10 McQuaig Alternatives: Top Picks by Features, Usability, and Pricing

Why the Hunt for Alternatives to McQuaig?

I've dug deep to understand why HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers like you might be peeking at McQuaig alternatives. It wasn't just about features and pricing – I wanted to know the real pain points driving this search.

Limited skill assessment coverage. McQuaig focuses primarily on aptitude and personality assessments, potentially leaving gaps in evaluating other skills. Today's job market demands a broader view, including technical skills, business acumen, and even typing proficiency. This narrowed scope can make it difficult to get a complete picture of a candidate's capabilities.

Lack of coding and job-specific assessments. In the tech-driven world, evaluating coding skills is a must, especially for technical roles. Similarly, assessing job-specific skills through scenarios and simulations provides insights that generic tests often miss. McQuaig's limited support here means you might need extra tools, adding complexity to your pre-employment assessment process.

Limited visibility into pricing and lack of free trial. Not having clear pricing info upfront can be a real buzzkill. And not being able to test-drive the platform before committing is like buying a car without a spin. Without a transparent pricing model or a free trial to fully explore the features, it's tough to know if McQuaig truly fits your needs and budget.

1. Adaface

Best for: Assess candidates across aptitude, AI, business, finance, and coding skills.

If you're seeking a McQuaig alternative that provides a broader range of skills assessment, Adaface emerges as a strong contender. It's time to broaden your horizons.

McQuaig's limited test library can be a bottleneck for companies needing to evaluate candidates on diverse skill sets. Adaface addresses this by offering a rich library of 500+ tests, covering everything from coding proficiency to personality traits. This ensures you can accurately assess candidates for a wide array of roles, all within a single, integrated platform.

Adaface levels up your hiring process with these standout features:

• Extensive test library covering technical, aptitude, and business skills.
• Robust anti-cheating measures, including webcam proctoring and IP tracking.
• Customizable assessments tailored to specific job descriptions.
• Detailed scorecards with skill-wise analysis.
• Company branding to create a seamless candidate experience.
• Enterprise-ready with ATS integrations and custom API support.
• Transparent and flexible pricing.

Top-Notch Proctoring for Reliable Results

Adaface takes test security seriously with a suite of anti-cheating features. We know how tempting it is to peek at answers, so we implemented measures to keep everyone honest. All tests are timed, and questions are randomized to prevent cheating.

Our platform also includes webcam proctoring, which records candidates during the test to ensure they're not getting outside help. Plus, we track IP addresses and browser activity to detect any suspicious behavior. With Adaface, you can be confident that your assessment results are accurate and trustworthy.

Transparent and Startup-Friendly Pricing

Unlike McQuaig, Adaface believes in transparent pricing. Our pricing details are readily available on our pricing page, so you know exactly what to expect. No need to jump on a call to get a quote.

We also offer a range of plans to fit different budgets and hiring needs. From individual plans to enterprise solutions, we've got something for everyone. Plus, all our plans include access to all proctoring features and our complete test library. We offer a free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits, letting you try the platform before subscribing.

Adaface vs McQuaig Attributes

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests covering technical, aptitude, and business domains.
• Customizable assessments designed as per the job description. Design your custom assessments using our assessment test library.
• Excellent anti-cheating measures, including webcam and IP proctoring, protecting against online cheating.
• Extensive ATS integrations with options to build custom integrations.
• Tests available in multiple languages, expanding your reach to global talent.
• Transparent and startup-friendly pricing, eliminating hidden costs.
• Used by clients from 70+ countries, showcasing global acceptance.

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers pricing plans designed to fit your team size and hiring volume. We’re committed to making the candidate screening process simpler for you! All plans include all proctoring features and access to all 500+ tests. Individual (180$/yr). Starter (500$/yr). Pro (900$/yr). Scale (3000$/yr). Growth (5500$/ yr). Enterprise (20,000$/ year). Unlimited (50000$/ yr). Try Adaface Assessments with our free trial, which includes 2 sample tests and 5 credits.

