Top 10 Criteria Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why are hiring teams scouting around for alternatives to Criteria?

I've done some digging to understand why HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers are looking beyond Criteria. Let's explore some common pain points.

Limited assessment types. Criteria primarily focuses on aptitude and personality assessments. If you're looking to assess specific skills like coding, finance, or AI, you might find their library lacking. For roles requiring hands-on technical skills, the absence of coding questions can be a significant drawback.

Surface level cheating protection. Criteria offers basic proctoring features like location logging, but lacks advanced measures such as webcam proctoring, IP tracking, and copy-paste disabling. This can be a concern if you're hiring for roles where test integrity is a must.

Pricing and feature limitations. Getting a clear picture of Criteria's pricing can be tricky, as they don't openly display it, and you'll have to contact them. Some core features might only be available in higher-priced tiers. This lack of transparency and potential cost for needed features may push teams to explore other platforms like Adaface.

1. Adaface

Best for: Assessing aptitude, business skills and personality traits all in one place

Looking for a Criteria alternative that offers a wider range of assessment options and a more candidate-friendly experience? Adaface could be the perfect fit.

One common concern with Criteria is the limited scope of their anti-cheating measures. Adaface tackles this head-on with a suite of proctoring features. We use webcam proctoring, tab switching detection, IP address tracking, and more to ensure test integrity, giving you confidence in your hiring decisions.

Adaface also shines where Criteria falls short, offering features such as:

• A vast library of 500+ skills tests
• Assessments for aptitude, finance, personality, and business roles
• Strong proctoring capabilities to prevent cheating
• Global reach, serving clients in 70+ countries
• Fair pricing based on credits, including all proctoring features
• Focus on candidate experience and company branding

Robust Proctoring Suite

Adaface offers a strong suite of proctoring features.

We go beyond basic measures with webcam recording, screen monitoring, and copy-paste disabling. Our system also flags suspicious activity, like candidates switching tabs to consult external resources or using Chat GPT. We even employ social listening to detect and address potential test leaks, maintaining the integrity of your assessments. You can ensure a fair evaluation process for all candidates.

Extensive and Diverse Test Library

Adaface boasts a large test library with over 500 pre-employment assessment tests, ensuring you can find the right assessment for any role.

From technical skills like coding tests and AI to aptitude, personality, and business skills, Adaface covers a wide spectrum of roles. We also offer tests for finance, typing speed, and language proficiency. This broad coverage makes Adaface a versatile solution for diverse hiring needs.

Adaface vs Criteria Attributes

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests covering technical skills, cognitive abilities, language proficiency, and more
• Extensive ATS integrations and the possibility to build custom integrations
• Customizable assessments tailored to specific job descriptions
• Excellent anti-cheating measures, including webcam and tab proctoring
• Multiple question sets to prevent cheating
• Tests available in multiple languages
• Transparent and flexible pricing

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit different hiring needs. You can start with a free trial that includes 2 sample tests and 5 credits to explore the platform. No credit card is required to begin. Paid plans include Individual ($180/yr), Starter ($500/yr), Pro ($900/yr), Scale ($3000/yr), Growth ($5500/yr), Enterprise ($20,000/yr), and Unlimited ($50,000/yr). All pricing plans include all proctoring features and access to all 500+ tests.

2. Alva Labs

Best for: Hiring Tech Talent Quickly

Alva Labs is another assessment platform focused on helping companies evaluate candidates, especially in tech roles. They offer tools to assess both personality and skills, aiming to give a well-rounded view of a candidate's potential.

Alva Labs helps in tech roles, especially when you need coding assessments. Where Criteria doesn't offer coding tests, Alva Labs has coding questions.

However, unlike Adaface's online assessment platform, Alva Labs lacks support for custom questions. If you need to test candidates on specific scenarios unique to your company, Alva Labs might fall short.

How Alva Labs compares to Criteria?

Key Features

• Personality assessments for culture fit.
• Skills tests, including coding challenges.
• Automated scoring and reporting.

