Top 10 Harver Alternatives & Competitors

So, why are hiring teams scouting around for alternatives to Harver? Let's find out!

I put on my detective hat and did some digging to understand what makes HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers look beyond Harver. Here's what I unearthed:

Limited scope for technical roles. While Harver offers a range of assessments, it lacks in-depth programming and coding assessments. For companies hiring software engineers or data scientists, this can be a significant drawback as they might need to use other platforms to properly assess tech skills. They can't get a complete view of a candidate's abilities using just one platform.

No clarity on pricing. Unlike many modern assessment platforms, Harver doesn't publicly display its pricing. This lack of transparency forces potential customers to contact sales, leading to delays and potentially deterring smaller businesses that prefer self-service options. This contrasts with platforms like Adaface, where pricing is readily available, enabling quick decision-making.

Lack of detailed proctoring insights. While Harver might offer some proctoring features, it appears to lack a detailed audit timeline of candidate activity during the test. An audit timeline provides recruiters with a comprehensive view of potential cheating attempts, allowing for a more informed and accurate assessment of candidate integrity. In today's remote hiring landscape, robust proctoring is more important than ever.

1. Adaface

Best for: Assess aptitude, business skills, and coding skills - all in one place.

Looking for a solid alternative to Harver? Adaface offers a powerful platform with a focus on skills-based hiring, providing a wide range of assessment options to identify top talent.

Harver's lack of pricing transparency can be frustrating. With Adaface, you get clear and upfront pricing, allowing you to plan your budget without hidden costs. Plus, you can explore the platform with a free trial, ensuring it meets your needs before committing.

Adaface helps you streamline your hiring with these key features:

• A vast test library covering 500+ skills, from aptitude to AI.
• Strong proctoring suite to maintain test integrity.
• Company branding to create a seamless candidate experience.
• Detailed scorecards for in-depth candidate analysis.
• Tests designed to be non-googleable and non-GPT-able.

Robust Proctoring for Secure Assessments

Adaface's proctoring suite is designed to prevent cheating and ensure reliable results. We employ a multi-layered approach including webcam proctoring, window and tab tracking, copy-paste protection, and IP address monitoring.

Our system also detects the use of tools like Chat GPT during the assessment, providing an additional layer of security. Detailed audit timelines give you full visibility into the candidate's test-taking behavior, letting you make decisions with confidence.

Transparent and Startup-Friendly Pricing

Unlike some platforms, Adaface offers clear and accessible pricing plans to suit various needs and budgets. No hidden fees, no seat-based pricing, just straightforward credit-based plans. All pricing includes all proctoring features.

Startups and enterprises alike will find value in our tiered plans, with options for individual users, growing teams, and large-scale recruitment. Plus, a free trial with sample tests lets you explore the platform before making a purchase. Check out our Adaface Assessments Pricing page for more details.

Adaface vs Harver Attributes

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests covering tech, aptitude, language, and personality.
• Strong proctoring suite including webcam, window, and tab tracking.
• Assessments are designed to be non-googleable, and non-GPT-able.
• Pricing is clear and all inclusive of proctoring features. No seat based pricing.
• Excellent candidate reviews.
• Integrates with all popular ATS systems.
• Used by clients from 70+ countries

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent, credit-based pricing plans with a free trial to get you started. No credit card is required to begin. All plans include full access to our test library and proctoring features. Choose from Individual ($180/yr), Starter ($500/yr), Pro ($900/yr), Scale ($3000/yr), Growth ($5500/yr), Enterprise ($20,000/yr), and Unlimited ($50,000/yr) plans.

2. Hackerrank

Best for: Technical skill assessment at scale

HackerRank provides a platform focused on assessing technical skills, primarily through coding challenges and assessments. It's a popular choice for companies looking to evaluate developers and engineers, offering a range of tools to screen and interview technical talent.

Unlike Harver, which focuses on a broader range of assessments including situational judgment and personality tests, HackerRank hones in on technical skills. This makes it a strong alternative when your main priority is evaluating coding abilities.

HackerRank's strength lies in its ability to assess coding skills with precision, which can be a game-changer if you're struggling to find developers. Its platform offers coding challenges in multiple languages, allowing you to evaluate candidates in a practical, hands-on way.

How Hackerrank compares to Harver?

