10 HireQuotient Alternatives: Top Picks by Features, Usability, and Pricing

Why the Hunt for HireQuotient Alternatives?

I've dug deep to understand why hiring teams explore alternatives to HireQuotient. I’ve looked at features, usability, pricing, and user reviews. Turns out, while HireQuotient has its strengths, some gaps might leave you wanting more.

Limited scope of tests. While HireQuotient offers aptitude and job-specific assessments, it lacks tests for programming, business skills, finance, AI, and languages. This could be a deal-breaker if you're hiring for diverse roles requiring a broader skill set.

Lacking Customization. One major drawback is the inability to add custom questions or tailor tests to specific job descriptions. In today's talent market, generic assessments just don't cut it. You need to evaluate candidates based on the unique requirements of each role, and this often calls for customized assessments.

Limited Proctoring Features. HireQuotient offers webcam proctoring, but it misses out on web, IP, and device fingerprint proctoring. For companies prioritizing test security and cheat prevention, these additional layers of security can be critical. A strong proctoring suite helps ensure that you're truly evaluating a candidate's skills, not their ability to find someone else to take the test for them. Consider platforms with robust online assessment platform features if test integrity is a top concern.

1. Adaface

Best for: Assess candidates across 500+ skills, from coding to cognitive aptitude, all in one platform.

Looking for a strong HireQuotient alternative? Adaface offers a powerful solution for assessing talent across a wide range of skills and roles.

One common concern with HireQuotient is the lack of flexibility in customizing assessments. Adaface addresses this by allowing you to tailor tests to match specific job descriptions. This ensures you're evaluating candidates on the skills that matter most, leading to more accurate hiring decisions.

Adaface provides a variety of features that make screening much easier:

• Extensive test library with 500+ tests
• Assessment support for business, aptitude, personality, finance and technical roles
• Strong proctoring features to prevent cheating
• Focus on candidate experience and company branding
• Scorecards with reporting and analytics
• Integrations with popular ATS systems

Extensive Test Library with 500+ Skills

Adaface boasts a rich and varied test library covering over 500 skills. Whether you need to assess technical abilities with Coding Tests, evaluate cognitive aptitude with Aptitude Tests, or gauge personality traits with Personality Tests, Adaface has you covered.

This extensive library allows you to assess candidates for a wide range of roles and industries, all from a single platform. Plus, the tests are designed to be engaging and candidate-friendly, ensuring a positive experience for everyone involved.

Robust Proctoring Suite

Maintaining test integrity is important. Adaface provides a suite of proctoring measures to prevent cheating and ensure accurate results. These measures include:

• Webcam proctoring: recording the candidate's video throughout the test.
• IP proctoring: tracking the IP address of the candidate's session.
• Tab and window tracking: detecting if a candidate navigates away from the test window.
• Copy paste protection: prevents candidates from sharing questions.

Adaface is committed to providing you with reliable and trustworthy assessment results. You can learn more about our security and compliance practices in our Trust Guide.

Adaface vs HireQuotient Attributes

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests on technical skills, cognitive abilities, language proficiency, and more
• Extensive ATS integrations and the possibility to build custom integrations
• Customizable assessments
• Excellent anti-cheating measures
• Campus Recruitment Software
• Tests available in multiple languages
• Regular updates and quality checks on tests

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers flexible pricing plans to suit different needs, with a free trial available to explore the platform. The platform is self-serve, and no credit card is required to start. All pricing plans include all proctoring features and 500+ tests. Plans include: Individual ($180/yr), Starter ($500/yr), Pro ($900/yr), Scale ($3000/yr), Growth ($5500/yr), Enterprise ($20,000/yr), and Unlimited ($50,000/yr).

2. TestGrid

Best for: Aptitude and Personality Screening

TestGrid offers a platform for conducting aptitude and personality assessments, aiming to streamline the initial stages of candidate screening. It focuses on evaluating a candidate's cognitive abilities and behavioral traits.