Alva Labs Pros

• Supports coding assessments, which Criteria lacks.
• Offers personality insights.
• Provides automated scoring for quick results.
• Integrates with various ATS platforms.
• Good for companies focused on tech hiring.

Alva Labs Cons

• Lacks custom question support.
• Doesn't offer typing tests.
• Tests can be lengthy, around 2 hours, potentially impacting candidate experience. Adaface assessments pricing can be economical compared to Alva Labs.

Alva Labs Pricing

Alva Labs has a transparent pricing model. The Starter plan begins at $289 per month and the Scale plan at $799 per month. For Growth and Enterprise plans, you'll need to contact Alva Labs for a custom quote. They do offer a free trial, so you can try before you buy.

3. HireVue

Best for: Video Interviewing and Assessments

HireVue is a platform primarily known for its video interviewing capabilities, but it also offers a suite of pre-employment assessments. It aims to help companies streamline their hiring process by leveraging video technology and AI-driven insights. This makes it a tool for initial screening and assessing candidate skills.

Where HireVue edges out Criteria is in its integration of video interviews with its assessment platform. While Criteria relies more on traditional testing methods, HireVue incorporates behavioral assessments via video. This can be useful for roles where communication and presentation skills are important.

However, this focus can also be a drawback. Companies primarily seeking a wide range of skills-based assessments, especially in areas like coding, finance, or language proficiency, might find HireVue's assessment library less extensive than other platforms. Also, while HireVue offers coding assessments, its strength lies in recorded video interviews.

How HireVue compares to Criteria?

Key Features

• On-demand video interviews with AI analysis
• Skills assessments across various domains
• Interview scheduling and automation

HireVue Pros

• Strong focus on video interviewing and behavioral insights.
• AI-powered analysis of video interviews can save time.
• Integration with applicant tracking systems (ATS).
• Decent automated scoring.
• Candidate tracking stages.

HireVue Cons

• Limited range of skills assessments compared to other providers.
• No custom API integrations.
• No option to create custom questions.
• Lacks detailed audit timeline for proctoring logs.

HireVue Pricing

HireVue doesn't publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a custom quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly compare costs with other assessment platforms like Adaface.

4. Pymetrics

Best for: Bias-free candidate assessment

Pymetrics uses neuroscience games to assess candidates' cognitive and personality traits. The goal? To predict job performance while removing bias. It's trying to shake up the traditional resume review process.

Criteria relies heavily on aptitude tests, which can sometimes feel disconnected from the actual job. Pymetrics, on the other hand, focuses on assessing potential through behavioral tasks.

Unlike Criteria, Pymetrics doesn't offer options for coding or business-specific skill evaluations. If you need to assess those hard skills, you might need to look elsewhere, maybe to a platform that can help you build customized assessments.

How Pymetrics compares to Criteria?

Key Features

• Game-based assessments: Candidates play games that measure different cognitive and behavioral traits.
• AI-driven analysis: The platform uses AI to analyze game data and predict job fit.
• Bias mitigation: Aims to reduce bias in the hiring process by focusing on potential, not just experience.

Pymetrics Pros

• Focus on potential: Assesses candidates based on their inherent abilities rather than past experience.
• Bias reduction: Designed to mitigate bias in hiring decisions.
• Candidate experience: Game-based assessments can be more engaging than traditional tests.
• Data-driven insights: Provides data on candidate traits and how they align with job requirements.
• Mobile-friendly: Candidates can complete assessments on their smartphones.

Pymetrics Cons

• Lack of skills testing: Doesn't directly assess hard skills like coding or finance, which Aptitude Tests For Employment do.
• Limited customization: Less control over the specific skills and knowledge being assessed.
• Black box approach: The AI-driven analysis can be opaque, making it difficult to understand why a candidate was or wasn't a good fit.
• No proctoring features: Pymetrics doesn't include any proctoring capabilities, raising concerns about test integrity.
• No custom questions: Pymetrics don't allow recruiters to add their own questions.