Key Features

• Coding Challenges: A wide variety of coding problems across different languages and skill levels.
• Live Coding Interviews: A collaborative coding environment for real-time assessments.
• Skill Certification: Allows candidates to earn certifications to validate their expertise.

Hackerrank Pros

• Large Developer Community: Well-known and used by many developers, creating a familiar testing environment.
• Wide Range of Skills: Supports over 40 programming languages and in-demand tech skills.
• Plagiarism Detection: Uses machine learning to identify and prevent cheating.
• Real-World Coding Questions: Assesses candidates in a sandboxed environment that mirrors actual job conditions.
• ATS Integrations: Integrates with applicant tracking systems for a streamlined hiring process.

Hackerrank Cons

• Limited Scope: Primarily focused on technical skills, neglecting other relevant areas like soft skills or aptitude tests.
• No Emotional Intelligence Screening: Lacks assessments for emotional intelligence and interpersonal skills.
• Default Questions Are Googleable: Many default questions can easily be found online, compromising test integrity.
• No Custom Questions: Custom questions not being supported limits the ability to assess role-specific skills that may not be covered in their existing library.

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank offers tiered pricing plans. The Starter plan begins at $100 per month (billed annually at $1200). For more advanced features, the Professional plan costs $250 per month (billed annually at $3000). Enterprise pricing, with customized features, requires contacting HackerRank directly. There's no straightforward way to sign up and explore all features without contacting sales.

3. HireVue

Best for: Video interviews and assessments

HireVue offers a platform primarily known for its video interviewing capabilities, but it also provides some pre-employment assessments. This makes it a solution for companies looking to incorporate video into their hiring process.

One area where HireVue attempts to one-up Harver is through its focus on video interviews. Harver's strength lies in its automated workflow assessments, while HireVue pitches you video interviews.

However, if you're looking for a broader variety of skill assessments beyond video and aptitude, HireVue might leave you wanting more. For instance, if you need to test coding skills or gauge business acumen, you might need to look elsewhere, or to Adaface's pre-employment assessment test library.

How HireVue compares to Harver?

Key Features

• On-demand video interviews
• AI-driven insights from video analysis (we're not entirely sold on this)
• Aptitude and personality assessments

HireVue Pros

• Strong focus on video interviewing
• AI analysis aims to provide deeper candidate insights
• Integrates with many ATS platforms
• Good for companies prioritizing video in their process
• Candidate location tracking

HireVue Cons

• Limited assessment types compared to Harver or Adaface
• AI analysis of video can be a black box, raising fairness concerns
• No custom coding questions. This makes it hard to assess specific coding skills.
• It lacks tests for roles like finance, cloud, AI, business or language proficiency which are easily available at Adaface -No support for social listening for task leaks. This is important to make sure assessments are accurate.

HireVue Pricing

HireVue doesn't share pricing details publicly. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote. This lack of transparency can make it tough to quickly compare costs with alternatives, but such is life!

4. Alva Labs

Best for: Aptitude and Personality Assessments

Alva Labs offers a platform focused on aptitude and personality assessments. It aims to provide insights into a candidate's cognitive abilities and behavioral traits, helping recruiters make data-driven hiring decisions. Think of them as offering a peek into how a candidate thinks and acts.

While Harver provides situational judgment tests, Alva Labs shines with its in-depth aptitude assessments and personality evaluations. Harver doesn't cover programming questions so Alva Labs is good at evaluating technical skills.

Alva Labs helps you understand a candidate's potential beyond just their past experiences. However, if you need to test specific business skills, or require situational judgment tests, you might need to look elsewhere.

How Alva Labs compares to Harver?

Key Features

• Cognitive ability assessments to measure problem-solving skills.
• Personality assessments to understand work style and team fit.
• Coding assessments for technical roles, including code playback.
• ATS Integrations to streamline workflow

Alva Labs Pros

• Free trial available to test the platform.
• Decent ready-to-use test library.
• Benchmarking feature allows comparison of candidates.
• Skills profile provides a snapshot of candidate strengths.
• Good support for integrations.

Alva Labs Cons

• Lacks situational judgment tests which are important for many roles.
• Does not support custom question creation, limiting flexibility.
• No language, business, or finance-related tests are offered.
• Tests can be long (2 hours), potentially impacting candidate experience.

