Choosing the right assessment platform is like picking the perfect avocado – you want something that's just right for your needs. Sova is a popular option for many companies, but it might not be the only avocado in the grocery store, right? There are other options that might be a better fit for your specific hiring goals. Let's explore some of the top Sova alternatives to help you find the assessment solution that's ripe for the picking. This article will cover 10 different platforms, highlighting their strengths and ideal use cases.
Before we dive deep, here’s a quick peek at the alternatives we'll be exploring:
- Adaface: For assessing a wide range of skills with strong proctoring.
- imocha: For a broad skills assessment library.
- TestGorilla: For creating diverse assessments with personality tests.
- Prevue Assessments: For matching candidates to company culture.
- Alva Labs: For personality and cognitive ability assessments.
- Talview: For end-to-end digital hiring solutions.
- Kolbe Corp: For measuring conative abilities and problem-solving.
- Byteboard: For assessing technical skills through realistic simulations.
- Canditech: For verifying skills with job-related tasks.
- Harver: For automating high-volume candidate screening.
Adaface is your friendly neighborhood assessment platform, excelling in creating skills-based assessments for various roles like aptitude, finance, and even AI! Need to make sure your candidates aren't just all talk? Adaface has a strong proctoring suite and a diverse test library with 500+ tests, making it suitable for companies operating in 70+ countries.
imocha is a platform for companies looking for a broad skills assessment library to screen candidates.
TestGorilla is a platform that helps you build assessments with a wide variety of tests to assess personality.
Prevue Assessments excels at matching candidates to company culture, ensuring a harmonious fit.
Alva Labs specializes in personality and cognitive ability assessments, providing insights into candidate potential.
Talview provides end-to-end digital hiring solutions, streamlining the entire recruitment process.
Kolbe Corp focuses on measuring conative abilities and problem-solving styles.
Byteboard is a platform that focuses on technical skills through realistic simulations, mirroring real-world scenarios.
Canditech shines in verifying skills with job-related tasks, offering hands-on validation.
Harver is for automating high-volume candidate screening, saving time and resources.
Table of contents
Why the Hunt for Sova Alternatives?
If you're reading this, chances are you're wondering if Sova is the perfect fit for your team. I've done some digging to uncover the reasons why recruiters and hiring managers explore other options in the pre-employment assessment test space.
Limited scope beyond personality and aptitude. While Sova shines with its personality and aptitude assessments, it lacks support for other critical areas. For roles demanding specific technical skills, finance expertise, or even typing proficiency, you might need to seek out additional tools, leading to a fragmented and complex assessment process.
Proctoring features are limited. Sova lacks key proctoring features such as webcam, window, tab, IP, device fingerprint, copy paste protection, full screen & chatGPT proctoring. This is a problem because if you are evaluating candidates, you want to make sure they are actually taking the test themselves without help from others or without cheating.
Team seat based pricing can get expensive. Sova charges per team seat, which can quickly inflate costs, especially for larger organizations. This can be a barrier for companies looking to scale their hiring processes without breaking the bank.
Navigating the assessment landscape can feel like a maze! Here's a quick comparison of Sova and its alternatives to help you pick the right assessment provider.Name | Usecase | Standout feature | G2 rating | Pricing |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adaface | Skills-based hiring for 500+ roles | Tests aptitude, coding, typing, finance |
4.6 | Starts $180, no seat-based pricing. [See pricing](https://www.adaface.com/pricing/) |
iMocha | Skills assessment across various domains | Wide range of skills |
4.5 | Contact iMocha for custom quote |
Testgorilla | Assessments for diverse roles | Extensive test library |
4.5 | From $75 per month |
Prevue Assessments | Aptitude and personality assessments | Behavioral insights and job-fit |
4.5 | Contact team for pricing quote |
Alva Labs | Predictive talent assessments | Data-driven candidate matching |
4.6 | $289 per month |
TalView | End-to-end hiring platform | AI-powered talent screening |
4.4 | Contact Talview for pricing |
Kolbe | Conative assessments | Measuring instinctive talents |
4.6 | Tests individually priced on website |
Byteboard | Technical skill assessment | Project-based coding assessments |
4.4 | CodeCollab starts at $15/unit |
Canditech | Technical and aptitude screening | Skills and culture assessments |
5 | $150 per month |
Harver | Volume hiring assessments | Automated candidate selection |
4.6 | Contact Harver for pricing |
1. Adaface
Best for: Assess candidates across business, aptitude, personality, typing, AI, technical, and coding roles with a single platform.
Looking for a strong alternative to Sova for your pre-employment assessments? Adaface offers a range of features and benefits that make it a compelling choice.

