsmål

Kan jeg kombinere flere ferdigheter til en tilpasset vurdering?

Ja absolutt. Tilpassede vurderinger er satt opp basert på stillingsbeskrivelsen din, og vil inneholde spørsmål om alle må-ha ferdigheter du spesifiserer.

Har du noen anti-juksende eller proktoreringsfunksjoner på plass?

Vi har følgende anti-juksede funksjoner på plass:

Ikke-googlable spørsmål
IP Proctoring
Nettproctoring
Webcam Proctoring
Deteksjon av plagiering
Sikker nettleser

Les mer om Proctoring -funksjonene.

Hvordan tolker jeg testresultater?

Den viktigste tingen å huske på er at en vurdering er et eliminasjonsverktøy, ikke et seleksjonsverktøy. En ferdighetsvurdering er optimalisert for å hjelpe deg med å eliminere kandidater som ikke er teknisk kvalifisert for rollen, det er ikke optimalisert for å hjelpe deg med å finne den beste kandidaten for rollen. Så den ideelle måten å bruke en vurdering på er å bestemme en terskelpoeng (vanligvis 55%, vi hjelper deg med å benchmark) og invitere alle kandidater som scorer over terskelen for de neste rundene med intervjuet.

Hvilken opplevelsesnivå kan jeg bruke denne testen til?

Hver ADAFACE -vurdering er tilpasset din stillingsbeskrivelse/ ideell kandidatperson (våre fageksperter vil velge de riktige spørsmålene for din vurdering fra vårt bibliotek med 10000+ spørsmål). Denne vurderingen kan tilpasses for ethvert opplevelsesnivå.

Får hver kandidat de samme spørsmålene?

Ja, det gjør det mye lettere for deg å sammenligne kandidater. Alternativer for MCQ -spørsmål og rekkefølgen på spørsmål er randomisert. Vi har anti-juksing/proctoring funksjoner på plass. I vår bedriftsplan har vi også muligheten til å lage flere versjoner av den samme vurderingen med spørsmål med lignende vanskelighetsnivåer.