Top 10 Maki People Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why are companies exploring alternatives to Maki People?

I've been digging around to understand why HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers are looking at options besides Maki People. Here's what I've learned:

Limited Test Types. While Maki People offers a range of assessments, they might not cover all the specific skills you need to evaluate. For example, they lack dedicated situational judgment tests, AI tests and typing tests which are important for assessing candidates for a range of roles.

No custom coding questions. While the platform offers coding questions, it doesn't allow you to add your own. This limits your ability to assess candidates on specific technologies or scenarios relevant to your company's tech stack. This can be a deal-breaker if you need to assess niche or proprietary skills.

Lack of Transparency on Pricing. Maki People doesn't publicly display their pricing, requiring potential customers to contact their team for information. This lack of transparency can be frustrating for companies who prefer to easily compare pricing and explore features before committing to a demo or sales call. If you're looking for straightforward and accessible pricing, exploring other online assessment platform options might be a better fit.

1. Adaface

Best for: Assess candidates for both technical and non-technical roles with ease.

Maki People is a decent assessment platform, but if you're seeking a more versatile and feature-rich solution, Adaface is a strong contender. Let's see why.

One area where Maki People falls short is in providing a complete view of candidate skills. While they offer some level of skill-based analysis, Adaface goes deeper, offering skill-wise breakdowns and comprehensive overviews in its scorecards. This helps recruiters make informed decisions by understanding a candidate's strengths and weaknesses across various skill categories.

Adaface addresses key limitations found in Maki People with features like:

Robust Proctoring Features

Adaface provides a suite of proctoring features to maintain test integrity, including webcam proctoring, window and tab tracking, IP address logging, and device fingerprinting. These measures ensure a fair and reliable assessment process. Maki People doesn't offer features like IP proctoring or built-in Chat GPT protection.

Adaface goes a step further by incorporating measures to prevent cheating such as copy-paste protection and full-screen proctoring, giving recruiters peace of mind.

Extensive Test Library for Diverse Roles

Adaface boasts a test library of 500+ skills, covering a wide range of domains including programming, aptitude, business, finance, and personality. This breadth allows you to assess candidates for various roles within your organization.

Unlike Maki People, Adaface supports typing tests, situational judgement tests, AI tests, cloud tests, and customized tests per job description, ensuring you can find the right assessment for your specific needs. You can explore our Pre-Employment Assessment Test Library for more info.

Adaface vs Maki People Attributes

Adaface Pros

• Wide range of skills assessed, including technical, aptitude, business, and personality
• Strong anti-cheating features like webcam proctoring and window/tab tracking
• Option to create customized assessments tailored to specific job descriptions
• Detailed scorecards with skill-wise analysis and comprehensive overviews
• Extensive ATS integrations for seamless workflow
• Used by clients in 70+ countries, demonstrating global applicability
• Unlimited team seats on all plans

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit different needs. You can start with a free trial that includes 2 sample tests and 5 credits to explore the platform. No credit card is required to begin your trial, and all proctoring features are included in every plan. The platform is self-serve, so you can get started right away. Paid plans include: Individual ($180/year), Starter ($500/year), Pro ($900/year), Scale ($3000/year), Growth ($5500/year), Enterprise ($20,000/year), and Unlimited ($50,000/year). See our Adaface Assessments Pricing page for more details.

2. Pymetrics

Best for: Assess aptitude and personality

Pymetrics offers a unique approach to talent assessment by using neuroscience-based games. These games evaluate cognitive and personality traits, aiming to predict job performance and identify the best-fit candidates.

While Maki People provides a broader range of skills assessments, Pymetrics focuses on assessing aptitude and personality traits through gamified challenges. This approach can be especially useful for roles where innate cognitive abilities and personality alignment are paramount.

Pymetrics' game-based assessments can offer a more engaging candidate experience compared to traditional tests. However, it's important to note that it lacks the ability to create custom questions or assess specific skills like coding, finance, or language proficiency, which Maki People offers.

