Top 10 Pymetrics Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why are companies hunting for alternatives to Pymetrics?

Well, you've landed in the right place! I've done some digging to uncover what makes HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers look beyond Pymetrics. It's not about hating on Pymetrics, but more about finding the right fit for their specific needs. Let's get into it.

Limited Assessment Types. Pymetrics mainly focuses on cognitive and personality assessments. This can be a drawback for teams needing to assess hard skills like coding, finance, or even typing speed. If you're hiring for roles requiring specific technical skills, you might need a platform with a wider range of assessment tests.

Lack of Customization. Pymetrics offers ready-made assessments, which is great for speed. However, many hiring teams want to tweak questions or create their own to match unique job requirements or company culture. The inability to add custom questions or tailor tests to specific job descriptions can be a significant limitation.

Limited Proctoring Capabilities. Pymetrics lacks advanced proctoring features like webcam monitoring, IP tracking, and copy-paste protection. For roles where test integrity is key, this can be a concern. Companies might seek solutions that offer a more suite of proctoring options to ensure fair and secure assessments.

1. Adaface

Best for: Assess candidates across a wide range of skills, from coding to cognitive abilities, using a single platform.

If you're seeking a Pymetrics alternative that offers a more extensive and flexible skills assessment solution, Adaface is worth considering.

One major drawback of Pymetrics is its limited scope in assessing various job roles. Adaface addresses this by offering a diverse test library, enabling you to evaluate candidates for business, technical, and aptitude-based roles all in one place. This versatility ensures you can accurately gauge candidate fit across your organization.

Adaface distinguishes itself from Pymetrics with its focus on a broader range of assessment capabilities:

• Extensive test library with 500+ tests
• Support for technical, aptitude, business, and personality assessments
• Strong proctoring features to ensure test integrity
• Used by clients in 70+ countries
• Transparent and flexible pricing
• Customizable assessments with company branding

Extensive Test Library Covering Diverse Skills

Adaface boasts a test library of over 500 assessments, far exceeding Pymetrics' capabilities. This vast collection allows you to evaluate candidates on a multitude of skills, including:

• Technical skills (coding, IT, AI)
• Aptitude (logical, numerical, verbal reasoning)
• Business skills (finance, accounting, sales, marketing)
• Personality traits
• Typing and Language proficiency

This breadth ensures you can create targeted assessments relevant to any role within your organization. With Adaface's Pre-Employment Assessment Test Library, you can evaluate candidates across a wider array of job roles.

Enhanced Candidate Experience with Company Branding

Unlike Pymetrics, Adaface allows you to customize the assessment experience with your company's branding. This includes adding your company logo, using your brand colors, and customizing invitation templates.

By creating a branded experience, you can leave a positive impression on candidates, improve brand recognition, and increase candidate engagement. You can customize shortlist and rejection email templates as well to maintain branding throughout the hiring process. This ensures a better candidate experience and helps you attract top talent who value company culture.

Adaface vs Pymetrics Attributes

Adaface Pros

• Extensive test library covering a wide range of skills
• Strong aptitude, finance, personality, business, typing, AI, technical and coding roles assessment
• Strong suite of proctoring features to prevent cheating
• Used by clients from 70+ countries
• Pricing only depends on credits, covering all proctoring features
• Customizable assessments and company branding
• Detailed scorecards, reporting, and analytics

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit different hiring needs. You can try out the platform with a free trial, which includes 2 sample tests and 5 credits, allowing you to explore the features before purchasing. Our self-serve platform doesn't require a credit card to start. All pricing plans include all proctoring features and access to 500+ tests.

Our pricing plans include:

• Individual ($180/yr)
• Starter ($500/yr)
• Pro ($900/yr)
• Scale ($3000/yr)
• Growth ($5500/yr)
• Enterprise ($20,000/yr)
• Unlimited ($50,000/yr)

2. Maki People

Best for: Holistic skill assessment platform

Maki People is an assessment platform providing a range of tests, from programming and aptitude to business skills and languages. It aims to be a one-stop-shop for evaluating various candidate abilities.

