10 Aon Alternatives: Top Picks by Features, Usability, and Pricing

Why are companies scouting for assessment platforms like Aon alternatives?

I've dug around to understand what makes HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers look beyond Aon for their assessment needs. Turns out, there are a few common sticking points.

Limited ability to create custom questions. When you're hiring for niche roles or need to assess specific company knowledge, off-the-shelf assessments just don't cut it. The ability to tailor questions is key to truly evaluating a candidate's fit. If you want to assess candidates on your custom parameters, creating your own questions is important.

Lack of detailed reporting and analytics. Aon's reporting capabilities may not offer the depth some companies need. Recruiters often seek platforms that provide skill-wise analysis, benchmarking against other candidates, and detailed audit trails to understand candidate performance and ensure test integrity. Such insights enable smarter hiring decisions and identify skill gaps more easily.

Pricing opacity and potential hidden costs. Budget is always a concern, and the lack of transparent pricing can be a major turnoff. Many companies prefer solutions with clear, upfront pricing, and no seat-based pricing so they can easily predict and manage expenses. With more transparent pricing, and features like proctoring included, platforms like Adaface may be considered.

1. Adaface

Best for: Screen candidates across 70+ countries with skill-based assessments.

Looking for a strong Aon alternative? Adaface offers a modern, candidate-friendly assessment platform designed to streamline your hiring process and improve candidate experience.

A significant drawback of Aon is its lack of pricing transparency. Finding out the costs can be a hassle. Adaface solves this by offering straightforward, credit-based pricing plans. No hidden fees, no seat-based charges, and all proctoring features are included in every plan. You can even start with a free trial to test the platform. See our Adaface Assessments Pricing page for more details.

Adaface offers a range of features designed to make skills-based hiring easier and more accurate. Here are a few things that stand out:

Extensive Test Library for Diverse Roles

Adaface boasts a rich test library with 500+ tests. This includes:

• Technical skills: Coding, IT, AI, and cloud computing.
• Business skills: Finance, accounting, sales, and marketing.
• Aptitude tests: Logical, numerical, verbal, and data interpretation.
• Soft skills: Personality, situational judgment, and communication skills.

Our Pre-Employment Assessment Test Library is constantly updated to reflect the latest industry trends, ensuring you're assessing candidates on the most relevant skills.

Stringent Proctoring and Cheating Detection

Adaface is serious about test integrity. We’ve implemented a suite of proctoring features to ensure fair and reliable results:

• Webcam proctoring: Records candidates during the test.
• Window and tab tracking: Detects if candidates navigate away from the test window.
• IP proctoring: Identifies suspicious activity from shared IP addresses.
• Device fingerprinting: Tracks the devices used to take the test.

Our advanced proctoring suite helps you maintain the integrity of your assessments and make hiring decisions with confidence. Learn more about our proctoring features.

Adaface vs Aon Attributes

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests across technical, aptitude, business and soft skills
• Enterprise-ready with ATS integrations and custom API
• Customizable assessments to match your job descriptions
• A strong suite of anti-cheating measures
• Global reach: Used by clients from 70+ countries
• Transparent and flexible pricing
• Scorecards with skill-wise analysis and benchmarking

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent, credit-based pricing plans. There are no seat-based charges, and all plans include access to our full test library and proctoring features. A free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits is available to explore the platform. No credit card is required to start.

Here’s a quick summary of our plans:

• Individual ($180/yr)
• Starter ($500/yr)
• Pro ($900/yr)
• Scale ($3000/yr)
• Growth ($5500/yr)
• Enterprise ($20,000/yr)
• Unlimited ($50,000/yr)

2. Coderbyte

Best for: Coding skill assessment platform

Coderbyte is a platform designed to evaluate coding skills through challenges and assessments. It offers a range of coding problems and challenges suitable for assessing developers' abilities.

