Top 10 TestWe Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why the Hunt for TestWe Alternatives?

You're here because you're weighing your options, and that's smart! I've done some digging to understand what makes HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers look beyond TestWe when it comes to skills assessment.

Limited test library. TestWe primarily provides the platform, leaving you to source or create your own assessments. Building a question bank from scratch can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, delaying your hiring process.

Lack of coding assessments. For tech roles, evaluating coding skills is key. TestWe doesn't offer integrated coding assessments, potentially requiring you to use separate tools and juggle multiple platforms.

Limited proctoring features. Ensuring test integrity is crucial, but TestWe's proctoring capabilities are limited. Features like tab and window tracking, which help prevent cheating, are not available, potentially compromising the reliability of your results. For instance, with Adaface's online assessment platform, you can enable webcam, window, tab, IP proctoring for cheating detection

Navigating the assessment landscape can be tricky, especially with platforms like TestWe offering a unique, but limited approach. To help you find the perfect fit, here's a comparison table of top [candidate screening tools](https://www.adaface.com/online-assessment-platform) that might just be what you're looking for.

1. Adaface

Best for: Screen candidates for technical and non-technical roles, all on one platform.

Looking for a TestWe alternative? Adaface offers a user-friendly and reliable platform for assessing candidates across various skills and roles.

One major drawback of TestWe is its limited test library. Unlike TestWe, Adaface provides a wide array of pre-built assessments, saving you the time and effort of creating your own from scratch. This allows you to quickly and easily evaluate candidates without delays.

Adaface addresses another key concern: the need for a comprehensive assessment solution. Here's how Adaface measures up:

• Extensive test library with 500+ skills
• Support for coding, aptitude, personality, and business roles
• Robust proctoring features to maintain test integrity
• Candidate-friendly experience with company branding options
• Detailed scorecards and reporting for informed decisions
• Transparent and flexible pricing
• Enterprise-ready features for seamless integration

Adaface vs TestWe Attributes

Attribute	Adaface	TestWe
Ready-to-use Test Library	500+ skills tests	Bring your own question bank
Programming Tests (Coding Questions)	Yes	No
Business Skills Tests	Yes (Excel, Finance, Marketing etc.)	No
Customizable Assessments	Yes	No
Webcam Proctoring	Yes	Yes (Live Proctoring by supervisor)
Chat GPT Protection	Yes	No
Free Trial	Yes	No
ATS Integrations	Yes	No

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests across technical and non-technical domains
• Strong proctoring suite for cheat-proof evaluations
• Customizable assessments to align with specific job descriptions
• Candidate-friendly experience with company branding options
• Detailed scorecards and reporting for insights
• Flexible pricing based on credits, not seats
• Used by clients in 70+ countries

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit different needs. A free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits allows you to explore the platform. Paid plans include Individual (180$/yr), Starter (500$/yr), Pro (900$/yr), Scale (3000$/yr), Growth (5500$/ yr), Enterprise (20,000$/ year), and Unlimited (50000$/ yr). All plans include all proctoring features and access to the complete test library.

2. HackerEarth

Best for: Technical hiring, coding assessments

HackerEarth offers a platform for assessing technical skills, primarily catering to coding-related roles. It's designed to help companies evaluate developers through coding tests, challenges, and hackathons.

Unlike TestWe, HackerEarth provides a ready-to-use test library, meaning you don't have to build your own question bank from scratch. This saves significant time and resources in the candidate screening process.

However, HackerEarth mainly focuses on technical roles and lacks assessments for other crucial areas like aptitude, personality, or business skills. If you're looking for a platform that covers a wider range of roles and skills beyond coding, you might need to look elsewhere. For a platform that provides assessments accross a wide range of skills, consider using Adaface's online assessment platform.

How HackerEarth compares to TestWe?

Key Features

• Coding Assessments: Evaluate candidates with coding challenges across 40+ programming languages.
• Live Coding Interviews: Conduct real-time coding sessions with a built-in IDE.
• Employer Branding: Build your employer brand through hackathons and coding contests.

