Top 10 Plum Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why are companies seeking alternatives to Plum?

I've done the homework to understand why HR professionals, recruiters, and hiring managers explore options beyond Plum. Here are some common pain points that might lead you to consider other platforms.

Limited assessment types. Plum focuses primarily on personality and aptitude assessments. If you need to evaluate candidates on job-specific skills, coding abilities, or even typing speed, you'll need to look elsewhere. A wider variety of assessment types ensures you're getting a complete picture of a candidate's capabilities.

Lack of customization. While Plum offers ready-to-use tests, tailoring assessments to match your specific job descriptions isn't an option. This can lead to a disconnect between the skills being assessed and the actual requirements of the role. This is where platforms with custom question capabilities can really shine.

Limited proctoring features. Ensuring test integrity is key. Without robust proctoring features like webcam monitoring, window tracking, and copy-paste prevention, you risk candidates cheating or misrepresenting their abilities. A strong proctoring suite helps you trust the results and make informed hiring decisions. If you want strong proctoring, check out the online assessment platform.

1. Adaface

Best for: Ideal for assessing both technical and non-technical skills with a focus on candidate experience.

Looking for a Plum alternative? Adaface offers a modern assessment platform with a strong focus on skills-based hiring. It's designed to be candidate-friendly and provides recruiters with the insights they need to make data-driven decisions.

One of the biggest challenges with Plum is its limited test library, especially when it comes to assessing technical skills. Adaface solves this by providing a wide array of tests, including coding, AI, cloud, finance, and typing skills, allowing you to assess candidates across various roles. This ensures you're not just evaluating personality but also the specific skills needed for the job.

Adaface tackles another common pain point: limited proctoring features. Here's how Adaface helps you maintain test integrity:

• Webcam proctoring
• Window and tab tracking
• IP address logging
• Device fingerprinting
• Copy-paste protection
• Full-screen enforcement
• Chat GPT Detection

Extensive Test Library with 500+ Skills

Adaface boasts a test library covering over 500 skills, going beyond basic aptitude and personality assessments. This includes specialized tests for business roles (like Excel, Finance, and Accounting) and technical roles (coding, AI, cloud).

What sets Adaface apart is the ability to create customized tests tailored to specific job descriptions. This ensures that candidates are evaluated on the skills that matter most for the role, saving time for both recruiters and candidates.

Robust Proctoring Suite

Adaface provides a suite of proctoring features to maintain the integrity of your assessments. These measures prevent cheating and ensure that you're getting an accurate evaluation of each candidate's skills.

Features include webcam proctoring, window/tab tracking, IP address logging, and copy-paste protection. Adaface also detects if a candidate switches windows to tools like ChatGPT, providing an extra layer of security. These features are included across all pricing plans, so you don't have to worry about costly add-ons.

Adaface vs Plum Attributes

Adaface Pros

• 500+ skills tests covering technical, aptitude, business, and personality
• Customizable assessments tailored to specific job descriptions
• Strong proctoring suite to prevent cheating
• Used by clients in 70+ countries
• No seat-based pricing; pricing based on credits
• Excellent candidate experience with company branding
• Detailed scorecards, reporting, and analytics

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit different needs. All plans include all proctoring features and 500+ tests. A free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits is available to explore the platform. Plans include: Individual ($180/yr), Starter ($500/yr), Pro ($900/yr), Scale ($3000/yr), Growth ($5500/yr), Enterprise ($20,000/yr), and Unlimited ($50,000/yr). No credit card is required to start the free trial.

2. Alva Labs

Best for: Assess aptitude and programming

Alva Labs is a platform that combines aptitude and personality assessments with coding challenges. This helps recruiters evaluate both cognitive skills and technical abilities.

Unlike Plum, Alva Labs includes coding assessments, which can be super helpful when you're hiring developers. Plum focuses more on personality and aptitude.

