Top 10 HighMatch Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why the Hunt for HighMatch Alternatives?

I did some digging to figure out why recruiters and hiring managers might be peeking at other options besides HighMatch. Here’s the scoop:

Limited Test Library. HighMatch might not have all the tests you need. For example, if you're hiring for tech roles and need to assess coding skills, you might find their offerings limited. An ideal assessment platform should have a wide range of tests, including coding, aptitude, finance, and even typing skills.

Lack of Proctoring Features. To ensure fair and reliable results, strong proctoring is key. HighMatch lacks features like webcam and IP proctoring, which can help prevent cheating and maintain test integrity. A robust online assessment platform should offer these features to give you confidence in your candidate evaluations.

Limited Integration and Customization. Integrating smoothly with your existing ATS is a time-saver. Also, branding is key. HighMatch lacks ATS integrations and customization options like adding your company logo or using your brand colors. These features streamline your workflow and create a seamless candidate experience.

1. Adaface

Best for: Screening candidates for both technical and non-technical roles with a single platform.

Looking for a HighMatch alternative? Adaface offers a powerful and versatile assessment platform to streamline your hiring process.

HighMatch lacks coding questions, limiting its ability to assess technical skills. Adaface bridges this gap, offering both coding questions and scenario-based MCQs. This allows you to evaluate a candidate's hands-on coding abilities alongside their understanding of programming concepts, all within a single, efficient assessment.

Adaface stands out with its focus on candidate experience and enterprise-ready features:

• Wide range of tests: Aptitude, finance, personality, business roles, typing, AI, technical, and coding roles.
• Strong proctoring suite to prevent cheating.
• Trusted by clients from 70+ countries.
• No seat-based pricing.
• Customizable company branding.
• Detailed scorecards with reporting and analytics.
• Free trial available to test the platform.

Top-Notch Proctoring for Reliable Results

Adaface offers a suite of proctoring features to maintain test integrity. We understand the importance of reliable results, especially when making hiring decisions.

Our platform includes webcam proctoring, which records the candidate during the test. We also track browser tab and window activity, log IP addresses, and offer copy-paste protection. Plus, we keep an eye out for candidates switching to tools like ChatGPT, ensuring a fair and accurate assessment. All proctoring features are included in every plan.

Extensive Test Library for Diverse Roles

Adaface boasts a rich test library covering 500+ skills. This includes everything from technical skills like coding and AI to aptitude, business skills, and even typing proficiency.

Our library allows you to assess candidates across various domains. We also support custom test creation tailored to your specific job descriptions. This ensures you're evaluating the precise skills needed for each role. Browse our Pre-Employment Assessment Test Library today.

Adaface vs HighMatch Attributes

Adaface Pros

• Wide range of tests: technical skills, aptitude, personality, and more
• Strong proctoring features to prevent cheating
• Customizable assessments to match specific job roles
• Detailed scorecards with skill-wise analysis
• Used by clients in 70+ countries
• Transparent pricing with no seat-based fees
• Excellent candidate reviews

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers several pricing plans to fit your hiring needs. You can start with a free trial that includes 2 sample tests and 5 credits to explore the platform. No credit card is required to get started!

Our plans include Individual ($180/yr), Starter ($500/yr), Pro ($900/yr), Scale ($3000/yr), Growth ($5500/yr), Enterprise ($20,000/yr), and Unlimited ($50,000/yr). All plans include all proctoring features and access to our 500+ test library.

2. Hackerrank

Best for: Technical skill screening platform

HackerRank offers a platform focused on assessing technical skills, particularly coding abilities. It's designed to help companies identify and hire skilled developers through coding challenges and assessments. This makes it a strong contender if you're laser-focused on tech talent.

Unlike HighMatch, HackerRank specializes in evaluating coding skills through practical coding challenges and a functional IDE. This means candidates get to demonstrate their abilities in a real-world environment.

However, if you are looking for skills beyond technical roles and a broader range of aptitude and business skill assessments, you might want to look for other alternatives.