Pymetrics Pricing

Pymetrics does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote, which can be a hurdle if you just want to explore the platform.

5. TestDome

Best for: Skill-based candidate assessments

TestDome offers a platform to assess candidates across various skills, including programming, data science, and general cognitive abilities. It aims to provide recruiters with the data needed to make informed hiring decisions through pre-employment testing.

TestDome shines in its ability to offer a wide range of assessments, including coding exercises. Unlike Criteria, TestDome supports coding questions, allowing recruiters to evaluate candidates' practical coding skills.

This is particularly advantageous when hiring developers or other technical roles, where hands-on coding ability is a must-have. While Criteria relies more on cognitive and personality assessments, TestDome steps in to give you a peek at how candidates actually perform.

How TestDome compares to Criteria?

Key Features

• Ready-made tests: Offers a library of pre-built tests across various skill domains.
• Coding assessments: Includes coding exercises with automated scoring.
• Video interviews: Facilitates video interviews for a more personal candidate evaluation.

TestDome Pros

• Diverse test library: Wide range of tests, including programming, aptitude, and personality.
• Automated scoring: Saves time with automated scoring for coding tests.
• Webcam Proctoring: Includes webcam proctoring to prevent cheating.
• Video Interviewing: Supports video interviewing, allowing for an easier candidate screening process.
• Cost-effective: Relatively affordable, especially for smaller teams.

TestDome Cons

• Limited Customization: Offers limited options for tailoring tests to specific job roles. You can add your own questions, but can't create fully custom tests like with Adaface.
• No Custom API: No custom API for deeper integrations with other systems.
• No social listening for task leaks: Doesn't actively monitor social media for potential test leaks.
• Lacks Multiple question sets: Doesn't provide the option to use multiple test sets to prevent cheating

TestDome Pricing

TestDome uses a credit-based pricing model. While they do offer a free trial, they don't have a free plan. The starting plan is $100, where you pay $20 per candidate. For exact pricing and enterprise solutions, reaching out to their sales team may be necessary.

6. Testgorilla

Best for: Skills-based hiring made easy

TestGorilla is a skills assessment platform offering a library of pre-employment tests to evaluate candidates across various skills and personality traits. It aims to streamline the hiring process by providing tools to screen candidates quickly and effectively.

Criteria excels in aptitude and personality assessments but falls short in technical skills evaluation, particularly lacking coding assessments. TestGorilla bridges this gap by offering a wide array of skills tests, including coding, web development, and data analysis, making it a strong contender for tech-focused roles.

While Criteria allows adding custom questions, it doesn't offer fully customized tests based on job descriptions. TestGorilla's extensive test library allows recruiters to build assessments tailored to specific roles, testing skills relevant to the job.

How Testgorilla compares to Criteria?

Key Features

• Skills Testing: Evaluate candidates using a library of tests covering cognitive ability, programming, and personality.
• Video Interviews: Conduct one-way video interviews for asynchronous candidate screening.
• Custom Test Creation: Build your own assessments using their question bank.

Testgorilla Pros

• Wide range of tests: A large library covering diverse skills and job roles.
• User-friendly interface: Easy to navigate and create assessments.
• Integrations: Integrates with popular ATS platforms.
• Webcam proctoring: Uses webcam to monitor candidates.
• Multiple Question Sets: Offers multiple question sets to reduce cheating.

Testgorilla Cons

• Limited Customization: Cannot create custom questions for use cases.
• AI Tests: Lacks Artificial Intelligence-specific tests.
• Shorter Tests: TestGorilla's tests are relatively short, limiting the depth of skill assessment compared to platforms that focus on hands-on coding skills.
• Lacks Excel simulation: Does not have Excel Workbook questions where candidates are given Excel simulation based questions right in the browser.

Testgorilla Pricing

TestGorilla's pricing depends on the size of your company. For a company with 31-50 employees, the prices are $208 USD per month ($2,496 per annum) for the Starter plan and $310 USD per month ($3,720 per annum) for the Pro plan. For enterprise pricing, you need to contact TestGorilla.