HackerEarth Pros

• Large Developer Community: HackerEarth has a large community of developers, increasing candidate familiarity.
• Multiple Question Sets: It provides multiple question sets to prevent cheating.
• Automated Scoring: The platform automates scoring for coding questions.
• Web and Webcam Proctoring: It offers web and webcam proctoring features.
• API Integrations: It offers ATS integrations via API to streamline your workflow.

HackerEarth Cons

• Limited Scope: Primarily focuses on technical skills, lacking assessments for other roles.
• Test Integrity: Coding questions are found in social groups, and MCQs are easily googleable.
• Lacks Key Features: Doesn't offer features like custom questions, excel/workbook questions, or situational judgement tests.
• No customer success manager, priority support, phone assistance.

HackerEarth Pricing

HackerEarth's pricing starts at $209/month (or $2508/year) for one recruiter seat. For scaling your hiring needs, you'll need to contact HackerEarth directly to get a custom quote. They do offer a free trial to explore the platform.

3. Testgorilla

Best for: Skills-based pre-employment assessments

TestGorilla offers a wide library of pre-employment tests designed to assess candidates across various skills and competencies. It provides recruiters with tools to screen candidates and identify top talent.

Unlike TestWe, which requires you to bring your own questions, TestGorilla offers a library of ready-to-use tests. This saves you the time and effort of creating your own assessments from scratch.

However, TestGorilla doesn't allow for extensive customization. While you can add your own questions, you can't create custom tests tailored to specific job descriptions like you can with other platforms like Adaface.

How Testgorilla compares to TestWe?

Key Features

• Skills Assessment Library: Access a range of tests covering cognitive abilities, personality, job-specific skills, and more.
• Candidate Ranking: See how candidates stack up against each other.
• Video Interviews: Conduct and record video interviews to assess soft skills and communication abilities.

Testgorilla Pros

• Large test library covering a multitude of skills.
• Offers video interviewing capabilities.
• Integrates with several ATS platforms.
• Provides decent proctoring features like webcam and window proctoring.
• Provides skill-wise analysis in reports.

Testgorilla Cons

• Lacks custom coding questions, limiting technical assessment depth.
• No custom data location support for enhanced security.
• Limited social listening and question bank management leading to potential question leaks.
• Questions are easily solvable by GPT.

Testgorilla Pricing

TestGorilla's pricing depends on your company size. For smaller teams, plans start at $75/month (billed annually). They also have tiered pricing for larger companies. For enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact their sales team.

4. HireVue

Best for: Video Interviewing at Scale

HireVue is primarily known for its video interviewing platform, offering features like on-demand and live interviews. It aims to streamline the hiring process by allowing recruiters to screen candidates remotely and assess their communication skills.

Unlike TestWe, which only provides the software to conduct tests and requires you to bring your own questions, HireVue offers a library of pre-built assessments. This can save time and effort in creating your own tests, especially if you're looking for a quick and easy way to screen candidates.

However, HireVue lacks the flexibility to create custom questions tailored to specific roles or company needs. If you need assessments that are highly specific and reflect your company's unique challenges, you might find HireVue's ready-made tests limiting.

How HireVue compares to TestWe?

Key Features

• On-demand video interviews for asynchronous screening.
• Live interview capabilities with collaborative tools.
• AI-driven insights to evaluate candidate responses.

HireVue Pros

• Good for initial screening to assess communication skills.
• Offers a structured interview process for consistency.
• Integrates with various ATS platforms.
• Provides data and analytics on candidate performance.
• Supports remote hiring initiatives.

HireVue Cons

• Limited ability to customize assessments.
• No coding questions or excel questions. Tests only verbal and non-technical aptitude.
• Lacks advanced proctoring features like tab monitoring or copy-paste prevention. This is important to ensure test integrity.
• Pricing can be a barrier for small businesses.