How Hackerrank compares to HighMatch?

Key Features

• Candidate Screening: Provides structured assessments for tech skills.
• Live Coding Interviews: Features a fully functional IDE for real-time coding assessments.
• SkillUp: Uses AI to filter candidates by skills and certifications.

Hackerrank Pros

• Developer Community: HackerRank is a popular platform among developers.
• Certified Assessments: Offers role-based tests for various programming languages.
• Plagiarism Detection: Uses machine learning to ensure assessment integrity.
• Real-World Coding Questions: Candidates are evaluated in a sandboxed environment.
• ATS Integrations: Integrates with applicant tracking systems, streamlining the hiring workflow.

Hackerrank Cons

• No Emotional Intelligence Screening: Lacks assessments for soft skills.
• Limited Business Skill Testing: Primarily focuses on technical roles, missing business skill assessments.
• Lengthy assessments: The length of the assessments can be 2 hours long, affecting completion rates. Consider a shorter skills tests solution for a better candidate experience.
• Default questions are easily googleable: Questions by default are easily solveable by GPT and on Google.

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank offers different pricing tiers: Starter at $100/month (billed annually), Pro at $250/month (billed annually). For enterprise plans, you'll need to contact HackerRank for a custom quote. This might make it difficult to quickly budget and get started.

3. Alva Labs

Best for: Skills and Personality Assessment

Alva Labs offers a platform combining aptitude and personality assessments to provide a rounded view of candidate potential. It aims to predict job performance and cultural fit using psychometric data and cognitive tests.

While HighMatch provides situational judgment tests, it lacks in-depth programming assessments. Alva Labs fills this gap by offering coding questions alongside aptitude evaluations, useful for tech-focused roles.

However, Alva Labs misses situational judgment tests and business tests that HighMatch has. If those are your priority, you can consider other alternatives for your pre-employment assessment.

How Alva Labs compares to HighMatch?

Key Features

• Aptitude Tests: Measures cognitive abilities with logical reasoning tests.
• Personality Assessments: Evaluates traits using questionnaires.
• Coding Assessments: Includes coding questions to assess technical skills.

Alva Labs Pros

• Solid aptitude and personality insights.
• Coding questions available, useful for tech roles.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.
• Offers candidate tracking features.
• Provides skill-wise analysis in reports.

Alva Labs Cons

• Lacks situational judgment tests.
• No support for custom questions or adding your own.
• Tests can take upto two hours, potentially affecting candidate experience.
• No webcam or window proctoring features.

Alva Labs Pricing

Alva Labs has a tiered pricing structure. Starter plan begins at $289 per month, and the Scale plan is $799 per month. For larger enterprises, they offer custom pricing which needs a call to their sales team. Unlike Adaface Assessments Pricing, they don't offer a plan with unlimited candidate assessments.

4. CodeSignal

Best for: Technical hiring, coding assessments

CodeSignal specializes in technical assessments, particularly for coding skills. It provides a platform for evaluating developers and engineers through coding tests and challenges, which helps companies gauge technical proficiency.

While HighMatch offers a broader range of aptitude and personality assessments, it lacks in-depth coding skill evaluations. CodeSignal shines where HighMatch falls short, offering coding assessments and a coding environment to deeply evaluate programming skills.

This makes CodeSignal especially advantageous for companies prioritizing technical roles and needing a laser focus on coding skill verification. If you want to assess coding abilities, CodeSignal could be a strong contender.

How CodeSignal compares to HighMatch?

Key Features

• Coding Challenges: Evaluate candidates with real-world coding tasks.
• Integrated IDE: Candidates use a functional IDE during assessments.
• Skills-Based Scoring: Get detailed reports on coding skills.

CodeSignal Pros

• Strong focus on coding skill assessment.
• Supports multiple programming languages.
• Automated scoring saves time.
• Public reports for easy sharing.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.