So, if you need to see how well someone can actually code, Alva Labs might be a better fit. However, keep in mind that Alva Labs doesn't offer business, language, finance or AI tests like some other platforms such as Adaface.

How Alva Labs compares to Plum?

Key Features

• Aptitude and Personality Assessments
• Coding Challenges with Code Playback
• Customizable Invitation Templates

Alva Labs Pros

• Good for assessing technical skills.
• Offers code playback for better evaluation.
• Provides candidate benchmarking.
• Integrates with popular ATS systems.
• Supports company branding with logo and colors.

Alva Labs Cons

• No custom question creation.
• Lacks situational judgment, business, language, finance, and AI tests.
• Test length is relatively long, around 2 hours, which could affect candidate experience. Adaface assessments are typically 40 minutes.
• Limited proctoring capabilities; no webcam, location, IP, device fingerprint, copy/paste protection or ChatGPT detection.

Alva Labs Pricing

Alva Labs offers a free trial and transparent pricing. Starter plans begin at $289 per month, while Scale plans cost $799 per month. For Growth and Enterprise plans, you'll need to contact Alva Labs directly.

3. Glider AI

Best for: Technical skill screening platform

Glider AI offers a platform for assessing candidates' skills, particularly in technical areas. They aim to streamline the hiring process by providing tools to evaluate coding abilities, aptitude, and personality traits, all in one place.

Unlike Plum, Glider AI supports coding questions, allowing for a hands-on evaluation of a candidate's programming skills. This is a huge advantage when you need to see if someone can actually code, not just talk about it.

While Plum focuses on aptitude and personality, Glider AI dives deeper into technical skills, offering coding assessments and even live coding interviews. If you're hiring developers, this could be a game-changer compared to Plum's more general approach. Consider trying out Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests for a quick and accurate skills evaluation.

How Glider AI compares to Plum?

Key Features

• Code Playback: Review a candidate's coding process step-by-step.
• AI-powered scoring: Automates evaluation for quicker results.
• Webcam proctoring: Monitors candidates during assessments.

Glider AI Pros

• Supports coding assessments, including live coding interviews.
• Offers AI-powered evaluation to accelerate the screening process.
• Provides webcam and IP proctoring to prevent cheating.
• Has integrations with various ATS platforms.
• Offers custom branding options like logo and brand colors.

Glider AI Cons

• Lacks question bank scale, potentially leading to question exposure with frequent use.
• No support for Excel or Finance related tests.
• Doesn't provide detailed audit timelines for proctoring.
• No clear pricing tiers are published on the website; requires contacting sales for a quote.

Glider AI Pricing

Glider AI does not publicly display its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a custom quote. There is no free trial to test the platform, but they do offer a limited interactive demo.

4. iMocha

Best for: Skills assessment for broad roles

iMocha provides skills assessments and skills intelligence features designed to help companies evaluate their workforce's current skills, plan for future needs, and address skill gaps through targeted recruitment. Unlike Plum, which focuses on personality and aptitude, iMocha aims for more technical and job-specific skill evaluation.

Plum relies heavily on personality assessments, which might not be enough when you need to evaluate specific skills like coding or accounting. iMocha offers a wider array of tests including technical skills, making it suitable when you need to assess job-specific competencies.

While Plum has ready-to-use tests, it lacks the ability to customize tests per job description. If you are looking to test on cloud, AI skills, iMocha would work better for you. If you need to assess business skills, or typing tests, iMocha provides all of these as well.

How iMocha compares to Plum?

