10 Willo Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why are Companies Seeking Alternatives to Willo?

I've done the homework, digging into why HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers are exploring options beyond Willo. It seems a few common pain points keep popping up.

Limited test library. Willo emphasizes video interviews, it does not offer a library of pre-built skills assessments. This can be a challenge for teams looking to evaluate a wide array of skills quickly and accurately. If you need to assess coding skills, aptitude, or even typing speed, you'll likely need to look elsewhere.

Lack of advanced proctoring features. While Willo offers webcam proctoring, it appears to lack more in-depth features like tab and window tracking, copy-paste disabling, and robust Chat GPT protection. For roles where test integrity is paramount, this could be a deal-breaker.

Inflexible pricing with no free trial. Willo doesn't openly display its pricing, and there's no free trial available. This lack of transparency can make it difficult for smaller businesses or those with limited budgets to evaluate the platform before committing. In contrast, Adaface Assessments Pricing are public.

1. Adaface

Best for: Screening for aptitude, business acumen, and technical skills, all in one place

Looking for a strong alternative to Willo? Adaface offers a feature-rich platform designed to streamline your hiring process and provide deeper insights into candidate skills.

Willo relies heavily on manual question creation, potentially leading to inconsistencies and a time-consuming setup. Adaface tackles this problem head-on with a vast test library of 500+ skills, covering everything from coding to cognitive abilities. This lets you quickly deploy assessments without sacrificing quality or accuracy.

Adaface provides a well-rounded solution with these features for your assessment needs:

• A library of 500+ tests
• Assessments for both technical and non-technical roles
• Strong proctoring features to ensure test integrity
• Detailed scorecards for candidate analysis
• Customizable assessments tailored to specific job descriptions
• Integrations with popular ATS platforms

Extensive Test Library for Diverse Roles

Adaface offers a library of over 500 tests, which includes tests for business roles as well as coding roles. This vast range allows you to assess candidates across different skill sets, all within a single platform. We've got you covered whether you're hiring for marketing, finance, or engineering positions.

This breadth of coverage ensures that you can create tailored assessments for different job descriptions, leading to a more accurate and fair evaluation process. Forget cobbling together tests from different sources – Adaface brings everything under one roof.

A Robust Proctoring Suite

Maintaining test integrity is of utmost importance, and Adaface provides a suite of proctoring features to prevent cheating. These include webcam proctoring, window and tab tracking, IP address logging, and copy-paste disabling.

These measures help ensure that candidates are completing the assessments fairly and without outside assistance. Detailed proctoring logs are also available for audit purposes, allowing you to review candidate activity and verify test results.

Adaface vs Willo Attributes

Adaface Pros

• Wide range of skills assessments, including coding, aptitude, and business skills
• Extensive ATS integrations
• Customizable assessments to match specific job requirements
• Strong proctoring features to prevent cheating
• Detailed scorecards and reporting
• Used by clients in 70+ countries, demonstrating global applicability
• Transparent and straightforward pricing

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers plans for different hiring needs. You can start with a free trial that includes 2 sample tests and 5 credits to explore the platform. No credit card is required to get started.

Our self-serve pricing plans include all proctoring features and access to our 500+ test library. These plans are: Individual ($180/yr), Starter ($500/yr), Pro ($900/yr), Scale ($3000/yr), Growth ($5500/yr), Enterprise ($20,000/year), and Unlimited ($50,000/yr).

2. TalView

Best for: Enterprise Talent Management Solution

TalView offers a suite of talent management tools, including assessment capabilities. It aims to provide a unified platform for screening, interviewing, and proctoring. This can streamline the hiring process, particularly for larger organizations needing an end-to-end solution.

Willo's focus is primarily on video interviewing, whereas TalView expands into a broader range of assessment types. While Willo allows you to add your own questions, TalView has a ready to use test library.

Unlike Willo, Talview offers a talent management solution with assessments capabilities. Talview provides comprehensive solution with a wider range of features.