Unlike Pymetrics, which focuses on psychometric games, Maki People offers a broader spectrum of assessments. This makes it suitable for organizations seeking to evaluate a wider array of skills beyond just personality traits and cognitive abilities.

While Pymetrics relies on a specific type of assessment, Maki People gives recruiters more flexibility in test selection. This allows for a more tailored approach to assessing candidates based on specific job requirements. This is especially useful if you are looking for a platform that offers skill based assessments to find candidates using Pre-Employment Assessment Test Library.

How Maki People compares to Pymetrics?

Key Features

• Wide variety of tests: programming, aptitude, business skills, and languages.
• Custom question creation: Tailor assessments to your needs.
• Automated scoring: Saves time and resources in evaluation.

Maki People Pros

• Supports a wide range of skills, offering a broad assessment scope.
• Enables creation of custom questions for niche roles.
• Offers automated scoring for coding and other technical tests.
• Integrates with popular ATS systems.
• Has web and webcam proctoring.

Maki People Cons

• Lacks a free trial for extensive platform exploration.
• Does not provide custom data location support.
• No API access limits integration possibilities compared to platforms with open APIs like Adaface.
• They don't have typing tests.

Maki People Pricing

Maki People doesn’t publicly list its pricing tiers. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote tailored to your specific needs. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly assess whether their platform fits your budget.

3. Harver

Best for: High-volume candidate screening workflows

Harver offers a platform focused on automating various stages of the hiring process, primarily aimed at high-volume recruitment. It combines assessments with workflow tools to help streamline candidate selection.

Unlike Pymetrics, Harver attempts to cover a broader range of roles with its assessments. While Pymetrics leans heavily on gamified psychometric evaluations, Harver includes options for skills testing and situational judgment, making it potentially more suitable for companies seeking a wider lens on candidate abilities.

However, Harver still lacks capabilities for evaluating technical skills, like coding. So while it expands beyond pure personality assessments, it doesn't quite reach the level of skill-based assessments offered by platforms like Adaface.

How Harver compares to Pymetrics?

Key Features

• Workflow automation for recruitment
• Situational judgment tests
• Culture fit assessments

Harver Pros

• Good for companies with high-volume hiring needs.
• Offers a range of assessments beyond just aptitude.
• Integrates with existing ATS systems.
• Customizable branding options for candidate experience.
• Includes video interviewing capabilities.

Harver Cons

• Lacks in-depth skills testing, especially for technical roles.
• No custom coding questions.
• No AI tests for data science or machine learning roles.
• No custom data location support.

Harver Pricing

Harver does not offer transparent pricing on their website. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote, and they don't offer a free trial to test out the platform before committing. This can make it hard to quickly evaluate if it fits your budget and needs compared to platforms with readily available Adaface Assessments Pricing.

4. Bryq

Best for: Understand personality, cognitive abilities

Bryq is an assessment platform that combines personality questionnaires with cognitive ability tests to help companies gain insights into candidates and employees. It aims to predict job performance and cultural fit.

Pymetrics relies on neuroscience-based games, which might not be everyone's cup of tea. Bryq, on the other hand, uses more conventional assessments. If you're looking for a way to assess both personality and cognitive skills, Bryq can be an option to explore.

Unlike Pymetrics, Bryq also offers assessments tailored for a few business roles. However, if you need assessments across a wide variety of roles and skills, including programming, finance, or language proficiency, a platform like Adaface might be a better fit.

How Bryq compares to Pymetrics?

Key Features

• Personality and cognitive assessments
• Culture fit analysis
• Job performance predictions

Bryq Pros

• Offers both personality and cognitive ability assessments.
• Provides insights into culture fit.
• Integrates with applicant tracking systems (ATS).
• Offers customizable invitation, shortlisting, and rejection templates.
• Shorter assessment times than some competitors.

Bryq Cons

• Lacks coding, AI, finance or language tests.
• No custom question creation.
• Limited reporting capabilities (no PDF, Excel, or CSV exports).
• Does not offer proctoring features like webcam or screen recording.

