Top 10 Symphony Talent Alternatives & Competitors

Why Might Recruiters Seek Alternatives to Symphony Talent?

I've dug around to get a sense of what makes talent acquisition teams explore options beyond Symphony Talent. Here are a few potential reasons that bubbled to the surface.

Limited support for technical assessments. Symphony Talent's assessment capabilities are lighter when it comes to evaluating technical skills. For roles demanding coding skills, or expertise in AI and cloud technologies, you might need a platform that provides coding questions, excel simulations, and scenario-based questions to assess practical abilities.

Lack of advanced proctoring features. Ensuring test integrity is paramount, especially in remote hiring scenarios. Symphony Talent seems to have unknown details around advanced proctoring features like webcam monitoring, IP tracking, and copy-paste disabling. Features like these minimize cheating and ensure a fair evaluation process. If you need a platform to proctoring and reduce candidate cheating, make sure the assessment solution has these.

Reporting and analytics limitations. While Symphony Talent provides skills profiles in scorecards and comprehensive overviews, it lacks in-depth reporting features. For example, the platform does not provide PDF or public reports, Excel/CSV exports, or skill-wise analysis. These features offer a more granular understanding of candidate performance, skill gaps, and benchmarking against peers. These insights can be very helpful when making informed hiring decisions.

1. Adaface

Best for: Skills assessments for both technical and non-technical roles.

If you're seeking a strong alternative to Symphony Talent for pre-employment assessments, Adaface offers a compelling solution. Let's break down why Adaface could be the perfect fit for your hiring needs.

One notable drawback of Symphony Talent is the absence of coding assessments, which can be a deal-breaker for tech companies. Adaface addresses this directly with a robust library of coding tests, supporting multiple programming languages and frameworks. This ensures you can accurately evaluate candidates' coding skills, a feature that Symphony Talent currently lacks.

Beyond coding assessments, Adaface provides a range of features to streamline your hiring process and ensure you're getting the best talent. Some of these include:

• A vast library of 500+ tests covering technical, aptitude, and personality skills.
• Strong proctoring features to prevent cheating.
• Customization options to tailor assessments to specific job descriptions.
• Detailed scorecards and reporting for candidate analysis.
• Integrations with popular ATS platforms.

Extensive Test Library for Diverse Skills

Adaface boasts a test library of over 500 assessments, ranging from technical skills like programming and AI to business skills like finance and aptitude. This breadth ensures you can assess candidates for a wide variety of roles within your organization.

Unlike Symphony Talent, Adaface also covers niche areas like typing tests and language proficiency assessments. This makes it a versatile tool for companies with diverse hiring needs. You can explore our Pre-Employment Assessment Test Library to find the perfect tests for your roles.

Robust Proctoring Suite to Maintain Test Integrity

Adaface's commitment to test integrity is evident in its comprehensive proctoring suite. We employ measures such as webcam proctoring, window/tab tracking, IP address logging, and copy-paste protection to minimize cheating.

Furthermore, Adaface utilizes a large question bank and implements social listening to detect and prevent question leaks. This multi-layered approach ensures that your assessments are reliable and accurately reflect candidates' skills. Learn more about our online assessment platform's proctoring capabilities.

Adaface vs Symphony Talent Attributes

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests for various roles.
• Strong proctoring features.
• Customizable assessments based on job descriptions.
• Detailed scorecards with skills profile and skill-wise analysis.
• Used by clients in 70+ countries.
• Pricing covers all proctoring features.
• Candidate-friendly conversational assessments.

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit different needs. We provide a free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits, allowing you to explore the platform before committing. The platform is self-serve, and no credit card is required to start your trial. Our pricing plans include Individual ($180/yr), Starter ($500/yr), Pro ($900/yr), Scale ($3000/yr), Growth ($5500/yr), Enterprise ($20,000/yr), and Unlimited ($50,000/yr). All plans include complete proctoring features and access to all 500+ tests.

2. iMocha

Best for: Skills intelligence, tech hiring

iMocha offers skills assessments and skills intelligence to help companies understand their workforce's current abilities, plan for future needs, and bridge skill gaps through strategic hiring. Unlike Symphony Talent, iMocha emphasizes skill management and development within your organization.

Symphony Talent lacks coding assessments, which are vital for tech roles. iMocha bridges that gap by offering coding assessments and a real-world environment.