How TalView compares to Willo?

Key Features

• AI-powered Talent Assessments: Evaluates candidates across diverse skills.
• Remote Proctoring: Ensures test integrity with features like webcam monitoring.
• Video Interviewing: Conduct and record interviews for later review.

TalView Pros

• Wide range of assessment types, including coding, aptitude, and personality tests.
• Offers integrations with popular ATS systems.
• Automated scoring to speed up the process.
• Web and webcam proctoring.
• Custom API is available for integrations.

TalView Cons

• Lacks custom test creation, limiting flexibility.
• No custom data location support for security.
• Does not provide candidate feedback to improve tests.
• No individual plans, therefore not ideal for small teams.

TalView Pricing

TalView does not publicly display its pricing. Interested users need to fill out a form on their website to get in touch with sales. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly assess whether it fits your budget. In contrast to Adaface Assessments Pricing, where our transparent pricing allows you to select a plan that best fits your needs.

3. Coderbyte

Best for: Coding skill development platform

Coderbyte is a platform focused on helping developers sharpen their coding skills through challenges, courses, and interview preparation. It offers a range of coding problems and learning resources.

Unlike Willo, which leans more towards video interviews and initial screening, Coderbyte digs deep into coding proficiency. If your priority is assessing a candidate's actual coding skills with hands-on challenges, Coderbyte might be a better fit.

Coderbyte offers coding assessments that are more detailed. In contrast, Willo lacks in coding assessment capabilities, as it does not offer programming tests.

How Coderbyte compares to Willo?

Key Features

• Coding challenges in various languages
• Data science and web framework questions
• Code evaluation and playback

Coderbyte Pros

• Wide range of coding challenges and courses
• Offers coding challenges in different languages
• Code playback to accurately score the candidates
• Has ready-to-use tests
• Automated scoring for coding questions

Coderbyte Cons

• Lacks aptitude or business skill assessments. Adaface covers a much broader range.
• No custom question creation. You're limited to their question bank.
• No ATS integrations, which can complicate workflows.
• Tests may be too lengthy (2 hours) for initial screening, impacting candidate experience.
• Lacks certain security features like location or IP proctoring.

Coderbyte Pricing

Coderbyte offers a free trial. They have subscription and pay as you go plans. Their starter plan begins at $199 per month. Their subscription is $1,699/year. Pay as you go plan is $500 (50 candidates) or $350 (30 candidates).

4. TestGrid

Best for: Aptitude and Personality assessments

TestGrid offers a platform to conduct aptitude and personality assessments. It aims to help businesses evaluate candidates on key skills and personality traits, but does not offer custom questions or coding questions.

TestGrid lets you assess aptitude and personality, but unlike Adaface's online assessment platform, it doesn't offer the flexibility of custom questions or coding assessments to test candidates on coding skills.

While Willo allows you to add your own questions, it lacks ready-to-use tests, unlike Adaface. TestGrid, on the other hand, doesn't even allow adding your own questions. This makes it challenging to assess candidates on skills that are specific to your company or role.

How TestGrid compares to Willo?

Key Features

• Aptitude Tests: Evaluate candidates' cognitive abilities.
• Personality Tests: Gauge personality traits and cultural fit.
• ATS Integration: Connect with existing applicant tracking systems.

TestGrid Pros

• User-friendly interface.
• Provides aptitude and personality assessments.
• Offers ATS integrations.
• Email and Help Center support.
• GDPR compliant and Role based access

TestGrid Cons

• Lacks coding assessments.
• No support for custom questions.
• Limited question bank compared to Adaface's pre-employment assessment test library.
• No custom data location support.

TestGrid Pricing

TestGrid doesn't publicly display its pricing. You need to sign up to receive pricing details. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly determine if TestGrid fits your budget. Unlike Adaface, it does not offer a free trial.

