Top 10 Evalart Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why are talent teams exploring options beyond Evalart?

Good question! I did some digging to understand why recruiters and hiring managers are searching for Evalart alternatives. Here's what I discovered:

Limited Test Variety. Evalart's test library might not cover all the skills and roles you need to assess. While they offer programming and aptitude tests, they lack business, finance, and job-specific assessments. This can be a problem when you need to assess a wide range of skills for varied positions.

Lacking Customization. While Evalart allows you to add your own questions, it falls short on creating custom tests tailored to specific job descriptions. If you require assessments designed to evaluate particular skills relevant to the role, Evalart may not be the ideal option. Creating a pre-employment assessment test that truly reflects the job requirements is key to finding the right fit.

Limited Proctoring Features. While Evalart offers webcam proctoring, it lacks features like location logging, IP proctoring, device fingerprint proctoring, Chat GPT protection, and full-screen proctoring. A strong proctoring suite helps maintain test integrity and minimize cheating, which is critical for fair and accurate results.

1. Adaface

Best for: Skills tests for 500+ roles - from entry-level to experienced candidates

Looking for a strong Evalart alternative? Adaface offers a wide array of features and a test library designed to help you make data-driven hiring decisions.

One common concern with Evalart is its limited ability to customize assessments to match specific job descriptions. Adaface solves this by allowing you to create tailored assessments that accurately reflect the skills and knowledge required for each role. This ensures that you're evaluating candidates on the criteria that matter most to your organization.

Adaface offers a suite of features designed for seamless and reliable candidate screening:

• A test library with 500+ skills tests on technical, aptitude, and personality traits
• Focus on Aptitude, Finance, Personality, Business skills, Typing, AI, Tech and Coding Roles
• Robust proctoring suite to ensure test integrity
• Reporting and Analytics
• Candidate experience and Company Branding

Enterprise-grade Anti-Cheating Measures

Adaface incorporates a suite of proctoring features to safeguard the integrity of your assessments. We understand that accurate results rely on a secure testing environment.

Our platform employs webcam proctoring, tracks candidate IP addresses, detects when candidates exit full-screen mode, and implements copy-paste protection. These measures provide a reliable and cheat-proof evaluation process, giving you confidence in your hiring decisions. This ensures accurate and reliable results for better hiring outcomes.

Extensive and Diverse Test Library

Adaface boasts a rich test library covering over 500 skills and roles. Unlike solutions with limited coverage, we provide tests for a wide spectrum of domains, ranging from technical skills like coding and AI to business skills such as finance, accounting, and marketing.

Whether you're hiring developers, business analysts, or customer service representatives, Adaface has you covered. Our tests are designed to be relevant, engaging, and reflective of real-world job scenarios. Explore our Pre-Employment Assessment Test Library for more details. We also offer the option to create customized assessment to assess the right set of skills.

Adaface vs Evalart Attributes

Adaface Pros

• Wide range of skills tests (500+ tests) covering technical, aptitude, and personality skills
• Strong support for non-technical roles, including aptitude, finance, and business skills
• Customizable assessments to match specific job requirements
• Robust anti-cheating measures, including webcam proctoring and IP tracking
• Enterprise-ready with ATS integrations
• Transparent and flexible pricing plans
• Scorecards reporting and analytics

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit different hiring needs. You can start with a free trial that includes 2 sample tests and 5 credits to explore the platform. No credit card is required to start. We have a variety of plans, including Individual ($180/year), Starter ($500/year), Pro ($900/year), Scale ($3000/year), Growth ($5500/year), Enterprise ($20,000/year), and Unlimited ($50,000/year). All plans include all proctoring features and access to our test library with 500+ tests.

2. TalView

Best for: Enterprise talent assessment platform

TalView offers a suite of solutions aimed at streamlining the hiring process, from sourcing to onboarding. It focuses on providing tools for assessments, interviews, and workforce management, creating an end-to-end hiring solution.

TalView's strength lies in its broad feature set, attempting to be a one-stop shop for talent acquisition. Evalart, while offering some similar features, lacks the depth in areas like interview management and workforce analytics. For companies seeking a more integrated platform that extends beyond just assessments, TalView presents a compelling alternative.