Bryq Pricing

Bryq's pricing starts at $299 per month ($3588 annually). For scaling your assessments, you'll need to contact their sales team for a custom quote. Note that there's no free trial available, which means you can't explore the platform before committing.

5. Hackerrank

Best for: Technical skill assessments at scale

HackerRank is a well-known platform particularly for assessing technical skills. It offers a wide array of coding challenges and skill-based questions, making it a go-to solution for companies seeking to evaluate developers.

Unlike Pymetrics, which leans heavily on personality assessments, HackerRank dives deep into the coding skills. It works better when evaluating candidates for technical roles because it focuses on coding skills, offers a variety of coding challenges and skill-based questions.

If you need to assess coding proficiency, data structure knowledge, and algorithmic thinking, HackerRank is much better against Pymetrics. It provides a practical coding environment where candidates can demonstrate their skills.

How Hackerrank compares to Pymetrics?

Key Features

• Candidate Screening: Use structured assessments for consistent evaluations.
• Live Coding Interviews: Conduct live interviews with a functional IDE.
• SkillUp: Filter candidates by skills using AI and a talent directory.

Hackerrank Pros

• Developer Community: Widely used by developers, making it a trusted platform for tech talent.
• Certified Assessments: Launch role-based tests in minutes with support for 40+ programming languages.
• Plagiarism Detection: Machine learning systems ensure assessment integrity.
• Real-World Coding Questions: Candidates are evaluated in a sandboxed environment.
• ATS Integrations: Seamless integrations with popular Applicant Tracking Systems.

Hackerrank Cons

• No Emotional Intelligence Screening: HackerRank lacks tailored assessments for soft skills.
• Limited Business Skill tests: HackerRank offers limited business skill tests beyond IT and Technical roles.
• Tests are too long: HackerRank tests can be quite lengthy leading to drop offs.
• No custom questions: HackerRank doesn't offer custom questions. This is where alternatives to Pymetrics like Adaface can help

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank offers a few pricing tiers. There's a Starter plan at $100 per month (billed annually), and a Pro plan at $250 per month (billed annually). For enterprise-level features, you'll need to contact HackerRank for a custom quote. There is a free trial available to explore basic functionalities.

6. HireVue

Best for: Video Interviews and assessments

HireVue is a platform primarily known for its video interviewing capabilities, but it also offers assessment features. It aims to streamline the hiring process using video technology and data-driven insights.

Unlike Pymetrics, HireVue incorporates video interviews, offering a different dimension to candidate evaluation. While Pymetrics relies on gamified assessments that some candidates find abstract, HireVue provides a more conventional interview setting, potentially easing candidate anxiety and offering a more familiar experience.

For roles where communication skills and personality are key, a video interview can be more insightful than a purely cognitive assessment. If your focus is on evaluating soft skills and cultural fit, HireVue's video platform can be a helpful tool.

How HireVue compares to Pymetrics?

Key Features

• On-demand video interviews
• Live Interviewing
• Code Assessments

HireVue Pros

• Structured interviews for standardized evaluations.
• AI analysis of video interviews (proceed with caution!).
• Integration with various ATS platforms.
• Supports remote hiring processes.
• Skills based assessments

HireVue Cons

• AI analysis can be controversial and raise ethical concerns.
• Limited customization options for assessments. To truly assess candidates on job-relevant skills, consider platforms like Adaface that allow custom assessments.
• No live chat support for instant query resolution.
• Lacks social listening for task leaks and social media.

HireVue Pricing

HireVue does not publicly display its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a custom quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly compare costs with other assessment platforms, especially when you're just starting your search.

7. Eva AI

Best for: Personality and language assessments

Eva AI focuses on using AI to streamline the hiring process, offering solutions for video interviewing and personality assessments. It aims to reduce time-to-hire and improve candidate engagement using AI-driven tools.