Coderbyte helps identify strong coders, but unlike Aon, it's heavily focused on coding skills, which might leave gaps in evaluating other essential skills. While Aon offers a broader range of assessments, it lacks the depth in coding assessments that Coderbyte provides.

However, keep in mind that Coderbyte mainly tests coding skills, potentially overlooking other important skills such as situational judgment, business acumen, or even typing speed. For a more rounded evaluation, a platform like Adaface which offers coding assessments as well as scenario-based questions is a better fit.

How Coderbyte compares to Aon?

Key Features

• Coding challenges in various languages
• Real-time code evaluation
• Progress tracking and performance reports

Coderbyte Pros

• Large library of coding challenges
• Supports multiple programming languages
• Automated scoring and detailed feedback
• Code playback feature for better analysis
• Suitable for assessing coding proficiency

Coderbyte Cons

• Limited assessment types beyond coding
• No support for aptitude or business skill tests
• Lacks situational judgment or personality assessments
• No custom questions or tailored assessments for non-coding roles

Coderbyte Pricing

Coderbyte offers a few pricing tiers. There's a Starter plan at $199/month. They also have subscription and 'pay as you go' plans with custom pricing for enterprise users. They do offer a free trial, which is a plus, allowing you to test the waters before diving in.

3. TestGrid

Best for: Aptitude-focused volume hiring

TestGrid offers a platform to assess candidates primarily on aptitude and personality traits. It's designed to help recruiters filter through large applicant pools, especially when looking for specific cognitive abilities. If you're seeking a tool with a strong focus on aptitude, TestGrid might be on your radar.

Aon provides assessments across a wider array of skills, including programming. However, if you're mainly concerned with aptitude and personality, TestGrid presents a more streamlined solution.

Unlike Aon, TestGrid doesn't offer options for custom questions or tailoring tests based on specific job descriptions. If your roles demand very specific skill sets and require custom assessments, you might find this limiting, and want to consider a platform like Adaface that allows for greater customization.

How TestGrid compares to Aon?

Key Features

• Aptitude Testing: Evaluates candidates on logical, verbal, and numerical abilities.
• Personality Assessments: Identifies personality traits relevant to job performance.
• ATS Integration: Connects with applicant tracking systems for streamlined workflows.

TestGrid Pros

• Caters to aptitude-based assessments.
• Integrates with existing ATS.
• Provides reporting in PDF and Excel formats.
• Offers a help center for user assistance.
• Has quality checks before questions go live.

TestGrid Cons

• Lacks coding assessments for technical roles.
• No support for custom question creation.
• No coding questions to assess coding skills.
• Limited question bank, raising concerns about question repetition and potential for cheating.

TestGrid Pricing

TestGrid doesn't publicly display its pricing. You'll need to sign up to receive pricing information, which can add an extra step to your evaluation process. Unlike Adaface, there's no option to immediately explore pricing or start a free trial to test the platform.

4. HireVue

Best for: Video interviewing and assessments

HireVue offers a platform focused on video interviewing and assessments, aiming to streamline the hiring process. They leverage video technology and AI to help companies screen and evaluate candidates remotely.

While Aon provides a broad suite of assessment tools, HireVue specializes in video-based assessments and interviews. This focus allows for a deeper dive into candidate communication skills and personality, which can be difficult to gauge with traditional methods.

Unlike Aon, HireVue leverages conversational AI to make the interview experience more engaging. However, HireVue does not support custom questions or customized tests based on the job description.

How HireVue compares to Aon?

Key Features

• On-demand video interviews
• AI-driven insights
• Coding assessments

HireVue Pros

• Structured interviews promote fairness.
• AI analysis can highlight top candidates.
• Integrations with popular ATS platforms.
• Mobile-friendly platform enables candidates to complete assessments anywhere.
• Comprehensive overview of candidate performance.

