Top 10 Interviewer AI Alternatives & Competitors

Why are companies seeking alternatives to Interviewer AI?

I've taken a good look around and it seems like HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers are looking for more when it comes to pre-employment assessment. Let's break down some of the reasons why.

Limited Test Library. While Interviewer AI offers a WorkMap assessment, it lacks a wide range of tests across various skills. Companies often need to assess candidates on programming, aptitude, finance, or even language proficiency, which may require juggling multiple platforms.

Lack of Coding Assessments. Interviewer AI does not provide coding questions, limiting its ability to assess a candidate's hands-on coding skills. Technical roles often require candidates to demonstrate coding abilities, making this a significant drawback for hiring teams focused on engineering talent.

Pricing Transparency. Interviewer AI's pricing details are not readily available on their website, requiring potential customers to sign up and engage with their team to get a quote. This lack of pricing transparency can be a barrier for smaller businesses or those who prefer to quickly evaluate costs before committing to a platform. Consider exploring pre-employment assessment tests with transparent pricing for easy comparison.

1. Adaface

Best for: Assess candidates across both business and technical roles with one platform.

Looking for a strong alternative to Interviewer AI? Adaface offers a skills-based assessment platform designed for companies that want accurate and reliable candidate screening.

One of the biggest limitations of Interviewer AI is its lack of support for coding assessments. Adaface solves this by providing coding questions, scenario-based MCQs, and automated scoring, giving you a well-rounded view of a candidate's abilities. So you can easily assess both their coding skills as well as communication for developer roles.

Adaface addresses the need for comprehensive skills assessment with:

• A test library of 500+ tests.
• Support for aptitude, finance, personality, and technical roles.
• Strong proctoring features to ensure test integrity.
• Used by clients in 70+ countries.
• Focus on candidate experience and company branding.
• Detailed scorecards for reporting and analytics.

Extensive Test Library for Diverse Roles

Adaface boasts a rich test library with over 500+ tests, designed to evaluate a wide range of skills and roles. Unlike Interviewer AI, which has limited pre-built tests, Adaface offers assessments for technical skills, cognitive abilities, language proficiency, and more.

Whether you're hiring for business roles like sales and marketing or technical positions requiring coding tests, Adaface has you covered. Our extensive library saves you time and resources by providing ready-to-use assessments for various job functions.

Robust Proctoring for Reliable Results

Adaface provides a suite of proctoring features to maintain test integrity and prevent cheating. These measures ensure that your candidate evaluations are accurate and reflect true skills.

Our proctoring suite includes webcam monitoring, window and tab tracking, IP address logging, and copy-paste disabling. Adaface also employs measures to detect the use of tools like ChatGPT during assessments, providing a secure and reliable testing environment. So that you can be assured that the tests are cheat proof and your hiring decisions are fair.

Adaface vs Interviewer AI Attributes

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests on technical skills, cognitive abilities, language proficiency, and more
• Extensive ATS integrations and the possibility to build custom integrations
• Customizable assessments to match specific job descriptions
• Excellent anti-cheating measures, including webcam and window proctoring
• Bulk candidate management for high-volume hiring
• Tests available in multiple languages to cater to global teams
• Regular updates and quality checks on tests to maintain accuracy

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit different hiring needs. A free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits is available to explore the platform before purchasing. No credit card is required to start. All pricing plans include all proctoring features and 500+ tests. Available plans include: Individual ($180/yr), Starter ($500/yr), Pro ($900/yr), Scale ($3000/yr), Growth ($5500/yr), Enterprise ($20,000/yr), and Unlimited ($50,000/yr).

2. Willo

Best for: Asynchronous video-based candidate screening

Willo is a platform specializing in asynchronous video interviews. It allows recruiters to create and send out pre-set questions to candidates, who then record and submit their responses at their convenience. This makes it ideal for initial candidate screening and gathering first impressions.

