Top 10 Thomas Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why are companies exploring alternatives to Thomas International?

Well, good news! I've been digging deep to figure out why HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers are looking beyond Thomas. I’ve considered features, user experience, pricing, and customer reviews to understand the common pain points.

Limited assessment types can be a deal-breaker. Thomas primarily focuses on personality and aptitude assessments. This leaves a gap if you need to assess specific skills like coding, finance, or even typing speed. For roles needing these skill sets, you'll need to look elsewhere.

The lack of coding assessments is a significant drawback for tech hiring. In today's tech-driven world, assessing coding skills is necessary for developer roles. Thomas doesn't offer coding questions or scenario-based programming challenges, making it less useful for companies hiring developers.

Limited proctoring features might raise concerns about test integrity. While Thomas offers user authentication and time limits, it lacks advanced proctoring features like webcam monitoring, window/tab tracking, and IP/device fingerprinting. These features are important for ensuring candidates aren't cheating, especially in remote hiring scenarios.

Navigating the world of assessment tools can feel like finding the perfect avocado – tricky! Here's a quick comparison to help you choose beyond Thomas International. Think of it as a cheat sheet to find your perfect match, just like finding the right [Pre-Employment Assessment Test Library](https://www.adaface.com/assessment-test).

1. Adaface

Best for: Assess candidates across business, aptitude, and technical roles with one platform.

Looking for a Thomas International alternative? Adaface offers a modern, skills-based approach to pre-employment assessments, covering a wide range of roles and skills to help you find the best talent.

One major drawback of Thomas International is the lack of transparency in their pricing. Getting a quote often requires contacting their sales team, making it difficult to compare costs quickly. Adaface offers transparent, self-serve pricing plans with no hidden fees. You can explore our platform and find the plan that fits your needs without needing to speak to a salesperson. Check out Adaface Assessments Pricing to find the best plan for you.

Adaface offers a robust assessment platform with features designed for companies of all sizes. Here are a few reasons why Adaface is a strong alternative to Thomas International:

• Extensive test library with 500+ tests
• Support for diverse roles: aptitude, finance, personality, business, typing, AI, technical and coding
• Strong proctoring suite for cheating detection
• Used by clients in 70+ countries
• Candidate experience and company branding features
• Scorecards reporting and analytics

Adaface vs Thomas Attributes

Attribute	Adaface	Thomas
Programming Tests	Yes, includes coding questions and scenario-based MCQs	No
Business Skills Tests	Yes, covers Sales, Marketing, Excel, and more	No
Customizable Assessments	Yes, tests can be tailored to specific job descriptions	No
Webcam Proctoring	Yes	No
Transparent Pricing	Yes, pricing details available on the website	No, requires contacting sales
Free Trial	Yes, with 2 sample tests and 5 credits	No
Custom API	Yes	No
AI Tests	Yes	No

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests for technical skills, cognitive abilities, language proficiency, and more
• Extensive ATS integrations
• Customizable assessments
• Excellent anti-cheating measures
• Unlimited team seats
• Tests available in multiple languages
• Transparent, self-serve Adaface Assessments Pricing

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit different needs. A free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits is available, allowing you to explore the platform before purchasing. No credit card is required to start the trial. Our plans include all proctoring features and access to all 500+ tests. We provide self-serve Online Assessment Platform | Assessment Software by Adaface.

Our pricing plans include:

• Individual ($180/year)
• Starter ($500/year)
• Pro ($900/year)
• Scale ($3000/year)
• Growth ($5500/year)
• Enterprise ($20,000/year)
• Unlimited ($50,000/year)

2. The Predictive Index

Best for: Behavioral assessments for team building

The Predictive Index (PI) offers behavioral assessments, workforce analytics, and leadership development tools. It helps companies understand their employees' drives and motivations, aiming to improve team dynamics and performance. Think of it as peeking into people's work personalities!

