Top 10 HackerEarth Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why are companies ditching HackerEarth and looking for something new?

I've done some digging to figure out why recruiters and hiring managers are seeking alternatives to HackerEarth. Let's break down some common pain points.

Limited Assessment Types. HackerEarth primarily focuses on coding assessments. If you're hiring for roles beyond developers, like in finance, marketing, or even aptitude testing, you'll need to look elsewhere to get a complete picture of a candidate's abilities.

Focus on Coding Expertise. While HackerEarth excels at evaluating coding skills, its emphasis on complex coding challenges might not align with every company's hiring needs. Some companies need to quickly assess a broader range of technical skills, including scenario-based questions and fundamental concepts, alongside coding proficiency.

Lack of Advanced Proctoring. While HackerEarth offers some proctoring features, companies seeking more stringent measures against cheating, such as device fingerprinting or real-time cheat detection, might find the proctoring suite lacking. Strong proctoring is crucial for maintaining test integrity and ensuring fair results.

1. Adaface

Best for: Evaluate candidates across 500+ skills, from coding to cognitive aptitude.

HackerEarth is a popular platform, but it's not the only fish in the sea. If you're looking for a skills assessment platform that goes beyond coding, Adaface could be a game-changer.

One common concern with HackerEarth is the potential for candidates to find questions online, compromising test integrity. Adaface tackles this challenge head-on with scenario-based questions designed to be non-googleable, ensuring a fair and reliable assessment of each candidate's true abilities. This means you can trust the results and make informed hiring decisions.

Adaface shines with its commitment to test integrity and a wider breadth of skills coverage. Here are a few ways Adaface stands out:

• Diverse test library: 500+ tests covering technical, aptitude, personality and business skills.
• Strong proctoring suite: Webcam, window, tab, IP, and device fingerprint proctoring.
• Customization: Create custom tests based on job descriptions.
• Candidate experience: Focus on conversational assessments and company branding.
• Reporting and Analytics: Skills profile and skill-wise analysis in scorecards.

Top-notch proctoring for cheat-proof assessments

Adaface's proctoring suite ensures test integrity. We employ measures such as webcam monitoring, screen recording, and disabling copy-paste functionality.

Our system also detects if a candidate navigates away from the test window, potentially accessing external resources. We even track device fingerprints! This multi-layered approach gives you confidence in the accuracy of your results.

Extensive test library covering diverse roles

Unlike HackerEarth, which mainly focuses on tech roles, Adaface offers a wide array of tests for various roles, including business, aptitude, and personality assessments. Whether you're hiring a marketing manager, a finance analyst, or a software engineer, Adaface has you covered.

Our library includes tests for typing skills, language proficiency, and even artificial intelligence. This breadth makes Adaface a versatile solution for all your hiring needs.

Adaface vs HackerEarth Attributes

Adaface Pros

• 500+ skills tests on technical skills, cognitive abilities, language proficiency, and more
• Customizable assessments based on job descriptions
• Strong anti-cheating measures, including webcam and window proctoring
• Detailed scorecards with skills profile and skill-wise analysis
• Candidate-friendly conversational assessments
• Transparent and flexible pricing
• Used by clients from 70+ countries

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers a range of pricing plans to suit different needs. You can start with a free trial that includes 2 sample tests and 5 credits to explore the platform. No credit card is required to begin. Paid plans include Individual ($180/yr), Starter ($500/yr), Pro ($900/yr), Scale ($3000/yr), Growth ($5500/yr), Enterprise ($20,000/year), and Unlimited ($50,000/yr). All plans include all proctoring features and access to all 500+ tests. Check out our pricing page for more details.

2. iMocha

Best for: Skills-based talent management

iMocha is a skills assessment platform with skills intelligence features designed to help companies understand their workforce's existing skills, prepare for future requirements, and address skill gaps through hiring and training. While HackerEarth focuses heavily on coding assessments, iMocha extends its capabilities to help manage and develop skills throughout your organization.

HackerEarth is widely recognized for its coding challenges and focus on technical skills, it often falls short in providing assessments for a broader range of roles beyond software development.

iMocha, on the other hand, offers a wider array of pre-employment assessment tests, including aptitude, business skills, and even language proficiency. This makes iMocha a more versatile option if you're looking to assess candidates across various departments and roles, especially if you want to test skills beyond just coding.

How iMocha compares to HackerEarth?