Alva Labs Pricing

Alva Labs offers a free trial and transparent pricing for their starter ($289/month) and scale ($799/month) plans. For larger organizations needing tailored solutions, they offer enterprise plans; you'll need to contact them directly for pricing. If you are looking to evaluate candidates for free you can try Adaface Assessments Pricing

5. Maki People

Best for: Skills-based hiring, coding assessments

Maki People offers a skills assessment platform to help companies identify and hire the right talent. It focuses on evaluating candidates through various tests, including coding, aptitude, and personality assessments.

While Harver provides a broad range of assessments, it lacks in-depth coding evaluations, a key aspect for tech roles. Maki People fills this gap with coding questions, including support for web frameworks and data structures.

Maki People allows candidates to demonstrate coding abilities, while Harver does not offer this. For companies seeking to assess practical coding skills, Maki People presents a stronger alternative.

How Maki People compares to Harver?

Key Features

• Coding Assessments: Evaluate candidates' programming skills with coding exercises.
• Aptitude Tests: Assess cognitive abilities with logical reasoning and numerical tests.
• Personality Questionnaires: Determine candidate fit through personality assessments.

Maki People Pros

• Supports coding assessments, including web frameworks and data structures.
• Offers a range of ready-to-use tests, saving time on setup.
• Provides automated scoring for coding assessments.
• Has integrations with popular ATS systems.
• Skill-wise analysis of candidate scores.

Maki People Cons

• Lacks coding playback feature for detailed code review.
• Doesn't offer custom coding questions.
• No Excel workbook questions to guage excel skill.
• Does not have situational judgement tests.

Maki People Pricing

Maki People does not publicly display its pricing. Interested users need to contact the Maki People team to get pricing information. This lack of transparency can make comparing costs difficult, especially when considering other platforms like Adaface Assessments Pricing.

6. Codility

Best for: Technical skill coding assessments

Codility is a platform designed to assess the coding skills of developers and engineers. It provides a suite of tools to evaluate coding proficiency through coding tests, live coding interviews, and skills mapping. Let's see how it stacks up as an alternative to Harver.

While Harver focuses on a broader range of assessments, including personality and culture fit, Codility zeroes in on technical skills. If your primary need is to evaluate coding skills with precision, Codility might be a stronger choice.

Harver lacks coding questions, which is a big miss. Codility, on the other hand, offers coding tests, code playback, and automated scoring. So, if you're specifically hiring developers, Codility's coding-centric approach could provide a more focused and in-depth evaluation than Harver.

How Codility compares to Harver?

Key Features

• Coding Tests: Evaluate candidates' coding abilities with various coding challenges.
• Live Coding Interviews: Conduct real-time coding interviews using a shared IDE.
• Skills Mapping: Identify skill gaps and create targeted learning paths.

Codility Pros

• Widely Recognized: Codility is a well-known platform in the tech industry, making it a trusted tool for many companies.
• Focus on Coding Skills: The platform offers specialized tools for evaluating coding skills, including coding tests and live coding interviews.
• Custom Coding Questions: Allows recruiters to add their own coding questions.
• Automated Scoring: Automatically scores coding questions.
• Code Playback: Recruiters can view code in timeline.

Codility Cons

• Limited Scope: Codility's focus is primarily on coding skills, so it may not be suitable if you need to assess a broader range of skills like aptitude or personality.
• No business, aptitude, or AI skills assessments: If you want to assess skills beyond coding, you will need another platform to do it, adding to the costs.
• No custom questions: Lacks the ability to create custom scenario based questions.
• Tests are lengthy: Average assessment length is 2 hours. This might impact candidate experience.

Codility Pricing

Codility offers different pricing tiers, including annual plans for Starter and Scale, with custom pricing available for Growth and Enterprise plans. The Starter plan begins at $1200 per annum. They do offer a free trial, but you need to fill out a form and wait for approval. Unlike Adaface's assessments pricing, you won't find all the pricing details readily available on their website.

7. Hogan Assessments

Best for: Personality-based role suitability analysis

Hogan Assessments offers a suite of personality assessments designed to evaluate candidates' strengths, weaknesses, and values. This can help you understand how a person is likely to behave in a work environment and predict job performance.