7. Cangrade

Best for: Predictive talent selection solution

Cangrade is a talent selection platform that uses predictive analytics and AI to help companies identify the best candidates for their open positions. They offer assessments designed to measure a candidate's fit with the role, company culture, and potential for success.

While Criteria offers a range of assessments, it lacks in-depth predictive capabilities. Cangrade distinguishes itself by leveraging AI to predict candidate success, providing insights beyond basic skill evaluation.

Cangrade's focus on predictive analytics can lead to better hiring decisions. By assessing candidate fit and potential, companies can reduce turnover and improve employee performance. This is a step up from traditional assessments that focus primarily on current skill sets.

How Cangrade compares to Criteria?

Key Features

• Predictive Index: Uses AI to predict candidate success and cultural fit.
• Customized Assessments: Tailors assessments based on job descriptions and company requirements.
• Candidate Ranking: Provides a ranked list of candidates based on assessment scores.

Cangrade Pros

• Strong focus on predicting candidate success.
• Customizable assessments adapt to specific roles.
• Offers insights into candidate-culture fit.
• Integrates with some applicant tracking systems (ATS).
• Claims to reduce employee turnover.

Cangrade Cons

• Lacks coding assessments that test practical coding skills.
• No live chat or dedicated support, which might be an issue for urgent queries.
• No custom API available, limiting integration capabilities with other HR tools.
• Limited reporting features; no PDF or Excel exports for detailed analysis.

Cangrade Pricing

Cangrade does not publicly list pricing information. Interested users must contact Cangrade directly to request a quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult for companies to compare Cangrade with other assessment providers like Adaface, which offers clear and accessible pricing plans.

8. Crystal

Best for: Personality Assessment for Culture-Fit

Crystal (CrystalKnows) positions itself as a personality assessment tool, primarily focusing on understanding behavioral patterns and improving team collaboration. It aims to provide insights into how different personalities interact and communicate within a workplace.

Unlike Criteria, which offers a broader spectrum of aptitude and skills assessments, Crystal zeroes in on personality. Crystal's strength lies in its ability to analyze communication styles and predict team dynamics, which can be valuable for roles where interpersonal skills are paramount.

However, if you need to assess a candidate's coding skills, or require a custom assessment based on the job description, you'll find Crystal lacking. For a well-rounded assessment that includes skills, aptitude, and even custom questions tailored to specific roles, a platform like Adaface might be a better fit.

How Crystal compares to Criteria?

Key Features

• Personality Assessment: Assesses personality traits based on a proprietary model.
• Communication Style Analysis: Provides insights into how individuals prefer to communicate.
• Team Dynamics Prediction: Attempts to forecast how different personalities will interact in a team.

Crystal Pros

• Provides insights into communication styles.
• Aims to improve team collaboration through personality understanding.
• Offers a basic personality assessment for hiring.
• Integrates with LinkedIn for quick personality insights.
• Offers a free trial to explore the tool.

Crystal Cons

• Lacks skills-based assessments like coding or finance.
• No option to create custom questions.
• Does not offer proctoring features to prevent cheating.
• Limited reporting features compared to platforms focused on skills testing.

Crystal Pricing

Crystal offers a free trial. Their basic plan starts at $49/month. For scaling options, you'll need to contact their sales team to get a customized quote. This lack of transparent pricing might be a hurdle for smaller businesses that want to quickly evaluate the platform.

9. Prevue Assessments

Best for: Predicting job performance quickly

Prevue Assessments offers tools to assess candidates' skills, personality, and motivation. Their aim is to help predict job performance and improve hiring decisions. They focus on providing insights into a candidate's potential fit within an organization.

Prevue Assessments, like Criteria, offers personality, aptitude, and skills testing. However, unlike Criteria, Prevue Assessments also offers business tests and job-specific tests, making it suitable for roles like customer service or project management.

While Prevue Assessments provides a comprehensive view of a candidate, it lacks coding questions and custom test creation, which are handy when assessing for technical roles. For roles requiring custom assessments and a wider range of skills assessment tools, Adaface is a better fit.