While Symphony Talent offers ready-to-use tests, it doesn't allow for custom test creation based on job descriptions. iMocha lets you customize tests and dive into individual profiles for detailed insights.

How iMocha compares to Symphony Talent?

Key Features

• Candidate Screening: Use structured assessments for consistency in evaluating talent pools.
• Live Coding Interviews: Evaluate developers in a real-world environment with a fully functional IDE.
• SkillUp: Filter candidates by skills and certifications with AI, providing detailed insights.

iMocha Pros

• Wide Range of Assessments: Covers a broad spectrum of skills, including aptitude, technical, and behavioral.
• Skills Intelligence: Provides insights into skills gaps and helps in workforce planning.
• Automated Scoring: Automates scoring for coding and other assessments, saving time and resources.
• Integration Capabilities: Integrates with various ATS platforms for a streamlined hiring process.
• Customizable Branding: Offers options to add company logos and brand colors to assessments.

iMocha Cons

• Limited Customization: Does not allow for creating custom questions, limiting the ability to assess specific company needs. For those seeking complete control over their assessment content, platforms like Adaface offer the ability to add your own questions and tailor tests to specific job descriptions.
• No Custom Data Location Support: Lacks support for custom data location, which can be a concern for companies with strict data residency requirements.
• No Custom API: Does not provide a custom API for deeper integration with other HR systems.
• No Candidate Feedback: Does not collect candidate feedback for test improvement.

iMocha Pricing

iMocha does not publicly list its pricing. Interested users need to contact iMocha directly for a pricing quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly assess its suitability compared to solutions with readily available pricing, especially when you want to quickly compare the prices with other skills assessment tools.

3. Testgorilla

Best for: Quickly assess diverse skillsets

TestGorilla offers a wide library of pre-made tests to assess candidates across various skills. It aims to simplify and accelerate the screening process, helping businesses identify the right talent for their open roles. It is different from Symphony Talent in that it provides coding questions as well, which Symphony Talent lacks.

Symphony Talent's platform doesn't offer programming language coding questions, which are important for assessing developers and engineers. TestGorilla fills this gap by providing a wide array of coding tests, allowing recruiters to evaluate candidates' practical coding abilities.

However, TestGorilla doesn't allow you to create custom questions tailored to your specific needs. This limitation can be a drawback if you're looking to assess niche skills or create questions that reflect your company's unique challenges. Consider exploring Adaface's online assessment platform for a more customizable solution.

How Testgorilla compares to Symphony Talent?

Key Features

• Ready-made assessment library for diverse skills.
• Video interviews and live coding interviews.
• Integrations with popular ATS platforms.

Testgorilla Pros

• Wide range of ready-to-use tests.
• Caters to diverse skills, including coding.
• Reporting and analytics features.
• Video interviewing capabilities.
• Integrates with major applicant tracking systems.

Testgorilla Cons

• Lacks custom question creation. Adaface provides support for creating custom questions especially for customer usecases
• No plagiarism detection for code submissions.
• Does not provide detailed audit timeline.
• Questions are easily answerable by smaller GPT models

Testgorilla Pricing

TestGorilla's pricing is based on company size and starts from $75 per month (billed annually) for small teams. Contact them to get precise pricing for your company's size. Unlimited invites has fair use policy restrictions.

4. Coderbyte

Best for: Coding skill assessment platform

Coderbyte specializes in assessing coding skills, providing a platform for companies to evaluate developers and engineers. It offers a range of coding challenges and assessments to gauge a candidate's programming abilities. Unlike Symphony Talent, Coderbyte hones in specifically on the technical aspects of hiring.

Coderbyte really shines when you need to deep-dive into a candidate's coding prowess. While Symphony Talent offers a broader suite of assessments, Coderbyte gives you coding challenges, algorithm analysis, and code review tools, ensuring you're getting a clear picture of their coding skills.

Symphony Talent lacks coding questions in its library. For roles demanding strong coding skills, Coderbyte helps you assess the practical application of programming knowledge, something that Symphony Talent misses out on.

How Coderbyte compares to Symphony Talent?

Key Features

• Coding challenges in various languages
• Real-time code evaluation and feedback
• Customizable assessments for specific roles

Coderbyte Pros

• Extensive library of coding challenges.
• Supports multiple programming languages.
• Provides detailed reports on candidate performance.
• Offers a platform for live coding interviews.
• Includes plagiarism detection to maintain test integrity.