Key Features

• Skills validation: Helps you validate the skills of your candidates with a diverse range of assessments.
• Skills intelligence: Provides insights into your workforce's skills and helps you identify skill gaps.
• Talent management: Helps you manage and develop the skills of your employees.

iMocha Pros

• Wide range of assessments: Offers assessments for various skills, including coding, aptitude, and business skills.
• Skills intelligence: Provides insights into your workforce's skills.
• Talent management: Helps manage and develop employee skills.
• Good for diverse roles: Suits companies hiring for a broad range of positions, not just technical ones.
• Mobile-friendly: Candidates can take assessments on their mobile devices.

iMocha Cons

• Limited Customization: Lacks the ability to create custom questions for niche roles.
• No public API: No custom API access for tighter integrations with in-house systems or workflows.
• No Custom Data Location Support: Data can't be stored in the location of your preference.
• Shorter tests: They may not be as insightful as Adaface's 40-min skills tests.

iMocha Pricing

iMocha does not offer transparent pricing on their website. Interested users need to contact their sales team for a custom quote. They also do not provide a free trial for users to test their platform before purchasing.

3. CodeSignal

Best for: Skill-based coding assessments

CodeSignal offers a technology-first approach to skills assessment, focusing primarily on coding skills. It uses a patented coding score called the Coding Score, attempting to provide a standardized benchmark for technical talent. Their assessments emphasize coding challenges and aim to simulate real-world coding scenarios.

Unlike HackerEarth, which started as a developer community and later transitioned into assessments, CodeSignal has always been laser-focused on technical skill evaluation. This focus translates into a more streamlined experience for companies primarily seeking to assess coding proficiency.

However, this focus also means CodeSignal lacks the breadth of assessment types found in platforms like Adaface. While CodeSignal excels at evaluating coding skills, it doesn't offer assessments for aptitude, personality, or job-specific roles outside of programming. If you need a wider range of assessments, you might need to look elsewhere.

How CodeSignal compares to HackerEarth?

Key Features

• Coding Score: A proprietary scoring system to benchmark coding skills.
• IDE: Browser-based IDE for coding assessments.
• Certified assessments: Library of coding tests across different languages.

CodeSignal Pros

• Strong Focus on Coding Skills: Excellent for evaluating coding proficiency.
• Coding Score: Provides a standardized benchmark for coding talent.
• Real-time IDE: Candidates can code in a realistic environment.
• Automated Scoring: Reduces manual effort in evaluating coding tests.
• ATS Integrations: Integrates with popular applicant tracking systems.

CodeSignal Cons

• Limited Assessment Types: Lacks assessments for aptitude, personality, and non-technical job roles.
• No Custom Question Creation: Unable to add your own bespoke questions.
• No Custom Data Location Support: No support for custom data locations for enterprises.
• No Free Trial: No free trial to test the platform before purchasing.

CodeSignal Pricing

CodeSignal does not publicly display its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote. This lack of transparency can be a hurdle for companies who prefer to evaluate pricing options upfront. Unlike Adaface Assessments Pricing, CodeSignal requires a direct sales engagement to understand the costs involved.

4. TestGrid

Best for: Aptitude and Personality Testing

TestGrid offers a platform for evaluating candidates using aptitude and personality assessments. While HackerEarth focuses heavily on coding skills, TestGrid broadens the scope to include traits useful across various roles.

HackerEarth excels in technical assessments but falls short when evaluating soft skills or general aptitude. TestGrid fills this gap, offering personality tests and aptitude assessments. This allows you to gain a more complete view of a candidate's potential beyond just technical expertise.

While HackerEarth allows adding your own questions, TestGrid does not support creating custom questions. For custom assessments tailored to your specific needs, consider using a platform like Adaface, which also provides a wider range of assessment types.

How TestGrid compares to HackerEarth?

Key Features

• Aptitude Assessments: Evaluate logical reasoning, verbal ability, and numerical skills.
• Personality Tests: Understand candidate traits and cultural fit.
• ATS Integrations: Connect with your existing recruiting workflow.

TestGrid Pros

• User authentication for secure testing.
• GDPR compliance for data privacy.
• Email support and help center access.
• Option for PDF reports.
• Integration with Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS).

TestGrid Cons

• No coding assessment capabilities.
• No custom question creation.
• Lacks a public API for custom integrations.
• No device fingerprint proctoring, decreasing proctoring abilities.