HireVue Pricing

HireVue does not offer transparent pricing on their website. You'll need to contact their sales team for a custom quote, which can be a time-consuming process. They also do not offer a free trial to explore their platform. If budget predictability and transparent pricing is something you value, you might want to consider other assessment test options.

5. Coderbyte

Best for: Technical hiring and training

Coderbyte is a platform geared toward helping developers sharpen their coding skills and companies to assess technical talent. It's designed with a focus on coding challenges and interview preparation, offering a range of features for evaluating programming skills.

Unlike TestWe, which provides the software but leaves you sourcing your own questions, Coderbyte delivers a ready-to-use library of coding challenges. This saves you the upfront work of building your own question bank, letting you focus on evaluating candidates right away.

However, remember that Coderbyte primarily caters to technical roles. If you need to assess skills beyond coding – think aptitude, personality, or even finance – you might need to look elsewhere. Need more than just coding assessments? Platforms like Adaface can handle a wider variety of skills.

How Coderbyte compares to TestWe?

Key Features

• Coding challenges across multiple languages
• Real-time code evaluation and playback
• Skill-based reporting

Coderbyte Pros

• Extensive library of coding challenges
• Supports multiple programming languages
• Provides code playback for better analysis
• Offers a free trial to explore the platform
• Includes personality assessments in addition to coding challenges

Coderbyte Cons

• Lacks assessments for non-technical roles
• No custom question creation
• Limited integrations with ATS platforms
• Does not offer phone assistance, dedicated priority support, or training and onboarding

Coderbyte Pricing

Coderbyte offers a few pricing tiers including a free tier. The starter plan begins at $199/month. They also have subscription plans for teams and pay-as-you-go options. Check their website for the most current details. It is worth noting that their features are limited in customizability.

6. Alva Labs

Best for: Data-driven talent acquisition

Alva Labs offers a platform designed to streamline the hiring process with a focus on data and psychometric assessments. They aim to help companies make informed decisions about candidates by evaluating personality traits and cognitive abilities. Unlike TestWe, which is more of a test delivery system where you bring your own questions, Alva Labs provides pre-built assessments.

TestWe is like a blank canvas – you get the tools to create a test, but you need to supply the questions. This can be time-consuming. Alva Labs, on the other hand, offers ready-to-use tests, which can save you a lot of time. However, the downside is that you're limited to their question bank.

If you're looking for a solution with a wide variety of ready-to-use tests that also allows you to design custom assessments tailored to specific job descriptions, consider exploring platforms like Adaface.

How Alva Labs compares to TestWe?

Key Features

• Personality assessments to evaluate soft skills.
• Cognitive ability tests to measure problem-solving skills.
• Automated scoring and reporting to streamline the evaluation process.

Alva Labs Pros

• Ready-to-use assessments to quickly evaluate candidates.
• Integrations with popular ATS platforms to streamline workflow.
• Focus on data-driven insights for informed hiring decisions.
• Supports web framework and mobile framework questions.
• Code playback and automated scoring.

Alva Labs Cons

• Limited ability to add custom questions, which reduces flexibility.
• Tests can be lengthy, around 2 hours, potentially impacting candidate experience.
• Lacks situational judgment tests, which are important for assessing real-world decision-making.
• No Chat GPT protection to prevent cheating during assessments.

Alva Labs Pricing

Alva Labs offers a free trial. Their starter plan begins at $289 per month, and the scale plan is $799 per month. For enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact Alva Labs directly to discuss your specific needs.

7. Bryq

Best for: Personality and Culture Fit

Bryq zeroes in on personality and culture fit assessments. It helps companies gauge whether a candidate’s work style and values align with the company's culture, potentially leading to better team dynamics and reduced turnover.

Unlike TestWe, which primarily offers a platform for administering tests (bring your own questions!), Bryq provides ready-to-use assessments, particularly in the realm of personality and aptitude. This means you can start assessing candidates right away without the upfront investment of creating your own question bank, a process that can take weeks.