Coderbyte Cons

• Lacks assessments for non-technical roles.
• No aptitude, behavioral, or personality tests are available.
• Limited ATS integrations.
• Does not offer custom question creation.

Coderbyte Pricing

Coderbyte offers both subscription and pay-as-you-go plans. The Starter plan begins at $199/month. They also provide a free trial. For detailed pricing, it's best to check their website directly.

5. TestGrid

Best for: Aptitude test for entry-level

TestGrid offers a platform primarily focused on aptitude assessments, catering to entry-level hiring needs. While Symphony Talent is a broader talent management solution, TestGrid zones in on evaluating a candidate's aptitude skills.

Symphony Talent is less focused on aptitude assessments, TestGrid makes it easier to conduct aptitude tests. However, TestGrid lacks the ability to create custom questions or add your own, limiting its flexibility for specific customer needs.

Unlike Symphony Talent, TestGrid is limited to custom coding questions or situation judgement questions, which are key in getting a holistic understanding of candidate's skills. If you're looking for a solution that offers aptitude tests and situational judgement tests, consider Adaface.

How TestGrid compares to Symphony Talent?

Key Features

• Aptitude Tests: Offers a range of aptitude tests to assess candidates.
• Personality Tests: Includes personality assessments to evaluate candidate traits.
• ATS Integration: Integrates with applicant tracking systems.

TestGrid Pros

• Easy to use platform.
• Integrates with ATS systems.
• Offers PDF and excel reports.
• Provides email support.
• Has qualifying questions support.

TestGrid Cons

• Lacks coding question support for tech roles.
• No support for language proficiency tests.
• Limited question types may not cover all required skills.
• No custom data location support.

TestGrid Pricing

TestGrid does not publicly display pricing details. You need to sign up on their website to receive pricing information. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly assess if it fits your budget or compare it against solutions with readily available pricing like Adaface Assessments Pricing.

6. Xobin

Best for: Skills assessment with coding

Xobin offers a platform for assessing candidates across various skills, including coding, aptitude, and personality. While Symphony Talent focuses on talent acquisition and employer branding, Xobin hones in on skill validation through assessments.

Symphony Talent, while strong in attracting candidates, lacks the depth in technical skill assessment that many roles require. Xobin bridges this gap by offering coding assessments and other technical evaluations, ensuring you're not just hiring a great personality, but also the right skillset.

Unlike Symphony Talent, Xobin provides coding assessments. This allows for a more complete skills evaluation, especially for technical roles. By incorporating coding tests, you gain insights into a candidate's practical coding abilities, something you might miss with Symphony Talent's broader assessment capabilities.

How Xobin compares to Symphony Talent?

Key Features

• Candidate screening with structured assessments
• Live coding interviews with a functional IDE
• AI-powered skill filtering

Xobin Pros

• Wide range of assessments including coding, aptitude and personality
• Supports web and mobile framework questions
• Automated scoring for coding questions
• Offers customizable invitation templates with company branding
• Integrates with popular ATS systems

Xobin Cons

• No support for custom question creation, limiting the ability to tailor assessments to specific company needs. Adaface allows you to create custom questions.
• Lacks custom data location support for enhanced data security.
• Doesn't offer a custom API, making integrations with niche or in-house tools challenging.
• No support for SQL and Excel workbook questions, potentially limiting the assessment of data-related skills.

Xobin Pricing

Xobin does not provide transparent pricing on their website. To get a quote, you'll need to request a demo and speak with their sales team. There is no free trial, limiting the ability to explore the platform before committing to a purchase.

7. HR Avatar

Best for: Evaluate Job Fit Quickly

HR Avatar offers pre-employment assessments designed to predict job performance. It uses simulations and traditional tests to evaluate candidates across various roles. While Symphony Talent focuses on broader talent management, HR Avatar zooms in on pre-hire assessments, but lacks advanced features.

Symphony Talent, while offering a suite of talent management tools, doesn't provide coding assessments or detailed AI-based evaluations. HR Avatar steps in by providing aptitude and job-specific tests, offering a more focused approach for initial candidate screening.

However, HR Avatar lacks the ability to create custom questions or customized tests based on specific job descriptions. This is where a platform like Adaface shines, providing tailored assessments that accurately reflect the requirements of each unique role.