While Thomas focuses on aptitude and personality, The Predictive Index centers more on predicting workplace behavior. This can be super useful for building teams where everyone gels well together.

However, if you're looking for a deeper dive into skills like coding, finance, or even typing speed, PI might leave you wanting more. It's great for understanding how people work, but not necessarily what they can do.

How The Predictive Index compares to Thomas?

Key Features

• Behavioral Assessments: Identifies individual personality traits and workplace behaviors.
• Workforce Analytics: Provides insights into team dynamics and organizational culture.
• Leadership Development: Offers programs to improve leadership skills based on assessment data.

The Predictive Index Pros

• Offers quick insights into behavioral traits.
• Aids in team building and conflict resolution.
• Helps improve communication and collaboration.
• Provides data-driven insights for leadership development.
• Integrates with some ATS platforms for smoother workflows.

The Predictive Index Cons

• Lacks skills-based assessments for technical or role-specific skills.
• Does not offer custom question creation or the ability to add your own questions.
• Limited proctoring features to prevent cheating during assessments.
• Pricing is not transparent, requiring a sales call for information.

The Predictive Index Pricing

The Predictive Index does not openly list its pricing. You'll need to contact them for a personalized quote. This can be a bit of a hassle if you're just trying to get a quick idea of costs, and there's no mention of a free trial to test the waters first.

3. Alva Labs

Best for: Assess personality and aptitude

Alva Labs offers a platform designed to evaluate candidates based on personality traits and cognitive abilities. This helps companies gain insights into a candidate's potential fit and performance.

Unlike Thomas, Alva Labs includes programming tests to evaluate technical skills. This makes Alva Labs a more versatile tool for companies that need to assess both soft skills and technical abilities.

However, Alva Labs, like Thomas, lacks the ability to create custom questions. If you need to tailor assessments to specific roles or scenarios, a platform like Adaface with custom question support might be a better fit.

How Alva Labs compares to Thomas?

Key Features

• Personality assessments based on the five-factor model.
• Cognitive ability tests to measure logical reasoning and problem-solving.
• Automated scoring and reporting.

Alva Labs Pros

• Measures both personality and aptitude.
• Offers a free trial to explore the platform.
• Provides automated scoring to reduce manual effort.
• Has integrations with popular ATS systems.
• Offers multiple invite options to reach candidates.

Alva Labs Cons

• Lacks situational judgment tests.
• Does not offer custom questions.
• Tests have a long completion time, impacting candidate experience.
• Doesn't offer phone support.

Alva Labs Pricing

Alva Labs offers a free trial and transparent pricing. Starter plans begin at $289 per month, while Scale plans cost $799 per month. For Growth plans and enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact Alva Labs directly. Note that they do not provide an unlimited plan, unlike Adaface Assessments Pricing.

4. Pymetrics

Best for: Bias-free talent matching

Pymetrics offers a unique approach to talent assessment by using neuroscience-based games. These games assess cognitive and personality traits to predict job performance. They aim to remove bias from the hiring process, focusing on potential rather than experience. In essence, Pymetrics helps companies find candidates who are a good fit, based on data, not gut feeling.

Unlike Thomas, which primarily focuses on personality and aptitude tests, Pymetrics uses gamified assessments. This method can feel more engaging for candidates, leading to a better candidate experience. The games measure a range of cognitive and personality traits, giving employers a more nuanced view of a candidate's potential.

However, it's worth noting that Pymetrics, similar to Thomas, does not offer coding assessments or the ability to add custom questions. If you need to assess technical skills or require tailored questions for specific roles, you might need to explore other options or use Pymetrics in combination with another platform like Adaface's online assessment platform.

How Pymetrics compares to Thomas?

Key Features

• Gamified Assessments: Uses a series of neuroscience-based games to evaluate candidates.
• Bias Mitigation: Aims to remove bias from the hiring process by focusing on inherent traits.
• Predictive Analytics: Uses data to predict job performance and cultural fit.