How Pymetrics compares to Maki People?

Key Features

• Game-based assessments for cognitive traits
• Personality assessments
• AI-driven candidate matching
• Focus on diversity and inclusion

Pymetrics Pros

• Gamified assessments improve candidate engagement.
• AI algorithms reduce bias in hiring decisions.
• Focus on predicting job performance based on cognitive traits.
• Provides insights into candidate's personality and cultural fit.
• Integrates with existing ATS systems.

Pymetrics Cons

• Lacks skills-based assessments like coding or finance.
• No support for custom questions or tailored assessments.
• Limited test integrity features like web proctoring, location logging, or copy-paste protection.
• Does not offer detailed skills-based analysis or reporting, unlike tools like Adaface.

Pymetrics Pricing

Pymetrics does not publicly display its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a custom quote.

3. CodeSignal

Best for: Technical skills assessment platform

CodeSignal focuses on evaluating technical skills, particularly coding abilities. It provides a platform for companies to assess candidates through coding tests and challenges.

CodeSignal centers around coding assessments, which contrasts with Maki People's broader scope that includes aptitude, business, and personality tests. If your primary need is to evaluate coding prowess, CodeSignal is a focused solution. However, if you're seeking a more versatile assessment tool covering various skills, a platform like Adaface might be a better fit.

Unlike Maki People, CodeSignal doesn't offer features like custom coding questions. While CodeSignal offers ready-to-use tests, the inability to tailor coding challenges might limit its suitability for companies with niche technical requirements. If your hiring process demands customized assessments aligned with specific job descriptions, consider Adaface, which provides in-depth analysis of JDs to create custom tests, unlike Maki People.

How CodeSignal compares to Maki People?

Key Features

• Coding Assessments: Evaluate candidates with coding challenges and tests.
• Skill Certification: Verify candidate skills with certified assessments.
• Tech Screen: Quickly screen candidates based on their technical skills.

CodeSignal Pros

• Developer Community: It is used by developers, making it a trusted platform for tech talent.
• Real-World Coding Questions: Assesses candidates in a sandboxed environment that mimics real job conditions.
• Plagiarism Detection: Uses machine learning to ensure assessment integrity.
• Automated Scoring: reduces manual effort in evaluating coding skills.
• Public Reports: Scorecards are shared publicly via unique links.

CodeSignal Cons

• Limited Assessment Scope: It lacks assessments for aptitude, business acumen, or personality traits.
• No Custom Question Support: It does not allow recruiters to add custom coding questions.
• No Custom API: Does not provide custom API for tighter workflow integration.
• Long Assessment Length: Tests typically take around 2 hours to complete.

CodeSignal Pricing

CodeSignal does not publicly display its pricing. Interested users need to contact CodeSignal directly to discuss pricing plans and options. This lack of transparency can make it challenging to compare costs upfront.

4. TestDome

Best for: Skills assessment for varied roles

TestDome offers a platform to assess candidate skills across various domains, including programming, data science, and aptitude. While focusing primarily on skills assessment using pre-built tests, TestDome aims to provide tools for evaluating a wide range of abilities.

TestDome stands out as a strong alternative to Maki People because it allows a greater level of test customization and the ability to add your own questions. This is beneficial because you have the flexibility to evaluate candidates on the specific skills and knowledge that are most relevant to your open role.

While Maki People offers ready-to-use tests, TestDome gives you that extra edge with the ability to tailor assessments to fit specific requirements. However, unlike Adaface's assessment tests, it stops short of creating fully custom tests from a job description.

How TestDome compares to Maki People?

Key Features

• Wide Range of Tests: Offers tests for programming, cognitive ability, personality, and more.
• Video Interviewing: Includes options for one-way video interviews.
• Customizable Tests: Allows adding custom questions to pre-built assessments.