How HR Avatar compares to Symphony Talent?

Key Features

• Realistic job simulations for certain roles.
• Personality and aptitude testing.
• Automated scoring and reporting.

HR Avatar Pros

• Large library of pre-built assessments.
• Simulations offer a glimpse into job performance.
• Straightforward reporting.
• GDPR compliant.
• Free Trial available.

HR Avatar Cons

• No coding assessments to evaluate developers.
• No custom question creation.
• No ATS integrations.
• Lacks advanced proctoring features like webcam or window tracking.

HR Avatar Pricing

HR Avatar's pricing is tiered, with individual assessments starting at $350 for 10 candidates. They also offer packages like $1430 for 50 candidates, $2660 for 100 candidates, and $12300 for 500 candidates. For enterprise-level solutions, you'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. They do have a free trial, so you can kick the tires before committing.

8. Priority Bridge

Best for: Personality-based team assessments

Priority Bridge focuses on personality assessments to help build better teams. It offers a ready-to-use test library, but lacks some key features that modern recruiters now consider essential. Let's see how it stacks up against Symphony Talent.

Symphony Talent offers a suite of talent acquisition tools, but it's missing some assessment types such as coding, language, AI, and finance. Priority Bridge focuses mainly on personality tests, which can be helpful for understanding team dynamics. However, it doesn't offer a wide range of skills-based assessments to accurately evaluate candidates for specific job roles.

Compared to Symphony Talent and Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests, Priority Bridge lacks options to create custom tests based on job descriptions or to include a variety of question types like coding, aptitude, or Excel workbook questions.

How Priority Bridge compares to Symphony Talent?

Key Features

• Personality assessments
• Ready-to-use tests
• Benchmarking candidates

Priority Bridge Pros

• Benchmarking candidates is available.
• Skills profile in scorecards are present.
• Comprehensive overview of candidate scores.
• Automated scorecard generation.
• Email Support.

Priority Bridge Cons

• Lacks coding, aptitude, business, typing, language, AI, and finance tests.
• No custom question creation.
• No ATS integrations.
• No web or webcam proctoring.

Priority Bridge Pricing

Priority Bridge doesn't publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their team for a quote. They also do not offer a free trial, making it difficult to try before you buy.

9. Hogan Assessments

Best for: Personality-based hiring decisions

Hogan Assessments offers a suite of personality assessments designed to predict job performance. They provide insights into a candidate's strengths, weaknesses, and values, helping organizations make informed hiring and development decisions.

Symphony Talent focuses primarily on talent acquisition and employer branding. Hogan Assessments, on the other hand, dives deep into personality assessments. While Symphony Talent offers a broad suite of HR tools, it lacks the in-depth personality insights that Hogan Assessments provides.

For companies seeking a nuanced understanding of candidate personality and its impact on job performance, Hogan Assessments works better. This makes it a strong choice for roles where personality is a key factor for success, like leadership or sales.

How Hogan Assessments compares to Symphony Talent?

Key Features

• Personality Inventories: Scientifically validated tools to assess personality traits.
• Leadership Forecast Series: Identify leadership potential and areas for development.
• Hogan Safety: Measures personality characteristics related to workplace safety.

Hogan Assessments Pros

• Provides validated personality insights.
• Helps in identifying leadership potential.
• Useful for predicting job performance based on personality.
• Aids in team building and conflict resolution.
• Offers customizable invitation templates

Hogan Assessments Cons

• Lacks skills-based assessments like coding tests and aptitude tests.
• No support for custom questions.
• Does not offer AI, Finance, Typing and Language tests like Adaface.
• No proctoring to prevent candidates from cheating.

Hogan Assessments Pricing

Hogan Assessments does not publicly display pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. There's no mention of a free trial, so be prepared to commit to a paid plan to experience the platform. This can make budgeting difficult compared to platforms with transparent pricing like Adaface's assessment pricing.

10. Wonderlic

Best for: Cognitive skills quick assessment

Wonderlic offers cognitive ability assessments, most famously the Wonderlic Personnel Test, designed to measure general cognitive ability. It’s a tool used by employers to gauge problem-solving skills, learning aptitude, and overall intelligence of potential hires.