5. HireVue

Best for: Enterprise video interview platform

HireVue offers a suite of tools designed to streamline the hiring process, primarily focusing on video interviewing and assessment. They aim to help companies identify top talent through structured interviews and data-driven insights.

While Willo allows for quick video introductions, HireVue offers a more structured and scalable approach, which can be beneficial for larger organizations. One key difference is HireVue's capability to score candidates using AI, providing a data-driven evaluation that goes beyond simple video responses.

This data-driven insight helps in standardized candidate comparison, reducing bias in the selection process. Unlike Willo, HireVue provides a platform for recruiters to assess candidates on various parameters and generate a holistic view.

How HireVue compares to Willo?

Key Features

• AI-Driven Assessments: Uses AI to score candidate responses, offering data-driven insights.
• Video Interviewing: Conducts structured video interviews for standardized evaluations.
• Candidate Ranking: Ranks candidates based on assessment performance.

HireVue Pros

• Structured Interviews: Enables standardized evaluations with pre-set questions.
• AI-Powered Insights: Provides data-driven candidate scoring.
• Scalability: Suitable for large-scale hiring needs.
• ATS Integration: Integrates with various Applicant Tracking Systems.
• Mobile friendly: Mobile-optimized platform for interviews on the go.

HireVue Cons

• Lack of Customization: Limited flexibility in question types beyond video responses.
• Pricing Complexity: Costs not transparent and require contacting sales.
• No Open API: Lacks an open API for custom integrations which limits integration.
• Limited Test Types: Does not offer tests for finance, AI, cloud and business skills, unlike Adaface.

HireVue Pricing

HireVue does not provide transparent pricing on their website. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote tailored to your specific needs. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly assess whether it fits within your budget, especially when compared to solutions like Adaface Assessments Pricing that offer clear, upfront pricing.

6. Testgorilla

Best for: Skills Assessment at Scale

TestGorilla offers a wide library of pre-employment assessment tests, allowing companies to evaluate candidates across various skill sets, from coding to cognitive abilities.

Unlike Willo, which relies on manually created questions, TestGorilla provides a ready-to-use test library. This can be a boon for recruiters who want to quickly screen candidates without the hassle of creating tests from scratch.

TestGorilla's extensive library covers various skills, including programming, aptitude, and business-related topics. This offers a broader assessment scope compared to Willo, which lacks ready-made tests for many domains.

How Testgorilla compares to Willo?

Key Features

• Ready-to-use assessment library with a wide range of tests.
• Webcam proctoring and other measures to prevent cheating.
• Reporting and analytics to evaluate candidate performance.

Testgorilla Pros

• Extensive test library covering diverse skills.
• Offers programming tests and coding questions, which Willo lacks.
• Includes webcam proctoring for enhanced test security.
• Provides skill-wise analysis of candidate performance.
• ATS integrations for streamlined hiring workflows.

Testgorilla Cons

• Lacks custom question creation capabilities.
• Doesn't offer Excel workbook questions to test practical skills.
• No custom API for deeper integrations with other HR tools.
• No phone assistance for customer support.

Testgorilla Pricing

TestGorilla's pricing scales with company size. For instance, a company with 31-50 employees can expect to pay $208 USD per month ($2,496 per annum) for their starter plan and $310 USD per month ($3,720 per annum) for their scale plan. Contact TestGorilla for enterprise pricing. There's also a free trial, which is a great way to test the waters before committing. However, they don't offer unlimited plans like Adaface Assessments Pricing.

7. Hackerrank

Best for: Technical skills assessment at scale

HackerRank is a well-known platform for assessing technical skills, particularly in coding. It provides a range of tools for screening and interviewing developers, making it a popular choice for companies focused on tech hiring.

Unlike Willo, which lacks coding questions, HackerRank shines with its coding assessments. This is particularly useful if you need to evaluate candidates' hands-on coding abilities.