TestGrid Pricing

TestGrid does not publicly display pricing information. You'll need to sign up and contact them to learn about their plans and costs. Unlike Adaface Assessments Pricing, which offers transparent pricing, TestGrid requires a more involved process to understand their pricing structure.

5. Hackerrank

Best for: Technical skill assessment platform

HackerRank offers a platform focused on assessing technical skills. It is favored by companies seeking to evaluate developers and engineers through coding challenges and standardized tests.

HackerRank addresses a key limitation of HackerEarth: the breadth of assessment types. While HackerEarth focuses heavily on coding challenges, HackerRank provides a wider range of skills assessments, including coding, data science, and even some aptitude testing, though still limited.

However, both platforms primarily cater to technical roles. If your hiring needs extend beyond developers and engineers, you might require a platform that can assess a broader spectrum of skills, like the pre-employment assessment test library Adaface offers.

How Hackerrank compares to HackerEarth?

Key Features

• Coding Challenges: Evaluate candidates with coding problems in various languages.
• Skill Certifications: Offers certifications that candidates can earn to demonstrate their abilities.
• Integrated IDE: Provides a coding environment within the assessment platform.

Hackerrank Pros

• Large Developer Community: Widely recognized among developers, increasing candidate familiarity.
• Wide range of coding languages: Supports assessments across numerous programming languages.
• Plagiarism Detection: Includes features to detect plagiarism in coding submissions.
• Real-world coding questions: coding questions in a sandboxed environment.
• Comprehensive Overview: Provides a single view where recruiters can compare multiple candidates at once across different skill scores.

Hackerrank Cons

• Limited scope: Focuses primarily on technical skills, neglecting other skill areas.
• Default questions are easily googleable: Most of the coding questions can be searched from google
• No Custom API: No Custom API integration.
• No Social Listening: no social listening for questions or questions leaks.

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank's pricing involves a tiered subscription model. They have starter plans, scale plans. For enterprise pricing, you will need to contact their sales team. They do offer a free trial, which is a plus.

6. Codility

Best for: Coding skills assessment at scale

Codility is another popular platform for assessing coding skills. It helps recruiters and hiring managers evaluate developers through coding tests and challenges. It's primarily focused on technical skills, making it a go-to for companies laser-focused on developer prowess.

HackerEarth is often criticized for its lengthy tests, sometimes stretching up to 2 hours. This can lead to candidate fatigue and a drop in completion rates. Codility, on the other hand, also offers assessments that can take up to 2 hours.

While both platforms offer coding challenges, Codility does not provide scenario-based questions, which can be helpful for understanding how candidates approach real-world problems. For a more holistic view of a candidate's abilities, consider using a platform like Adaface, which combines coding challenges with scenario-based questions.

How Codility compares to HackerEarth?

Key Features

• Task Library: A library of coding tasks and challenges to test a range of programming skills.
• Online IDE: Provides an online Integrated Development Environment (IDE) for candidates to write and execute code.
• Automated Scoring: Automatically scores coding tests, saving time for recruiters.

Codility Pros

• Wide Range of Coding Languages: Supports many popular programming languages.
• Plagiarism Detection: Helps ensure the integrity of assessments.
• Candidate Experience: Offers a smooth testing experience for candidates.
• ATS Integrations: Integrates with various Applicant Tracking Systems.
• Custom Tasks: Ability to add your own custom coding tasks.

Codility Cons

• Limited Scope: Focuses mainly on coding skills, neglecting other important aspects like aptitude or personality.
• No Support for non-technical roles: Lacks assessments for roles outside of software development.
• No Custom API: No custom API for deeper integrations into existing systems. This can be a bottleneck for enterprise clients.
• Lack of social listening: Does not proactively monitor for test leaks, which can compromise test integrity.

Codility Pricing

Codility offers different pricing tiers depending on the features and number of candidates you need to assess. They have plans like 'Starter' at $1200 per annum, 'Scale' at $5000 per annum, but for more customized solutions, you'll need to reach out to their sales team. And unlike some platforms, they don't offer an unlimited plan, so keep that in mind if you're planning a hiring spree.

7. Coderbyte

Best for: Coding challenges and assessments

Coderbyte is another platform focused on assessing coding skills. It provides a range of coding challenges and interview prep tools, focusing primarily on programming skills. Think of it as a digital gym for your code muscles!