While Interviewer AI focuses on using AI to conduct and analyze interviews, Willo relies on pre-recorded video responses. This offers a different approach to candidate evaluation. It’s particularly useful for assessing communication skills, personality, and cultural fit early in the hiring process.

Unlike Interviewer AI which assesses candidates using AI, Willo allows recruiters to add their own questions which makes it better because it doesn't restrict what you ask. However, it lacks automated scoring of coding questions or other technical skills. If you need to test for coding skills, you should look at solutions like Adaface.

How Willo compares to Interviewer AI?

Key Features

• Asynchronous video interviews
• Customizable question sets
• Candidate ranking and shortlisting

Willo Pros

• Simple and user-friendly interface
• Mobile-friendly platform for candidates
• Good for assessing communication skills and personality
• ATS integrations to streamline the hiring process
• Uses GenAI for optimizing recruiter workflows

Willo Cons

• Lacks skills testing capabilities for technical skills
• No automated scoring or skills-based analysis
• No free trial, and you have to book a demo
• They don't support multiple question sets to prevent cheating

Willo Pricing

Willo's pricing starts at $310/month for their individual plan and $399/month for their starter plan. They also have enterprise pricing available, but you'll need to contact Willo directly for a custom quote. There is no free trial available.

3. Coderbyte

Best for: Coding skills assessment platform

Coderbyte is a platform primarily focused on evaluating coding skills through challenges and assessments. It provides a range of coding problems and courses designed to help developers improve their skills and companies assess technical talent.

Unlike Interviewer AI, Coderbyte dives deep into the technical skills of candidates. While Interviewer AI offers a broad AI-driven approach, Coderbyte provides a platform specifically tailored for assessing coding abilities, offering a wider variety of coding challenges.

This makes Coderbyte a strong alternative if your primary goal is to evaluate coding skills in a detailed and practical manner, especially since Interviewer AI doesn't offer coding assessments.

How Coderbyte compares to Interviewer AI?

Key Features

• Coding challenges in various languages
• Assessments for different skill levels
• Career page integrations

Coderbyte Pros

• Wide range of coding challenges.
• Supports multiple programming languages.
• Good for identifying coding strengths and weaknesses.
• Provides a platform for developers to practice and improve.
• Offers coding courses to upskill talent.

Coderbyte Cons

• Limited scope beyond coding skills. Does not assess aptitude or business skills.
• Lacks situational judgment and personality assessments.
• No custom question creation. Companies can't tailor assessments to their specific needs, unlike with Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests.
• Reporting capabilities are basic, lacks in-depth skills analysis.

Coderbyte Pricing

Coderbyte offers several pricing tiers. A basic plan starts at $199/month. They also offer subscription based plans that costs $1,699/year. Their 'pay as you go' plan costs $500 for 50 candidates, or $350 for 30 candidates. Contact them for enterprise pricing.

4. HireVue

Best for: Enterprise video interview platform

HireVue is a video interviewing platform designed to help large companies streamline their hiring process. It uses video and AI to assess candidates, aiming to make hiring faster and fairer.

HireVue shines where Interviewer AI falls short: handling high-volume recruitment for large organizations. While Interviewer AI focuses on personality insights, HireVue tackles the practical challenge of screening thousands of applicants.

This is especially valuable for large enterprises that need to fill many roles. HireVue's structured interviews and AI analysis offer a consistent way to evaluate candidates at scale, something Interviewer AI doesn't offer.

How HireVue compares to Interviewer AI?

Key Features

• On-demand video interviews
• AI-driven assessment
• Candidate ranking and scoring

HireVue Pros

• Structured interview process for consistency.
• Scalable for high-volume hiring needs.
• Integrates with many Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS).
• Provides data-driven insights to improve hiring decisions.
• Offers coding assessments for technical roles.

HireVue Cons

• Lacks custom question creation.
• No support for situational judgment tests, limiting the scope of assessment.
• Doesn't offer custom data location support, raising data residency concerns.
• Pricing is not transparent, requiring a sales call for information.

