Top 10 iMocha Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why are companies scouting for alternatives to iMocha? Let's face it, no single assessment platform is a one-size-fits-all solution. Different teams have varied needs, and what works for one might not be the best fit for another.

I've done the groundwork to figure out what makes HR professionals, recruiters, and hiring managers seek other options. It's all about finding the perfect match for their specific hiring challenges.

Limited Customization. While iMocha offers a wide range of ready-made tests, creating custom questions or tailoring assessments to very specific job descriptions can be a challenge. This lack of flexibility might force teams to settle for generic tests that don't accurately reflect the nuances of the role.

Pricing Structure Can Be a Hurdle. iMocha's pricing model, which involves seat-based licenses, can become expensive, especially for larger teams or companies with high-volume hiring needs. This can lead to budget constraints and a search for more scalable pricing options.

Question Quality and Test Integrity. Some users have expressed concerns about the quality of questions and the potential for candidates to easily find answers online. If questions are easily searchable or solvable by AI, the assessment's ability to accurately gauge a candidate's skills is compromised. For robust skills evaluations, consider exploring platforms with a focus on skills assessment tools that emphasize non-googleable and non-GPT-able questions.

1. Adaface

Best for: Role-based tests for non-technical and technical roles

Looking for a strong iMocha alternative? Adaface is your go-to platform. It provides a smooth and reliable way to assess your candidate pool.

One common complaint about iMocha is the lack of transparency in pricing. It is hard to understand how much you will be paying before actually using the product. With Adaface, pricing is straightforward and available on our pricing page. No hidden fees, no surprises.

Adaface focuses on providing a great experience and accurate candidate assessments. Here are some ways we achieve it:

Advanced Proctoring Measures

Adaface employs a suite of proctoring features to maintain test integrity. We use webcam proctoring, which needs candidate permission, to monitor the test environment and deter fraud.

Additionally, our platform tracks tab switching, protects against copy-pasting, and uses IP and device fingerprint proctoring. These measures ensure a fair and reliable assessment experience.

Extensive Test Library

Adaface boasts a rich test library that spans across 500+ roles and skills. From aptitude tests to coding tests and even personality tests, we've got you covered.

Our questions are designed to be scenario-based, mirroring real-world challenges. This makes sure you're evaluating how candidates apply their knowledge, not just what they know. We also provide tests for business roles such as finance and accounting.

Adaface vs iMocha Attributes

Adaface Pros

• High test library with 500+ tests
• Aptitude, finance, personality, business, typing, AI, technical and coding tests
• Strong proctoring suite
• Used by clients from 70+ countries
• No seat-based pricing; pricing only depends on credits
• Candidate experience and company branding
• Scorecards, reporting, and analytics

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers clear and transparent pricing. You can explore the platform with a free trial that includes 2 sample tests and 5 credits. No credit card is required to start. Our self-serve platform has several plans to suit different needs: Individual ($180/year), Starter ($500/year), Pro ($900/year), Scale ($3000/year), Growth ($5500/year), Enterprise ($20,000/year), and Unlimited ($50,000/year). All plans include all proctoring features and access to all 500+ tests.

2. Alva Labs

Best for: Data-driven personality assessments

Alva Labs offers personality and cognitive ability assessments to help companies make data-driven hiring decisions. They aim to predict job performance and cultural fit.

Unlike iMocha, Alva Labs leans heavily into personality assessments, which can be useful for roles where soft skills are paramount. However, this focus means they lack the breadth of skills assessment that iMocha provides.

For companies seeking to evaluate candidates across a wide range of technical and business skills, a platform like Adaface offering comprehensive skills assessment tests might be a better fit.

How Alva Labs compares to iMocha?

Key Features

• Personality assessments based on the Big Five model.
• Cognitive ability tests to measure problem-solving skills.
• Candidate ranking and comparison tools.

Alva Labs Pros

• Focuses on personality and cognitive traits.
• Integrates with various ATS platforms.
• Provides candidate scorecards for easy comparison.
• Offers a free trial to explore the platform.
• Claims to use science-backed assessments.