One of the biggest limitations of Sova is its lack of support for robust proctoring. Adaface addresses this concern head-on with a suite of proctoring features, including webcam monitoring, window/tab tracking, IP address logging, and copy-paste protection. This ensures test integrity and minimizes cheating, giving you confidence in your hiring decisions.
Adaface goes beyond proctoring to offer a wider range of capabilities, including:
- A test library with 500+ skills tests
- Support for aptitude, finance, personality, business, typing, AI, technical and coding roles
- Strong proctoring suite to maintain test integrity
- Customizable assessments to match specific job requirements
- Candidate experience and company branding to attract top talent
- Scorecards reporting and analytics for data-driven decisions
- Used by clients from 70+ countries.
Extensive Test Library with 500+ Skills
Adaface boasts a rich test library with over 500 skills tests, covering a broad spectrum of roles and abilities. This means you can assess candidates for various positions, from technical roles to business roles, all within a single platform.
Whether you need to evaluate coding skills, aptitude, personality traits, or business acumen, Adaface has you covered. This eliminates the need for multiple assessment tools and streamlines your hiring process. Explore the Pre-Employment Assessment Test Library to find the perfect tests for your needs.

Robust Proctoring for Uncompromised Integrity
Adaface prioritizes test integrity with a suite of proctoring features designed to prevent cheating. These measures include webcam monitoring, which records the candidate during the test, and window/tab tracking, which detects if the candidate navigates away from the test window.
Additionally, Adaface employs IP address logging to identify suspicious activity, such as multiple candidates taking the test from the same location. Copy-paste protection further safeguards against plagiarism and unauthorized sharing of information. With Adaface's proctoring suite, you can rest assured that your assessments are fair and reliable. Learn more about online assessment platform.

