Top 10 Glider AI Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why might recruiters and HR professionals be on the hunt for alternatives to Glider AI?

If you're exploring other options, you're not alone! I put on my detective hat and dug around to uncover some of the most common reasons why hiring teams consider alternatives to Glider AI. Let's break it down:

Limited Business, Typing, Language, and Finance Tests. While Glider AI shines with technical skills, it lacks breadth in areas like business acumen, typing proficiency, language fluency, and financial literacy. This can be a deal-breaker if you're hiring for roles beyond tech, requiring you to cobble together assessments from multiple platforms.

Inability to Add Custom Questions or Create Customized Tests. Glider AI doesn't allow you to add your own questions or tailor tests based on specific job descriptions. This lack of flexibility can be frustrating when you need to assess candidates on niche skills or company-specific knowledge. The inability to customize pre-employment assessment tests makes it difficult to accurately gauge a candidate's fit for the role.

Lack of Transparency in Pricing and Limited Customer Support. Glider AI does not provide pricing on their website, and they do not provide live chat support. Recruiters might want more transparency in pricing so they can quickly know which plan suits their hiring needs. Live chat support helps recruiters get their questions answered easily.

1. Adaface

Best for: Screen candidates across 500+ skills, from Aptitude to AI.

Looking for a Glider AI alternative? Adaface offers a powerful and user-friendly assessment platform designed to streamline your hiring process and identify top talent.

One common concern with Glider AI is the lack of transparent pricing. Getting a quote often requires a sales call, which can be time-consuming. Adaface offers clear, upfront pricing on its website, allowing you to quickly determine the best plan for your needs and get started without delay. No more waiting, just straightforward skills assessment.

Adaface stands out with its focus on candidate experience and breadth of assessment options:

• Test library of 500+ tests
• Business roles coverage
• Mobile-friendly assessments
• Strong proctoring features
• Customizable company branding
• Detailed scorecards and reporting
• Transparent, credit-based pricing

Extensive Test Library for Diverse Roles

Adaface provides a rich Pre-Employment Assessment Test Library covering 500+ skills. This includes not only technical skills like Coding Tests but also aptitude, personality, and role-specific assessments.

Need to assess Excel proficiency, accounting knowledge, or even typing speed? Adaface has you covered. This breadth of assessment options makes Adaface a versatile alternative to Glider AI, particularly for companies hiring across various departments.

We also have specialized Aptitude Tests For Employment which you can leverage.

Robust Proctoring for Secure Assessments

Maintaining test integrity is paramount. Adaface offers a suite of proctoring features to deter cheating and ensure reliable results. This includes webcam monitoring, window/tab activity tracking, IP address logging, and copy-paste prevention.

Furthermore, Adaface employs non-googleable questions and plagiarism detection to minimize the risk of candidates finding answers online or copying code. Detailed audit timelines provide transparency and allow you to review proctoring logs in case of any concerns.

Our questions are also designed by following How we design questions at Adaface.

Adaface vs Glider AI Attributes

Adaface Pros

• Wide range of skills assessments beyond just coding (aptitude, personality, business, typing, AI)
• Strong proctoring features including webcam, window & tab tracking, and plagiarism detection
• Excellent candidate experience and company branding options
• Detailed scorecards and reporting for data-driven hiring decisions
• Transparent and flexible Adaface Assessments Pricing (credit-based, no seat-based fees)
• Easy signup and platform exploration without a sales call
• Enterprise-ready with ATS integrations and custom API

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers clear, credit-based pricing plans to suit different hiring volumes. A free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits is available to explore the platform. All plans include all proctoring features and 500+ tests. Plans include Individual ($180/yr), Starter ($500/yr), Pro ($900/yr), Scale ($3000/yr), Growth ($5500/yr), Enterprise ($20,000/yr), and Unlimited ($50,000/yr).

2. CodeSignal

Best for: Technical skills assessment platform

CodeSignal is a technical assessment platform designed to help companies evaluate developer skills through coding tests and certifications. It aims to provide a standardized way to measure a candidate's coding abilities and identify top talent.

CodeSignal focuses on coding skills, offering a platform where candidates solve coding challenges in a real-time environment. This is different from Glider AI, which offers a broader range of skills assessments but may not dive as deeply into coding proficiency.