TestDome Pros

• Extensive Test Library: Covers a broad spectrum of skills and roles.
• Practical Questions: Focuses on real-world scenarios and practical application.
• Automated Scoring: Reduces manual effort and speeds up the evaluation process.
• Flexible Pricing: Offers different pricing tiers to suit various needs.
• Integrations: Integrates with popular ATS platforms.

TestDome Cons

• Limited Customization: Does not offer fully customized tests based on job descriptions.
• No Live Chat Support: Lacks real-time support for immediate assistance.
• Limited Branding: Does not allow for extensive company branding on the platform.
• No Multiple Test Sets: Does not offer multiple question sets to prevent test leaks during mass hiring events.

TestDome Pricing

TestDome provides different pricing tiers starting from $100, which includes assessments for 5 candidates ($20 per candidate). For higher volumes, they have a plan at $400 for 25 candidates. They also have a scaling plan that costs $4200 for 600 candidates. They do offer a free trial and have transparent pricing listed on their website.

5. Testgorilla

Best for: Skills-based candidate screening quickly

TestGorilla offers a wide range of pre-employment assessment tests to evaluate candidates across various skills, from cognitive abilities to job-specific knowledge. It aims to streamline the hiring process by providing tools to screen candidates early on.

TestGorilla stands out as a potential alternative to Maki People, particularly when you need a broad assessment library. While both offer ready-to-use tests, TestGorilla provides a more extensive selection across diverse skill sets, including aptitude, personality, and job-specific roles.

However, unlike TestGorilla, Maki People allows custom questions. For those needing tailored assessments based on specific job descriptions, especially for niche roles, consider using a platform that offers custom tests like Adaface.

How Testgorilla compares to Maki People?

Key Features

• Extensive test library covering various skills and roles.
• Video interviews for better candidate insights.
• Customizable assessments with pre-made questions.

Testgorilla Pros

• Wide range of tests available for different roles and skills.
• Offers video interviews for a more personal candidate evaluation.
• User-friendly interface for easy test creation and administration.
• Integrates with several ATS platforms for streamlined workflow.
• Provides data-driven insights to improve hiring decisions.

Testgorilla Cons

• Lacks the ability to create fully custom questions, limiting assessment tailoring.
• Relies heavily on multiple-choice questions, which might not fully assess practical skills.
• No custom data location support.
• Doesn't offer a public API for custom integrations.

Testgorilla Pricing

TestGorilla's pricing depends on the size of your company. For example, a company with 31-50 people costs $208 per month ($2,496 per annum) for the Starter Plan and $310 USD per month ($3,720 per annum) for the Pro plan. For enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact TestGorilla directly. They do offer a free trial to explore the platform.

6. DevSkiller

Best for: Coding skill screening platform

DevSkiller is a platform designed to assess the coding skills of candidates. It offers a range of tests and tools to help recruiters evaluate technical proficiency.

DevSkiller, like Maki People, emphasizes coding skills, but falls short on aptitude, business, and role-specific assessments. If you're aiming for more than just coding, DevSkiller might leave you wanting.

Unlike Maki People, DevSkiller doesn't offer personality or typing tests. This means you miss out on a holistic view of the candidate, focusing solely on their coding capabilities. Consider this if you need a well-rounded candidate profile.

How DevSkiller compares to Maki People?

Key Features

• Online code editor for real-time assessment
• Task-based coding challenges
• Automated test scoring

DevSkiller Pros

• Wide range of supported programming languages.
• Real environment coding assessments.
• Plagiarism detection to ensure test integrity.
• Integration with applicant tracking systems (ATS).
• Dedicated support for enterprise clients.

DevSkiller Cons

• Lacks assessments for aptitude, business skills and AI skills.
• No support for excel simulations or workbook questions.
• Doesn't offer conversational assessments, making the candidate experience less engaging.
• Limited proctoring capabilities, such as no copy-paste protection or chat GPT detection, raising concerns about test integrity.