How Prevue Assessments compares to Criteria?

Key Features

• Personality assessments to evaluate traits.
• Aptitude tests for cognitive abilities.
• Skills testing for specific job roles.

Prevue Assessments Pros

• Offers personality, aptitude, and skills assessments.
• Provides job-specific tests for various roles.
• Includes business tests.
• Integrates with ATS systems.
• Offers candidate benchmarking.

Prevue Assessments Cons

• Lacks coding questions for technical roles.
• No coding questions to assess candidates hands on coding skills.
• Doesn't offer custom test creation.
• No social listening to prevent test leaks

Prevue Assessments Pricing

Pricing details are not publicly available. You'll need to contact Prevue Assessments directly for a pricing quote. There's no free trial and no way to explore their features without reaching out to their sales team. Adaface Assessments Pricing is transparent.

10. SuccessFinder

Best for: Personality-based role matching

SuccessFinder focuses on personality assessments to predict job performance and team fit. It aims to provide insights into a candidate's behavioral traits and how well they align with specific roles and company culture.

Unlike Criteria, SuccessFinder emphasizes personality-based assessments. This is useful if you believe a candidate's personality is a better predictor of success than skills alone.

However, if you're looking for a platform that can assess a broader range of skills, including coding, aptitude, or business skills, you might find SuccessFinder's focus too narrow. Consider whether personality fit outweighs demonstrable skills for your hiring needs.

How SuccessFinder compares to Criteria?

Key Features

• Personality-based assessments
• Job fit analysis
• Team role mapping

SuccessFinder Pros

• Predicts job performance based on personality.
• Provides insights on team fit.
• Helps in understanding workplace behaviors.
• Offers candidate matching based on personality traits.
• Can improve hiring decisions and reduce employee turnover.

SuccessFinder Cons

• Lacks coding, aptitude, and business skill assessments.
• Does not offer custom question creation.
• No proctoring features for preventing cheating.
• No ATS integrations available.

SuccessFinder Pricing

SuccessFinder doesn't openly display pricing. Contacting them directly is required to obtain a quote. This lack of transparency can be a hurdle for companies seeking a straightforward pricing model, particularly when comparing it to platforms like Adaface Assessments Pricing that offer clear, tiered plans.

Found Your Perfect Criteria Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface stands out with its high test library of 500+ tests, aptitude, finance, personality, AI, technical and coding roles, strong proctoring, and pricing based on credits, not seats, covering proctoring features.
• Alva Labs offers programming tests and integrates with ATS systems, but tests can take up to 2 hours.
• HireVue provides AI-driven video interviews and coding assessments, but lacks custom questions and multiple invite options.
• Pymetrics uses neuroscience-based games to assess candidates, but doesn't offer programming tests or custom branding.
• TestDome has a range of tests, including programming and business skills, but lacks custom questions and charges per candidate.
• TestGorilla offers a broad test library and integrates with ATS, but has questions easily solvable by GPT and pricing scales with company size.
• Cangrade provides job-specific assessments and customizable tests, but lacks finance tests and details on pricing.
• Crystal focuses on personality assessments and team compatibility, with a very quick 15 minute assessment time.
• Prevue Assessments offers aptitude and personality tests, but lacks programming tests and custom data location support.
• SuccessFinder is designed for personality assessment, but provides lengthy tests with 340 questions and no programming assessment.

We've explored a range of alternatives to Criteria, each with its own strengths. Criteria is known for its aptitude tests, but it lacks in areas like coding assessments and customizability. This can be a deal-breaker if you need to assess technical skills or tailor tests to specific roles.

Fortunately, there are strong contenders in the market, and Adaface is one of them. You can find tools to meet your specific hiring needs.

No matter what your specific requirements are, these alternatives offer viable solutions. Always consider your unique use case when making a decision; and know that you can always rely on Adaface for your pre-employment skills assessment tools.

Ready to transform your hiring? Explore Adaface today and screen candidates across 500+ roles.