Key Features

• Skills Assessment Library: Offers a range of tests covering technical, aptitude, and behavioral skills.
• AI-Powered Proctoring: Includes features like webcam monitoring and browser tab tracking.
• Skills Intelligence: Helps organizations understand and manage the skill sets of their workforce.

iMocha Pros

• Wide Variety of Tests: Covers a broad spectrum of skills, including technical, aptitude, and job-specific areas.
• Proctoring Features: Includes webcam, window, and IP proctoring for cheating detection.
• Skills Profiling: Offers skills profiling and benchmarking to compare candidates.
• ATS Integrations: Integrates with various ATS systems for a streamlined hiring process.
• Customizable Branding: Allows companies to add their logo and brand colors to the assessment interface.

iMocha Cons

• Limited Customization: Does not offer custom question creation.
• Question Quality: Some questions may be easily searchable.
• No Social Listening: Lacks features to detect test leaks on social media.
• Limited Language Support: Supports fewer languages than some competitors.

iMocha Pricing

iMocha does not publicly list its pricing. Interested users need to contact iMocha directly for a custom quote. They do not offer a free trial. This lack of transparency can make it harder to quickly assess whether iMocha fits your budget compared to platforms with published pricing, like Adaface Assessments Pricing.

5. TestGrid

Best for: Aptitude and personality tests

TestGrid offers a platform focused on aptitude and personality assessments. It aims to help businesses evaluate candidates based on these traits, providing insights into their potential fit within an organization. However, TestGrid is missing tests beyond aptitude and personality.

While Plum emphasizes behavioral assessments and matching candidates to company culture, TestGrid centers on evaluating cognitive abilities and personality traits. Unlike Plum, TestGrid also lacks programming tests.

TestGrid's focus can be useful for roles where those attributes are key. However, companies seeking a tool that offers custom tests or a wider range of skill assessments like Adaface might find TestGrid limiting.

How TestGrid compares to Plum?

Key Features

• Aptitude Assessments: Evaluates logical reasoning, numerical ability, and verbal skills.
• Personality Tests: Measures traits and behavioral tendencies.
• Reporting: Provides insights into candidate performance.

TestGrid Pros

• Integrates with existing ATS systems.
• Offers role-based access controls.
• Provides PDF reports.
• Supports email for customer support.
• Offers training and onboarding.

TestGrid Cons

• Lacks coding assessments.
• No custom questions.
• No custom API available.
• The questions are easily googleable.

TestGrid Pricing

TestGrid does not publicly display its pricing. You'll need to sign up to receive pricing information and explore available plans.

6. CoderPad

Best for: Technical interviews and assessments

CoderPad specializes in providing a platform for technical interviews and assessments. It offers a collaborative coding environment where interviewers can assess candidates' coding skills in real-time.

Unlike Plum, CoderPad is heavily focused on coding assessments, offering a robust environment for evaluating candidates' coding abilities. This is especially useful when the role requires intensive coding skills.

While Plum focuses more on personality and aptitude, CoderPad lets you deep-dive into a candidate's coding proficiency, making it easier to identify top tech talent.

How CoderPad compares to Plum?

Key Features

• Real-time collaborative coding environment
• Support for multiple programming languages
• Code playback for detailed analysis

CoderPad Pros

• Wide support for many programming languages.
• Code playback feature enables better analysis.
• Real-time collaboration promotes better understanding.
• Integration with ATS systems streamlines workflow.
• Offers a free trial to explore platform.

CoderPad Cons

• Lacks aptitude and personality tests to assess holistic skills.
• No support for custom branding.
• Doesn't offer phone or live chat support.
• No custom data location support.

CoderPad Pricing

CoderPad's pricing starts at $70/month (billed annually) for the Basic plan. They also have a Scale plan for $325/month (billed annually). For higher plans, you need to contact CoderPad for custom pricing.

7. Vervoe

Best for: Skills-based hiring solution

Vervoe offers a skills-based hiring platform leveraging AI to automate candidate screening. It provides a range of assessments to evaluate candidates on different skills, with a focus on practical, real-world simulations.

Vervoe stands out as an alternative to Plum, especially when you need to assess job-specific skills. While Plum focuses more on personality and aptitude, Vervoe provides assessments across a broader range of skills, including technical and business-related roles.