CodeSignal Cons

• Lacks breadth of assessments beyond coding.
• No support for aptitude or personality tests.
• No custom question creation.
• Tests can be lengthy at around 2 hours.
• No support for mobile-friendly assessments.

CodeSignal Pricing

CodeSignal's pricing is not publicly available. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a custom quote. They also do not offer a free trial. This lack of transparency can make it tough to compare costs upfront. If you are looking for transparent pricing, Adaface's assessment pricing is publicly listed.

5. Eva AI

Best for: AI-powered candidate sourcing

Eva AI focuses on automating candidate sourcing and initial screening using AI. It aims to streamline the early stages of recruitment by identifying potential candidates from various sources and engaging them through automated conversations.

While HighMatch offers skills assessments, it lacks the AI-driven sourcing capabilities of Eva AI. Eva AI excels at proactively finding candidates, especially passive ones, using AI to match profiles with job requirements. This is a game-changer if you're struggling to find qualified applicants.

Unlike HighMatch, which relies on candidates taking tests, Eva AI can start engaging with potential hires even before they apply. Think of it as an always-on recruiter, expanding your talent pool without additional work.

How Eva AI compares to HighMatch?

Key Features

• AI-powered candidate sourcing across multiple platforms
• Automated candidate engagement through conversational AI
• Candidate rediscovery from your existing database

Eva AI Pros

• Automates initial candidate outreach.
• Leverages AI to identify and engage passive candidates.
• Integrates with existing ATS systems.
• Includes a chatbot for candidate support.
• Offers personality assessments.

Eva AI Cons

• Lacks skills-based assessments like coding or aptitude tests; focuses more on personality and initial fit.
• No proctoring features to prevent cheating.
• Limited reporting and analytics compared to platforms focused on skills evaluation.
• No custom question creation.

Eva AI Pricing

Eva AI's pricing is not publicly available. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. They don't offer a free trial, so getting hands-on experience before committing might be difficult. If you're looking for transparent pricing and a free trial to explore features, consider checking out Adaface Assessments Pricing.

6. HireVue

Best for: Video interviews, coding assessments

HireVue is well-known for its video interviewing platform, but it also offers a suite of assessment tools to help companies screen candidates. It combines video interviews with skill assessments.

Unlike HighMatch, HireVue supports coding assessments. This makes it suitable for tech roles. If you're looking to evaluate coding skills along with conducting video interviews, HireVue might be a fit.

However, HireVue doesn't offer the breadth of assessments that Adaface does. For example, it lacks specific tests for finance, AI, cloud, or business roles. So, while it covers some bases, it might not meet all your assessment needs.

How HireVue compares to HighMatch?

Key Features

• On-demand video interviews with AI analysis.
• Coding assessments with automated scoring.
• Integrations with popular ATS platforms.

HireVue Pros

• Video interviewing capabilities.
• Automated scoring for coding tests.
• Integration with applicant tracking systems.
• Skills profile and skill-wise analysis in reporting.
• Candidate benchmarking.

HireVue Cons

• Limited test variety compared to other platforms.
• No custom coding question support.
• Lacks proctoring features like web, window, or device fingerprint tracking.
• No Free trial or easy sign up to explore all features before purchasing.

HireVue Pricing

HireVue does not publicly display its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote. This lack of transparency can make it tricky to compare costs upfront. There is also no free trial.

7. Coderbyte

Best for: Coding challenges for developers

Coderbyte is a platform designed to help developers sharpen their coding skills and companies assess technical talent. It provides coding challenges, courses, and interview preparation tools.

Unlike HighMatch, Coderbyte focuses heavily on coding skills. While HighMatch offers a broader range of assessments, it lacks the depth of coding-specific evaluations that Coderbyte provides. If you're primarily hiring developers, Coderbyte offers a more specialized assessment experience.

However, keep in mind that Coderbyte's scope is limited to technical roles. If you need to assess candidates across various departments, including business or aptitude skills, a more versatile platform like Adaface might be a better fit.

How Coderbyte compares to HighMatch?