Pymetrics Pros

• Data-Driven Insights: Provides objective data on candidate traits and potential.
• Improved Candidate Experience: The gamified approach can be more engaging for candidates.
• Bias Reduction: Aims to create a fairer hiring process by reducing subjective biases.
• Broad Trait Assessment: Measures a range of cognitive and personality traits.
• API Integrations: Offers custom API to integrate with existing HR systems.

Pymetrics Cons

• Limited Skill Assessment: Does not offer assessments for technical skills like coding.
• No Custom Questions: Users cannot add custom questions tailored to specific job roles or company needs.
• Black Box Approach: The algorithms and data analysis can sometimes feel opaque.
• Lack of Transparency: Does not offer web, webcam, location, IP, device finger print proctoring making it easier to cheat.

Pymetrics Pricing

Pymetrics does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a personalized quote. This lack of transparency can make it tricky to compare costs upfront.

5. Evalart

Best for: Skills tests with coding

Evalart is a platform that offers skills assessment tests, focusing primarily on technical skills. They provide a range of tests including coding, aptitude, personality, and language assessments to help evaluate candidates.

While both Evalart and Thomas offer personality and aptitude tests, Evalart steps into the coding arena. Thomas doesn't offer coding tests, making Evalart a better choice if you need to assess technical skills.

However, Evalart only provides coding questions and lacks scenario-based MCQs. So, while Evalart might help assess coding skills, it might not give a complete picture compared to platforms like Adaface's coding tests which mixes coding questions with scenario based questions.

How Evalart compares to Thomas?

Key Features

• Coding assessments with code grading
• Personality and aptitude testing
• Language proficiency evaluations

Evalart Pros

• Offers a free trial to explore the platform
• Provides coding assessments, a feature lacking in some competitors
• Allows users to add their own custom questions
• Has email and live chat support available
• Includes webcam proctoring to maintain test integrity

Evalart Cons

• No business skills or job-specific tests
• Lacks coding questions. Only coding questions are available.
• No custom test creation based on job descriptions
• No social listening for task leaks

Evalart Pricing

Evalart provides a free one-month trial. However, they don't publicly display pricing details on their website. You'll need to contact their sales team directly to get a personalized quote, which can be a bit of a hassle.

6. Hackerrank

Best for: Coding skill assessment

HackerRank is a platform primarily designed to assess technical skills. It provides coding challenges and assessments to evaluate developers' programming abilities.

Unlike Thomas, HackerRank specializes in evaluating coding skills. This makes it a strong option for companies needing to assess developers.

HackerRank is best used if you need to drill down into coding prowess, with support for multiple languages and frameworks. If you are looking for business and aptitude skills, you will need to look somewhere else.

How Hackerrank compares to Thomas?

Key Features

• Coding Challenges: Assess candidates with practical coding problems.
• Multiple Languages: Supports 40+ programming languages.
• Automated Scoring: Get coding tests scored automatically.

Hackerrank Pros

• Large Developer Community: Widely used by developers, making it a recognizable platform for candidates.
• Plagiarism Detection: Helps maintain the integrity of coding tests.
• Real-World Coding Questions: Simulates actual job conditions for better evaluation.
• ATS Integrations: Integrates with various Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) for streamlined hiring.
• Customizable invitation templates: You can customize invitation templates to improve company branding.

Hackerrank Cons

• Limited Scope: Primarily focuses on technical skills, lacking assessments for soft skills or other domains.
• No AI/ML specific tests: No support for AI/ML tests unlike Adaface.
• Lengthy assessments: Assessment times can be up to 2 hours long. This can result in low candidate experience.
• Default questions are easily googleable: Easy to find the answers, and easy to cheat.

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank offers tiered pricing plans. The Starter plan begins at $100/month (billed annually). For enterprise pricing, you’ll need to contact HackerRank directly for a quote. They offer a free trial.