DevSkiller Pricing

DevSkiller does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote. If you prefer straightforward pricing, without needing a sales call, you might consider other options like Adaface Assessments Pricing.

7. AccuRecruiter

Best for: Sales skills aptitude testing

AccuRecruiter, by AlignMark, specializes in assessing sales aptitude. While they offer a library of ready-to-use tests, the focus is heavily skewed towards evaluating candidates for sales roles. If you're looking for a solution beyond sales, keep reading.

Unlike Maki People, AccuRecruiter doesn't offer programming tests, AI tests, or even finance tests. It's heavily niche towards sales aptitude.

If you're hiring for diverse roles beyond sales, a platform like Adaface with a broader assessment library might be a better fit. We offer tests ranging from aptitude and personality to coding and AI.

How AccuRecruiter compares to Maki People?

Key Features

• Sales-focused aptitude assessments
• Customizable company branding
• Ready-to-use test library

AccuRecruiter Pros

• Good for assessing sales aptitude.
• Offers company branding options.
• Provides email support.
• Has a library of ready-to-use tests to get you started fast.
• GDPR compliant.

AccuRecruiter Cons

• Lacks assessments for various roles like engineering, finance, and marketing.
• No custom API for integrations.
• No webcam, tab, or window proctoring, which is a big risk for cheating.
• Doesn't support integrations with ATS.

AccuRecruiter Pricing

AccuRecruiter's pricing isn't publicly available. You'll need to contact their team directly for a quote. They don't seem to offer a free trial to explore the platform before committing.

8. TestWe

Best for: BYO assessment content platform

TestWe offers a platform to conduct assessments, but here's the catch: you need to bring your own questions. Think of it as a stage – you provide the actors and the script.

Unlike Maki People, which offers a library of pre-built tests, TestWe puts the onus on you to create and manage your assessment content. This means more work upfront, but also more control over the assessment process.

For companies with very specific or niche assessment needs and the resources to create their own question banks, TestWe can be a viable option. However, for most, the time and effort required to build and maintain a quality question bank can be a significant drawback.

How TestWe compares to Maki People?

Key Features

• Exam creation and delivery
• Candidate monitoring tools, including webcam proctoring
• Reporting and analytics

TestWe Pros

• Highly customizable assessment environment
• Suitable for secure, high-stakes exams with live proctoring
• Integrates with existing learning management systems (LMS)
• Supports various question formats (though you need to create them)
• GDPR compliant

TestWe Cons

• Lacks pre-built assessments, requiring significant upfront effort to create content
• No coding questions or automated scoring, limiting its use for technical roles
• No aptitude, personality, or skill-specific tests provided
• No ATS integrations to streamline the hiring process

TestWe Pricing

TestWe doesn't list pricing on their website, instead encouraging you to contact them for a quote. This lack of transparency can make it tricky to budget and compare against other options. Before you get on a call, consider whether you really want to build your entire assessment from scratch. If you need something up and running, consider exploring alternatives with ready-to-use assessments like Adaface.

9. Evalart

Best for: Skills tests, job fit

Evalart is a platform providing skills assessment tests for recruitment. It offers a range of pre-made tests and the option to add your own questions, helping you evaluate candidates across different skills and roles.

While Maki People provides coding questions, Evalart provides only coding questions and no scenario-based MCQs. This means you might miss out on evaluating a candidate's understanding of real-world scenarios.

Evalart lets you add your own questions. But doesn't create customized tests per job description. Creating customized tests ensures the skills assessment is tailored to the specific needs of each role. This can lead to more accurate and relevant assessments of candidate abilities, compared to using the same test for all positions.

How Evalart compares to Maki People?

Key Features

• Ready-to-use tests library
• Add own questions
• Webcam proctoring

Evalart Pros

• Supports programming assessments.
• Offers personality assessments.
• Provides a one-month free trial.
• Includes webcam proctoring for enhanced security.
• Has email, live chat and help center support.