Unlike HireQuotient, TestGrid doesn't offer programming assessments. This limits its effectiveness when evaluating candidates for technical roles requiring coding skills. If you're looking to assess coding skills through hands-on tests and scenario-based questions, a platform like Adaface would be a better fit.

Moreover, TestGrid lacks support for custom questions, business tests, and language tests. So, if you need tailor-made assessments, or want to evaluate skills beyond aptitude and personality, this limitation can be a significant drawback.

How TestGrid compares to HireQuotient?

Key Features

• Aptitude Tests: Evaluates logical, numerical, and verbal reasoning.
• Personality Assessments: Gauges behavioral traits and work styles.
• ATS Integration: Connects with various Applicant Tracking Systems for smoother workflows.

TestGrid Pros

• Supports integration with ATS platforms.
• Offers both aptitude and personality assessments.
• Provides a basic level of candidate screening.
• GDPR Compliant for data privacy.
• Role-based access control for team management.

TestGrid Cons

• Lacks coding assessments for technical roles.
• No custom question creation capabilities.
• Limited test types beyond aptitude and personality.
• Absence of coding questions to assess technical skills.
• Pricing details aren't transparently available.

TestGrid Pricing

TestGrid does not publicly display its pricing. You need to sign up and contact their sales team to get a quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly assess if it fits your budget and requirements, unlike Adaface Assessments Pricing.

3. Maki People

Best for: Versatile skill assessment platform

Maki People is a platform offering a range of assessments, from programming to aptitude, with a focus on helping businesses evaluate candidate skills. They provide tools to create custom questions and ready-to-use tests.

While HireQuotient offers ready-to-use tests, it lacks the flexibility of creating custom questions, limiting its adaptability to specific company needs. Maki People bridges this gap, allowing you to tailor assessments to your unique requirements.

However, unlike Adaface's skill-based hiring platform, Maki People doesn't offer customized tests per job description, potentially leading to generic assessments that don't accurately reflect the nuances of each role.

How Maki People compares to HireQuotient?

Key Features

• Ready-to-use tests for various skills
• Custom question creation
• ATS integrations

Maki People Pros

• Supports programming assessments, including coding questions.
• Offers business, language, and finance tests.
• Provides custom question creation.
• Integrates with applicant tracking systems.
• Includes role-based access control.

Maki People Cons

• No typing tests available.
• Lacks custom data location support.
• Doesn't provide a public API for custom integrations.
• No support for Excel workbook questions.

Maki People Pricing

Maki People does not publicly display its pricing. You will need to contact their team for pricing details. This lack of transparency makes it harder to quickly evaluate if it fits your budget.

4. TestDome

Best for: Skills assessment for various roles

TestDome provides a platform for assessing candidate skills across a wide spectrum, from programming and data science to accounting and customer service. It's like a digital Swiss Army knife for evaluating talent.

Unlike HireQuotient, TestDome lets you add your own questions, providing flexibility when evaluating niche skills or tailoring assessments to very specific job requirements. While HireQuotient offers ready-to-use tests, this customization can be a game-changer.

However, TestDome doesn't offer the ability to create fully customized tests based on job descriptions. While you can add your own questions, the platform lacks the functionality to design a completely unique assessment tailored to a specific role's needs. If you need a solution that creates custom tests based on job description, Adaface might be a better fit.

How TestDome compares to HireQuotient?

Key Features

• Wide range of tests: Access a library covering various skills and roles.
• Add your own questions: Tailor assessments to specific needs by incorporating custom questions.
• Automated scoring: Save time with coding questions and other assessments scored automatically.

TestDome Pros

• Good test coverage: Offers assessments for various skills, including programming, aptitude, and business-related topics.
• Flexibility: Ability to add your own questions for customization.
• Automated scoring: Automates the evaluation of coding and other skill-based assessments.
• Proctoring: Offers webcam, window, tab, copy-paste and full-screen proctoring for cheating detection
• Good for programming roles: Offers programming language based coding questions.