HireVue Cons

• Limited test types compared to Adaface's pre-employment assessment test library.
• Lacks custom question creation, limiting adaptability.
• No support for typing, language, finance, AI, or cloud skill assessments.
• Absence of web proctoring raises cheating concerns.
• No custom API for advanced integrations.

HireVue Pricing

HireVue does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly assess whether HireVue fits your budget.

5. Alva Labs

Best for: Skills and Personality assessments

Alva Labs offers a platform to assess candidates' cognitive abilities and personality traits. It aims to help companies make data-driven hiring decisions.

Alva Labs, like Aon, offers coding assessments, but where Alva Labs falls short compared to Aon is its lack of support for finance, language and AI tests. When you need to evaluate candidates across a broader spectrum of skills, especially those outside of IT, Alva Labs might leave you wanting more.

Furthermore, unlike Aon, Alva Labs doesn't allow for custom questions or customized tests per job description. This means you're stuck with their pre-made assessments, which might not perfectly align with your specific needs. With Adaface's online assessment platform, you can tailor assessments to the role and even add your own questions.

How Alva Labs compares to Aon?

Key Features

• Cognitive and Personality Assessments
• Ready-to-use tests
• Candidate benchmarking

Alva Labs Pros

• Integrates with popular ATS systems
• Offers skill-wise analysis in reports
• Provides candidate ranking
• Allows company branding on the platform
• Has a good range of web and mobile framework questions

Alva Labs Cons

• Tests can be quite lengthy at around 2 hours, which can lead to candidate fatigue.
• No support for webcam, window, or IP proctoring, raising concerns about test integrity.
• Lacks typing, business skills, situational judgment, finance, and AI tests, limiting its scope.
• Does not support custom questions tailored to specific roles or company needs.

Alva Labs Pricing

Alva Labs offers a free trial. Their starter plan begins at $289 per month, and the scale plan is $799 per month. For growth and enterprise plans, you'll need to contact Alva Labs directly for pricing.

6. Xobin

Best for: Skills assessment, talent screening

Xobin provides a platform for assessing candidates across various skills and competencies. It aims to streamline the hiring process by offering tools for screening and evaluating talent, similar to Aon but with some key differences.

Xobin, like Aon, offers ready-to-use tests, covering a wide range of skills. However, unlike Aon, Xobin allows you to add your own questions, although it doesn't offer customized tests per job description. This provides a degree of flexibility, but might still require additional effort to tailor assessments to specific roles. For truly customized assessments, consider how platforms like Adaface can design tests based on your job descriptions.

While Aon has been in the market for a while, Xobin offers a modern interface and a focus on specific skill assessments. Xobin also covers Cloud and Web framework skills, a gap Aon has in its testing capabilities. However, Xobin does not have SQL or Excel Workbook questions, so keep that in mind.

How Xobin compares to Aon?

Key Features

• Wide range of assessments: Covers programming, aptitude, personality, and more.
• Coding assessments: Supports multiple programming languages.
• Integrations: Integrates with popular ATS platforms.

Xobin Pros

• Supports a broad skills assessment range, including aptitude, technical and psychometric tests.
• Provides coding assessments across multiple programming languages.
• Offers integrations with popular ATS platforms.
• Includes webcam and window proctoring to prevent cheating.
• Lets you add your own custom questions.

Xobin Cons

• Lacks customized tests per job description.
• No SQL or Excel assessment questions available.
• No custom API for integrations.
• No free trial or transparent pricing; you need to request a demo.

Xobin Pricing

Xobin does not offer transparent pricing on their website. To get a quote, you need to sign up for a demo. There is also no free trial, so exploring the platform's capabilities before committing to a purchase can be challenging.

7. Attitux | Drawmetrics

Best for: Personality Driven Team Analysis

Attitux | Drawmetrics offers personality assessments to help companies understand their team dynamics and individual work styles. While Aon provides a broad suite of assessments, Attitux | Drawmetrics specializes in personality insights for better team collaboration and management.