Unlike Symphony Talent, which offers a broader suite of talent management tools, Wonderlic zeros in on cognitive assessment. This focus can be particularly useful when you need a quick and reliable measure of a candidate's general mental aptitude.

If you are specifically seeking cognitive ability insights, Wonderlic's focused approach could be advantageous. However, remember that cognitive ability is just one piece of the puzzle. You might need other assessments to evaluate job-specific skills, personality, or cultural fit, which Wonderlic doesn't provide. To cover all bases, platforms like Adaface can help assess across the board.

How Wonderlic compares to Symphony Talent?

Key Features

• Cognitive Ability Testing: Primarily known for its cognitive ability tests like the Wonderlic Personnel Test-Revised (WPT-R).
• Pre-built Assessments: Offers a library of pre-designed assessments covering different skill areas.
• Reporting and Analytics: Provides reports on candidate performance.

Wonderlic Pros

• Quick assessment: The Wonderlic test is relatively quick to administer, providing results in a short timeframe.
• Standardized scores: Offers standardized scoring, making it easy to compare candidates.
• Wide Recognition: The Wonderlic test is a well-known and recognized assessment tool.
• Large candidate pool: Since it's a popular test, many candidates are familiar with it.
• Good for initial screening: Helps quickly filter candidates based on cognitive ability.

Wonderlic Cons

• Limited scope: Primarily focuses on cognitive ability, neglecting other skills like coding, business acumen, or personality.
• No custom questions: Doesn't allow for the creation of custom questions tailored to specific job roles. This makes it hard to assess niche skills.
• Lacks advanced proctoring: May not offer advanced proctoring features to prevent cheating.
• No skills profile: The reports don't give a skills profile of each candidates' strengths and weaknesses.

Wonderlic Pricing

Wonderlic's pricing isn't readily available on their website. You'll need to contact them directly for a quote, which can vary based on your specific needs and the volume of assessments you plan to use. This lack of transparent pricing can make budgeting a bit tricky. A free trial isn't offered.

Found Your Perfect Symphony Talent Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface offers a vast library of 500+ tests spanning aptitude, finance, personality, and technical roles, plus a strong proctoring suite and transparent, credit-based pricing with no seat restrictions. It's used by clients in 70+ countries. The best part? Adaface's pricing covers all proctoring features.
• iMocha offers a wide range of assessments, including coding and aptitude tests, but lacks custom question creation and has limited language support compared to Adaface.
• TestGorilla provides a comprehensive suite of tests and integrates with ATS systems, but their pricing scales with company size, which might not be as flexible as Adaface's credit-based approach.
• Coderbyte focuses on technical assessments with coding challenges and custom coding questions, but it doesn't cover aptitude or business skills and has longer test durations.
• TestGrid offers aptitude and personality tests with ATS integration but lacks coding assessments and detailed pricing information.
• Xobin provides a range of assessments including coding and aptitude, along with company branding options, but doesn't allow custom question creation.
• HR Avatar focuses on job-specific assessments and personality tests, but lacks coding assessments and custom questions, and has limited ATS integrations.
• Priority Bridge primarily offers personality assessments, lacking aptitude, business skill, and coding tests, and doesn't provide pricing details upfront.
• Hogan Assessments specializes in personality assessments, particularly for sales roles, but has limited assessment types and lacks coding assessments.
• Wonderlic provides aptitude and personality tests, but lacks coding, business skill, and job-specific assessments, and doesn't offer custom questions.

We've journeyed through a landscape of candidate assessment platforms, each offering unique features and catering to diverse hiring needs. Let's recap why exploring alternatives to Symphony Talent is worthwhile.

Symphony Talent shines with its aptitude and business skill assessments, but it lacks coding tests and in-depth skill analysis which are important for a lot of roles. This can be a deal-breaker if you're hiring for technical roles or need a more granular understanding of candidate abilities.

Luckily, there are some strong contenders in the market. From Adaface with its expansive test library, to other platforms tailored for specific skill sets, the options are plentiful. The key is to pinpoint the tools that align with your specific requirements.

Whether you prioritize technical prowess, personality insights, or a blend of both, remember there's a Symphony Talent alternative out there waiting to transform your hiring process. All you need to do is pick one that suits your usecase and solves your purpose. And, yes, we definitely recommend starting with Adaface.

Ready to elevate your hiring process? Give Adaface a try and discover how skills-based assessments can transform your talent acquisition.