7. Realcoderz

Best for: Technical hiring, coding assessments

Realcoderz is a platform designed to evaluate coding skills, offering a range of assessments primarily focused on technical roles. It aims to help companies identify candidates with the right coding abilities for their open positions.

Unlike Thomas, which has limited support for programming assessments, Realcoderz specializes in evaluating coding skills. This makes it a more direct alternative when your primary need is to assess a candidate's coding proficiency.

However, remember that while Realcoderz focuses on coding, it might lack the breadth of assessments that Thomas offers in areas like aptitude or personality. So, if you need a more varied skills assessment, consider platforms that cover a wider spectrum like Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests.

How Realcoderz compares to Thomas?

Key Features

• Coding assessments across various languages
• Automated scoring for coding tests
• Webcam proctoring and IP tracking

Realcoderz Pros

• Specializes in technical skill evaluation.
• Offers automated scoring, saving time on manual reviews.
• Includes proctoring features to maintain test integrity.
• Provides ready-to-use assessments, streamlining the evaluation process.
• Supports job-specific tests tailored for particular roles.

Realcoderz Cons

• Lacks breadth beyond coding assessments, unlike more general platforms.
• Does not offer custom coding questions.
• No support for excel workbook questions.
• Lacks integrations with ATS system.

Realcoderz Pricing

Realcoderz does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact them directly to request a quote. They also do not offer a free trial. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly compare costs with other assessment solutions.

8. Kolbe

Best for: Uncover instincts for problem-solving

Kolbe Corp offers assessments designed to measure a candidate's instinctive method of problem-solving. Unlike traditional aptitude or skills-based tests, Kolbe focuses on conative talent – how someone will naturally take action when faced with a challenge.

While Thomas assessments focus on personality and behavior, Kolbe hones in on a candidate's natural problem-solving style. This can be especially useful for identifying individuals who are naturally inclined to take initiative and find solutions.

However, unlike Thomas and even Adaface, Kolbe doesn't offer skills testing. Therefore, you might miss out on candidates’ practical skills that are important for a role and filter them out.

How Kolbe compares to Thomas?

Key Features

• Measures instinctive problem-solving approach
• Identifies conative strengths
• Provides insights into how individuals take action

Kolbe Pros

• Provides a unique perspective on candidate behavior.
• Can help in team building and role assignment.
• Identifies individuals who are likely to be self-starters.
• Offers different assessments for various purposes.
• Reporting is simple to understand.

Kolbe Cons

• Doesn't assess skills or knowledge.
• Limited integrations with other HR tools.
• Doesn't offer coding, AI, finance, typing or language skill tests like Adaface.
• Lacks proctoring features to prevent cheating.

Kolbe Pricing

Kolbe offers tests individually, with Kolbe A priced at $45 and Kolbe B at $55. For team or enterprise solutions, you'll need to contact Kolbe directly for a personalized quote. There is no free trial available to test the platform.

9. iMocha

Best for: Skills intelligence and assessments

iMocha provides skills assessments and skills intelligence to help companies understand their workforce skills, plan for future needs, and bridge skill gaps via recruitment. It supports a wide range of assessments, from aptitude to AI.

Thomas offers personality and aptitude assessments but lacks coding and business skills assessments. iMocha fills this gap with its extensive library, including programming, AI, cloud, and business skills tests, offering a broader view of candidate capabilities.

While Thomas offers ready-to-use tests, iMocha allows adding your own questions. However, it does not offer customized tests per job description like Adaface, which tailors tests to specific roles for optimal accuracy.

How iMocha compares to Thomas?