While Pymetrics leans heavily on gamified cognitive assessments, Eva AI carves a niche with its AI-powered video interviews and language assessments. This can be useful if you're specifically targeting communication skills and personality traits.

However, unlike Adaface, Eva AI doesn't offer the breadth of skills assessment, such as coding, aptitude, finance, AI or job-specific tests. So, if you need a wider spectrum of skills evaluation, it might not fit the bill.

How Eva AI compares to Pymetrics?

Key Features

• AI-powered video interviews
• Personality assessments
• Language proficiency testing

Eva AI Pros

• Streamlines initial screening with AI.
• Decent ATS integrations.
• Supports mobile assessments.
• Role based access.
• Provides a candidate tracking system.

Eva AI Cons

• Lacks coding, aptitude, and other skills assessments.
• No custom API for deeper integrations.
• Unknown proctoring or anti-cheating features.
• Limited reporting capabilities; no Excel/CSV exports.

Eva AI Pricing

Eva AI doesn't publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote, which can add an extra step to your evaluation process. Without clear pricing tiers, comparing costs can be a bit tricky.

8. Wonderlic

Best for: Quick cognitive ability assessment

Wonderlic offers a suite of assessments, with its flagship product being the Wonderlic Personnel Test (WPT), a brief cognitive ability test. It aims to measure general mental aptitude through a timed, multiple-choice format.

Unlike Pymetrics, which focuses on behavioral assessments through gamified tasks, Wonderlic directly assesses cognitive skills. It’s a straightforward approach, providing a score that reflects a candidate's problem-solving and reasoning abilities under pressure.

For organizations seeking a quick and standardized measure of cognitive aptitude, Wonderlic offers a practical alternative. It's particularly helpful in roles where quick thinking and problem-solving are key but doesn't cover the range of skills assessed by platforms like Adaface.

How Wonderlic compares to Pymetrics?

Key Features

• Cognitive ability measurement
• Standardized test format
• Quick assessment duration

Wonderlic Pros

• Widely recognized and validated test.
• Quick to administer and score.
• Can be useful for initial screening.
• Benchmarking data available for various roles.
• GDPR Compliant

Wonderlic Cons

• Limited scope, focusing primarily on cognitive ability.
• Lacks coding and job-specific skill assessments.
• No custom question creation feature.
• Integrates poorly with ATS systems, compared to Adaface integrations.

Wonderlic Pricing

Wonderlic's pricing isn't publicly available; you'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. Unlike platforms with transparent pricing, this lack of transparency can make budgeting and comparing options tricky. Also there's no free trial available.

9. Testlify

Best for: All-in-one skills assessments

Testlify is an assessment platform offering a range of pre-made tests across various skills and job roles. It's designed to streamline the hiring process by providing tools to assess candidates' abilities.

Unlike Pymetrics, which focuses on gamified assessments, Testlify provides a broader spectrum of skills tests, including aptitude, business, and personality assessments. This makes it a solid choice for companies looking for an all-encompassing solution.

However, Testlify lacks the ability to create custom tests based on specific job descriptions. If you need assessments tailored precisely to your unique hiring needs, a platform like Adaface might be a better fit, as it offers customized assessments designed by analyzing the job description.

How Testlify compares to Pymetrics?

Key Features

• Wide range of pre-built tests.
• Webcam and window proctoring.
• ATS integrations for streamlined workflow.

Testlify Pros

• Offers a wide variety of tests, including programming, aptitude, and personality assessments.
• Provides webcam and window proctoring to prevent cheating.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms to streamline the hiring process.
• Has a free trial and transparent pricing plans.
• Supports multiple invite options.

Testlify Cons

• Lacks custom coding questions, limiting the ability to assess specific technical skills deeply.
• Does not offer custom data location support, potentially raising concerns for companies with strict data residency requirements.
• Does not support skill-wise analysis in scorecards, making it harder to pinpoint specific areas of strength and weakness.
• No social listening to detect test leaks, potentially compromising test integrity.

