Top 10 Sprockets Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why are companies seeking alternatives to Sprockets?

I've dug into the reasons why recruiters and hiring managers explore options beyond Sprockets. Here's what I discovered about the platform's potential drawbacks:

Limited assessment types offered. Sprockets primarily focuses on personality assessments, neglecting crucial areas like aptitude, finance, coding, and job-specific skills. This narrow focus can make it challenging to get a 360-degree view of a candidate's capabilities, especially for roles requiring diverse skill sets.

Lack of proctoring features. Sprockets lacks advanced proctoring features like webcam, window, tab, IP, and device fingerprint tracking. This could be a concern for organizations prioritizing test security and integrity.

Limited customization options. Sprockets does not allow you to add your own questions or create custom tests tailored to specific job descriptions. For organizations that need to assess candidates on very specific skills or use cases, this can be a major disadvantage and can result in inaccurate pre-employment assessment tests.

1. Adaface

Best for: Assess candidates across 500+ skills, from coding to cognitive aptitude and personality

Looking for a Sprockets alternative? Adaface offers a powerful and user-friendly platform designed to help you screen and hire top talent.

Sprockets lacks robust proctoring features, creating a risk of cheating and unreliable results. Adaface solves this by offering a suite of proctoring measures, including webcam monitoring, window violation detection, IP address tracking, and copy-paste disabling, ensuring a fair and secure assessment experience.

Adaface stands out with its expansive test library and features designed for accurate and cheat-proof assessments:

• 500+ ready-to-use skills tests
• Support for technical, aptitude, personality, and role-specific skills
• Advanced proctoring features
• Customizable assessments tailored to job descriptions
• Detailed scorecards and reporting
• Company branding options for a better candidate experience

Advanced Proctoring for Secure Assessments

Adaface's proctoring suite ensures the integrity of your assessments. We use a combination of techniques to prevent cheating, including webcam proctoring, which records candidates during the test, and window violation detection, which flags candidates who switch tabs or windows.

We also track IP addresses and device fingerprints to identify suspicious activity. Additionally, copy-paste functionality can be disabled to prevent plagiarism. With these features, you can be confident that your results are reliable and reflect the true skills of your candidates.

Extensive Test Library Covering Diverse Skills

Adaface offers a wide range of skills tests to evaluate candidates across various domains. Our library includes tests for programming, aptitude, personality, and role-specific skills, ensuring you can find the right assessment for any position.

Unlike Sprockets, we also offer specialized tests for business skills, typing proficiency, AI, and finance. You can also create customized assessments tailored to specific job requirements, ensuring you assess the most relevant skills for each role.

Adaface vs Sprockets Attributes

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests on technical skills, cognitive abilities, language proficiency, and more
• Extensive ATS integrations
• Customizable assessments
• Excellent anti-cheating measures
• Used by clients from 70+ countries
• Pricing only depends on credits. Pricing covers all proctoring features.
• Candidate experience and company branding

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit different needs. A free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits is available to explore the platform. No credit card is required to start.

Our pricing plans include all proctoring features and access to our 500+ tests:

• Individual ($180/year)
• Starter ($500/year)
• Pro ($900/year)
• Scale ($3000/year)
• Growth ($5500/year)
• Enterprise ($20,000/year)
• Unlimited ($50,000/year)

2. Coderbyte

Best for: Coding challenges for developers

Coderbyte focuses on providing coding challenges and assessments, primarily aimed at developers and engineers. It's a platform where candidates can showcase their coding skills and recruiters can evaluate technical abilities.

Unlike Sprockets, Coderbyte emphasizes coding skills. Sprockets lacks coding questions. So if you need to assess if a candidate knows how to write actual code, Coderbyte is the one.

However, if you want to test for more than just coding, like aptitude, communication, or even how well someone knows Excel, you might need a platform that offers a wider variety of tests like Adaface.

How Coderbyte compares to Sprockets?

Key Features

• Coding challenges across multiple languages
• Assessments for web and data science skills
• Code playback feature for review

Coderbyte Pros

• Large library of coding challenges.
• Supports code playback for better evaluation.
• Offers both subscription and pay-as-you-go pricing.
• Caters to a range of skill levels, from beginner to expert.
• Has pre-built assessments to quickly launch tests.

Coderbyte Cons

• Lacks assessments for non-technical roles.
• No support for testing mobile framework skills.
• Does not offer custom questions.
• No ATS integrations.

Coderbyte Pricing

Coderbyte offers both subscription and pay-as-you-go options. The subscription plan starts at $199/month. If you don't want a subscription, you can choose the Pay as you go plan at $500 for 50 candidates. They do provide a free trial.