However, this breadth sometimes comes at the cost of specialization. Unlike Adaface's focus on quick, accurate skill assessments, TalView tries to do a little bit of everything, which can be overwhelming for smaller teams or those with specific assessment needs.

How TalView compares to Evalart?

Key Features

• AI-powered Talent Assessments: Evaluates candidates across various skills and competencies.
• Video Interviewing: Conduct asynchronous and live video interviews.
• Workforce Management: Tools for scheduling, attendance, and performance tracking.

TalView Pros

• Strong ATS Integrations: Integrates with popular Applicant Tracking Systems for seamless workflow.
• Video Interviewing Capabilities: Asynchronous and live options enhance the interview process.
• Customizable Branding: Allows companies to add their logo and brand colors.
• Wide Range of Tests: Covers aptitude, behavioral, and technical skills.
• API access: Public API is available.

TalView Cons

• No Free Trial: Does not offer a free trial to test the platform.
• Limited Language Support: Primarily focuses on English language assessments.
• No Typing Tests: Lacks dedicated typing tests, which might be important for certain roles.
• Pricing Transparency: Pricing details require contacting sales, making it difficult to compare costs quickly.

TalView Pricing

TalView does not publicly display its pricing. Interested users need to fill out a form on their website to request a quote. This lack of transparency can make it challenging for businesses to quickly evaluate whether TalView fits their budget. Without a free trial, it's hard to test the waters before committing to a sales call.

3. Maki People

Best for: Skills-based assessment platform

Maki People offers a platform for skills assessment, covering areas like programming, aptitude, business skills, personality, and language proficiency. They aim to provide tools for evaluating candidate capabilities, with a focus on customizing the assessment experience.

Unlike Evalart, Maki People offers a broader range of assessment types beyond coding questions. While Evalart is limited to only coding questions, Maki People includes assessments for business skills and cloud technologies, offering recruiters a more rounded view of candidate abilities.

However, Maki People falls short in AI and cloud (only AWS) tests compared to other alternatives. While offering custom questions, Maki People doesn't offer tailor-made tests based on job descriptions, potentially missing out on assessing role-specific scenarios. In this aspect, Adaface's ability to create custom tests based on job descriptions gives a more accurate and relevant assessment experience.

How Maki People compares to Evalart?

Key Features

• Skills Assessment: Evaluate candidates across various domains, including programming, aptitude, and business acumen.
• Custom Questions: Add your own questions to tailor assessments to specific needs.
• Integrations: Connect Maki People with existing ATS systems for smoother workflows.

Maki People Pros

• Wide Range of Tests: Supports various assessment types, including programming and aptitude.
• ATS Integrations: Integrates with popular ATS platforms.
• Customization: Allows you to add your own questions.
• Proctoring: Offers webcam, window, location and device proctoring
• Comprehensive Overview: Candidate reports are comprehensive

Maki People Cons

• Limited AI and Cloud tests: Lacks depth in AI and only has AWS Cloud assessments.
• No tailor-made tests: Doesn't offer customized tests based on specific job descriptions.
• No Free Trial or Public Pricing: Requires contacting sales for pricing, and lacks a free trial.
• No brand customisations: Doesn't offer company logo, brand colors and invitation templates to customize test branding

Maki People Pricing

Maki People does not offer public pricing, which means you'll have to contact their team to get pricing information. They also don't offer a free trial. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to compare their pricing to other assessment platforms. For clear and accessible pricing, consider exploring Adaface Assessments Pricing.

4. TestGrid

Best for: Aptitude and personality assessments

TestGrid offers a platform for aptitude and personality assessments, aiming to streamline the hiring process. It focuses on evaluating candidates through pre-designed tests, providing insights into their cognitive abilities and behavioral traits.

TestGrid, like Evalart, lacks coding assessments and scenario-based questions. This makes it difficult to assess technical skills and real-world problem-solving abilities effectively. If you're seeking a solution that goes beyond aptitude and personality to include in-depth skill assessment, especially for technical roles, TestGrid may fall short.