Key Features

• Coding challenges in multiple languages
• Company challenges and assessments
• Courses for skill development

Coderbyte Pros

• Strong focus on coding skills.
• Offers a wide range of coding challenges.
• Includes a code playback feature to review candidate's coding process.
• Supports many popular programming languages.
• Provides a free trial to explore the platform.

Coderbyte Cons

• Limited to technical skills; lacks assessments for aptitude, business acumen, or personality.
• Tests can be time consuming, with some assessments lasting up to 2 hours. This might impact candidate experience and completion rates.
• No custom question creation, limiting the ability to tailor assessments to specific company needs.
• Lacks integrations with popular ATS platforms, hindering streamlined workflows.

Coderbyte Pricing

Coderbyte offers a few pricing tiers. They have subscription plans starting at $199/month. Alternatively, they have pay-as-you-go plans that start at $350 for 30 candidates. For custom or enterprise solutions, you'll need to contact their sales team.

8. HireQuotient

Best for: Skills-based assessments and screening

HireQuotient offers a platform designed to help companies assess and screen candidates based on their skills. It aims to streamline the hiring process by providing tools to evaluate candidate abilities early on.

HighMatch focuses on personality assessments, which, while helpful, might not provide a full picture of a candidate's capabilities. HireQuotient, on the other hand, offers skills-based assessments which helps recruiters gauge a candidate's practical abilities, making it suitable for roles requiring specific skills.

Unlike HighMatch, HireQuotient includes webcam proctoring to prevent cheating. While HighMatch focuses on personality traits, HireQuotient focuses on skills-based assessments to ensure you're hiring someone who can actually do the job.

How HireQuotient compares to HighMatch?

Key Features

• Ready-to-use assessments for various roles.
• Webcam proctoring to maintain test integrity.
• ATS integrations to streamline workflow.

HireQuotient Pros

• Skills-based assessments allow for evaluating practical abilities.
• Webcam proctoring provides increased test security.
• Provides support via email and live chat.
• Offers candidate feedback to improve tests.
• Provides candidate benchmarking against the pool.

HireQuotient Cons

• Lacks programming coding questions for technical roles.
• No support for custom questions tailored to specific company needs unlike Adaface.
• No custom API for advanced integrations.
• Does not provide detailed reporting like PDF or public reports like Adaface.

HireQuotient Pricing

HireQuotient offers a tiered pricing structure. The starter plan begins at $200/month ($2400/year), the scale plan costs $500/month ($6000/year), and the growth plan is priced at $1000/month ($12000/year). For enterprise plans, you'll need to contact their team for a custom quote. They offer a free trial, but no easy sign up. Explore Adaface Assessments Pricing for transparent and flexible options.

9. Paradox | Traitify

Best for: Personality and aptitude assessments

Paradox, through its Traitify offering, emphasizes personality assessments using a visually engaging, mobile-friendly format. Instead of diving deep into skills, they offer a quick way to gauge candidate fit through personality insights and some aptitude measures.

HighMatch is ok, but if you want a simple candidate experience, Traitify is the choice. Traitify leverages images rather than text-heavy questions making it more engaging for candidates. This is especially useful for initial screening stages where you want to quickly filter candidates based on personality traits.

However, personality is not everything. HighMatch has situational judgement questions, which Traitify lacks. If you want in-depth understanding across a wide range of skills, then Adaface might be a better fit.

How Paradox | Traitify compares to HighMatch?

Key Features

• Image-based Personality Assessments: Uses visual assessments to quickly determine personality traits.
• Mobile-Optimized Experience: Designed to be candidate-friendly on mobile devices.
• Basic Aptitude Tests: Offers limited coverage of aptitude skills.

Paradox | Traitify Pros

• Visually Engaging: Image-based assessments are more appealing for some candidates.
• Fast Assessments: Quick to complete, offering a rapid overview of personality.
• Mobile-Friendly: Great candidate experience on mobile devices.
• ATS Integration: Integrates with applicant tracking systems.
• Some aptitude coverage

Paradox | Traitify Cons

• Limited Skill Coverage: Lacks in-depth skill assessments beyond personality.
• No Coding assessments: It lacks coding assessments to guage code proficiency.
• No custom questions: It doesnt offer any custom questions.
• No proctoring support: It has no proctoring or anti-cheating features. Can easily be cheated.