3. Hackerrank

Best for: Technical Hiring and Assessments

HackerRank is a platform known for its focus on technical skill assessment, particularly in coding. It offers a range of tools and features to help companies evaluate candidates' programming abilities.

Unlike Sprockets, HackerRank emphasizes coding skills and offers a platform tailored for technical roles. If you're primarily hiring developers, data scientists, or other tech professionals, HackerRank provides a deeper dive into their coding proficiency.

Sprockets lacks the ability to assess coding skills and other technical skills that Hackerrank solves.

How Hackerrank compares to Sprockets?

Key Features

• Coding Challenges: Evaluate candidates through coding exercises in various programming languages.
• Skill Certification: Allows candidates to earn certifications to demonstrate their abilities.
• Live Coding Interviews: Conduct real-time coding sessions to assess problem-solving skills.

Hackerrank Pros

• Large Developer Community: Popular among developers, which may make it easier to attract candidates.
• Extensive Question Library: Offers a vast selection of coding challenges and assessments.
• Plagiarism Detection: Helps maintain the integrity of coding tests.
• Supports Multiple Languages: Assesses candidates in over 40 programming languages.
• ATS Integrations: Integrates smoothly with many applicant tracking systems.

Hackerrank Cons

• Limited Scope: Focuses primarily on technical skills, lacking assessments for other crucial roles like marketing or customer service.
• No Emotional Intelligence Screening: Doesn't offer tools to measure soft skills or emotional intelligence.
• Lengthy Assessments: Tests can be time-consuming, potentially impacting candidate experience; Adaface Assessments are designed to be shorter and more engaging.
• Default Questions are Googleable: The questions can be easily found on the internet, thus reducing assessment accuracy.

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank's pricing includes a free tier for basic use. Paid plans start at $100 per month, billed annually. For enterprise-level features and custom solutions, you'll need to contact HackerRank directly for a pricing quote.

4. iMocha

Best for: Skills intelligence for workforce planning

iMocha offers skill assessments and skills intelligence to help companies understand their workforce's current skills and plan for future skill requirements. It aims to close skill gaps through targeted recruitment and development programs.

Sprockets offers basic assessment but it doesn't let you create custom questions tailored to specific roles or projects. iMocha allows you to add your own questions to assess niche skills or simulate real-world scenarios.

While Sprockets may offer a decent library of ready-to-use tests, iMocha has a wider variety of tests across different domains, from aptitude to AI. This is useful if you want to assess candidates across a broader range of skills.

How iMocha compares to Sprockets?

Key Features

• Skills assessments for various domains
• Skills intelligence for workforce planning
• Live coding interview capabilities

iMocha Pros

• Extensive skill assessment library.
• Skills intelligence to identify skill gaps.
• Integrates with existing ATS systems.
• Offers webcam and window proctoring.
• Supports various question types, including coding.

iMocha Cons

• Doesn't support creation of custom questions.
• Lacks conversational assessments, impacting candidate experience. Conversational Assessments have better candidate experience.
• Limited language support compared to platforms like Adaface.
• No custom data location support.

iMocha Pricing

iMocha does not provide transparent pricing on their website. You need to contact them directly for a quote, which may involve a sales call. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly evaluate whether iMocha fits your budget.

5. HireVue

Best for: Video interviews and assessments

HireVue offers a combination of video interviewing and assessments to help companies screen and identify top talent. It aims to streamline the hiring process by using data and AI to predict candidate success.

While Sprockets offers basic conversational assessments, it falls short when you need to dive deeper into a candidate's skills, especially technical ones. HireVue offers coding assessments, which Sprockets does not. This makes HireVue a better choice when you need to evaluate a candidate's hands-on coding abilities.

Furthermore, HireVue's webcam proctoring and location logging give recruiters added assurance against cheating. Adaface also offers coding assessments with webcam proctoring, as well as window, tab, IP and device fingerprint proctoring for cheating detection.

How HireVue compares to Sprockets?

Key Features

• On-demand video interviews for initial screening.
• AI-driven insights to evaluate candidate responses.
• Coding assessments to test technical skills.

HireVue Pros

• Large user base and brand recognition.
• Good for initial screening with video interviews.
• Strong focus on AI-driven insights.
• Offers mobile-friendly assessments.
• Integrates with various ATS platforms.

HireVue Cons

• Lacks custom question creation, limiting flexibility.
• No tests for finance, business or cloud roles, limiting versatility.
• No coding playback feature, impacting coding assessment analysis
• No custom API for integrations with other HR systems. If you need to have a tight integration with your HR systems, then HireVue is not a good fit. For instance, Adaface Integrations - Integrate with your hiring tools can help.