Unlike HackerEarth, which offers a broader suite of services, Coderbyte zeroes in on coding skill assessment. This makes it a strong choice for companies exclusively seeking to evaluate coding abilities.

However, if you're looking for a more complete picture of a candidate's abilities, including aptitude, personality, or even how they'd handle real-world situations, Coderbyte's narrower focus might leave you wanting more. For a wider range of assessments, you might want to check out Adaface's assessment test library.

How Coderbyte compares to HackerEarth?

Key Features

• Coding challenges in various languages
• Interview preparation courses
• Company challenges for team building

Coderbyte Pros

• Strong focus on coding skill evaluation.
• Good for interview preparation.
• Offers company challenges for team activities.
• Supports code playback for detailed analysis.
• Has automated scoring for coding questions.

Coderbyte Cons

• Lacks assessments beyond coding (no aptitude, personality, etc.).
• No custom question creation. You're stuck with their question bank.
• No ATS integrations, meaning manual data transfer.
• Doesn't offer detailed reporting like PDF or public reports.

Coderbyte Pricing

Coderbyte offers both subscription and pay-as-you-go plans. Their starter plan begins at $199/month. They also offer a subscription plan at $1,699/year or a pay as you go plan at $500 (50 candidates) or $350 (30 candidates). They also provide a free trial.

8. HiPeople

Best for: Assess diverse skill sets

HiPeople provides skills assessments to help companies evaluate candidates across various domains. It offers pre-made tests and the ability to create custom questions, aiming to streamline the hiring process.

While HackerEarth focuses heavily on coding assessments, HiPeople broadens the scope to include aptitude, business skills, and language proficiency. This makes it suitable for roles beyond software development.

However, HiPeople relies on multiple-choice questions for programming assessments and lacks actual coding challenges. So, while you get breadth, hands-on coding experience is not tested.

How HiPeople compares to HackerEarth?

Key Features

• Ready-to-use assessment library
• Custom question creation
• Integration with ATS platforms

HiPeople Pros

• Wide range of skills assessed, including aptitude and business skills.
• Ready-made tests available for quick setup.
• ATS integrations streamline workflow.
• Custom questions allow tailoring assessments to specific needs.
• Mobile-friendly assessments.

HiPeople Cons

• No coding challenges, only MCQs for programming skills.
• Lacks features like code playback or plagiarism detection, which are important for maintaining assessment integrity. Adaface offers advanced proctoring features like webcam and window proctoring to ensure test integrity.
• Does not offer phone assistance for support. Adaface prioritizes support with dedicated customer success contacts on higher plans.
• Limited reporting capabilities, lacking features like detailed audit timelines or the ability to export data in Excel or CSV formats.

HiPeople Pricing

HiPeople's pricing is dependent on company size. For a company with 16-25 employees, the starter plan is $96/month, billed annually at $1,152. For companies with 51-100 employees (and ATS integrations), pricing is $448/month, billed annually at $5,376. Enterprise pricing requires contacting their sales team. No pricing information is available on their site, which makes it harder to evaluate without a sales call. This contrasts with Adaface Assessments Pricing, where you can explore pricing without needing to speak to sales.

9. Hire Success

Best for: Aptitude and personality insights

Hire Success offers a suite of pre-employment assessments designed to gauge a candidate's aptitude and personality. These assessments aim to help employers predict job performance and cultural fit.

While HackerEarth focuses heavily on technical skills, Hire Success leans into aptitude and personality testing. This can be useful if you want to broaden your assessment strategy beyond just coding skills.

However, unlike Adaface, Hire Success doesn't offer coding tests, AI tests, finance tests, or cloud-related assessments. If you need to evaluate technical skills, you'll need to look elsewhere or combine Hire Success with another platform. But for a quick and dirty insight into a candidate's cognitive abilities and personality traits, it could be a starting point.

How Hire Success compares to HackerEarth?

Key Features

• Aptitude Testing: Evaluates numerical reasoning, verbal reasoning, and abstract reasoning skills.
• Personality Assessments: Measures traits like conscientiousness, agreeableness, and emotional stability.
• Job-Specific Assessments: Ready-to-use tests tailored for specific roles.