If your primary need is to assess coding skills, CodeSignal's focus can be an advantage. However, for roles requiring a mix of skills beyond just coding, you might need additional tools, whereas a platform like Adaface provides scenario-based MCQs and coding questions in one test.

How CodeSignal compares to Glider AI?

Key Features

• Coding Tests: Evaluate candidates with coding challenges in various programming languages.
• Certifications: Offer standardized assessments to validate skills.
• Real-Time IDE: Candidates code in a live environment that mimics real-world development.

CodeSignal Pros

• Strong Coding Focus: Excellent for assessing coding skills.
• Industry-Recognized: CodeSignal is well-known among developers.
• Coding Playback: Feature to review how the candidate was coding, and the time they took to code.
• Automated Scoring: Saves time by scoring the code automatically
• ATS Integrations: Integrate with Applicant Tracking Systems for seamless workflow.

CodeSignal Cons

• Limited Scope: Lacks assessments for personality, aptitude, or business skills.
• No Custom Questions: You can't add your own custom questions.
• Shorter Assessment Lengths: Tests can be longer, impacting candidate experience.
• No Custom API: Lacks a Custom API to enable tighter integration into existing workflows.

CodeSignal Pricing

CodeSignal's pricing isn't publicly available. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly compare costs with other solutions. There's no free trial offered either which makes it hard to check out all the features.

3. Hackerrank

Best for: Technical skill screening at scale

HackerRank offers a platform primarily focused on assessing technical skills, particularly coding abilities. It provides a range of coding challenges and assessments designed to identify skilled developers and engineers. HackerRank is a popular choice for companies seeking to evaluate candidates' coding proficiency through practical exercises.

HackerRank shines when you need to assess coding skills. Unlike Glider AI, it lets you add your own questions, meaning you can tailor the assessment to your specific needs. Glider AI does not have this flexibility.

However, remember that HackerRank's expertise lies mainly in technical roles. If you're looking to assess a broader range of skills beyond coding, or need assessments for business roles, you might need to explore other options.

How Hackerrank compares to Glider AI?

Key Features

• Coding Challenges: Evaluate candidates with coding problems in various languages.
• Live Coding Interviews: Conduct real-time coding sessions with candidates.
• Skill Certifications: Offer certifications to candidates to validate their expertise.

Hackerrank Pros

• Large Developer Community: Widely used by developers, making it a familiar platform for candidates.
• Broad Language Support: Supports 40+ programming languages for diverse tech roles.
• Plagiarism Detection: Helps maintain the integrity of coding assessments.
• Real-World Coding Questions: Assesses candidates in sandboxed environments.
• ATS Integrations: Integrates with various Applicant Tracking Systems.

Hackerrank Cons

• Limited Skill Coverage: Primarily focused on coding and technical skills, lacking in areas like aptitude, personality, or business acumen. Unlike Adaface's skills assessment tools, HackerRank is not the ideal choice for these skills.
• No Situational Judgment Tests: Lacks support for situational judgment tests to evaluate soft skills.
• No Custom API: No open public API. This makes it harder to integrate with new ATS or HR systems easily.
• Longer Test Length: Candidates might spend more than 2 hours to complete the assessments.

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank offers different pricing tiers. They have a free trial, but their paid plans start at $100 per month. For enterprise plans, you'll need to contact HackerRank directly for a custom quote. This lack of transparent pricing makes it harder to know which plan fits your team's needs.

4. TestGrid

Best for: Aptitude testing and screening

TestGrid offers an aptitude assessment platform designed to evaluate candidates through various tests. While Glider AI has a broader range of testing capabilities, TestGrid focuses on aptitude skills, which might be useful for roles prioritizing analytical thinking.

TestGrid stands out with its qualifying questions feature, allowing recruiters to filter candidates based on basic criteria before they even begin the assessment. This saves time and resources for both the company and the candidate. Glider AI lacks this upfront filtering, potentially leading to wasted effort.

While Glider AI offers a wider array of test types, including coding and AI assessments, TestGrid hones in on aptitude. If your primary need is to gauge a candidate's aptitude, TestGrid offers a focused solution. For more comprehensive skill assessment, including coding, consider Adaface.

How TestGrid compares to Glider AI?