While TestGrid provides ready-to-use tests, it does not offer options for custom questions or tailored tests per job description. This rigid approach could limit the accuracy of your assessments compared to platforms like Adaface that let you adapt tests to specific role requirements.

How TestGrid compares to Evalart?

Key Features

• Aptitude Tests: Measures cognitive abilities with a range of aptitude tests.
• Personality Assessments: Evaluates candidates' personality traits.
• Reporting: Provides reports on candidate performance.

TestGrid Pros

• Integrates with some Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS).
• Offers role-based access to manage user permissions.
• Provides email support and help center access.
• Compliant with GDPR standards.
• Offers PDF and Excel/CSV reports.

TestGrid Cons

• Lacks coding assessments for technical roles.
• Does not offer custom questions or tailored tests.
• No coding questions or Excel simulation questions.
• Limited insights into candidates' real-world problem-solving capabilities.

TestGrid Pricing

TestGrid's pricing details aren't readily available on their website. You'll need to sign up to receive pricing information, meaning a direct comparison without contacting their sales team is not possible. This lack of transparency can make budgeting and platform selection more challenging.

5. Hackerrank

Best for: Technical Hiring, Coding Assessments

HackerRank provides a platform primarily focused on assessing technical skills. It's a popular choice for companies looking to evaluate developers and other IT professionals, especially those needing to gauge coding abilities.

Unlike Evalart, HackerRank shines when you need to dig deep into a candidate's coding prowess. While Evalart offers a broader range of assessments, HackerRank specializes in coding challenges and technical skill evaluation.

HackerRank lets you assess practical coding skills with a real IDE. While Evalart might offer some coding questions, HackerRank's core strength lies in providing a robust environment for candidates to write and execute code, making it easier to identify top tech talent.

How Hackerrank compares to Evalart?

Key Features

• Candidate Screening: Structured assessments for tech roles.
• Live Coding Interviews: Functional IDE for real-time evaluations.
• Plagiarism Detection: Systems to ensure assessment integrity.

Hackerrank Pros

• Developer Community: Widely recognized platform among developers.
• Certified Assessments: Supports many programming languages and tech skills.
• Real-World Coding: Candidates use a sandboxed environment mirroring job conditions.
• Coding Playback: Review the candidate's coding process.
• ATS Integration: Streamlined workflow with integration into applicant tracking systems

Hackerrank Cons

• Lacks Business Skill Tests: Focuses almost entirely on tech skills.
• No Emotional Intelligence Screening: Misses out on soft skill assessments.
• No Custom API: Limited integration capabilities for custom workflows.
• Questions Are Googleable: Default questions are easily found online.

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank's pricing includes a Starter plan at $100 per month (billed annually) and a Pro plan at $250 per month (billed annually). For enterprise-level features, you'll need to contact them for a custom quote. They do offer a free trial, but it's best to inquire directly to understand the full scope of what's included. If you're seeking transparent, upfront pricing, consider exploring Adaface Assessments Pricing.

6. HireVue

Best for: Video interview-focused talent screening

HireVue primarily offers video interviewing solutions, but it also has an assessment component. It aims to help companies streamline the hiring process using on-demand and live video interviews, along with some skills assessments.

Evalart offers a broader range of assessment types, including aptitude, language, and personality tests. HireVue's strength lies in its video interviewing capabilities, which it integrates with its assessment platform.

If your main focus is on conducting and analyzing video interviews and you need some supplementary assessment features, HireVue might be a fit. But, if you need tests across a wider range of skills, you might want to explore other options.

How HireVue compares to Evalart?

Key Features

• On-demand video interviews
• Live video interviews
• AI-driven insights for interviews

HireVue Pros

• Strong video interviewing platform.
• AI analysis of video interviews can provide deeper insights.
• Good for remote hiring scenarios.
• Integrates with several ATS systems.
• Automated interview scheduling.

HireVue Cons

• Limited assessment types compared to other platforms.
• Lacks custom coding questions and excel workbook questions.
• No custom API for integrations.
• Does not offer multiple test sets to prevent cheating.