However, if you're looking for a tool that goes beyond personality and aptitude, and need to assess specific skills like coding, finance, or even typing speed, you might find Bryq's assessment library limited. While Bryq has some business-related assessments, it doesn't have the breadth of options to evaluate candidates across different roles and skills.

How Bryq compares to TestWe?

Key Features

• Personality Assessments: Understand candidate traits and cultural fit.
• Cognitive Ability Tests: Evaluate problem-solving skills.
• Role-Based Assessments: Determine if a candidate matches the role's requirements.

Bryq Pros

• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.
• Provides candidate benchmarking.
• Offers customizable invitation templates.
• Has role-based access for teams.
• Mobile-friendly assessments

Bryq Cons

• Lacks coding assessments for technical roles.
• Does not provide custom API access.
• Limited question bank compared to platforms like Adaface.
• Does not offer proctoring features like tab switching detection, copy-paste disabling or full screen enforcement to prevent cheating.

Bryq Pricing

Bryq's pricing starts at $299 per month (or $3,588 annually). For larger-scale needs, you'll need to contact their sales team to discuss custom pricing. Unfortunately, they do not offer a free trial to explore the platform. If you are looking for transparent Adaface Assessments Pricing, check out our site.

8. AssessFirst

Best for: Personality-based role matching

AssessFirst offers personality, motivation, and reasoning-based assessments to help businesses predict candidate success. They aim to go beyond skills and experience to evaluate potential.

TestWe offers software to conduct tests, but you need to bring your own questions. AssessFirst, on the other hand, provides ready-to-use tests, saving you the hassle of creating your own.

However, AssessFirst focuses on personality and aptitude. If you need to assess technical skills like coding, or need custom questions tailored to specific job descriptions, you might find AssessFirst limiting.

How AssessFirst compares to TestWe?

Key Features

• Personality assessments using the Shape test.
• Motivation questionnaires to understand work preferences.
• Reasoning tests to gauge cognitive abilities.

AssessFirst Pros

• Identifies candidates who fit company culture.
• Streamlines hiring by predicting job performance.
• Mobile-friendly assessments for candidate convenience.
• Integrates with existing ATS systems.
• Offers comprehensive PDF reports for easy sharing.

AssessFirst Cons

• Lacks coding assessments for technical roles.
• No custom question creation.
• No typing tests or language proficiency tests.
• Limited customer support options, with no live chat or dedicated support on lower plans.

AssessFirst Pricing

AssessFirst does not publicly display pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. They don't offer a free trial to explore their platform. For straightforward and transparent pricing, consider exploring Adaface Assessments Pricing.

9. Maki People

Best for: Skills assessment with coding support

Maki People is an assessment platform offering skills tests, including coding challenges. It aims to help businesses evaluate candidates across various domains, from tech to business-related skills.

Unlike TestWe, which only provides the platform to conduct assessments and requires you to bring your own questions, Maki People comes with a pre-built library of tests. This means you can start assessing candidates almost immediately without spending weeks creating your own question bank.

However, keep in mind that while Maki People offers coding questions, platforms like Adaface provide both coding questions and scenario-based MCQs. This balanced approach ensures a thorough evaluation of a candidate's skills without excessively long tests.

How Maki People compares to TestWe?

Key Features

• Ready-to-use assessments across various skills.
• Coding challenges for technical roles.
• Custom question creation to tailor assessments.

Maki People Pros

• Offers a range of skills assessments, including programming.
• Integrates with popular ATS systems.
• Allows for custom question creation.
• Provides candidate benchmarking to compare performance.
• Includes webcam and web proctoring features.

Maki People Cons

• Lacks situational judgment tests, which are to gauge soft skills.
• No support for excel simulations, which are important for finance roles.
• No custom coding questions can be added for advanced roles.
• No phone assistance is provided to recruiters.

Maki People Pricing

Maki People does not publicly display its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote. There is also no free trial, which might make it hard to explore all the features before making a purchase decision.