Hire Success Pros

• Skills Profile: The platform provides skills profile in scorecards to quickly see how a candidate has performed in each skill.
• Benchmarking: Candidates can be benchmarked against other candidates so that recruiters know where a candidate lies amongst the candidate pool.
• ATS Integrations: Integrates with various Applicant Tracking Systems for a streamlined workflow.
• Skill-wise Analysis: Breaks down candidate's scores by different categories to decide whether to shortlist a candidate to next rounds.
• Multiple Invite Options: Provides recruiters with the ability to invite users via multiple channels like email invites and public links.

Hire Success Cons

• Lacks Coding Assessments: No support for coding skill evaluations.
• No Webcam Proctoring: Doesn't offer webcam proctoring to prevent cheating.
• Limited Test Variety: Focuses primarily on aptitude and personality, lacking tests for other skills like finance, AI, or cloud computing.
• No Custom API: Doesn't provide a custom API for tighter integrations with existing systems. Consider Adaface Integrations - Integrate with your hiring tools.

Hire Success Pricing

Unfortunately, Hire Success doesn't display its pricing publicly. You'll need to contact their team for a quote, which might add an extra step to your evaluation process. Also, they don't offer a free trial.

10. DevSkiller

Best for: Technical skills assessment platform

DevSkiller is a platform designed to assess the technical skills of candidates, focusing primarily on coding and IT-related roles. It aims to provide a realistic evaluation of a candidate's abilities through work sample simulations and coding challenges.

Unlike HackerEarth, which primarily focuses on coding challenges and competitions, DevSkiller emphasizes assessing real-world skills through its task-based approach. This means candidates are evaluated on how they solve problems similar to those they'd encounter on the job.

While HackerEarth does offer coding tests, it lacks the breadth of assessment types offered by platforms like Adaface, which includes aptitude, personality, and language tests, making it a more versatile solution for evaluating a wider range of skills beyond just technical proficiency.

How DevSkiller compares to HackerEarth?

Key Features

• Work sample simulations for realistic assessments
• Automated scoring and reporting
• Integration with popular ATS platforms

DevSkiller Pros

• Strong focus on practical coding skills.
• Supports a variety of programming languages and frameworks.
• Provides detailed reports on candidate performance.
• Offers a good level of customization in test creation.
• Code playback feature for better evaluation.

DevSkiller Cons

• Lacks assessments for soft skills and behavioral traits.
• Does not offer a conversational assessment experience, unlike Adaface.
• Limited options for branding and customization of the candidate experience.
• Does not have custom data location support.

DevSkiller Pricing

DevSkiller does not publicly display its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote. The absence of transparent pricing and lack of a free trial could make it difficult to quickly evaluate whether it fits your budget and needs.

Found Your Perfect HackerEarth Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface provides a wide range of assessments beyond just coding, including aptitude, personality, and job-specific tests, plus strong proctoring and transparent, credit-based pricing.
• iMocha offers a large test library and supports assessments across various domains, but lacks custom question options.
• CodeSignal is focused on technical assessments but has limited options for customization and no custom API.
• TestGrid supports aptitude and personality assessments, but doesn't have programming tests and lacks pricing transparency.
• HackerRank is a popular choice for technical hiring, but doesn't offer aptitude, personality, or business skills assessments.
• Codility focuses on coding skills assessments, and has test integrity features, but only offers coding questions.
• Coderbyte provides coding assessments along with some personality tests, and offers unlimited team seats, but has no ATS integrations.
• HiPeople supports a variety of assessments including AI and business skills, but doesn't offer coding challenges.
• Hire Success focuses on aptitude and personality assessments, but doesn't offer programming tests or custom questions.
• DevSkiller is tailored for technical skill validation with custom questions but lacks assessments for aptitude, business skills or personality.

We've explored a range of alternatives to HackerEarth, each with its own strengths. HackerEarth shines when it comes to technical assessments, especially for coding roles. However, its focus on coding skills can be a limitation if you're looking for a platform that covers a broader spectrum of roles and skills, such as aptitude, personality, or even typing skills.

Fortunately, there are many other assessment providers who can help you hire for multiple roles and test for a large variety of skills. Some of the alternatives like Adaface are great for this since they offer a wide range of tests that cover not just tech, but also aptitude, finance, personality, and business roles.

Ultimately, the best HackerEarth alternative depends on your specific hiring needs. Regardless of whether you need a platform for tech skills, or something that covers multiple skills, there’s an alternative for everyone. We recommend Adaface though. Just saying.

Ready to make hiring easier and more effective? Give Adaface a try to see how you can transform your candidate screening process.