HireVue Pricing

HireVue doesn't publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a custom quote. This lack of transparency can make it hard to compare HireVue against alternatives like Adaface, which offers clear and upfront pricing.

5. CodeSignal

Best for: Coding skills assessment platform

CodeSignal offers a technology skills assessment platform designed to help companies measure candidate skills. It mainly focuses on coding assessments, offering coding tests and coding interview tools.

Interviewer AI leans heavily on AI-driven interviews, which might not be the best for accurately assessing coding skills. CodeSignal's strength lies in its coding assessments. They provide a platform where candidates can demonstrate coding abilities, which is useful for technical roles.

Unlike Interviewer AI, CodeSignal is focused on technical skills and provides a coding environment. If you're hiring for roles where coding proficiency is important, CodeSignal lets you evaluate candidates in a more practical way.

How CodeSignal compares to Interviewer AI?

Key Features

• Candidate skills assessment: Provides coding assessments to screen candidates.
• Live Coding Interviews: Offers a platform for conducting live coding interviews with a collaborative coding environment.
• Skill Certification: Allows candidates to earn certified assessments to showcase their abilities.

CodeSignal Pros

• Strong focus on technical skills assessment.
• Provides a platform for live coding interviews.
• Offers coding challenges for skill verification.
• Integrates with popular ATS systems.
• Provides automated scoring for coding tests.

CodeSignal Cons

• Lacks assessments for non-technical skills like aptitude, personality, or business acumen, limiting its scope compared to platforms like Adaface.
• Doesn't offer custom questions creation, making it less flexible for specific use cases.
• Doesn't offer custom data location support.
• No support for multiple question sets, so you run the risk of questions getting leaked and used by candidates.

CodeSignal Pricing

CodeSignal does not have pricing information available publicly, so you need to contact sales to understand the pricing tiers. CodeSignal doesn't offer a free trial.

6. Byteboard

Best for: Technical role assessments

Byteboard specializes in assessing technical skills, particularly for software engineering roles. They aim to predict on-the-job performance through assessments designed to mimic real-world scenarios.

Unlike Interviewer AI, Byteboard focuses heavily on coding assessments, diving deep into a candidate's technical proficiency. This makes it a better fit for companies laser-focused on verifying coding skills.

However, if your needs extend beyond just coding, Byteboard's limited scope in areas like aptitude, personality, or business skills might leave you wanting more. Interviewer AI also doesn't support coding questions.

How Byteboard compares to Interviewer AI?

Key Features

• Project-based assessments for software engineering roles.
• Automated scoring for coding challenges.
• Integration with Greenhouse and Workable ATS.

Byteboard Pros

• Assesses coding skills with realistic project simulations.
• Automated scoring saves time for hiring managers.
• Strong focus on technical roles.
• GDPR compliant
• Candidates can use popular IDEs

Byteboard Cons

• Limited to technical roles; lacks breadth in assessing other skill types.
• No support for custom questions, restricting flexibility.
• Longer assessment times (around 1.5 hours) may deter some candidates. This can impact your candidate drop off rates negatively compared to shorter tests like Adaface's 40-min skills tests.
• No support for multiple question sets.

Byteboard Pricing

Byteboard uses a credit-based pricing model. They provide a free trial of CodeCollab product. However, to get detailed pricing information tailored to your needs, you'll need to contact their sales team. Their CodeCollab starts at 15$/unit and CoreEval at 300$/interview.

7. TestGrid

Best for: Aptitude and personality assessments

TestGrid offers a platform for conducting aptitude and personality assessments. While Interviewer AI focuses on AI-driven interviews, TestGrid provides a different approach by focusing on standardized tests to evaluate candidates.

Interviewer AI leverages AI to conduct interviews, but it might fall short in objectively evaluating specific skills like aptitude. TestGrid works better in these situations as it provides structured aptitude tests that offer standardized scoring and benchmarking.