Aon's breadth can be a double-edged sword, sometimes overwhelming users with features they don't need. Attitux | Drawmetrics focuses on personality assessments which makes it easy to use and interpret for team building.

Unlike Aon, Attitux | Drawmetrics places personality at the core. This focus can lead to more actionable insights for improving team performance, even though it lacks broader skill assessment capabilities.

How Attitux | Drawmetrics compares to Aon?

Key Features

• Personality-focused team analysis.
• Insights into individual work styles.
• Team collaboration improvement tools.

Attitux | Drawmetrics Pros

• Strong focus on personality assessments.
• Helps in improving team dynamics.
• Offers insights into individual work styles.
• Provides a comprehensive overview of team personalities.
• Easy-to-understand reports.

Attitux | Drawmetrics Cons

• Lacks coding or technical skill assessments.
• No support for custom questions or tests.
• No ATS integrations for streamlined workflows.
• No free trial for potential customers to test the platform.

Attitux | Drawmetrics Pricing

Attitux | Drawmetrics does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote. This lack of transparency can make it harder to quickly compare costs with other assessment test providers.

8. HireQuotient

Best for: Role-specific skill assessment

HireQuotient offers a platform designed to assess candidates through various tests, including aptitude and situational judgment. This makes it a solution for companies looking to gauge how candidates perform in different scenarios.

Aon may provide a broad spectrum of assessments, but it lacks the flexibility of custom questions and certain specialized tests that companies need. With HireQuotient you can assess candidates via role-specific assessments.

Unlike Aon, HireQuotient does not offer features like AI, cloud, language, finance, and typing tests, limiting its scope compared to platforms like Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests.

How HireQuotient compares to Aon?

Key Features

• Situational Judgment Tests: Evaluates how candidates handle workplace scenarios.
• Aptitude Tests: Measures logical reasoning and problem-solving skills.
• Ready-to-use Tests: Provides a library of pre-built assessments for roles.

HireQuotient Pros

• Streamlines initial candidate screening.
• Offers a structured approach to assessing skills.
• Caters to various roles.
• Has email and chat support.
• Offers webcam proctoring

HireQuotient Cons

• Lacks custom question creation.
• No coding, AI or finance tests.
• Limited proctoring like web, location, IP and device fingerprint.
• No excel and CSV exports.

HireQuotient Pricing

HireQuotient's pricing starts at $200/month (billed annually). They also have a free trial. For enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact their sales team.

9. HR Avatar

Best for: Job simulation for various roles

HR Avatar offers a library of pre-employment assessments designed to simulate real job scenarios. It aims to provide insights into a candidate's potential job performance through these simulations, covering a range of skills and aptitudes.

While Aon provides a broad range of assessment types, it lacks the depth of job-specific simulations that HR Avatar offers. HR Avatar focuses on giving candidates a realistic preview of the job, which is super useful for both the candidate and the company.

However, unlike Aon, HR Avatar doesn't let you create custom questions or tailor tests to specific job descriptions. This can be a bummer if you need to assess super-specific skills, and that's where a platform like Adaface can be a better fit, allowing you to design assessments perfectly matched to your unique hiring needs.

How HR Avatar compares to Aon?

Key Features

• Job-specific simulations
• Personality assessments
• Aptitude tests

HR Avatar Pros

• Offers realistic job previews through simulations.
• Includes personality assessments for culture fit analysis.
• Provides aptitude tests to measure cognitive abilities.
• Has email support to help candidates with queries.
• Offers language tests

HR Avatar Cons

• Lacks programming tests to gauge coding abilities.
• Does not support custom question creation or tailored tests.
• No support for excel workbook questions
• Doesn't offer integrations with ATS for seamless workflow.

HR Avatar Pricing

HR Avatar's pricing is structured around the number of candidates assessed. Their individual plan starts at $350 for 10 candidates. For larger volumes, their Starter plan is $1430 for 50 candidates. For enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact the HR Avatar team directly for a quote. They do offer a free trial, so you can test the waters before diving in!