Key Features

• Skills assessments for various roles
• Skills intelligence for workforce planning
• Live coding interview capabilities

iMocha Pros

• Wide range of skills assessments available, covering technical and non-technical skills.
• Skills intelligence features help in identifying and addressing skill gaps within the organization.
• Supports integration with various ATS platforms.
• Offers webcam and window proctoring to maintain test integrity.
• Provides detailed reporting and analytics on candidate performance.

iMocha Cons

• Does not allow creating custom questions for specific usecases.
• Lacks conversational assessments, which can impact candidate experience negatively.
• Doesn't offer custom data location support for enhanced security.
• Questions can be easily googled and GPT-able which impacts assessment quality.

iMocha Pricing

iMocha does not offer transparent pricing on their website. You need to contact them for a personalized quote. A free trial is also not available, limiting the ability to explore the platform before committing.

10. Vervoe

Best for: Skills-based hiring simplified

Vervoe offers a platform designed to streamline the hiring process by focusing on skills assessment. It aims to predict candidate success through practical assessments, using AI to automate scoring and provide insights.

Unlike Thomas, which lacks coding assessments, Vervoe supports evaluating candidates across various skills, including coding. This is particularly helpful if you need to assess technical skills as a part of your hiring process.

Vervoe also lets candidates add their own custom questions. However, it does not allow creation of customized tests per job description. This is where solutions like Adaface really shine, offering tailor-made assessments that accurately match the requirements of each role.

How Vervoe compares to Thomas?

Key Features

• AI-powered scoring for assessments
• Ready-to-use skill assessments
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms

Vervoe Pros

• A wide range of skills tests, including coding, aptitude, and business skills.
• Automated scoring saves time for recruiters.
• API access for custom integrations.
• Candidate location tracking for proctoring.
• Offers a free trial to explore the platform.

Vervoe Cons

• Lacks web and webcam proctoring features.
• No option for custom-branded assessments.
• Doesn't support excel simulation based questions
• Doesn't offer custom question creation for customer usecases.

Vervoe Pricing

Vervoe's pricing starts at $300 for 10 candidates. There are other plans at $600 for 50 candidates. They also offer enterprise pricing and a plan with unlimited candidate assessments. Vervoe provides a free trial so you can get a feel for the platform before committing.

Found Your Perfect Thomas Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface offers a vast test library of 500+ tests, strong proctoring, and serves clients in 70+ countries, with pricing based on credits, not seats, covering aptitude, finance, personality, AI, technical and coding roles, making it a versatile alternative to Thomas.
• The Predictive Index focuses on behavioral assessments and aptitude, helping companies understand candidates' work styles but lacks coding assessments.
• Alva Labs combines aptitude and personality tests with coding assessments, offering a more tech-focused approach, but tests can take up to 2 hours!
• Pymetrics uses neuroscience-based games to assess cognitive and personality traits, aiming to reduce bias in hiring, but doesn't offer coding or job-specific skills tests.
• Evalart provides a range of tests, including programming and language skills, focusing on a broad skills evaluation. The site, however, lacks details on pricing and integrations.
• HackerRank specializes in technical skill assessments, offering coding challenges and tests for developers, however, the default questions are easily googleable.
• Realcoderz is tailored for tech roles, providing coding assessments, but lacks details on test types, pricing, and ATS integrations.
• Kolbe focuses on conative assessments, measuring a candidate's natural problem-solving style.
• iMocha has a wide range of assessments including aptitude, skills and coding, but it lacks custom questions and social listening features.
• Vervoe uses AI to assess candidates through simulations and tasks, evaluating skills with a practical approach, but lacks personality tests.

We've taken a tour through several Thomas alternatives, each offering a unique approach to candidate assessment.

Thomas stands out with its personality and aptitude assessments. However, its lack of coding tests, AI tests, or finance tests can be a limitation for many.

Thankfully, there are good options to consider! From platforms excelling in skills assessment to those specializing in behavioral insights, the market is rich with solutions tailored to different needs. Adaface, for example, offers a wide range of tests including aptitude, finance, personality, AI, technical and coding roles.

No matter your specific use case, there's a Thomas alternative ready to help you make smarter hiring decisions.

Eager to elevate your hiring game? Give Adaface a try and discover a new way to screen talent!