Adaface vs Sova Attributes
Attribute | Adaface | Sova |
---|---|---|
Customized Assessments | Yes | Unknown |
Business Skills Tests (e.g., Excel, Finance) | Yes | No |
Coding Tests | Yes | No |
Webcam Proctoring | Yes | No |
Window/Tab Tracking | Yes | No |
Device Fingerprint | Yes | No |
Free Trial | Yes | No |
Public API | Yes | No |
Adaface Pros
- More than 500 skills tests on technical skills, cognitive abilities, language proficiency, and more
- Adaface Integrations with your existing ATS and HR tools
- Customizable assessments tailored to specific job descriptions
- Excellent anti-cheating measures to ensure test integrity
- Unlimited team seats to promote collaboration
- Multiple invite options for candidate convenience
- Used by clients from 70+ countries
Adaface Cons
- No live video interviews
- No take-home assignment support
Adaface Pricing
Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit your needs. A free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits is available to explore the platform. No credit card is required to start. All pricing plans include all proctoring features and all 500+ tests.
Here's a quick summary of the yearly plans: Individual ($180), Starter ($500), Pro ($900), Scale ($3000), Growth ($5500), Enterprise ($20,000), and Unlimited ($50,000). Check out the Adaface Assessments Pricing page for more details.
2. iMocha
Best for: Skills-based Workforce Management
iMocha offers skill assessments and skill intelligence, helping companies understand their workforce's current capabilities. It aims to assist in planning for future skill needs and closing skill gaps through strategic hiring, going beyond simple assessment to offer an integrated talent management solution.
Sova excels in personality and aptitude assessments but lacks the depth in technical skill evaluation, particularly with the absence of coding assessments and limited business skill tests. iMocha fills this gap by offering a broad spectrum of skill assessments, including coding tests and business-related evaluations, making it suitable for companies needing to assess a wider range of skills.
Unlike Sova, iMocha has a code playback feature that allows the recruiters to see candidate's coding in a timeline for accurate evaluation. While Sova's tests average between 5-25 minutes, iMocha's can range from 15-60 minutes. This provides a more in-depth assessment. However, consider that longer tests can affect candidate experience. Platforms like Adaface focus on shorter, conversational assessments to balance accuracy and candidate engagement.
How iMocha compares to Sova?
Key Features
- Extensive Skill Assessment Library: A wide range of tests, covering aptitude, technical skills, and job-role competencies.
- Live Coding Interviews: Evaluate coding skills with a real-time coding environment.
- Skills Intelligence: Identify and address skill gaps within your organization.
iMocha Pros
- Wide range of assessment types, including coding, aptitude, and job-specific skills.
- Integrates with various ATS platforms for streamlined hiring workflows.
- Offers skill analytics to identify skill gaps and training needs.
- Supports proctoring features like webcam and window monitoring.
- Provides good customer support through email and a help center.
iMocha Cons
- Lacks custom question creation, limiting tailoring assessments to niche roles.
- No custom data location support, which might be a concern for companies with strict data residency requirements.
- They do not provide custom shortlist and rejection templates.
- Questions provided are easily googleable.
iMocha Pricing
iMocha does not publicly list its pricing. Interested users need to contact iMocha directly for a custom quote. This lack of transparent pricing and the absence of a free trial might be a hurdle for smaller businesses looking for straightforward assessment solutions.

3. Testgorilla
Best for: Skills-based assessment at scale
TestGorilla offers a wide library of pre-made tests to assess candidates across various skills and personality traits. It aims to help recruiters screen candidates quickly and determine the best fit for open roles. TestGorilla boasts a large test library, making it a potentially appealing alternative to Sova.
Sova's assessments are primarily focused on psychometric evaluations and aptitude testing, which may not always provide a clear picture of a candidate's hands-on abilities. TestGorilla shines by offering a broader spectrum of skills assessments, including coding, language proficiency, and role-specific knowledge. This allows for a more granular evaluation of candidate capabilities.
However, TestGorilla lacks the ability to create truly custom questions tailored to your company's specific needs. While you can add your own questions to existing tests, you can't build assessments from scratch that perfectly mirror your unique challenges. For companies who want to design custom assessment for skills based hiring, that can be a deal breaker
How Testgorilla compares to Sova?
Key Features
- Extensive test library covering various skills and personality traits.
- Video interviews and live coding options.
- Integration with popular ATS platforms.
Testgorilla Pros
- Wide range of ready-to-use assessments.
- Supports various question types, including coding questions.
- Offers webcam proctoring to deter cheating.
- Provides candidate ranking and reporting features.
- Integrates with applicant tracking systems (ATS).
Testgorilla Cons
- Lacks custom question creation capabilities.
- No AI test coverage.
- Limited branding options to reflect your company's identity.
- Fair use policy may restrict unlimited assessment invites.
Testgorilla Pricing
TestGorilla uses a tiered pricing model based on company size and features needed. Plans start from $75 per month (billed annually) for teams of 1-15 FTEs. For larger organizations, the pricing scales with the company size. Contact TestGorilla for enterprise pricing.