Paradox | Traitify Pricing

Paradox | Traitify does not publicly list pricing on their website. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. This lack of transparency can make comparing costs difficult if you're evaluating multiple assessment solutions.

10. McQuaig

Best for: Personality and aptitude insights

McQuaig offers personality and aptitude assessments designed to help businesses understand their candidates and employees better. The platform aims to provide insights into a person's behavior and cognitive abilities, aiding in hiring and development decisions.

While HighMatch offers a limited scope of aptitude and skill assessments, McQuaig focuses on personality and aptitude. However, both HighMatch and McQuaig lack the breadth of assessments to evaluate candidates across the spectrum.

McQuaig doesn't offer coding tests, AI tests, finance tests, language tests, business tests or job-specific tests making it difficult to be a one stop shop assessment provider. If you are looking to solve for usecases beyond personality and aptitude, consider using a platform like Adaface's online assessment platform.

How McQuaig compares to HighMatch?

Key Features

• Personality assessments to gauge behavioral traits.
• Aptitude tests to measure cognitive abilities.
• Reporting and analytics on candidate/employee profiles.

McQuaig Pros

• Helps in understanding candidate's personality.
• Provides data-driven insights for hiring decisions.
• Offers reports for individual and team analysis.
• Aids in identifying potential training and development needs.
• Company logo, company brand colors and customizable invitation templates are supported.

McQuaig Cons

• Lacks coding assessments for tech roles.
• Limited coverage of job-specific skills.
• No built-in proctoring features for remote assessments.
• No support for custom question creation.

McQuaig Pricing

McQuaig does not provide public pricing details. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. They offer a starter plan that begins at $1250 for 90 days. There is no free trial.

Found Your Perfect HighMatch Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface offers a diverse test library with 500+ options, covering everything from aptitude tests to coding tests, personality tests, and even finance tests - things HighMatch doesn't cover. Plus, with its robust proctoring suite and global client base, it's a solid choice for companies hiring across various roles and regions. Also, Adaface's pricing is based on credits, covering all proctoring features, without seat-based pricing!
• HackerRank is a developer's playground, perfect for assessing coding skills with its coding challenges, but it does come with longer test times.
• Alva Labs is another option for assessing coding skills, offering integration with ATS systems.
• CodeSignal focuses on technical skills assessment but lacks customization options.
• Eva AI focuses on personality assessments and language skills, but lacks coding and technical assessments.
• HireVue uses video interviews and assessments but lacks customizability and has limited test integrity features.
• Coderbyte offers coding challenges and assessments with automated scoring and plagiarism detection.
• HireQuotient focuses on aptitude and job-specific tests with skill-wise analysis.
• Paradox | Traitify (previously Traitify) offers personality assessments using a conversational interface but lacks technical skill assessments.
• McQuaig provides aptitude and personality tests with customizable branding options.

We've explored a range of HighMatch alternatives, each with its own strengths. Now, let's wrap things up.

HighMatch shines with its personality assessments and situational judgment tests. However, it lacks coding assessments, finance skills evaluation, and AI skill testing, making it less versatile for companies hiring for varied roles.

Luckily, the market has some good alternatives to HighMatch that can meet your varied usecases. For example, Adaface boasts a rich test library of 500+ tests for aptitude, finance, personality, business, typing, AI, technical, and coding roles. Plus, it is used by clients from 70+ countries.

No matter what your specific needs are, there's a HighMatch alternative out there that can help you screen candidates better. Whether you need a platform for coding, aptitude, finance, or personality tests, you can rely on the alternatives such as Adaface.

Ready to elevate your hiring game? Explore Adaface today and screen candidates with 500+ skills tests.