Key Features

• Aptitude Tests: Assesses logical, verbal, and numerical abilities.
• Qualifying Questions: Filters candidates based on predefined criteria.
• ATS Integration: Connects with various Applicant Tracking Systems.

TestGrid Pros

• PDF and Excel/CSV Reports: Easy to share candidate performance.
• GDPR Compliant: Adheres to data privacy regulations.
• Role-Based Access: Controls user permissions.
• Email Support: Readily available assistance.
• Training and Onboarding: Helps recruiters learn the platform.

TestGrid Cons

• No Coding or AI Tests: Lacks support for technical skill assessments.
• Limited Customization: Unable to create custom questions or tests.
• No Custom API: Difficult to deeply integrate with other HR systems.
• Small Question Bank: Higher chance of candidates encountering repeat questions.

TestGrid Pricing

TestGrid does not publicly display pricing details. You'll need to sign up to receive pricing information. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to compare costs without directly engaging with their sales team. Platforms like Adaface Assessments Pricing offer straightforward pricing, allowing you to quickly determine the best plan for your needs.

5. HireVue

Best for: Video Interviewing and assessments

HireVue offers a suite of tools focused on video interviewing and candidate assessment. Their platform aims to streamline the hiring process by leveraging video technology and AI-driven insights.

Unlike Glider AI, HireVue places significant emphasis on video interviews, allowing recruiters to assess candidates' soft skills and communication abilities through recorded or live interactions. This can be helpful for roles where interpersonal skills are key.

While Glider AI offers assessments with coding questions, HireVue provides a broader range of interview formats. However, it's worth noting that HireVue lacks certain assessment types like situational judgment, business, finance, and language tests. Consider Adaface's pre-employment assessment test library for a wider variety of assessment options.

How HireVue compares to Glider AI?

Key Features

• On-demand video interviews for asynchronous assessment.
• Live interview capabilities with collaborative coding tools.
• AI-driven analysis of video interviews for insights into candidate traits.

HireVue Pros

• Strong focus on video interviewing capabilities.
• AI-driven analytics to identify top talent.
• Mobile-friendly platform for candidate convenience.
• Integration with various ATS systems for seamless workflow.
• Automated scoring for coding questions.

HireVue Cons

• Limited scope of assessment types beyond technical skills.
• No support for custom questions, restricting test personalization.
• Lacks features like device fingerprint proctoring, copy-paste protection, and full-screen proctoring.
• Pricing is not readily available, requiring a sales call.

HireVue Pricing

HireVue does not publicly list its pricing. Interested users need to contact their sales team for a custom quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to compare costs upfront. There's also no mention of a free trial, so exploring the platform beforehand might not be an option.

6. TalView

Best for: AI-powered talent lifecycle management

TalView offers a unified platform leveraging AI to streamline the entire talent lifecycle, from recruitment to employee development. They aim to provide a data-driven approach to talent decisions, helping businesses identify, hire, and nurture top talent.

Where Glider AI focuses heavily on skills assessment, TalView extends into video interviewing and behavioral insights. Talview offers a holistic approach beyond just skills, but on complete talent lifecycle management.

Unlike Glider AI, TalView provides solutions for remote proctoring and interview management, catering to a broader spectrum of hiring needs. While Glider AI provides custom API, Talview lacks custom data location support.

How TalView compares to Glider AI?

Key Features

• Video Interviewing: Conduct asynchronous and live video interviews with AI-powered analytics.
• Talent Assessment: Evaluate candidates on skills, aptitude, and personality traits.
• Remote Proctoring: Secure online assessments with advanced proctoring features.

TalView Pros

• Talent lifecycle management on a single platform.
• Video interview capabilities.
• Behavioral insights.
• AI-powered analytics for data-driven decisions.
• Wide range of assessment types beyond just coding.

TalView Cons

• No typing tests are offered.
• No custom data location support.
• Limited support for coding questions related to Data Structures and Algorithms, SQL, and Excel workbooks. Consider Adaface's pre-employment assessments for a more comprehensive skill evaluation.
• User feedback is not used to improve tests.

TalView Pricing

TalView does not publicly list pricing details. You'll need to contact their sales team for a custom quote. They also do not offer a free trial for potential users to test the platform.

7. Qualified

Best for: Technical Hiring Made Easier

Qualified focuses on technical skill assessment, particularly for developers and IT roles. They offer a platform to evaluate coding skills and technical abilities, aiming to streamline the hiring process for tech companies.