4. Prevue Assessments
Best for: Personality & aptitude assessments
Prevue Assessments offers tools to evaluate candidates on personality, abilities, and motivation. It aims to predict job performance and cultural fit. Think of it as peeking into a candidate's potential before they even start!
Unlike Sova, Prevue Assessments offers business skills tests, providing a broader perspective on a candidate's capabilities. While Sova focuses on aptitude and personality, Prevue extends to job-specific skills.
Prevue Assessments also has a larger question bank making it less likely for candidates to see the same questions.
How Prevue Assessments compares to Sova?
Key Features
- Personality assessments to gauge fit.
- Aptitude tests for cognitive skills.
- Business skill assessments for specific roles.
Prevue Assessments Pros
- Measures personality, aptitude, and skills.
- Offers customizable invitation templates.
- Provides comprehensive overview and skill-wise analysis in reports.
- Integrates with various ATS platforms.
- Includes benchmarking feature for comparing candidates.
Prevue Assessments Cons
- Lacks coding assessments for technical roles. Consider Adaface's coding tests for that!
- No custom API for deeper integrations.
- Doesn't provide web or webcam proctoring.
- No support for custom data location.
Prevue Assessments Pricing
Prevue Assessments doesn't publicly list pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. This lack of transparency can make comparing costs a bit tricky. They also don't have a free trial available.

5. Alva Labs
Best for: Assess tech and personality
Alva Labs combines aptitude and personality assessments to give a rounded view of a candidate's potential. They aim to predict job performance and cultural fit, which sounds pretty neat, right?
Sova focuses on personality and cognitive ability, but it doesn't offer coding assessments which is a big miss for tech roles. Alva Labs, on the other hand, covers technical skills including coding assessments, which makes it suitable for tech recruitment.
However, Alva Labs does fall short when it comes to customisation. Unlike Adaface, Alva Labs doesn't allow you to create your own questions or tailor tests to match specific job descriptions. So, if you need assessments that are very specific, keep that in mind.
How Alva Labs compares to Sova?
Key Features
- Aptitude Tests: Measures logical reasoning and numerical skills.
- Personality Assessments: Evaluates traits and cultural fit.
- Coding Assessments: Includes tests for programming skills.
Alva Labs Pros
- Strong focus on personality and aptitude.
- Includes coding assessments for tech roles.
- Integrates with popular ATS systems.
- Offers a free trial to test the platform.
- Provides candidate benchmarking.
Alva Labs Cons
- Tests can be quite long, averaging around 2 hours.
- No support for custom questions or bespoke assessments which Adaface supports.
- Lacks AI, Finance, and Cloud tests.
- No webcam or web proctoring which Adaface supports.
Alva Labs Pricing
Alva Labs' pricing starts at $289 per month. For enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact them for a custom quote. They do offer a free trial, so you can kick the tires before committing. Also, remember that they don't have unlimited plans, so if you're hiring at a massive scale, Adaface Assessments Pricing might be a better bet.

6. TalView
Best for: End-to-end talent lifecycle management
TalView offers a unified platform for managing the entire talent lifecycle, from sourcing and screening to interviewing and onboarding. It aims to streamline hiring processes using automation and AI.
While Sova focuses on psychometric assessments, TalView offers a broader range of assessment types including aptitude, behavioral, and technical skills. This makes TalView a more versatile option for companies needing to assess candidates across diverse roles.
Furthermore, Sova lacks coding assessments, which are essential for tech roles. TalView supports coding assessments with code playback, allowing recruiters to review a candidate's coding process. While both platforms offer ready-to-use tests, TalView covers a wider range of business skills with its tests, making it a more suitable choice for companies looking for a comprehensive assessment solution.
How TalView compares to Sova?
Key Features
- AI-powered talent acquisition suite
- Video interviewing platform
- Automated assessment and proctoring
TalView Pros
- Wide range of assessment types, including coding tests.
- AI-driven automation to streamline hiring.
- Video interviewing capabilities.
- Strong focus on candidate experience through personalized assessments.
- Integrates with various ATS platforms.
TalView Cons
- No support for typing tests.
- Lacks detailed reporting and analytics compared to some competitors.
- No custom question creation, limiting personalization.
- No device finger print proctoring.
TalView Pricing
TalView does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to fill out a form on their website and speak with their sales team to get a quote. Unlike Adaface Assessments Pricing, TalView does not offer transparent, readily available pricing information.