2. Evalart

Best for: Skills tests and assessments

Evalart offers a platform for creating and conducting online assessments, catering to various skills and job roles. It aims to streamline the hiring process by providing tools to evaluate candidates' abilities.

Evalart, unlike McQuaig, includes programming tests and language proficiency assessments. However, these programming tests are limited to coding questions and lack scenario-based questions.

While Evalart supports aptitude and personality tests, similar to McQuaig, it misses out on critical elements like situational judgment tests and job-specific assessments. For companies that need assessments tailored to specific roles and real-world scenarios, a platform like Adaface is a better choice.

How Evalart compares to McQuaig?

Key Features

• Ready-to-use test library covering diverse skills
• Option to add your own custom questions
• Webcam proctoring to prevent cheating

Evalart Pros

• Offers a wide range of skills tests, including programming and languages.
• Allows adding custom questions to tailor assessments.
• Provides a free trial for initial exploration.
• Includes webcam proctoring for enhanced security.
• Email and Live Chat support.

Evalart Cons

• Lacks scenario-based programming questions, focusing solely on coding.
• Does not offer situational judgment tests or job-specific assessments.
• No custom API for integration with other HR systems.
• No Social Listening or question replacement based on usage Limits

Evalart Pricing

Evalart doesn't publicly display its pricing. To obtain detailed pricing information, you'll need to contact their sales team directly. They do offer a one-month free trial, allowing you to test the platform before committing.

3. The Predictive Index

Best for: Behavioral and Cognitive Assessments

The Predictive Index (PI) offers behavioral and cognitive assessments designed to help companies understand their employees and candidates better. Their tools aim to improve hiring decisions, team dynamics, and overall organizational performance. Think of it as trying to decode how people tick at work!

Unlike McQuaig, The Predictive Index provides a blend of behavioral and cognitive assessments. This helps in understanding not just how someone behaves, but also how they think. This dual approach can be super helpful in predicting job performance.

However, like McQuaig, The Predictive Index doesn't offer custom questions or assess specific skills like coding or finance. So, if you're looking to test a candidate's proficiency in, say, Python or Excel, you'll need to look elsewhere.

How The Predictive Index compares to McQuaig?

Key Features

• Behavioral Assessments: Understand workplace behavior and motivators.
• Cognitive Assessments: Measure general mental ability.
• PI Design: A framework for job analysis and team building.

The Predictive Index Pros

• Integrated ATS: Integrates with many ATS systems to streamline your workflow.
• GDPR Compliance: Adheres to data privacy regulations.
• Ready-to-use Tests: Library of pre-built assessments to get you started.
• Skills Profile: Skills profile in scorecards.
• Skill-wise analysis: Break down candidate's scores by different categories and for each category, breakdown which areas candidate performed well and which topcis/ areas candidate didn't.

The Predictive Index Cons

• No Custom Questions: You can't add your own questions.
• Limited Skills Testing: Doesn't assess hard skills like coding or finance.
• No Live Chat Support: Lacks immediate support via live chat.
• Lacks proctoring features: No web proctoring, webcam proctoring, location logging, IP proctoring, device fingerprint proctoring, copy paste protection, full screen proctoring, Chat GPT protection.

The Predictive Index Pricing

The Predictive Index doesn't offer transparent pricing on their website. You'll need to contact them directly for a quote. Also, they do not offer a free trial to explore the platform. This can make it tricky to budget or quickly test out the platform's capabilities.

4. SuccessFinder

Best for: Personality-based role matching

SuccessFinder offers a unique approach by focusing on personality traits to predict job performance. It helps identify candidates who are not just skilled, but also a great fit for the role and company culture.

Unlike McQuaig, which primarily assesses aptitude and personality, SuccessFinder emphasizes on personality-based role matching. McQuaig lacks the depth to predict how a candidate's personality will impact their performance.