10. McQuaig

Best for: Personality, aptitude based hiring

McQuaig offers personality and aptitude assessments to help you understand candidates better. They aim to match people to roles where they'll thrive, focusing on improving hiring decisions and team dynamics.

While Aon offers a wider range of assessments, including programming tests, McQuaig zeroes in on personality and aptitude. This makes McQuaig a choice for roles where these traits are predictors of success.

However, if you need to assess technical skills like coding, McQuaig falls short. Aon offers the capability, but both lack the depth of Adaface's assessment test library which covers a broader spectrum of technical and role-specific skills.

How McQuaig compares to Aon?

Key Features

• Personality Assessments: Delivers insights into a candidate's behavioral traits.
• Aptitude Tests: Evaluates cognitive abilities and problem-solving skills.
• Reporting & Analytics: Offers data-driven insights to inform hiring decisions.

McQuaig Pros

• Benchmarking: Compare candidates against each other to identify top talent.
• Customizable: Tailor assessments to match specific job requirements.
• Reporting: Access comprehensive reports on candidate performance.
• Email Support: Provides candidates with email support to answer any queries they might have.
• Quality Checks: McQuaig does Quality checks before questions go live.

McQuaig Cons

• No Coding Assessments: Lacks the ability to assess coding skills.
• Limited Test Types: Focuses primarily on personality and aptitude, missing other important skill areas.
• No Custom Questions: Cannot create custom questions tailored to your specific needs.
• No Free Trial: No Free trial is provided for users to explore the tool.

McQuaig Pricing

McQuaig's pricing isn't publicly available. You'll need to contact their team to receive a custom quote. There's no free trial, so exploring the platform beforehand isn't an option.

Found Your Perfect Aon Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface: With 500+ tests spanning aptitude, finance, AI, and coding, plus strong proctoring features and transparent, credit-based pricing, Adaface offers a robust and customizable alternative to Aon.
• Coderbyte: Specializes in assessing technical skills, offering coding challenges and custom assessments tailored for software development roles.
• TestGrid: Provides aptitude and personality tests, with qualifying questions to filter candidates early in the process.
• HireVue: Combines assessments with video interviewing, leveraging AI for analysis, but lacks custom questions and certain proctoring features.
• Alva Labs: Offers aptitude, programming, and personality tests, with customizable branding options and strong ATS integrations.
• Xobin: Covers a broad range of skills including programming, aptitude, business, and finance, with custom branding and integrations but no custom question support.
• Drawmetrics: Focuses on personality assessments, providing insights into candidate traits but missing skill-based testing capabilities.
• HireQuotient: Offers aptitude and situational judgment tests with webcam proctoring and detailed reporting, but lacks coding assessments.
• HR Avatar: Provides job-specific and language tests alongside aptitude and personality assessments, though it misses key features like custom questions and integrations.
• McQuaig: Specializes in personality and aptitude assessments with brand customization, but does not have coding or custom questions.

Navigating the world of candidate assessment tools can feel like a quest to find the perfect fit. We've explored various alternatives to Aon, each with its own strengths and weaknesses.

Aon shines with its aptitude and programming assessments, but its limitations like the absence of finance, AI, and language tests might leave you wanting more. Plus, no custom questions? That's like a chef without their own special spice blend!

Luckily, there are other fish in the sea! Options like Adaface offer a wide range of tests including aptitude, finance, personality, and even AI, making it a versatile choice. And unlike Aon, Adaface allows you to create custom questions tailored to your specific needs, giving you the power to truly assess what matters most.

So, whether you need to screen for technical skills, assess personality traits, or evaluate job-specific competencies, remember that there's an Aon alternative out there ready to help you make smarter hiring decisions. For a robust and customizable solution, consider giving Adaface a try.

Ready to elevate your hiring process? Give Adaface a try today!