7. Kolbe
Best for: Understand conative candidate strengths
Kolbe provides assessments focused on understanding a candidate's conative strengths – how they take action and solve problems. Unlike other assessments, Kolbe aims to measure a candidate's natural instincts rather than learned behaviors.
Sova leans heavily on personality and situational judgment tests, which might not fully capture a candidate's inherent problem-solving style. Kolbe, on the other hand, focuses directly on these conative abilities, offering a different lens for evaluating potential hires.
However, keep in mind that Kolbe does not offer skills testing for areas like coding, finance, or AI, unlike a platform like Adaface. If you need to assess technical skills alongside personality, you might need to combine Kolbe with other assessment methods.
How Kolbe compares to Sova?
Key Features
- Measures instinctive problem-solving methods.
- Provides insights into a candidate's natural strengths.
- Offers a unique perspective beyond skills and personality.
Kolbe Pros
- Provides unique insights into candidate's natural problem-solving style.
- Can help in team building by understanding individual work styles.
- Offers a different perspective compared to typical skills or personality tests.
- GDPR Compliant.
- Has a ready to use test library.
Kolbe Cons
- Lacks skills assessment capabilities (coding, finance, etc.).
- Does not offer custom questions or the ability to add your own.
- Doesn't offer integrations with applicant tracking systems.
- No proctoring features for remote assessments.
Kolbe Pricing
Kolbe offers tests individually priced on their website, with the Kolbe A costing $45 and Kolbe B at $55. For team or enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact Kolbe directly for a personalized quotation. Note that they do not have a free trial, limiting your ability to fully explore the platform before committing.

8. Byteboard
Best for: Technical role hiring simplified
Byteboard specializes in assessing technical skills through realistic, project-based assessments. They aim to simulate on-the-job experiences, giving you a glimpse into how candidates perform in real-world scenarios.
Sova focuses on personality, aptitude, and situational judgement, whereas Byteboard zeroes in on technical skills, offering a deeper dive for engineering roles. So, if you need to test coding skills with hands-on projects, Byteboard is a strong contender.
However, keep in mind Byteboard’s focus is limited to software engineering roles. Unlike Adaface, they don't offer assessments for other crucial roles like marketing, finance, or customer service.
How Byteboard compares to Sova?
Key Features
- Project-based assessments simulating real work.
- Automated scoring for coding challenges.
- Focus on technical skills validation.
Byteboard Pros
- Realistic job simulations mirror day-to-day tasks.
- Automated scoring reduces time spent on manual reviews.
- Strong focus on assessing coding skills.
- Web and webcam proctoring to prevent cheating.
- Email support is available.
Byteboard Cons
- Limited to software engineering roles; lacks breadth in assessment types.
- No custom question creation to tailor tests to specific needs. Unlike Adaface where you can create custom questions and even have Adaface design questions for you.
- No support for mobile-friendly assessments, potentially impacting candidate experience.
- Does not offer candidate benchmarking, unlike Adaface.
Byteboard Pricing
Byteboard's pricing isn't readily available; you'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. While they offer a free trial for CodeCollab, CoreEval does not have a free trial, making it difficult to test drive the full platform without a commitment.

9. Canditech
Best for: Skills validation with job simulations
Canditech offers a platform to assess candidates using job simulation assessments. This allows recruiters to see how candidates would perform in real-world scenarios, providing a practical evaluation of their skills.
Sova focuses on personality and aptitude, but Canditech goes a step further, to assess job-specific skills through simulations. This is a game changer because recruiters can see how the candidate would actually perform on the job.
Unlike Sova, Canditech provides a more hands-on approach, especially helpful for roles where practical skills are key. While Sova offers ready-to-use tests, Canditech focuses on simulations, giving a clearer picture of a candidate's abilities in action.
How Canditech compares to Sova?
Key Features
- Job simulation assessments across diverse roles
- Automated scoring and reporting features
- Webcam proctoring and IP tracking
Canditech Pros
- Job simulations offer realistic previews of candidate performance.
- Automated scoring saves time and resources.
- Integrates with popular ATS systems for streamlined workflows.
- Wide range of assessment types, including coding and Excel tests.
- Unlimited team seats for better collaboration.
Canditech Cons
- Lacks custom question creation, limiting flexibility for niche roles. Adaface allows you to add your own questions.
- No support for Situational Judgment tests, missing key behavioural insights.
- Doesn't provide custom data location support which might be needed for compliance.
- No multiple test sets, increasing the risk of question leaks.
Canditech Pricing
Canditech's pricing starts at $150 per month (billed annually). They also offer custom enterprise plans; you'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. Good news, they do provide a free trial to explore the platform before committing.