SuccessFinder works better because it dives deep into aligning personality traits with job requirements. While it lacks coding assessments, it ensures a strong personality fit, leading to better team cohesion and employee satisfaction.

How SuccessFinder compares to McQuaig?

Key Features

• Behavioral assessment for role fit
• Predictive analytics for performance
• Culture alignment insights

SuccessFinder Pros

• Focuses on personality alignment for job success.
• Provides insights into culture fit.
• Offers predictive analytics to forecast performance.
• Has email support.
• Is GDPR compliant.

SuccessFinder Cons

• Lacks skills testing for technical roles, unlike Adaface
• No custom branding options.
• No ATS integrations to streamline hiring workflows.
• No free trial to evaluate the platform.

SuccessFinder Pricing

SuccessFinder doesn't have transparent pricing on their website. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly assess whether it fits your budget, unlike Adaface Assessments Pricing.

5. Bryq

Best for: Personality-driven hiring decisions

Bryq offers a platform focusing on personality and cognitive assessments to predict candidate success and cultural fit. It aims to help companies make data-driven hiring decisions by understanding candidate traits and potential.

McQuaig offers limited options for skills validation beyond personality and aptitude. Bryq does not provide coding tests, business tests, or the ability to create custom questions based on specific job descriptions. If you want to test a broader range of skills, including technical abilities and job-specific knowledge, you'll need a more versatile solution.

Unlike McQuaig, Bryq offers some business tests. However, it does not offer typing tests, language tests, finance tests, AI tests, or cloud tests. For roles requiring these specific skill sets, other assessment options will be more appropriate. For more diverse testing needs, consider exploring Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests.

How Bryq compares to McQuaig?

Key Features

• Cognitive and personality assessments
• Culture fit analysis
• Role-based candidate matching

Bryq Pros

• Focus on personality assessment.
• Some ATS integrations.
• Mobile-friendly assessments.
• Provides help center documentation.
• Offers customizable invitation templates.

Bryq Cons

• No coding, AI, or finance skill assessments.
• Lacks custom question creation.
• Limited proctoring features.
• No public API for custom integrations.

Bryq Pricing

Bryq's pricing isn't readily available. Their starter plan begins at $299 per month (billed at $3588 annually). For scale plans or enterprise solutions, you will need to contact their sales team directly for a quote. They do not offer a free trial or a way to sign up to explore their platform.

6. Thomas

Best for: Personality and Aptitude assessments

Thomas International provides a range of psychometric assessments designed to evaluate personality, aptitude, and behavior. These assessments aim to help businesses understand their employees and candidates better, informing decisions across various HR functions.

Unlike McQuaig, which primarily focuses on personality and aptitude, Thomas offers a blend of assessments to provide a broader view of a candidate. This can be advantageous when you need to assess both cognitive abilities and behavioral traits.

However, it's worth noting that Thomas lacks coding assessments, situational judgment tests, and other skill-based evaluations. If your hiring process requires in-depth skill testing, you might need to supplement Thomas with other tools. Consider exploring Adaface's pre-employment assessment test library for a wider array of skills tests.

How Thomas compares to McQuaig?

Key Features

• Personality assessments (DISC)
• Aptitude testing
• Behavioral profiling

Thomas Pros

• Benchmarking capabilities
• Automated scorecard generation
• ATS Integrations
• GDPR Compliant
• Skill profile available in scorecard

Thomas Cons

• Lacks coding assessments
• No custom question creation
• No conversational interface for better candidate experience
• Pricing not transparent; requires contacting sales

Thomas Pricing

Thomas International does not provide pricing details publicly. You'll need to contact them for a personalized quote. They also do not offer a free trial, so you'll need to commit to a demo before trying the platform.

7. Crystal

Best for: Personality insights and predictions

Crystal offers personality assessments aimed at predicting workplace behavior and improving team dynamics. It leverages personality data to provide insights into communication styles and potential conflicts.

Crystal focuses heavily on personality assessments, offering insights into how individuals might interact in a team. Unlike McQuaig, which has limited scope, Crystal dives deeper into understanding personality traits.