10. Hackerrank

Best for: Technical skill screening at scale

HackerRank is a popular platform focused on assessing technical skills, particularly in coding and programming. It provides a range of tools for screening and interviewing developers, making it a go-to solution for companies hiring tech talent.

Unlike TestWe, HackerRank offers a library of ready-to-use tests focused on coding skills. This eliminates the need to build your own question bank, saving you setup time and effort. While TestWe requires you to bring your own questions, HackerRank provides a pre-built assessment infrastructure for technical roles.

However, it's important to note that HackerRank's focus is primarily on technical skills. If you need to assess a broader range of skills beyond coding, such as aptitude, personality, or role-specific knowledge for non-technical positions, you might need to explore other alternatives.

How Hackerrank compares to TestWe?

Key Features

• Coding assessments: Evaluate candidates' coding abilities with challenges in various programming languages.
• Live coding interviews: Conduct real-time coding sessions with candidates using a collaborative IDE.
• Skill certifications: Offer candidates the opportunity to earn certifications to validate their expertise.

Hackerrank Pros

• Large developer community: Widely recognized and used by developers, making it a familiar platform for candidates.
• Wide range of coding languages supported: Supports over 40 programming languages, catering to diverse tech stacks.
• Plagiarism detection: Uses machine learning to detect plagiarism and maintain the integrity of assessments.
• Real-world coding questions: Assesses candidates in a sandboxed environment that simulates real job conditions.
• ATS integrations: Integrates with popular ATS systems to streamline the hiring process.

Hackerrank Cons

• Limited scope beyond tech skills: Lacks assessments for aptitude, personality, or role-specific skills outside of IT.
• No situational judgment tests: Does not offer assessments to evaluate candidates' decision-making in workplace scenarios.
• Default questions are easily searchable: Many default questions are readily available online, which can compromise test integrity.
• No custom data location support: No options to have your data in your own country for compliance.

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank offers several pricing plans. The Starter plan begins at $100 per month ($1200 annually), and the Pro plan at $250 per month ($3000 annually). For enterprise-level features and customized solutions, you'll need to contact HackerRank directly for a pricing quote. There is a free trial available.

Found Your Perfect TestWe Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface offers a high test library with 500+ tests for aptitude, finance, personality, business roles, typing, AI, technical and coding roles and has a strong proctoring suite. Plus, it's used by clients in 70+ countries and has no seat-based pricing.
• HackerEarth focuses on tech skills, providing coding assessments, though their questions can sometimes be found online.
• TestGorilla has a wide range of tests, including aptitude, personality, and job-specific assessments, suitable for various roles.
• HireVue uses video interviews and assessments to evaluate candidates, but lacks custom question options.
• Coderbyte is another platform specializing in coding assessments, offering coding challenges and skill-based questions.
• Alva Labs is a platform for assessing both cognitive abilities and personality, suitable for roles requiring a mix of skills.
• Bryq focuses on personality and cognitive assessments to match candidates with the right company culture.
• AssessFirst offers personality and aptitude assessments but doesn't offer coding tests.
• Maki People provides a range of assessments, including coding, aptitude, and personality tests, with custom question options.
• Hackerrank is popular for coding assessments, but their default questions are easily searchable.

We've explored a range of TestWe alternatives, each offering unique features for candidate assessment. But before you jump to a decision, let's zoom out for a sec.

TestWe shines when you want a simple platform to host your own questions. However, that's also its biggest drawback. You're on the hook for creating and maintaining a question bank, which can be a massive time sink. Plus, it lacks many features that modern assessment platforms offer.

Thankfully, there are assessment tools like Adaface that provide comprehensive solutions. Adaface comes with a vast library of 500+ tests and features like strong proctoring to ensure test integrity.

Ultimately, the best TestWe alternative depends on your specific needs. Whether you're looking for coding tests, aptitude assessments, or personality evaluations, there's a platform to streamline your hiring process.

Eager to see how Adaface can transform your hiring? Explore Adaface today!