Unlike Plum, Vervoe offers the ability to assess candidates with coding questions and even Excel workbook simulations. If you're seeking candidates with demonstrable skills, Vervoe gives recruiters a way to do that.

How Vervoe compares to Plum?

Key Features

• AI-powered candidate screening
• Skills assessments across different roles
• Automated scoring and ranking

Vervoe Pros

• Wide range of skills assessments, including coding.
• Offers a free trial to explore the platform.
• Automates the initial screening process, saving time for recruiters.
• ATS integrations for a streamlined workflow.
• Provides candidate benchmarking to easily compare applicants.

Vervoe Cons

• Lacks personality assessments for comprehensive candidate profiling.
• Doesn't offer custom questions for niche skill evaluations. Consider using Adaface's pre-employment assessment test library if you need to customize your questions.
• No social listening for task leaks, raising concerns about test integrity.
• No audit timeline for detailed proctoring analysis.

Vervoe Pricing

Vervoe's pricing starts at $300 for 10 candidates. A free trial is available. For larger volume needs and enterprise features, you'll need to contact Vervoe directly for custom pricing.

8. Equalture

Best for: Data-driven team composition

Equalture offers a unique approach to recruitment by focusing on team dynamics and cultural fit. They use data and games to predict how well a candidate will integrate into a team, aiming to reduce bias and improve team performance. It's all about finding the puzzle piece that fits perfectly!

Unlike Plum, which emphasizes personality assessments, Equalture focuses on the team as a whole. Equalture uses data-driven insights to identify the ideal candidate profile for a specific team. Plum is limited to ready-to-use tests only and no custom questions.

This approach can be particularly helpful when you're looking to build balanced teams with diverse skill sets and personalities. Equalture's assessments help you see beyond the resume and understand how a candidate will contribute to the team's overall success. However, they lack critical skill-based assessments to evaluate core job requirements.

How Equalture compares to Plum?

Key Features

• Team Fit Assessment: Measures how well a candidate aligns with existing team members.
• Culture Fit Assessment: Assesses a candidate's compatibility with the company's values.
• Gamified Assessments: Uses games to evaluate cognitive abilities and personality traits.

Equalture Pros

• Team synergy focused assessments.
• Helps in reducing hiring bias.
• Data-driven insights for informed decisions.
• Mobile friendly assessments for candidates.
• Assesses company brand colors.

Equalture Cons

• No coding tests for technical roles.
• Lacks proctoring features which raises concerns about test integrity.
• No custom question support.
• No support for typing tests or language proficiency tests.

Equalture Pricing

Equalture doesn't offer publicly available pricing. You need to contact them for a custom quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly assess whether their solution fits your budget. They don't offer a free trial, which might deter some users from exploring the platform.

9. 123test

Best for: Quick personality skill assessment

123test offers a variety of assessments, primarily focusing on personality, career, and aptitude. These tests aim to provide insights into individual traits and capabilities, aiding in self-discovery or candidate screening.

While both Plum and 123test offer personality assessments, 123test's aptitude tests can give you a basic overview of a candidate's cognitive skills, something Plum doesn't offer. However, unlike Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests, 123test doesn't provide the depth and customization needed for detailed skills evaluation.

123test lacks features like custom question creation or the ability to test job-specific skills effectively. If you need to assess technical skills or require in-depth role-based evaluations, 123test may fall short compared to more specialized platforms. For instance, Adaface provides coding tests and aptitude tests that offer a more comprehensive evaluation.

How 123test compares to Plum?

Key Features

• Personality assessments for self-discovery.
• Career aptitude tests for guidance.
• IQ and skills tests for basic evaluation.

123test Pros

• Affordable entry-level testing.
• Wide range of personality tests.
• Mobile-friendly interface.
• Readily available results.
• Free tests available.

123test Cons

• Limited customization options.
• Lacks advanced proctoring features.
• No custom coding questions.
• No ATS integrations.