Unlike Harver, which focuses on skills-based assessments and simulations, Hogan Assessments specializes in personality insights. This makes it a great choice when you need to understand the underlying traits driving a candidate's behavior.

If you're looking to go beyond skills and delve into the psychological aspects of your candidates, Hogan Assessments could be more suitable than Harver. However, remember that personality insights alone might not give you a complete picture, especially if you need to assess specific skills like with Aptitude Tests.

How Hogan Assessments compares to Harver?

Key Features

• Personality Inventories: Standardized questionnaires assessing various personality traits.
• Leadership Forecast Series: Focused assessments for predicting leadership potential.
• Hogan 360: Multi-rater feedback tool for leadership development.

Hogan Assessments Pros

• Validated Assessments: Backed by research and designed to predict job performance.
• Focus on Personality: Provides insights into how a candidate is likely to behave.
• Leadership Development: Offers tools for improving leadership skills.
• Customizable Templates: They offer customizable invitation templates.
• GDPR Compliant: They are GDPR Compliant

Hogan Assessments Cons

• Lacks Skills Testing: Doesn't directly assess job-specific or technical skills.
• No Custom Questions: You can't create your own custom questions to align with your company.
• No Integrations: Doesn't integrate with ATS systems.
• Pricing Isn't Transparent: It's hard to know the price without talking to sales.

Hogan Assessments Pricing

Hogan Assessments doesn't publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact them for a quote, which can involve a sales call to discuss your specific needs and the assessments you're interested in. Also, they don't seem to offer a free trial to test things out.

8. Eva AI

Best for: Personality and Language Assessments

Eva AI focuses on automating HR processes with an AI-powered chatbot. It offers personality and language assessments to help streamline initial candidate screening.

While Harver offers a broader range of assessments, including situational judgment tests, Eva AI carves a niche in personality and language skills. This makes it suitable if you're primarily focused on evaluating these specific traits.

However, if you need a more rounded assessment solution, consider Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests that cover aptitude, business, and technical skills. Adaface also provides a deeper skills analysis.

How Eva AI compares to Harver?

Key Features

• Personality assessments based on psychometric models
• Language proficiency tests
• AI-powered chatbot for initial screening
• ATS integrations

Eva AI Pros

• AI-driven automation for initial screening
• Focus on personality and language skills
• Mobile-friendly assessments for candidate ease
• ATS Integrations to make data flow seamless
• User authentication to avoid fraud attempts

Eva AI Cons

• Lacks coding and technical skill assessments, unlike Adaface.
• No custom question creation, limiting flexibility.
• Limited test types beyond personality and language.
• Absence of proctoring features raises concerns about test integrity.

Eva AI Pricing

Eva AI does not publicly list pricing information. You need to contact them directly for a quote. This lack of transparency can make comparing costs difficult. Unlike Eva AI, Adaface Assessments Pricing is available on the website.

9. Testgorilla

Best for: Skills-based candidate screening

TestGorilla offers a wide range of pre-employment assessments to evaluate candidates on various skills, cognitive abilities, personality traits, and job-specific knowledge. It's designed to help businesses make data-driven hiring decisions by identifying the best talent for their open roles. It provides a strong alternative to Harver.

Harver primarily focuses on volume hiring and providing a candidate experience with realistic job previews and simulations. While valuable, this approach can lack the depth needed to assess specific skills. TestGorilla shines by offering a more granular approach to skill assessment, enabling recruiters to accurately gauge a candidate's proficiency in areas like coding, finance, or even language proficiency.

So, if you're looking for a platform that goes beyond surface-level assessments and provides quantifiable insights into a candidate's skill set, TestGorilla might be your champion. It allows you to create tests composed of different question types and test candidates across multiple skills.

How Testgorilla compares to Harver?

Key Features

• Skills Testing: Offers a library of pre-built tests across various domains.
• Custom Tests: Allows users to create custom assessments by combining different test types.
• Reporting & Analytics: Provides detailed reports on candidate performance.

Testgorilla Pros

• Wide variety of tests available, covering diverse skill sets.
• Offers a free plan, making it accessible for small businesses.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.
• Decent proctoring features to maintain test integrity.
• Good for screening a large number of candidates quickly.