TestDome Cons

• No custom test creation: Cannot create fully customized tests based on specific job descriptions.
• Limited branding: Lacks options for company branding on the assessment platform.
• No Excel Simulation: Does not provide a way to simulate Excel during the test. Doesnt test for hands-on excel proficiency.
• No Skills breakdown: Doesn't offer skill-wise analysis in the scorecards.

TestDome Pricing

TestDome's pricing starts at $100, which gives you $20 credit per candidate. There are tiered pricing plans available for larger volumes of assessments. While they offer a free trial, it's worth noting that they don't offer any unlimited plans.

5. Coderbyte

Best for: Sharpen coding assessment skills

Coderbyte focuses on technical assessments, providing a platform to evaluate coding skills. It's designed to help recruiters identify candidates with strong programming abilities, offering challenges and assessments in various languages.

While HireQuotient provides a broader range of assessment types, Coderbyte zeroes in on the nitty-gritty of coding. This can be a better approach when the job demands solid coding skills, giving recruiters more confidence in a candidate's practical abilities.

Coderbyte allows customization of tests based on job descriptions, ensuring that the assessment aligns with the specific needs of the role. This targeted approach contrasts with HireQuotient's ready-to-use tests, providing a more precise evaluation of the candidate's fit for the position.

How Coderbyte compares to HireQuotient?

Key Features

• Coding challenges in multiple languages
• Real-time code evaluation
• Custom assessment creation

Coderbyte Pros

• Large question bank for coding assessments.
• Offers code playback to review candidate's coding process.
• Has plagiarism detection to prevent cheating.
• Supports automated scoring for coding questions.
• Provides a way to create custom coding questions.

Coderbyte Cons

• Lacks aptitude tests beyond technical skills.
• Doesn't provide a way to add your own questions to the platform.
• Tests can be time-consuming, with typical assessment lengths around 2 hours.
• No support for typing tests or language tests.

Coderbyte Pricing

Coderbyte offers a few pricing tiers. The Starter plan begins at $199 per month. They also have subscription and pay-as-you-go options. For more tailored solutions and enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact their sales team, since these details are not publicly listed.

6. Hackerrank

Best for: Technical skill assessment platform

HackerRank is a well-known platform for evaluating tech skills, particularly strong in coding assessments. It offers a wide range of coding challenges and contests, making it a popular choice for companies hiring developers.

While HireQuotient offers a broader range of assessment types, HackerRank shines when the focus is on pure coding prowess. If you need to assess a candidate's ability to write and debug code in various languages, HackerRank's extensive library of coding challenges gives it an edge.

HireQuotient also lacks the ability to create custom coding questions. HackerRank supports custom questions, allowing you to evaluate on specific technologies used by your company.

How Hackerrank compares to HireQuotient?

Key Features

• Coding Challenges: Extensive library of coding questions across various languages and skill levels.
• Live Coding Interviews: Integrated environment for conducting live coding sessions.
• Skill Certification: Offers certifications for candidates to showcase their proficiency.

Hackerrank Pros

• Large Developer Community: Widely recognized platform among developers.
• Extensive Coding Libraries: Huge selection of coding questions and challenges.
• Plagiarism Detection: Helps maintain the integrity of coding assessments.
• Supports Multiple Languages: Evaluate candidates across various programming languages.
• Real-time Collaboration: Allows interviewers and candidates to collaborate effectively during live coding sessions.

Hackerrank Cons

• Limited Non-Technical Assessments: Focus primarily on coding skills, lacking in areas like aptitude or personality tests.
• No Business or Finance Skill Tests: It doesn't cover business skills such as sales, marketing, or project management and no finance assessments.
• Lengthy Tests: HackerRank tests can be quite long which impacts candidate experience and completion rates.
• Default questions are easily googleable: Their default questions are not unique and the candidate can easily google the question

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank offers several pricing tiers. They have a starter plan at $100/month, billed annually. Then there is a scale plan for $250/month billed annually. For enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact HackerRank directly for a custom quote. They don't have pricing details on their website.