HireVue Pricing

HireVue doesn't publicly display pricing information. You'll need to contact their sales team for a custom quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to compare costs upfront. Companies looking for straightforward, readily available assessment pricing may find this frustrating.

7. Willo

Best for: Video screening and interviews

Willo is a video-first platform designed for asynchronous video interviews and candidate screening. It allows recruiters to create and send video interview questions to candidates, who can then record and submit their responses at their convenience.

Unlike Evalart, Willo specializes in video assessments, offering a different approach to candidate evaluation. Evalart focuses on a broader range of skills assessments, but lacks the depth in video interviewing that Willo provides. If your hiring process hinges on seeing and hearing candidates articulate their thoughts, Willo may be a better fit.

However, it's worth noting that Willo's assessment capabilities are more limited. While it allows you to add custom questions, it doesn't offer a ready-to-use test library for skills like programming, finance, or role-specific competencies. For a wider range of assessments, including aptitude tests and personality tests, a platform like Adaface might be more suitable.

How Willo compares to Evalart?

Key Features

• Asynchronous video interviews
• Candidate screening
• Custom question creation

Willo Pros

• Streamlines initial screening with video responses.
• Improves candidate engagement through video format.
• Facilitates remote hiring and collaboration.
• Offers a structured approach to video interviews.
• Integrates with applicant tracking systems (ATS).

Willo Cons

• Lacks ready-made skill assessments for technical roles.
• No support for coding questions or excel tests.
• Limited reporting and analytics compared to more mature platforms.
• Relies heavily on manual question creation, increasing workload.

Willo Pricing

Willo doesn't publicly display its pricing. You'll need to book a demo to discuss your specific needs and receive a custom quote. They offer a tiered pricing approach and their plans starts from $310/month. This lack of transparency can be a barrier for smaller businesses who prefer to evaluate pricing options upfront.

8. TestDome

Best for: Skills assessments and coding tests

TestDome offers a platform for assessing candidates' skills across various domains, including programming, aptitude, and personality. It provides a range of pre-built tests and allows for some customization, making it a contender in the skills assessment market.

TestDome helps evaluate a wide array of skills, from coding and data analysis to general aptitude and even personality traits. Unlike Evalart, TestDome provides more options when it comes to business skills and cloud related skills.

However, TestDome doesn't allow you to create custom questions for your specific needs. While you can add your own questions, the platform is more focused on using its existing library. If you need fully customized tests designed around your unique job descriptions, a platform like Adaface might be a better fit.

How TestDome compares to Evalart?

Key Features

• Wide range of tests: Covers programming, aptitude, and personality.
• Coding questions: Supports evaluating coding skills.
• Webcam proctoring: Includes webcam proctoring for enhanced security.

TestDome Pros

• Large library of pre-built tests.
• Supports coding skill assessment.
• Offers webcam proctoring.
• Covers a range of skills beyond just technical ones.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.

TestDome Cons

• Lacks custom questions creation.
• No support for multiple question sets. This can lead to questions getting leaked, especially for companies hiring at scale.
• Doesn't offer role-based access control.
• Limited customer support options.

TestDome Pricing

TestDome's pricing varies based on the number of candidates assessed. They offer a free trial. The starting plan begins at $100, which gives you 5 candidates at $20/candidate. For more detailed pricing, it's best to visit their website.

9. Paradox | Traitify

Best for: Personality-based hiring assessments

Paradox (Traitify) leans into personality assessments, offering a visually engaging way to evaluate candidates. Instead of diving deep into specific skills like coding or finance, Paradox aims to give you a glimpse into a candidate's character, motivations, and how they might fit within your company culture.

Evalart offers a broader range of skills assessments, including programming and AI, but it lacks focus on personality insights. Paradox, on the other hand, emphasizes personality traits, making it useful for roles where fit and soft skills are important.

However, keep in mind that personality tests should complement skills assessments, not replace them. Use Paradox if you want to add a personality layer to your hiring process, particularly since Evalart doesn't delve into this area.

How Paradox | Traitify compares to Evalart?