However, Crystal falls short in assessing concrete skills like coding, finance, or even aptitude. While understanding team dynamics is useful, assessing skills is also key to making informed hiring decisions. For a balanced assessment, consider platforms like Adaface which combines skills and personality assessments.

How Crystal compares to McQuaig?

Key Features

• Personality Predictions: Predict how candidates will behave at work.
• Communication Style Analysis: Understand preferred communication styles.
• Team Dynamics Insights: Identify potential team conflicts and improve collaboration.

Crystal Pros

• Identifies personality traits effectively.
• Offers team dynamic insights.
• Easy-to-understand reports.
• Helps improve workplace communication.
• GDPR Compliant.

Crystal Cons

• Lacks skills-based assessments.
• No coding, aptitude or business skills tests.
• No custom question support.
• Doesn't offer assessment across different proficiency levels like CEFR A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2.

Crystal Pricing

Crystal's starter plan begins at $49 per month. For larger teams requiring more extensive features, you'll need to contact their sales team to discuss pricing options. They do offer a free trial.

8. Qualified

Best for: Technical skills assessment platform

Qualified is a platform designed to assess technical skills, focusing primarily on coding abilities. They offer a range of pre-built tests and tools aimed at streamlining the tech hiring process.

Unlike McQuaig, Qualified dives deep into the world of coding assessments, providing a platform to evaluate developers with real-world coding challenges. This hands-on approach is especially useful when you need to see how candidates perform under pressure.

While McQuaig focuses on personality and aptitude, Qualified helps recruiters hiring for technical roles. However, if you’re looking for a platform that provides support for all aptitude tests or business skill tests and want to build custom tests, you may need to look elsewhere. Unlike Qualified, Adaface can test for Sales, Marketing, Excel skills, along with custom questions and skill-wise analysis.

How Qualified compares to McQuaig?

Key Features

• Candidate screening with structured assessments.
• Live coding interviews with a functional IDE.
• SkillUp talent directory to filter candidates by skills.

Qualified Pros

• Developer Community: Widely used by developers, a trusted platform for tech talent.
• Certified Assessments: Launch role-based tests in minutes with support for 40+ programming languages and in-demand tech skills.
• Plagiarism Detection: Advanced machine learning systems ensure the integrity of assessments.
• Real-World Coding Questions: Evaluate candidates in a sandboxed environment that mirrors real job conditions.
• PDF reports: Scorecards in PDF formats for easy sharing.

Qualified Cons

• No Emotional Intelligence Screening: Lacks assessments for emotional intelligence or soft skills.
• Limited ATS Integrations: Advanced ATS integrations are only available on custom plans.
• No custom questions: You cannot add your own custom questions.
• No Typing tests: Does not support typing tests.

Qualified Pricing

Qualified does not offer transparent pricing on their website; you need to contact them for a quote. This lack of pricing transparency might make it hard to gauge if it's the right fit for your budget without engaging in a sales call. Want transparent pricing? Check out Adaface's pricing.

9. Testlify

Best for: Skills-based candidate assessment

Testlify offers a platform to create and administer a wide array of pre-employment assessments. They aim to help businesses streamline their hiring process by evaluating candidates across various skills and competencies. This can assist in identifying top talent and making informed hiring decisions.

Testlify offers a broad range of tests, from aptitude and personality to job-specific skills, aiming to cover many assessment needs. Unlike McQuaig, Testlify includes programming and situational judgment tests, expanding the scope of skills you can evaluate.

While Testlify provides a diverse test library, it doesn't offer the ability to create fully customized tests tailored to specific job descriptions. For creating assessments perfectly aligned with your unique hiring needs, consider a platform like Adaface that specializes in custom assessment design.

How Testlify compares to McQuaig?

Key Features

• Wide variety of ready-made tests.
• Automated scoring for coding assessments.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.