7. Alva Labs

Best for: Data-driven talent acquisition

Alva Labs offers a platform that combines personality assessments with cognitive ability tests to provide a rounded view of candidate potential. This approach aims to predict job performance and cultural fit, ensuring better hiring outcomes.

Unlike HireQuotient, Alva Labs integrates personality assessments, offering insights into candidate behavior and work style. This is particularly useful when cultural alignment and soft skills are as important as hard skills.

However, Alva Labs misses the mark on customizability. If you need to design your own questions tailored to specific scenarios or industry nuances, Alva Labs might leave you wanting.

How Alva Labs compares to HireQuotient?

Key Features

• Personality and cognitive assessments.
• Structured interviews.
• Candidate ranking and comparison.

Alva Labs Pros

• Strong focus on personality and cognitive insights.
• Aims to predict job performance and cultural fit.
• Integrates with existing ATS systems.
• Structured interview guides to maintain consistency.
• Skills profile for candidate insights.

Alva Labs Cons

• Lacks support for typing tests, language tests, and finance tests.
• No custom question creation, limiting test tailoring.
• Doesn't offer coding assessments beyond basic programming languages.
• Misses advanced anti-cheating features like web proctoring and copy-paste protection.

Alva Labs Pricing

Alva Labs offers different pricing tiers starting at $289 per month for the basic plan and $799 for the scale plan. For larger organizations requiring customized solutions, you'll need to contact Alva Labs directly to get a quote. They do offer a free trial, so you can dip your toes in before diving in headfirst.

8. Qualified

Best for: Deep dive coding assessments

Qualified (formerly known as Coderbyte) focuses on providing in-depth technical assessments, particularly for coding roles. They offer a range of challenges and projects designed to evaluate a developer's practical skills, going beyond simple multiple-choice questions.

While HireQuotient covers a broader range of skills with ready-to-use tests, it lacks the depth needed for technical roles. Qualified lets you create realistic coding exercises, mimicking on-the-job tasks. This is invaluable if you need to assess a candidate's coding proficiency.

Unlike HireQuotient, Qualified supports evaluating candidates in a sandboxed environment that mirrors real job conditions.

How Qualified compares to HireQuotient?

Key Features

• Real-world coding challenges
• Project-based assessments
• Automated scoring and reporting

Qualified Pros

• Focuses on coding skills.
• Provides a platform for evaluating practical skills.
• Offers automated scoring for coding assessments.
• Integrates with popular ATS systems for a streamlined workflow.
• Supports multiple programming languages.

Qualified Cons

• Lacks support for non-technical skills assessments like business acumen, personality, or aptitude.
• Does not offer custom question creation.
• No webcam proctoring features to mitigate cheating.
• Lacks features for candidate engagement and branding, such as customizable invitation templates or company-branded assessments.

Qualified Pricing

Qualified does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. The absence of transparent pricing and a free trial can make it difficult to evaluate the platform quickly.

9. Equip

Best for: Coding skills at scale

Equip offers a platform geared towards assessing coding skills, providing a range of tests focused on programming languages, web and mobile frameworks, and database knowledge. It aims to help companies identify candidates with the right technical abilities for software development roles.

While HireQuotient provides a broader range of assessment types, Equip specializes in coding skills. This focus allows them to offer more in-depth evaluations of a candidate's coding abilities, which is important for tech-heavy roles.

However, Equip lacks some of the broader assessment capabilities that companies might need. For example, if you're looking to assess business acumen, personality traits, or communication skills in addition to coding, you might need to supplement Equip with another tool or consider a platform like Adaface that offers a more versatile assessment library.

How Equip compares to HireQuotient?

Key Features

• Coding challenges in various languages
• Assessments for web and mobile frameworks
• Automated scoring for coding tests

Equip Pros

• Focus on coding skills assessment
• Support for multiple programming languages and frameworks
• Automated scoring saves time on manual review
• Integrates with applicant tracking systems (ATS)
• Offers webcam and window proctoring

Equip Cons

• Lacks assessments for personality, business, or job-specific skills
• No support for custom question creation, limiting flexibility
• Sample questions available online might compromise test integrity. Their questions are also easily googleable.
• Doesn't offer features like code playback or plagiarism detection for more thorough code review.