Evalart Cons

• No custom-built assessments per job descriptions.
• Lacks AI, finance, cloud and business tests.
• Does not offer audit timelines for proctoring logs.
• Missing features like IP proctoring and copy-paste protection during tests.

Evalart Pricing

Evalart does offer a free trial. However, pricing details aren't readily available on their website. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote. If you are looking for transparent and easy to understand pricing, check out Adaface's pricing.

10. CoderPad

Best for: Live coding interviews simplified

CoderPad is a technical assessment platform primarily designed for conducting live coding interviews. It provides a real-time collaborative coding environment where interviewers and candidates can interact and assess coding skills.

Unlike Maki People, which offers a broader range of assessment types, CoderPad excels in providing a specialized environment for evaluating coding proficiency through live interaction. This makes it particularly useful for roles where real-time problem-solving and communication skills are as valued as coding knowledge.

While Maki People might offer a wider range of skills assessment, CoderPad hones in on the practical coding aspect. This allows for a deeper dive into a candidate's coding thought process and ability to collaborate, an area where Maki People might not provide as granular a view.

How CoderPad compares to Maki People?

Key Features

• Real-time collaborative IDE
• Support for multiple programming languages
• Code playback for review

CoderPad Pros

• Provides a realistic coding environment.
• Code playback feature aids in detailed evaluation.
• Supports many programming languages.
• Public reports are shareable.
• Offers benchmarking against other candidates.

CoderPad Cons

• Lacks aptitude and business skill assessments.
• No custom data location support.
• No custom API. Consider Adaface Integrations for a more connected workflow.
• Doesn't offer phone assistance for support.

CoderPad Pricing

CoderPad's pricing starts at $70/month ($840 per year) for the basic plan and goes up to $325/month ($3,900 per year). For higher plans, you need to contact CoderPad directly. They do offer a free trial, so you can test the waters before committing.

Found Your Perfect Maki People Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface stands out with its high test library of 500+ tests, strong proctoring suite, and a pricing model that depends only on credits and covers all proctoring features. It works for aptitude, finance, personality, business, typing, AI, technical and coding roles and is used by clients from 70+ countries. Unlike Maki People, Adaface provides coding questions as well as scenario based MCQs.
• Pymetrics focuses on aptitude and personality assessments, but lacks programming or business tests.
• CodeSignal excels in programming assessments, offering coding questions and automated scoring, but misses out on aptitude, business, or personality tests.
• TestDome offers a wide range of tests, including programming, aptitude, and personality, but does not allow for custom questions.
• TestGorilla provides a broad spectrum of tests, from programming to personality, but doesn't allow custom questions and can get pricey as your company grows.
• DevSkiller is a strong choice for programming skills, offering coding questions and custom test creation but with limited support for other skills.
• AccuRecruiter offers aptitude and sales-specific business tests but has limited skill assessment capabilities.
• TestWe provides the software to conduct tests, but you need to bring your own question bank.
• Evalart offers programming, aptitude, personality, and AI tests, but doesn't support custom questions and has limited skill assessment capabilities.
• CoderPad is a coding interview tool with automated scoring, ideal for technical roles, but lacks aptitude, business, or personality assessments.

Choosing the right assessment platform is a big decision. We've explored a bunch of options, each with its own strengths.

Maki People is good at covering a range of skills, including programming and business know-how. However, it might not be the best fit if you need features like situational judgment tests or tests for AI roles. Plus, if you're looking for custom test creation tailored to your specific job descriptions, it might fall short.

That's where alternatives come in! Platforms like Adaface offer a wide test library, strong proctoring, and customized assessments. There are many other great alternatives in the market as well.

No matter what you need – whether it's a large question bank, custom coding questions, or detailed reporting – there's a Maki People alternative out there that can help you level up your hiring game. The important thing is to weigh all the factors carefully.

Why not try Adaface and see how you can transform your hiring process today?