Testlify Pros

• Large library of pre-built tests covering diverse skills.
• Supports coding assessments with automated scoring.
• Offers web and webcam proctoring for test security.
• Provides skill-based candidate profiles.
• Has a free trial and transparent pricing.

Testlify Cons

• No custom test creation based on job descriptions.
• Lacks AI or cloud-based skill assessments.
• Doesn't offer detailed audit timelines for proctoring logs.
• No custom API for deeper integrations.

Testlify Pricing

Testlify offers tiered pricing plans, starting from $49/month (billed at $588/year). Add-ons such as integrations and team seats are available for extra cost. They do offer a free trial so you can explore the platform. For larger enterprises or specific needs, contacting their team is recommended.

10. Topgrading

Best for: Leadership Role Candidate Screening

Topgrading offers a structured approach to hiring, emphasizing in-depth interviews and a candidate's history to predict future performance. Unlike McQuaig, which focuses on personality and aptitude, Topgrading aims to understand a candidate's entire career trajectory.

McQuaig's assessments provide a snapshot of a candidate's traits, Topgrading seeks to uncover patterns and trends in their past behavior. This is especially useful when hiring for leadership roles where past performance is a strong indicator of future success.

Topgrading's methodology emphasizes thorough interviews and reference checks, potentially revealing insights that a standardized assessment might miss. This makes it valuable for high-stakes hiring decisions, where a bad hire can have significant consequences.

How Topgrading compares to McQuaig?

Key Features

• Career History Deep Dive
• Structured Interview Process
• Focus on Past Performance

Topgrading Pros

• Provides a thorough understanding of a candidate's background.
• Helps identify patterns of success and failure.
• Can reveal hidden strengths and weaknesses.
• Emphasizes reference checks for verification.
• Aids in making informed hiring decisions for senior roles.

Topgrading Cons

• Time-consuming due to the extensive interview process.
• Heavily reliant on the interviewer's skills and judgment.
• Limited scope of assessment, focusing primarily on past roles.
• Doesn't offer skills assessments for skills based hiring like Adaface.

Topgrading Pricing

Topgrading's pricing is not publicly available. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to compare costs upfront, and there is no mention of a free trial.

Found Your Perfect McQuaig Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface offers a vast test library of 500+ tests, covering aptitude, finance, personality, and technical roles, complete with a robust proctoring suite and transparent credit-based pricing, suitable for global teams.
• Evalart provides coding assessments, but unlike Adaface, it lacks scenario-based MCQs.
• The Predictive Index focuses on personality and aptitude, but doesn't offer the breadth of testing like coding or custom questions that Adaface provides.
• SuccessFinder centers on personality assessments, differing from Adaface's broader scope that includes aptitude and technical skills.
• Bryq combines aptitude and personality tests, though its business role coverage is limited compared to Adaface's.
• Thomas International provides aptitude and behavior assessments, but lacks the tech skill evaluations that Adaface offers.
• Crystal specializes in personality insights, missing the skill-based assessments available on Adaface.
• Qualified.io excels in coding assessments, yet doesn't cover aptitude or personality like Adaface.
• Testlify has a wide range of tests, but lacks AI assessments and the advanced proctoring found in Adaface.
• Topgrading concentrates on leadership assessments, a niche offering compared to Adaface's diverse skill evaluations.

Choosing the right assessment tool is a big deal for hiring. We've explored several alternatives to McQuaig, each with its strengths and weaknesses.

McQuaig is known for its personality and aptitude assessments, but it lacks the breadth of tests needed for many roles today. It doesn't offer coding, AI, or finance tests, which are now must-haves for tech-forward companies.

Thankfully, there are great alternatives. Adaface stands out with its massive test library and strong proctoring. It supports various roles from aptitude to AI and is trusted by clients in 70+ countries.

No matter what your specific hiring needs are, the alternatives we've covered offer viable solutions. Whether you're looking for coding skills, personality insights, or business acumen, there's a tool to help you hire smarter.

See how Adaface can transform your hiring process – try it out today!