However, HackerRank primarily focuses on technical skills, and it doesn't offer the breadth of assessment types that some companies might need. If you're looking for a platform that covers a wider range of skills, including aptitude, business acumen, or even personality traits, you might need to look elsewhere.

How Hackerrank compares to Willo?

Key Features

• Coding Challenges: Evaluate developers with challenges in various programming languages.
• Skill Certification: Offers certifications to validate candidates' proficiency.
• Live Coding Interviews: Conduct real-time coding sessions with candidates.

Hackerrank Pros

• Large Developer Community: HackerRank's popularity among developers means a wide pool of candidates are familiar with the platform.
• Plagiarism Detection: Helps maintain the integrity of coding assessments.
• Supports Many Languages: Offers support for a broad range of programming languages.
• Real-World Environment: Candidates code in an environment that mirrors actual job conditions.
• Strong Focus on Tech: Ideal if your primary focus is on evaluating technical skills.

Hackerrank Cons

• Lacks Versatility: Limited support for non-technical assessments, like aptitude tests or situational judgment tests.
• No Customization for Non-Tech Roles: Assessments are geared towards tech roles.
• Lengthy Tests: Tests can be 2 hours long, which might hurt candidate experience, thus leading to test fatigue and drop offs.
• Default questions are easily googleable or solvable by GPT

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank offers different pricing tiers. The 'Starter' plan begins at $100 per month (billed annually). For enterprise-level features, you'll need to contact HackerRank directly for a custom quote.

8. CoderPad

Best for: Technical interviews, coding assessments

CoderPad is a platform designed for conducting technical interviews and coding assessments. It provides a collaborative coding environment where interviewers and candidates can interact in real-time.

Unlike Willo, which focuses on video interviews and lacks coding assessments, CoderPad shines when you need to evaluate a candidate's coding abilities. It offers a real-time coding environment, allowing you to see how a candidate thinks through problems and writes code.

CoderPad supports multiple programming languages, making it suitable for various software development roles. This makes CoderPad a better fit for roles where practical coding skill is the primary evaluation criteria.

How CoderPad compares to Willo?

Key Features

• Real-time collaborative coding environment
• Support for multiple programming languages
• Automated test case execution

CoderPad Pros

• Supports many programming languages.
• Provides a real-time collaborative coding environment.
• Has automated test case execution.
• Offers screen sharing for better collaboration.
• Provides code playback to review candidate's coding process.

CoderPad Cons

• Lacks features for non-technical assessments.
• Doesn't offer personality or aptitude tests.
• Limited features to customize the platform to match company branding.
• Doesn't have a question bank with scenario-based questions.

CoderPad Pricing

CoderPad's pricing starts at $70/month (billed annually). For higher plans, you need to contact their sales team. There is a free trial available to explore the platform.

9. Eva AI

Best for: Behavioral assessments and personality

Eva AI offers video-based AI assessments designed to evaluate soft skills and personality traits. It aims to predict candidate success by analyzing non-verbal cues and communication styles in video responses.

While Willo allows for custom question creation, it lacks the ready-to-use assessment library that Eva AI provides. For recruiters looking for a quick and easy way to gauge personality and communication skills, Eva AI might seem like a convenient option.

However, Eva AI does not offer the capability to assess technical skills like coding. Unlike Adaface, which combines behavioral insights with skill-based assessments, Eva AI is limited in its scope of evaluation.

How Eva AI compares to Willo?

Key Features

• AI-driven video analysis
• Personality and soft skill assessments
• Ready-to-use assessment library

Eva AI Pros

• Focus on behavioral insights
• AI-powered analysis for objectivity
• Integrates with existing ATS
• User authentication to prevent impersonation
• Mobile friendly interface

Eva AI Cons

• No technical skill assessments. Cannot be used to screen developers, IT, finance or other skilled roles.
• Lacks coding assessments. Doesn't support coding questions and other technical aptitude testing.
• Limited proctoring features. Doesn't track browser tabs, windows or copy paste activities like Adaface.
• No custom API

Eva AI Pricing

Eva AI does not publicly display its pricing. You'll need to contact them directly to get a custom quote, which can be a hurdle for companies seeking quick and transparent pricing information. They do not offer a free trial.