Equip Pricing

Equip offers a 'pay-as-you-go' pricing model, charging $1 per candidate. While this is a budget-friendly option, it might be best suited for companies with smaller testing volumes or specific project needs. The low per-candidate cost might reflect a trade-off in the depth and breadth of the assessment library compared to platforms with subscription-based pricing.

10. 123test

Best for: Quick personality, aptitude testing

123test offers a variety of assessments, primarily focusing on personality and aptitude tests. They provide a broad range of free tests, with options to purchase more in-depth assessments. It's a good starting point if you need to quickly gauge certain candidate traits, but it might not be enough for detailed skills assessment.

While HireQuotient offers a more business-focused approach with job-specific tests and some aptitude assessments, 123test focuses more on personality and aptitude. This can be useful for initial screening or understanding team dynamics.

However, 123test lacks the depth needed for technical roles or roles requiring specific skills validation. It doesn't offer features like coding assessments, custom questions, or detailed reporting, making it less suitable for in-depth skills evaluation than Adaface.

How 123test compares to HireQuotient?

Key Features

• Personality assessments: Understand candidate traits and work styles.
• Aptitude tests: Evaluate cognitive abilities like numerical and verbal reasoning.
• Variety of tests: Offers a wide array of tests, though depth varies.

123test Pros

• Free tests available for initial screening.
• Mobile-friendly platform for easy access.
• Caters to personality and aptitude assessment.
• Email support is available.
• Easy to sign up and explore features

123test Cons

• Lacks coding assessments for technical roles.
• Does not support custom questions.
• No ATS integrations for streamlined workflow.
• No webcam proctoring, location logging, IP proctoring, device fingerprint proctoring, copy paste protection, full screen proctoring or chat GPT protection

123test Pricing

123test offers a freemium model, with several free tests available. For more detailed reports and access to additional features, you can purchase individual tests, ranging from $8.99 to $17.99 each. There are no subscription plans or volume discounts available.

Found Your Perfect HireQuotient Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface: With a rich test library of 500+ tests, strong proctoring features, skills profile and flexible pricing, Adaface is used by customers from 70+ countries.
• TestGrid: Offers ATS integrations, but lacks programming tests and custom questions.
• Maki: Includes programming and aptitude tests, but has limited business and AI test coverage.
• TestDome: Features a wide range of tests including programming, aptitude, and business, but lacks company branding options and Excel workbook questions.
• Coderbyte: Focuses on programming skills assessment, with long tests that take around 2 hours.
• HackerRank: Specializes in IT roles, providing coding questions and skill-based challenges.
• Alva Labs: Offers programming and aptitude tests, while lacking business and AI assessments.
• Qualified-io: Designed for IT roles, but does not offer company branding or support for custom questions.
• Equip: Provides programming and aptitude tests, focusing on technical skills, but their sample questions are easily googleable.
• 123test: Offers aptitude and personality assessments, but has no programming or business skill evaluations.

Choosing the right assessment platform is a bit like finding the perfect pair of shoes—it needs to fit just right. We've explored several alternatives to HireQuotient, each with its own unique strengths.

HireQuotient does offer a free trial and automated scorecards. However, it lacks coding questions, custom question options, and detailed reporting. This can be a deal-breaker if you're looking for in-depth skill analysis, especially across technical roles.

Luckily, you have other options! Platforms like Adaface offer a vast test library, advanced proctoring, and flexible pricing. They can assess candidates across aptitude, finance, personality, and technical skills, making them a versatile choice.

No matter your specific hiring needs, from screening for aptitude to assessing for specific skills, you can find a HireQuotient alternative that fits your unique needs. Adaface is one to consider for a well rounded offering.

Eager to find the perfect fit? Jump into Adaface and discover how our assessments transform hiring!