Alva Labs Cons

• Lacks assessments for many job-specific and business-related skills.
• Does not offer custom question creation.
• No support for excel simulations for finance roles.
• Tests can be time intensive, with a typical assessment lasting 2 hours. If you want shorter tests, consider Adaface assessments pricing.

Alva Labs Pricing

Alva Labs offers a free trial and has paid plans starting at $289 per month. For larger organizations, enterprise pricing is available upon request. Contact them to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote. But note that they do not provide unlimited plans.

3. Testgorilla

Best for: Quick general skills assessment

TestGorilla offers a broad library of pre-employment tests designed to assess a candidate's skills, personality, and culture fit. While iMocha provides skills intelligence features, TestGorilla focuses on offering a wide range of ready-to-use tests for various roles and skill sets.

TestGorilla shines when you need to quickly evaluate candidates across a wide spectrum of skills. Unlike iMocha, which can be more focused on in-depth skill analysis, TestGorilla gives you breadth. It's like having a diverse box of chocolates – you get a little bit of everything!

However, TestGorilla lacks the ability to create custom questions. If you need assessments tailored to very specific or unique company scenarios, TestGorilla's pre-made tests might not fully cover your needs. For custom needs, solutions like Adaface's online assessment platform may be more suitable.

How Testgorilla compares to iMocha?

Key Features

• Extensive test library covering aptitude, personality, and job-specific skills.
• Video interviews for asynchronous candidate screening.
• Employer branding options to customize the candidate experience.

Testgorilla Pros

• Wide variety of tests available, covering diverse skill sets.
• User-friendly interface for easy test creation and administration.
• Good for quickly screening large numbers of candidates.
• Offers a free plan with limited features to try out the platform.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.

Testgorilla Cons

• Lacks custom question creation, limiting ability to assess niche skills.
• No AI tests available, restricting assessment of emerging technology skills.
• Limited options for customizing the candidate experience.
• Does not offer custom data location support, potentially raising compliance issues.

Testgorilla Pricing

TestGorilla offers tiered pricing plans that scale with the size of your company. Plans range from a free option with limited features to paid plans that start from $75 per month (billed annually) for teams of 1-15 FTEs, scaling up based on company size. Enterprise pricing requires contacting TestGorilla directly for a custom quote. Note that the unlimited invites have fair use policy restrictions.

4. Hackerrank

Best for: Technical skill screening at scale

HackerRank focuses on technical skill assessment, especially for developers. It provides coding challenges and assessments to evaluate a candidate's programming abilities. Unlike iMocha, HackerRank is primarily centered around coding skills, making it suitable for tech-heavy roles.

HackerRank shines when you need to assess coding proficiency. While iMocha tries to be a jack-of-all-trades, HackerRank doubles down on coding. If your priority is to see how well a candidate can actually code, HackerRank provides a focused environment for that.

However, remember that HackerRank leans heavily into coding challenges. If you need to assess a broader range of skills like aptitude or personality, you might need additional tools. It's best for scenarios where coding skill is the primary deciding factor and you want to use real world coding question to ensure that the candidate knows how to code. For a wider array of tests, including aptitude tests, you might want to explore other options.

How Hackerrank compares to iMocha?

Key Features

• Coding Assessments: Evaluate candidates with coding challenges in various languages.
• Real-time IDE: Candidates can write and execute code in a realistic coding environment.
• Plagiarism Detection: Helps maintain the integrity of the assessments.

Hackerrank Pros

• Large Developer Community: Popular among developers, potentially increasing candidate familiarity.
• Wide Range of Coding Languages: Supports numerous programming languages and frameworks.
• Automated Scoring: Reduces manual effort in evaluating coding assessments.
• Real-World Coding Questions: Assesses practical coding skills.
• Strong focus on coding skill: Best to accurately evaluate technical skill

Hackerrank Cons

• Limited Scope: Primarily focused on coding skills, lacking in other areas like aptitude or personality assessments.
• No Situational Judgement Questions: Fails to assess how candidates will react on the job.
• Lengthy tests: Hackerrank tests have 2 hours of time, which could cause candidate drop-off.
• Default questions googleable: The default questions provided on the platform are easily googleable, which can cause inaccurate evaluation.