Moreover, Interviewer AI lacks the capability to assess personality traits effectively. TestGrid, on the other hand, incorporates personality assessments, providing insights into a candidate's behavioral tendencies and cultural fit, offering a more rounded candidate profile.

How TestGrid compares to Interviewer AI?

Key Features

• Aptitude Testing: Assesses logical reasoning, numerical ability, and verbal skills.
• Personality Assessments: Evaluates personality traits and behavioral tendencies.
• Reporting & Analytics: Provides detailed reports on candidate performance.

TestGrid Pros

• Wide range of aptitude tests available.
• Personality assessments to gauge candidate fit.
• Integrates with existing ATS systems.
• Offers proctoring features to maintain test integrity.
• Provides detailed reporting and analytics.

TestGrid Cons

• Lacks programming language coding questions.
• Does not support custom question creation, limiting flexibility.
• No custom API for integration with other platforms.
• Limited test types compared to platforms like Adaface.

TestGrid Pricing

TestGrid does not provide pricing details on their website. You need to sign up to receive pricing information from their sales team. They do not offer a free trial.

8. Plum

Best for: Predictive hiring using behavioral data

Plum advertises itself as a talent assessment platform that uses objective data to measure candidates' potential. It focuses on matching people to jobs where they thrive, aiming to improve hiring outcomes and reduce turnover. They hinge on the power of behavioral data to make candidate matches.

Unlike Interviewer AI which is restricted to just interviews, Plum offers behavioral assessments that can identify candidates who possess traits linked to success within a specific role and company culture. This approach expands beyond the resume and attempts to look at potential, not just past experience.

However, it's important to note that Plum's assessments primarily gauge personality traits and aptitude. If you're looking for a platform to also assess specific skills like coding, accounting, or even language proficiency, you might need to explore alternatives like Adaface that offer a broader range of assessment types.

How Plum compares to Interviewer AI?

Key Features

• Behavioral Assessments: Measures personality traits and cognitive abilities.
• Job Matching: Aligns candidate profiles with ideal roles.
• Talent Rediscovery: Identifies internal candidates for new opportunities.

Plum Pros

• Focus on Personality: Great for roles where personality fit is key.
• Predictive Hiring: Aims to predict candidate success.
• ATS Integration: Connects with existing recruiting workflows.
• Candidate Experience: Provides insights to candidates on their strengths.
• Data-Driven Insights: Provides objective data to inform hiring decisions.

Plum Cons

• Limited Skill Testing: Lacks assessments for specific technical or hard skills.
• No Custom Questions: Cannot create custom questions tailored to specific roles.
• No Coding assessments: No support for coding assessments.
• Lack of Proctoring: No webcam proctoring or plagiarism checks to maintain test integrity.

Plum Pricing

Plum does not publicly display its pricing. You need to contact them directly for a quote. This lack of transparency makes it hard to compare costs upfront.

9. Pymetrics

Best for: Bias-free behavioral assessments

Pymetrics uses neuroscience-based games to assess candidates' cognitive and personality traits. The goal is to remove bias and predict job performance by focusing on potential instead of past experience.

While Interviewer AI focuses on conversational assessments, Pymetrics differentiates itself through its game-based approach. These games measure a range of cognitive, social, and emotional traits, providing a more nuanced view of a candidate's potential fit.

This approach is particularly useful in early-stage screening, where recruiters aim to quickly filter large applicant pools while minimizing unconscious biases. Unlike resume screening or initial interviews, Pymetrics provides data-driven insights into candidate attributes, aligning them with job requirements and company culture.

How Pymetrics compares to Interviewer AI?

Key Features

• Game-based assessments: Candidates play a series of neuroscience-backed games.
• AI-driven analysis: Algorithms analyze game data to predict job performance.
• Bias mitigation: Aims to reduce unconscious bias in hiring decisions.

Pymetrics Pros

• Focus on Potential: Assesses candidates based on their inherent traits, not just past experience.
• Data-Driven Insights: Provides objective data to inform hiring decisions.
• Improved Diversity: Designed to reduce bias and promote fairer hiring practices.
• Ready-to-use assessments: Offers a library of pre-built assessments for various roles.
• ATS Integration: Integrates with existing Applicant Tracking Systems.