Qualified lets you assess coding skills with a live coding environment, providing a space where candidates can demonstrate practical abilities. Unlike Glider AI, which casts a wider net across various roles, Qualified zeros in on tech-specific skills, which can be useful if you are laser-focused on technical hiring.

However, if you're seeking a solution that extends beyond the tech domain, covering aptitude, personality, or even business-related skills, Qualified's narrower focus might not fulfill all your assessment needs. For a broader approach to skills assessment, consider platforms like Adaface.

How Qualified compares to Glider AI?

Key Features

• Live coding interviews with a functional IDE.
• Skill-based assessments for developers and IT roles.
• Automated scoring to save time on code reviews.

Qualified Pros

• Strong focus on technical skills assessment.
• Real-time coding environment for practical evaluation.
• Automated scoring of coding tests.
• Integrates with existing ATS systems.
• Public reports for easy sharing.

Qualified Cons

• Limited assessment types beyond technical skills.
• Lacks webcam proctoring for enhanced test security.
• No custom API for deeper integrations.
• No test customization.

Qualified Pricing

Qualified does not offer transparent pricing on their website. To get a quote, you'll need to contact their sales team. They also do not offer a free trial. This lack of pricing visibility can make it difficult to quickly evaluate whether Qualified fits within your budget.

8. Harver

Best for: Volume Hiring Process Automation

Harver offers a range of pre-employment assessments designed to streamline high-volume recruitment. Think of it as a digital assistant that helps you quickly sift through lots of candidates to find the best fits.

While Glider AI offers a broad suite of assessments, Harver specializes in automating the initial stages of high-volume hiring. This means it's particularly useful when you need to quickly filter a large pool of applicants for roles where speed and scale are priorities.

Harver's focus on automation allows for a more streamlined candidate experience in these scenarios. However, if you need in-depth assessments for specialized roles, a platform like Adaface might be a better fit.

How Harver compares to Glider AI?

Key Features

• Digital Interviewing: Conduct structured interviews with automated scoring.
• Culture Fit Assessments: Determine if candidates align with your company values.
• Cognitive Ability Tests: Evaluate problem-solving skills and learning potential.

Harver Pros

• Streamlined High-Volume Hiring: Designed to manage large applicant pools efficiently.
• Data-Driven Insights: Offers analytics to improve your hiring process.
• Candidate Experience: Focuses on providing a positive and engaging experience for applicants.
• Customizable Workflows: Tailor the assessment process to match your specific needs.
• Strong focus on automation: Reduces manual effort in initial screening stages.

Harver Cons

• Limited Coding Assessments: Lacks extensive coding skill evaluations.
• No Custom API: Does not provide custom API.
• Limited Proctoring Features: Lacks advanced proctoring capabilities like device fingerprinting or chat GPT detection.
• Less Suitable for Technical Roles: Better suited for roles that don't require extensive technical skills testing.

Harver Pricing

Harver does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote tailored to your specific requirements. Keep in mind that this might require a sales call to get the full picture. There is no free trial.

9. Paradox | Traitify

Best for: Personality-focused candidate screening

Paradox, through its Traitify assessment, emphasizes personality and cultural fit. It uses visually appealing, card-based assessments to gauge candidate traits. Unlike Glider AI, which has a broader focus, Paradox zeroes in on soft skills and behavioral patterns to predict job performance and team compatibility.

While Glider AI offers assessments across various domains, including coding and aptitude, Paradox focuses primarily on personality assessments. This makes Paradox a strong choice when evaluating culture fit is paramount. If you're seeking to understand a candidate's work style, values, and how they align with your company culture, Paradox offers a quick way to gain insights.

However, if your primary need is to assess technical skills, aptitude, or job-specific knowledge, Adaface's assessment test library provides a wider range of options. We dive deeper into skill validation through scenario-based questions and coding challenges, ensuring a more accurate evaluation of a candidate's capabilities.

How Paradox | Traitify compares to Glider AI?

Key Features

• Visual, card-based assessments for personality traits.
• Focus on cultural fit and team compatibility.
• Mobile-friendly assessments.