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank offers different pricing tiers. They have a free trial. The basic plan starts at $100 per month ($1200 per annum), the professional plan starts at $250 per month ($3000 per annum) and for enterprise plans, you'll need to contact them for a custom quote. This might involve a sales call to understand your specific needs.

5. Coderbyte

Best for: Coding challenges, skill development.

Coderbyte is like a playground for developers, offering coding challenges and courses to sharpen their skills. While iMocha tries to be a jack-of-all-trades with various assessment types, Coderbyte sticks to what it knows best: coding.

Coderbyte focuses on assessing coding skills, providing a platform for developers to practice and improve. Unlike iMocha, it doesn't spread itself thin across aptitude, personality, and other non-coding assessments. This makes Coderbyte a solid choice when your main focus is on evaluating and enhancing coding proficiency.

Also, Coderbyte lets you add your own coding questions which iMocha doesn't let you do. This can be useful for custom cases to solve complex situations.

How Coderbyte compares to iMocha?

Key Features

• Coding Challenges: Solve challenges in various languages.
• Courses: Learn new skills or brush up on existing ones.
• Assessments: Evaluate coding skills for hiring.

Coderbyte Pros

• Large developer community for peer learning.
• Supports many programming languages.
• Provides a good range of coding challenges.
• Code playback to see candidate's coding process.
• Multiple question sets to minimize cheating.

Coderbyte Cons

• Lacks assessments for non-coding skills.
• No ATS integrations for streamlined hiring workflows.
• Mobile experience isn't available.
• Does not test for soft skills, aptitude, or other role specific tests.

Coderbyte Pricing

Coderbyte offers a few pricing plans. Their starter plan begins at $199/month. They also have subscription and pay-as-you-go plans. For enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact them directly.

6. AssessFirst

Best for: Personality and aptitude assessments

AssessFirst offers a suite of psychometric assessments designed to evaluate personality, motivation, and cognitive abilities. It aims to predict candidate fit and performance by focusing on behavioral traits and potential, offering a different lens compared to iMocha's skill-based approach.

AssessFirst focuses on predicting workplace behavior and potential, which can be incredibly valuable when cultural fit and long-term growth are priorities. While iMocha excels at verifying specific skills, AssessFirst helps you understand how a candidate is likely to perform and interact within your team.

This is especially useful when skills can be taught, but inherent traits like adaptability, teamwork, and drive are harder to cultivate. If you're looking beyond immediate skills to assess a candidate's overall potential and alignment with your company culture, AssessFirst provides insights that iMocha might miss.

How AssessFirst compares to iMocha?

Key Features

• Personality assessments to gauge workplace behavior.
• Cognitive ability tests to evaluate learning potential.
• Motivation questionnaires to understand drivers.

AssessFirst Pros

• Provides insights into personality and cultural fit.
• Offers a different perspective beyond skill validation.
• Helps predict long-term potential and adaptability.
• Integrates with existing ATS systems for streamlined hiring.
• Provides psychometric tests to evaluate candidate behavior.

AssessFirst Cons

• Lacks specific skill-based assessments like coding or finance tests. If you want candidates to pass through pre-employment assessment tests, this might not be the right choice.
• No support for custom question creation.
• Doesn't offer coding questions, Excel simulations, or other practical skill evaluations.
• No live chat or phone support for candidates or recruiters.

AssessFirst Pricing

AssessFirst doesn’t openly list pricing on their website. You'll need to contact their team to get a personalized quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly assess if it fits your budget, and there is no mention of a free trial to test the platform's capabilities beforehand.