Testlify Pricing

Testlify offers several pricing tiers, starting with a plan at $49/month (billed annually at $588). They also offer Growth and Scale plans at $749/month and $299/month (billed annually) respectively. Enterprise features like integrations, whitelabeling, and team seats are available as add-ons. They also offer an unlimited plan. A free trial is available, allowing you to explore the platform before committing to a paid plan.

10. McQuaig

Best for: Personality-based hiring decisions

McQuaig offers assessments designed to evaluate personality, aptitude, and skills. This helps companies understand a candidate's potential fit within their organization. Unlike Pymetrics, which focuses on gamified assessments to gauge cognitive and behavioral traits, McQuaig uses a more traditional approach, which might appeal to organizations seeking a less novel method.

The primary use case for McQuaig lies in its ability to provide insights into a candidate's personality and how it aligns with specific roles and company culture. This is particularly useful for roles where interpersonal skills and behavioral traits are paramount.

While Pymetrics offers a unique, game-based approach, it lacks the depth and breadth of skills assessment that many organizations require. McQuaig, while not offering coding or AI tests like Adaface's pre-employment assessment test library, does provide a solid foundation for understanding candidate personalities.

How McQuaig compares to Pymetrics?

Key Features

• Personality Assessments: Evaluates traits like dominance, sociability, and empathy.
• Aptitude Testing: Measures verbal, numerical, and clerical abilities.
• Skills Testing: Assesses proficiency in areas like typing and data entry.

McQuaig Pros

• Offers personality and aptitude assessments.
• Provides insights into candidate-job fit.
• Supports company branding with customizable features.
• Has been around for a while, giving it some brand recognition.
• Integrates with various Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS).

McQuaig Cons

• Lacks coding and AI assessment capabilities.
• Does not offer situational judgment tests.
• No support for custom question creation.
• Limited proctoring capabilities compared to more modern platforms.

McQuaig Pricing

McQuaig's pricing isn't readily available on their website, requiring you to contact their sales team for a quote. Their starter plan starts at $1250 for 90 days. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly assess its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions.

Found Your Perfect Pymetrics Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface stands out with its huge test library of 500+ skills and strong proctoring features at a transparent price, making it ideal for companies hiring across diverse roles and from 70+ countries.
• Maki provides programming and aptitude tests, but lacks AI tests and custom test creation based on job descriptions.
• Harver focuses on situational judgment tests and offers company branding options, making it suitable for assessing culture fit, though it lacks coding tests.
• Bryq offers aptitude and personality tests, but has limited business-related tests and lacks custom question options.
• HackerRank is a go-to for technical roles, but its two-hour assessments can lead to candidate fatigue. It is also easily googleable and GPT-able, failing the non-cheating benchmark.
• HireVue uses conversational AI, offers coding tests and supports mobile-friendliness, but it has no custom questions and no coding questions.
• Eva AI focuses on personality and language tests with mobile support, but lacks key features like custom questions and coding tests.
• Wonderlic focuses on aptitude and personality tests, but lacks ATS integrations and custom questions.
• Testlify boasts a range of tests including coding, aptitude, and personality, along with web and webcam proctoring, but has no social listening for task leaks.
• McQuaig offers aptitude and personality assessments with some branding options but lacks coding tests and ATS integrations.

Alright, we've explored a bunch of Pymetrics alternatives. Choosing the right assessment platform is like picking the right tool for a job – it needs to fit your specific needs.

Pymetrics shines with its focus on behavioral assessments, but its limited scope in areas like coding, finance, and job-specific skills can be a deal-breaker for many. Plus, a lack of proctoring features can raise concerns about test integrity.

Thankfully, there are great alternatives available that cover a wider range of skills. Platforms like Adaface offer 500+ tests across aptitude, finance, coding, and more, plus a strong proctoring suite. This ensures you're getting a complete picture of your candidates' abilities while maintaining test security.

No matter your use case – whether it's assessing technical skills, evaluating personality traits, or screening for specific job roles – these Pymetrics alternatives offer a path to better, data-driven hiring decisions.

Ready to elevate your pre-employment assessment process? Give Adaface a try today!