Pymetrics Cons

• Limited Customization: Lacks the option to add custom questions or coding challenges, unlike solutions like Adaface.
• No skills testing: Doesn't directly assess job-specific skills like coding, finance, or language proficiency.
• No Proctoring: Lacks anti-cheating measures like webcam or window proctoring.
• No Live Support: Candidates do not have Live Chat support.

Pymetrics Pricing

Pymetrics does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly evaluate whether it fits within your budget.

10. Aon

Best for: Scalable talent assessment solution

Aon's assessment solutions aim to help businesses identify and cultivate talent. They offer a range of tests to evaluate skills and potential, designed to assist in making better hiring decisions.

Aon shines where Interviewer AI falls short: offering a wider range of assessment types. While Interviewer AI focuses on AI-driven interviews, Aon covers more ground with aptitude, personality, and even programming tests. This breadth lets you create a more complete candidate profile.

Unlike Interviewer AI, Aon provides coding questions, ensuring candidates have hands-on experience. This difference is key for roles demanding hands-on technical abilities, offering a more in-depth evaluation than a standard AI interview.

How Aon compares to Interviewer AI?

Key Features

• Aptitude and Skills Testing: Assess candidates across various skill sets with pre-designed tests.
• Personality Assessments: Evaluate personality traits and cultural fit.
• Coding Assessments: Verify programming skills with coding challenges.

Aon Pros

• Wide range of assessments covering aptitude, personality, and skills.
• Supports coding assessments for technical roles.
• ATS integrations to streamline the hiring process.
• Role-based access for team collaboration.
• GDPR compliant for data privacy.

Aon Cons

• Lacks custom question creation, limiting tailoring to specific roles. Adaface excels at this.
• No custom API for deeper integration with other HR systems.
• Limited candidate support resources, such as live chat.
• No detailed audit timeline for proctoring logs.

Aon Pricing

Aon does not provide pricing details publicly. You'll need to request a quote to understand their pricing structure. They don't offer a free trial to test the platform beforehand.

Found Your Perfect Interviewer AI Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface offers a vast test library, covering technical, aptitude, and personality assessments, used by clients in 70+ countries, with strong proctoring suite and transparent pricing that depends only on credits.
• Willo excels in asynchronous video interviews, allowing for fast and flexible candidate screening, but lacks a ready-to-use test library.
• Coderbyte focuses on technical skills with coding challenges and assessments, offering a free trial and transparent pricing, but tests are long.
• HireVue provides AI-driven assessments and video interviews, suitable for large organizations, but lacks custom questions.
• CodeSignal is tailored for technical recruitment, offering coding tests and skills assessment, but requires contacting sales for pricing.
• Byteboard specializes in evaluating software engineering skills through project-based assessments, but ATS integrations are limited.
• TestGrid offers aptitude and personality tests with ATS integrations but lacks coding assessments.
• Plum focuses on personality assessments to predict job fit, but lacks coding assessments and transparent pricing.
• Pymetrics uses neuroscience-based games to assess cognitive and personality traits, but does not support custom branding.
• Aon provides a wide range of assessments, including aptitude, personality, and coding, but is lengthy.

We've explored a range of Interviewer AI alternatives, each offering unique features for candidate assessment.

Interviewer AI shines with its AI-driven interviews. However, its limited test library and lack of coding assessments might leave you wanting more.

Fortunately, there are strong contenders to consider. Platforms like Adaface provide a wide array of tests, from aptitude to AI, ensuring a thorough skills evaluation.

No matter your specific needs, these alternatives offer the tools to streamline your hiring process and identify top talent. Choose the one that aligns with your requirements, keeping in mind the scale, budget, and particular roles you're hiring for.

Ready to transform your candidate screening? Explore Adaface and discover a better way to assess talent.