123test Pricing

123test operates on a freemium model. While some tests are available for free, more in-depth assessments require payment. The pricing structure varies depending on the specific test and the number of users. They have paid tests in the range of $8.99-$17.99 each, but there is no clear subscription pricing available on their website, and they do offer a free trial.

10. Brillium

Best for: Customized exam creation platform

Brillium is a platform focused on enabling organizations to create and deliver customized exams. It provides the tools to build assessments, but you need to bring your own question bank. Think of it as the 'Lego' set for assessments – you get the blocks, but you need to design the model.

Unlike Plum, Brillium doesn't offer a pre-built library of assessments. If you have existing training material or require highly specific questions tailored to your internal processes, Brillium allows you to craft assessments precisely aligned with your needs.

However, this also means you're responsible for the entire content creation process. While Plum offers personality and aptitude tests, Brillium doesn't offer any pre-built tests. In contrast, if you want a ready to use solution, you can explore Adaface's pre-employment assessment test library.

How Brillium compares to Plum?

Key Features

• Exam Authoring: Design and build custom exams using a variety of question types.
• Delivery Options: Flexible delivery methods, including online and offline testing.
• Reporting & Analytics: Track candidate performance and generate reports.

Brillium Pros

• Highly Customizable: Design assessments tailored to specific needs.
• API Access: Integrate with other systems using their API.
• Multiple Delivery Options: Offers flexibility in how assessments are administered.
• Supports Various Question Types: Accommodates different testing formats.
• White Labeling: Brand the platform with your company's logo and colors.

Brillium Cons

• No Pre-built Question Library: You must create or source your own questions.
• Lacks Integrated Proctoring: Relies on external tools for exam security.
• Limited Assessment Types: No support for coding, AI, language or finance tests out of the box.
• Focus on Exam Creation Only: Does not offer candidate sourcing or skill development features.

Brillium Pricing

Brillium offers subscription-based pricing, starting at $69 per month (or $828 annually) for a single user on their Starter plan and $205 per month ($2460 annually) for 3 users on the Scale plan. For larger organizations requiring more features or users, you'll need to contact them directly to discuss Enterprise pricing. They do offer a free trial to explore the platform.

Found Your Perfect Plum Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface offers a vast library of 500+ tests covering aptitude, finance, personality, coding, and more, backed by a strong proctoring suite and transparent, credit-based pricing.
• Alva Labs is a good choice if you are looking for programming and aptitude skills but tests can be lengthy, averaging around 2 hours
• Glider AI has coding questions as well as a conversational interface. However it is not possible to create custom questions.
• iMocha boasts a expansive skill library including business and typing tests. However they do not provide custom questions and questions are easily googleable.
• TestGrid is a assessment solution with aptitude and personality assessment but there is no programming test available.
• CoderPad is designed for coding interviews with collaborative code editing features, but it lacks aptitude and personality assessments.
• Vervoe simulates real-world job tasks with AI-powered assessments, offering a practical way to evaluate candidates but lacks personality tests.
• Equalture focuses on team dynamics and culture fit, using gamified assessments to predict team performance but does not have programming and business tests.
• 123test offers a range of personality and career tests, useful for initial screening but lacks integrations with ATS and coding assessment.
• Brillium provides a platform to conduct tests, but you need to bring your own question bank since there are no read-to-use tests.

We've explored a range of alternatives to Plum, each offering unique strengths.

Plum shines with its focus on personality assessments and aptitude tests. However, its lack of coding assessments, situational judgment tests, and customization options might leave you wanting more.

Thankfully, the market offers great solutions to consider. For example, Adaface brings a wide test library and strong proctoring features to the table.

No matter your use case, there's a Plum alternative ready to help you level up your hiring game. These tools ensure you're equipped to make informed decisions and build a stellar team.

Ready to experience hassle-free, skills-based hiring? Give Adaface a try today!