HireVue Pricing

HireVue does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to compare costs upfront. Also, they do not offer a free trial.

6. Evalart

Best for: Skills testing, AI assessments

Evalart offers a platform to assess candidates across various skills, including programming, languages, and aptitude. They also provide AI assessments, expanding their utility in tech-focused hiring. Let's see how it stacks up!

Sprockets doesn't support coding questions, which is a big miss if you're hiring developers. Evalart fills this gap with coding assessments, but it focuses only on coding questions.

Evalart lets you add your own questions and has coding, language, and AI tests. But Sprockets is still limited; it doesn't have aptitude, business, typing, finance, or cloud tests. If you need a broader assessment scope, you need something more versatile.

How Evalart compares to Sprockets?

Key Features

• Coding assessments (coding questions only)
• Language proficiency tests
• AI-related skill evaluations

Evalart Pros

• Supports coding skill assessment.
• Includes webcam proctoring for added security.
• Offers a free trial to test the platform.
• Provides a range of language tests.
• Has aptitude tests to check candidate's cognitive skills.

Evalart Cons

• Lacks situational judgment and business skills assessments.
• No custom test creation based on job descriptions.
• Limited reporting features, lacking skills profiles and benchmarking.
• No copy/paste protection during tests, risking cheating.

Evalart Pricing

Evalart does offer a one-month free trial. However, pricing details aren't publicly available; you'll need to contact their sales team. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to budget and compare against other platforms like Adaface Assessments Pricing.

7. CodeSignal

Best for: Coding skill assessment platform

CodeSignal offers a technology-driven platform designed to evaluate coding skills through online assessments. They aim to provide a standardized and data-driven approach to technical hiring, focusing on identifying and measuring a candidate's coding proficiency.

CodeSignal emphasizes coding skills, making it a fit for companies laser-focused on developer roles. Unlike Sprockets, it dives deep into coding with its coding tests.

However, if you're looking for a broader skills assessment solution beyond just coding, like aptitude, personality, or even job-specific skills, a platform like Adaface might be a better bet.

How CodeSignal compares to Sprockets?

Key Features

• Coding assessments across various languages
• Live coding interview environment
• Skills-based candidate matching

CodeSignal Pros

• Strong focus on coding skills assessment.
• Automated scoring saves time.
• Supports multiple programming languages.
• Provides a structured coding environment.
• Integrates with applicant tracking systems (ATS).

CodeSignal Cons

• Lacks assessments for non-technical skills.
• Customization options are limited.
• No support for assessing skills like Excel or Finance.
• No support for custom data location support.

CodeSignal Pricing

CodeSignal does not publicly display its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. This lack of transparency can make it hard to quickly evaluate if it fits your budget. No free trial is mentioned, so you can't try before you buy.

8. XBInsight Talent Assessments

Best for: Predictive behavioral talent assessments

XBInsight Talent Assessments offers behavioral assessments designed to predict job performance and cultural fit. They aim to provide insights into a candidate's personality traits, cognitive abilities, and how they align with specific roles.

Unlike Sprockets, XBInsight digs deeper into candidate behavior, offering situational judgment tests to simulate real-world scenarios. This helps you see how candidates actually respond, not just how they say they would.

While Sprockets offers limited customization, XBInsight provides a broader range of assessments to understand cognitive abilities and personality. If you're looking to understand a candidate's potential beyond basic skills, XBInsight might be the sherlock holmes you need.

How XBInsight Talent Assessments compares to Sprockets?

Key Features

• Behavioral assessments for predicting job performance.
• Situational judgment tests to evaluate decision-making.
• Cognitive ability tests to assess learning aptitude.

XBInsight Talent Assessments Pros

• Offers insights into behavioral traits and cultural fit.
• Provides situational judgment tests for realistic scenarios.
• Includes cognitive ability assessments.
• ATS Integrations for streamlined workflow.
• GDPR Compliant

XBInsight Talent Assessments Cons

• No coding assessments to assess hands-on skills, so, it's a no-go for tech roles that require coding skills.
• Lacks custom question creation, limiting tailoring to specific company needs. With Adaface, you can design custom questions specific to your company's needs.
• No mention of proctoring features; cheating might be a concern.
• Limited information available about pricing and features, making it difficult to evaluate.

XBInsight Talent Assessments Pricing

Pricing information is not readily available on XBInsight's website. You'll need to contact them directly for a quote. Since there's no free trial, you'll have to jump on a call to see if it's the right fit.

9. Testlify

Best for: Skills-based assessment platform

Testlify offers a wide array of pre-employment assessment tests designed to evaluate candidates across various skills. They aim to streamline the hiring process by providing tools for screening and assessing candidates effectively.