7. Realcoderz

Best for: Coding skills assessment platform

Realcoderz offers a platform focused on assessing coding skills. While iMocha aims to be an all-in-one solution, Realcoderz zeroes in on evaluating a candidate's coding capabilities.

iMocha provides a wide array of tests, but its coding assessments lack the depth needed for specialized roles. Realcoderz provides coding assessments, letting you precisely evaluate coding skills.

Realcoderz's proctoring features aim to maintain test integrity. However, it lacks some ATS integrations, and this where Adaface's online assessment platform would come in handy to help.

How Realcoderz compares to iMocha?

Key Features

• Coding skill assessment
• Job-specific tests available
• Automated scoring system

Realcoderz Pros

• Focus on coding skills
• Automated scoring for coding tests.
• GDPR compliant ensuring data privacy.
• Job-specific assessments available.
• Provides email support.

Realcoderz Cons

• Lacks aptitude, behavioral, and business skill assessments, limiting its use for roles requiring diverse skill sets.
• No custom coding questions, hindering the ability to assess skills specific to your company's tech stack.
• Limited integrations, making it less convenient for companies using various HR tools.
• No support for excel simulation based assessments.

Realcoderz Pricing

Realcoderz does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. Unlike some platforms, there's no readily available free trial to test the waters before committing. To request a trial, you will have to request the Realcoderz team by filling out a form.

8. SuccessFinder

Best for: Personality-based role matching

SuccessFinder zeroes in on personality assessments, offering a unique approach to talent acquisition. Unlike iMocha, which provides a broad spectrum of skill assessments, SuccessFinder emphasizes predicting job performance based on personality traits and behavioral patterns. It's like choosing between a Swiss Army knife (iMocha) and a specialized screwdriver (SuccessFinder).

SuccessFinder's main strength lies in its ability to provide insights into a candidate's potential fit within a specific role and company culture, based on personality and behavioral assessments. Where iMocha focuses on skills, SuccessFinder emphasizes predicting future job performance.

However, if you need to assess a wider array of skills beyond personality, especially technical skills, SuccessFinder might leave you wanting more. For instance, if you're hiring developers, you'd miss out on assessing their coding skills. If you are looking for a tool that can assess for both personality and skills, consider Adaface's online assessment platform.

How SuccessFinder compares to iMocha?

Key Features

• Behavioral assessment focused on predicting performance
• Personality-based job matching
• Candidate-culture fit analysis

SuccessFinder Pros

• Focus on predicting job performance.
• Identifies candidate-culture fit.
• Can reduce employee turnover through better matching.
• Helps in building teams with complementary personalities.
• Mobile friendly assessments.

SuccessFinder Cons

• Lacks technical skill assessments.
• No coding assessments.
• Limited integrations.
• No custom questions.

SuccessFinder Pricing

SuccessFinder does not offer transparent pricing on their website. You'll need to contact them directly to discuss your needs and get a custom quote. No free trial is available, so diving in requires a conversation with their sales team.

9. Pulsifi

Best for: Predictive talent analytics platform

Pulsifi is a talent assessment platform that emphasizes predicting candidate success. It goes beyond skills and evaluates candidates based on how well they align with a company's culture and values.

While iMocha offers a wide array of skill-based assessments, it falls short on evaluating culture fit and predicting candidate performance. Pulsifi focuses on helping you understand which candidates will thrive in your organization, potentially leading to better retention and team cohesion.

Pulsifi's predictive analytics capabilities can assist in making informed hiring decisions. However, it's important to note that its assessment scope is narrower than iMocha's, particularly lacking in technical skill assessments like coding tests. If you're prioritizing culture fit over technical skill screening, Pulsifi might be a viable alternative.

How Pulsifi compares to iMocha?

Key Features

• Culture-fit assessments: Determines candidate alignment with company values.
• Predictive analytics: Forecasts candidate success and performance.
• Behavioral assessments: Evaluates personality and work styles.