10. Harver
Best for: High-volume, culture-fit hiring

Harver is an assessment platform focused on automating high-volume recruitment, particularly for roles where culture fit and personality are key. They offer a range of assessments and tools designed to help companies screen candidates at scale and identify those who best align with their organizational values.
While Sova offers assessments geared towards personality and aptitude, Harver emphasizes realistic job previews and simulations. This allows candidates to experience aspects of the role firsthand, providing a clearer picture for both the candidate and the employer.
However, unlike Adaface's pre-employment assessment test library, Harver doesn't offer coding tests or AI tests, limiting its ability to accurately assess technical skills or other specialized knowledge areas.
How Harver compares to Sova?
Key Features
- Realistic Job Previews: Provides candidates with a glimpse into the day-to-day tasks of a role.
- Culture Fit Assessments: Evaluates how well a candidate's values align with the company culture.
- Automation Tools: Streamlines the screening process for high-volume recruitment.
Harver Pros
- Good for assessing culture fit and personality.
- Automates initial screening stages.
- Offers a candidate-friendly experience with job simulations.
- Provides a structured and consistent hiring process.
- Integrates with various ATS platforms.
Harver Cons
- Lacks in-depth skill assessment capabilities, especially for technical roles.
- No custom API for advanced integrations.
- Limited proctoring capabilities compared to other platforms.
- Pricing is not transparent and requires contacting sales.
Harver Pricing
Harver does not provide pricing details publicly. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to compare costs upfront.

Found Your Perfect Sova Alternative?
Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:
- Adaface stands out with its extensive test library, covering aptitude, finance, personality, and technical roles. Used by clients in 70+ countries and boasts a strong proctoring suite, all within a credit-based pricing model, so you can avoid seat based pricing.
- iMocha offers a wide array of assessments, including AI and cloud-based tests, but lacks custom question options.
- TestGorilla has a large test library and free trial, but it does not let you add your own questions.
- Prevue Assessments provides personality and aptitude tests but lacks coding assessments and custom branding options.
- Alva Labs is known for its focus on personality and logic assessments but has limited test types beyond IT roles and very long test taking time.
- Talview offers AI-powered recruitment solutions, including coding assessments, but lacks typing tests and has limited language support.
- Kolbe specializes in conative assessments, focusing on individual's natural problem-solving methods, but it does not have job specific or custom questions.
- Byteboard concentrates on software engineering assessments, using project-based evaluations, but only integrates with Greenhouse and Workable ATS.
- Canditech provides a range of assessments, including coding and aptitude, but lacks custom question options and does not support mobile.
- Harver focuses on high-volume recruitment with simulations and situational judgement tests but does not offer coding assessments.
Choosing the right assessment platform is a big deal. We've explored some top contenders to Sova, each bringing something unique to the table.
Sova shines with its focus on personality and aptitude assessments, which are great for understanding candidate potential. However, its lack of coding tests and business-specific assessments might leave you wanting more, depending on your hiring needs.
Thankfully, there are strong alternatives ready to step up. Platforms like Adaface offer a broader range of tests, including coding, finance, and AI assessments, making them a versatile choice. These alternatives provide different ways to evaluate candidates, ensuring you find the perfect fit.
No matter your specific use case, from high-volume screening to in-depth skills assessment, there's a Sova alternative ready to help you make smarter hiring decisions.
Ready to find your ideal assessment solution? Check out Adaface to start screening candidates effectively!

40 min skill tests.
No trick questions.
Accurate shortlisting.
We make it easy for you to find the best candidates in your pipeline with a 40 min skills test.
Try for free