Sprockets primarily focuses on personality assessments, while Testlify extends its capabilities to cover a broader spectrum of skills, including aptitude, business skills, typing speed, and even coding skills. This makes Testlify a more versatile option if you're looking for a tool that goes beyond just personality and delves into tangible abilities.

Unlike Sprockets, Testlify provides coding questions, situational judgment tests, and a wider range of skill assessments that gives recruiters a better sense of candidate skills.

How Testlify compares to Sprockets?

Key Features

• Wide range of tests: Access a diverse library including aptitude, personality, and job-specific assessments.
• Coding assessments: Evaluate candidates' coding skills with practical coding challenges.
• Custom questions: Add your own questions to tailor assessments to specific job requirements.

Testlify Pros

• Wide range of assessment types are available.
• Coding assessments are supported.
• Ready-to-use tests are available.
• ATS Integrations are supported.
• The platform supports webcam and window proctoring.

Testlify Cons

• No AI skills assessments are present.
• Lacks custom test creation from job description unlike Adaface.
• No proprietary algorithms to improve the quality of questions.
• No candidate feedback loop to improve test quality.

Testlify Pricing

Testlify offers a tiered pricing structure, starting with a basic plan at $49/month (billed annually). Higher-tier plans with more features and assessment capacity are available at $299/month and $749/month (billed annually). For larger organizations, custom enterprise plans are also offered. They offer a free trial and ease of sign up to explore all features.

10. Crystal

Best for: Personality-based team building

Crystal helps you understand anyone's personality to communicate effectively, build better relationships, and work together. It's like having a decoder ring for people!

While Sprockets might give you some insight into personality, Crystal dives deeper, offering communication and collaboration advice tailored to specific personality types. Crystal helps you understand how different personalities interact, which is great for team building and conflict resolution.

However, Crystal, like Sprockets, doesn't offer the full spectrum of assessment types needed for hiring. You won't find coding tests, aptitude tests, or even the ability to add your own custom questions, which are all available with a platform like Adaface.

How Crystal compares to Sprockets?

Key Features

• Personality assessments based on DISC methodology
• Communication style guides for different personalities
• Team analysis to identify strengths and weaknesses

Crystal Pros

• Understand team member's personalities.
• Offers some level of insight.
• Can improve team communication.
• Good for conflict resolution.
• Has some level of assessment to help you.

Crystal Cons

• Lacks skills testing beyond personality.
• No coding, aptitude, or job-specific tests.
• Can't create custom questions.
• No proctoring features for secure assessments.

Crystal Pricing

Crystal offers a free trial to get you started. Their starter plan begins at $49/month. For scaling your team's personality prowess, you will need to contact their team for custom pricing.

Found Your Perfect Sprockets Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface offers a vast test library of 500+ tests covering aptitude, finance, personality, technical, and coding roles, complete with a strong proctoring suite and transparent pricing.
• Coderbyte specializes in technical assessments with coding challenges, but its tests can be lengthy, averaging around 2 hours.
• HackerRank is a popular choice for technical hiring, providing coding tests and customizable branding, but its default questions are easily googleable.
• iMocha provides a broad assessment suite, including aptitude, business, and coding tests, but lacks custom question options.
• HireVue leverages video interviewing and assessments, including coding tests and personality assessments, but lacks web proctoring.
• Evalart focuses on coding and aptitude assessments, but lacks business-specific tests and detailed pricing information.
• CodeSignal specializes in technical assessments through coding challenges, with lengthy test times (2 hrs) and no free trials.
• XBInsight Talent Assessments emphasizes behavioral insights and aptitude testing, but lacks programming assessments and pricing transparency.
• Testlify provides a variety of tests, including programming and aptitude assessments, with shorter test times (10-30 mins), but lacks custom coding questions.
• Crystal focuses on personality assessments and team collaboration insights with short test times (15 mins), but lacks coding and aptitude tests.

We've explored a range of alternatives to Sprockets, each with its strengths and weaknesses. Selecting the right assessment platform depends on your specific hiring needs and priorities.

Sprockets offers personality assessments and AI-powered insights into candidates. However, it lacks coding, aptitude, and finance tests. This makes it unsuitable for companies looking for an all-in-one solution.

Fortunately, several excellent alternatives can fill these gaps. Platforms like Adaface offer a wide range of tests and features, including coding assessments, aptitude tests, and strong proctoring.

No matter your company size or industry, a Sprockets alternative exists to help you streamline your hiring process and identify top talent. So, leverage them and find the best.

Ready to upgrade your assessment strategy? Try Adaface and screen candidates with 500+ skills tests.