Testgorilla Cons

• Doesn't allow creating custom questions, limiting the ability to assess niche skills. If you want to test on customer usecases using your own questions, then you cannot.
• Lacks focus on candidate experience, which can impact completion rates. Conversational Assessments are important.
• No plagiarism detection for coding tests. So you may end up not knowing if the candidate is copying codes from somewhere.
• Limited customization options for branding and candidate communication.
• Doesn't offer a custom API.

Testgorilla Pricing

TestGorilla offers several pricing plans depending on the size of your company. The pricing scales w.r.t your employee size. They don't have a plan with unlimited assessments, and have a fair use policy restriction. For a precise quote tailored to your needs, it's best to contact TestGorilla directly.

10. WeCreateProblems (WeCP)

Best for: Technical hiring assessment platform

WeCreateProblems (WeCP) offers a platform primarily focused on technical skill assessment. It's designed to help companies evaluate candidates for various IT roles through coding tests, AI assessments, and cloud-related skill evaluations. Let's see how it stacks up against Harver.

One area where WeCP aims to improve on Harver is in its focus on technical skills. While Harver offers a broad range of assessments, WeCP zeroes in on tech roles, offering coding environments and assessments tailored for developers and IT professionals. This makes it suitable for companies who are serious about their tech hiring.

However, if you're looking for a platform that goes beyond just technical skills, WeCP might not be a perfect fit. For instance, while WeCP provides coding tests, it lacks in situational judgment, aptitude, business, personality, and language tests. For a more rounded assessment of candidates across various roles, you might need to look elsewhere.

How WeCreateProblems (WeCP) compares to Harver?

Key Features

• Coding Assessments: Offers a range of coding tests supporting various programming languages.
• AI and Cloud Skill Evaluation: Evaluates candidates on AI and cloud computing skills.
• Customizable Tests: Allows creating tests based on specific job descriptions (Only for IT roles)

WeCreateProblems (WeCP) Pros

• Supports assessments for niche tech skills like AI and Cloud.
• Provides a fully functional IDE for live coding interviews.
• Offers automated scoring for coding questions.
• Has integrations with popular ATS systems.
• Provides a free trial to explore features.

WeCreateProblems (WeCP) Cons

• Limited assessment types beyond IT roles. No support for aptitude or personality tests.
• Lacks situational judgment tests.
• No custom question creation, limiting flexibility.
• Doesn't offer location or IP proctoring for enhanced security.

WeCreateProblems (WeCP) Pricing

WeCP offers a free trial, and their paid plans start at $240 per month (or $2,388 per year). For enterprise plans, you'll need to contact WeCP for a personalized quote, which could add extra time to your decision-making process. So, be prepared to hop on a sales call to uncover the pricing details.

Found Your Perfect Harver Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface stands out with its extensive test library (500+), covering diverse roles, strong proctoring, and transparent, credit-based pricing, and clients from 70+ countries. No seat based pricing.
• HackerRank focuses on technical skill assessment, offering coding challenges and skill certification. Tests typically take around 2 hours.
• HireVue leverages video interviewing and assessments, incorporating AI to analyze candidate responses.
• Alva Labs combines aptitude and personality assessments to predict job performance. They have a free trial and you can explore all features.
• Maki People provides a range of skills tests, including coding, business, and language assessments.
• Codility is tailored for coding skills, offering coding tasks and challenges to evaluate developers. Tests usually take around 2 hours.
• Hogan Assessments specializes in personality assessments for predicting job performance and leadership potential.
• Eva AI offers AI-powered assessments, focusing on personality and language skills.
• TestGorilla provides a wide range of tests, including cognitive ability, personality, and job-specific skills.
• WeCreateProblems (WeCP) focuses on technical assessments, with coding challenges and AI and cloud-based skill evaluation.

We've explored a range of alternatives to Harver, each with its strengths and weaknesses. Ultimately finding the perfect fit depends on your unique hiring needs.

One of the biggest strengths of Harver is its focus on automation and candidate experience. However, its lack of coding assessments and limited customization options can be a deal-breaker for many.

That's where considering alternatives becomes really important. Platforms like Adaface offer a wide range of assessments, from aptitude and personality to technical and coding skills, with strong proctoring.

Whatever your use case – high-volume hiring, niche skill assessment, or ensuring test integrity – there’s a Harver alternative ready to help you hire top talent.

Eager to see how Adaface can transform your hiring? Explore our platform features today.