Paradox | Traitify Pros

• Engaging candidate experience with visual assessments.
• Quick assessment completion times (around 2 minutes).
• Focus on personality and soft skills.
• Integrates with applicant tracking systems (ATS) for streamlined workflow.
• GDPR Compliant

Paradox | Traitify Cons

• Limited scope, primarily focuses on personality; lacks technical skill assessments.
• No coding assessments or job-specific skill tests.
• Doesn't offer detailed reporting or benchmarking features.
• No custom question creation. You can't create your own questions to test for specific situations.

Paradox | Traitify Pricing

Paradox | Traitify does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact them directly for a custom quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly evaluate whether it fits within your budget.

10. Mercer | Mettl

Best for: Skills for Broad Assessments

Mercer | Mettl offers a wide array of assessments, covering aptitude, technical, and personality traits. It's designed to help businesses evaluate candidates across various roles and skill sets.

While Glider AI focuses heavily on technical skills, Mercer | Mettl extends its reach to business skills, typing tests, and even finance-related assessments. This makes it a fit for organizations seeking to assess candidates for roles beyond just tech.

However, Mercer | Mettl doesn't offer custom questions, which Glider AI also lacks. For those requiring tailored assessments to mirror specific company challenges, a more adaptable solution might be needed. For custom assessments, check out how Adaface can help.

How Mercer | Mettl compares to Glider AI?

Key Features

• Large test library covering diverse skills.
• AI-powered remote proctoring.
• Reporting and analytics dashboards.

Mercer | Mettl Pros

• Wide range of assessment types.
• Supports coding and video interviews.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.
• Strong focus on data security and compliance.
• Offers psychometric assessments.

Mercer | Mettl Cons

• No custom coding questions.
• Lacks conversational assessments.
• No custom data location support.
• No social listening for task leaks.

Mercer | Mettl Pricing

Mercer | Mettl does not offer transparent pricing on their website. You'll need to contact them directly for a custom quote, which can add extra time to your decision-making process. They also don't offer a free trial.

Found Your Perfect Glider AI Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface stands out with its extensive test library of 500+ tests covering diverse skills like aptitude, finance, personality, and technical roles, plus robust proctoring features and transparent, credit-based pricing.
• CodeSignal is laser-focused on technical assessments, offering coding challenges and skill-based frameworks for tech roles, but lacks support for aptitude or personality assessments.
• HackerRank provides coding tests and challenges, making it suitable for evaluating developers, but its default questions are easily searchable, potentially impacting test integrity.
• TestGrid offers aptitude and personality tests with qualifying questions, but lacks coding assessments and transparency in pricing.
• HireVue leverages video interviews and assessments, including coding challenges, but doesn't offer custom questions or comprehensive support documentation for candidates.
• Talview covers a broad spectrum of skills, including programming, aptitude, and business, but its secure browser requires a desktop environment, limiting mobile accessibility.
• Qualified-io specializes in technical skill assessments, offering coding challenges and cloud-based evaluations, but lacks company branding options and detailed reporting features.
• Harver focuses on situational judgment and personality assessments, incorporating typing tests and language proficiency evaluations, but lacks coding assessments.
• Paradox | Traitify utilizes visual assessments to evaluate personality traits, offering a mobile-friendly experience, but it's primarily limited to personality insights.
• Mercer | Mettl provides a wide array of assessments, including programming, aptitude, and business skills, but lacks custom question options and detailed proctoring logs.

So, we have journeyed through a landscape of Glider AI alternatives, each with its own unique strengths and focus. Glider AI shines with its conversational interface and coding assessments, but it might not be the perfect fit for everyone. The absence of business skill tests and limited mobile support can be a deal-breaker for some.

Fortunately, the market offers a variety of robust solutions tailored to different needs. Whether you're seeking a wider range of assessment types, stronger proctoring features, or simply a more budget-friendly option, you're sure to find a suitable alternative.

Among these alternatives, Adaface emerges as a strong contender. With its extensive test library covering aptitude, finance, personality, and technical skills, coupled with strong proctoring, it's a well-rounded platform used by clients across 70+ countries. Plus, its transparent pricing model makes budgeting a breeze.

Ultimately, the best Glider AI alternative depends on your specific needs and priorities. No matter your use case, there are alternatives available to help you make smarter hiring decisions.

Ready to elevate your hiring process? Explore Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests today!