10. Ensize

Best for: Personality-driven team role assessment

Ensize specializes in personality assessments to determine the most suitable roles for individuals within a team. It uses psychometric tests to evaluate candidates and understand their behavioral traits, providing insights into their potential team contributions.

While Willo focuses on video interviews, Ensize dives deep into personality insights. This approach is valuable for understanding team dynamics and individual fit, but it lacks the breadth of skills assessment that some companies require.

Unlike Willo, Ensize doesn't support coding, aptitude, or other job-specific skills tests. It's primarily focused on understanding personality, so you can use this if you want a deep dive into personality for team role.

How Ensize compares to Willo?

Key Features

• Personality assessments using psychometric tests.
• Role-based suitability analysis.
• Team role mapping.
• Reports on behavioral traits and team contributions.

Ensize Pros

• Identifies candidates' strengths and weaknesses.
• Helps in building balanced teams.
• Offers insight into candidate's work style.
• Integration with company branding (logos and colors).
• GDPR compliant.

Ensize Cons

• Lacks skill-based assessments like coding or finance.
• No custom question creation available.
• Doesn't offer multiple question sets to prevent cheating.
• No custom API for integration with HR systems.

Ensize Pricing

Ensize does not offer transparent pricing. To get a quote, you'll need to contact their sales team. They don't offer a free trial, so you can't test the platform before committing.

Found Your Perfect Willo Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface offers a vast test library with 500+ tests, covering aptitude, finance, personality, and technical roles, complemented by a strong proctoring suite and credit-based pricing, making it a versatile and cost-effective alternative.
• Talview provides a range of assessments including aptitude, business skills, and coding tests, but lacks typing tests and support for multiple languages beyond English.
• Coderbyte is tailored for assessing software-related jobs with coding challenges and personality tests, but lacks aptitude, business, finance, and AI tests, with tests averaging around 2 hours.
• TestGrid offers aptitude and personality tests, but lacks programming, business, finance, and AI tests, and does not provide custom questions.
• HireVue combines assessments with video interviews and offers programming and aptitude tests, but lacks business, finance, and AI tests, while providing AI insights.
• Testgorilla provides a wide variety of tests including programming, aptitude, personality, and language assessments, but lacks AI tests and customized tests per job description, with pricing that scales with company size.
• Hackerrank specializes in technical assessments, especially for IT roles, offering coding challenges and the ability to add custom questions, but does not have aptitude, business, or finance tests.
• CoderPad focuses on coding assessments with support for multiple programming languages and collaborative coding interviews, but lacks aptitude, business, and finance tests, and also doesn't offer custom questions.
• Eva AI primarily focuses on personality and language assessments, but does not provide programming, aptitude, business, finance, or AI tests, focusing on AI-driven talent acquisition.
• Ensize provides personality tests and allows company branding, but lacks programming, aptitude, business, finance, and AI tests, with limited information available on its features.

We've explored a range of alternatives to Willo, each with its own strengths. Now, it's time to zoom out and see how these options stack up.

Willo shines with its asynchronous video interviews, making initial screenings a breeze. However, its limited test library and lack of coding assessments might leave you wanting more, especially if you're hiring for technical roles.

Luckily, there are plenty of other fish in the sea – or rather, platforms in the cloud! From HackerRank's coding prowess to Adaface's versatile skills assessments, you're bound to find a tool that fits like a glove.

No matter your hiring needs – be it aptitude tests, personality tests, or even niche skills – there's a Willo alternative ready to help you find the perfect candidate. Time to explore!

Why not give Adaface a try and see how it transforms your hiring process?