Pulsifi Pros

• Focus on culture fit and values alignment.
• Predictive analytics provides insights into candidate potential.
• Integrates with existing ATS systems for streamlined workflow.
• Assesses personality traits relevant to job performance.
• Provides a comprehensive overview to compare multiple candidates.

Pulsifi Cons

• Limited scope of skills assessments. Lacks programming, finance, or language tests, unlike Adaface's pre-employment assessment test library.
• No coding questions, SQL questions, or excel workbook questions to test candidates.
• No webcam proctoring, IP proctoring, or device fingerprint proctoring, which is crucial for test integrity.
• No free trial or transparent pricing information available on their website.

Pulsifi Pricing

Pulsifi does not offer transparent pricing on their website. You need to contact their sales team to get a quote. This lack of transparency can make it harder to quickly evaluate if it fits within your budget. No free trial is available.

10. Vervoe

Best for: Skills-based, AI-driven hiring

Vervoe is an AI-powered assessment platform that helps companies screen and rank candidates based on their skills and potential. It uses simulations and work sample tasks to evaluate candidates.

Vervoe differentiates itself from iMocha through its reliance on AI to automate the assessment process. It focuses on assessing candidates through practical, real-world simulations. This approach helps companies see how candidates perform, as opposed to just what they know.

While iMocha offers a broad range of question types, Vervoe's AI-driven approach automates much of the evaluation. However, Vervoe lacks web and webcam proctoring. Consider Adaface's online assessment platform for a balance of question variety and robust proctoring features.

How Vervoe compares to iMocha?

Key Features

• AI-powered candidate screening
• Skills-based assessments
• Work sample simulations

Vervoe Pros

• Automates the assessment process with AI.
• Offers a free trial to test the platform.
• Provides a skills-based approach to candidate evaluation.
• Has integrations with popular ATS systems.
• Offers public reports for easy sharing.

Vervoe Cons

• Does not offer webcam or web proctoring for cheating detection.
• Lacks situational judgment and personality assessments.
• Does not offer custom question creation. You must rely on existing questions or simulations.
• No support for excel workbook questions or SQL coding questions.

Vervoe Pricing

Vervoe offers a free trial. Pricing starts at $300 for 10 candidates. They have an unlimited plan and enterprise pricing is available upon request.

Found Your Perfect iMocha Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface stands out with its high test library of 500+ tests across aptitude, finance, personality, typing, AI, technical, and coding roles, all backed by a strong proctoring suite and transparent, credit-based pricing.
• Alva Labs offers structured interviews and personality assessments to predict job success but lacks support for custom questions.
• TestGorilla provides a wide range of tests, including cognitive ability and personality assessments, with pricing dependent on company size.
• HackerRank is tailored for tech roles but excels in coding assessments, offering custom coding questions and plagiarism detection.
• Coderbyte focuses on coding challenges and technical assessments, providing a platform for companies to evaluate developers' skills.
• AssessFirst specializes in personality and aptitude assessments to predict candidate potential and fit, but does not offer coding tests.
• Realcoderz is focused on technical assessments, especially programming skills, but lacks certain features like custom questions and integrations.
• SuccessFinder focuses on behavioral assessments and identifying high-potential candidates, but lacks the ability to assess technical skills.
• Pulsifi uses AI to predict candidate fit and potential, focusing on personality and aptitude assessments, but does not provide coding tests.
• Vervoe utilizes AI-powered assessments and simulations to evaluate candidates across various skills, providing a broad assessment approach with a custom API.

We've explored a range of iMocha alternatives, each offering unique strengths. iMocha shines with its skill assessment variety but falls short for those needing custom questions or tests tailored to specific job descriptions.

Fortunately, several platforms bridge these gaps. Consider Adaface, offering custom tests, a vast question bank, and strong proctoring.

Whether you prioritize coding skills, personality insights, or a blend, alternatives abound.

No matter your specific hiring needs, a suitable iMocha alternative awaits, ready to transform your remote hiring process.

Ready to find top talent? Try Adaface for skills-based hiring and see the difference!