Key Features

• Visual, card-based assessments for candidates.
• Personality insights and team compatibility reports.
• API available for personality data integration.

Paradox | Traitify Pros

• Candidate-friendly, quick assessments.
• Strong focus on company culture fit.
• Decent ATS integrations.
• Mobile-friendly interface for on-the-go assessments.
• GDPR compliant, ensuring data privacy.

Paradox | Traitify Cons

• Limited scope beyond personality assessments.
• No coding, finance, or business skills tests offered, unlike Adaface's pre-employment assessment test library.
• Lacks anti-cheating/proctoring features.
• No free trial and pricing requires a sales call.

Paradox | Traitify Pricing

Paradox (Traitify) doesn't publicly list pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a custom quote. The absence of transparent pricing and a free trial might make it difficult to evaluate its fit before committing.

10. XBInsight Talent Assessments

Best for: Predictive analytics for team success

XBInsight Talent Assessments offers a suite of tools designed to help organizations understand team dynamics and predict performance. They focus on assessing individual and team behaviors to optimize team composition and leadership effectiveness.

Unlike Evalart, which emphasizes skills-based assessments, XBInsight dives into behavioral insights. Evalart has some aptitude tests, but XBInsight hones in on predicting team success through understanding behavioral patterns and team roles.

If you're aiming to build teams that not only have the right skills but also work together like a charm, XBInsight might seem compelling for its focus on team synergy. However, remember that a complete hiring strategy might also need robust skills evaluations, which is where a platform like Adaface shines.

How XBInsight Talent Assessments compares to Evalart?

Key Features

• Team Role Assessments: Identifies individual roles within a team.
• Leadership Assessments: Evaluates leadership styles and effectiveness.
• Predictive Analytics: Forecasts team performance based on assessment data.

XBInsight Talent Assessments Pros

• Provides insights into team behavioral dynamics.
• Offers leadership assessment tools.
• Integrates with existing ATS systems.
• Helps in making data-driven decisions about team composition.
• Supports GDPR compliance.

XBInsight Talent Assessments Cons

• Lacks coding and technical skills assessments.
• No custom question creation available.
• No support for language or finance tests.
• Limited information on anti-cheating features and test integrity.

XBInsight Talent Assessments Pricing

XBInsight does not openly display pricing on their website. Interested users must contact XBInsight directly to receive a customized quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to compare costs without engaging in a sales call.

Found Your Perfect Evalart Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface offers a wide range of tests including aptitude, finance, personality, and coding, coupled with strong proctoring and serving clients in 70+ countries with credit-based pricing. Unlike Evalart, it provides tests for business roles and typing skills, along with customized test creation based on job descriptions, ensuring a tailored assessment experience.
• Talview provides AI-powered talent screening and assessments but lacks typing tests and doesn't allow customized tests per job description like Adaface does.
• Maki People offers a range of assessments including programming and aptitude but falls short on situational judgment tests and mobile-friendliness, unlike Adaface.
• TestGrid offers aptitude and personality tests with ATS integration, but lacks programming tests and custom questions, setting it apart from more versatile platforms like Adaface.
• HackerRank specializes in technical assessments and coding challenges, providing a platform for evaluating developers, but unlike Adaface, it does not provide aptitude, personality, language, finance, AI, or cloud tests.
• HireVue leverages video interviewing and assessments to evaluate candidates, but lacks custom questions, custom coding questions, and multiple invite options, distinguishing it from platforms with more comprehensive feature sets like Adaface.
• Willo focuses on asynchronous video interviews, allowing for flexible and cost-effective candidate screening, but falls short of providing a ready-to-use test library, setting it apart from platforms like Adaface.
• TestDome provides skill testing with a focus on minimizing cheating through work sample simulations but lacks custom questions and doesn't offer company branding options.
• Paradox | Traitify delivers personality assessments through a visually engaging format, but lacks programming tests and several proctoring features, offering a different approach than Adaface.
• XBInsight Talent Assessments offers assessments for evaluating talent, including aptitude and situational judgment tests but lacks programming and business tests, focusing on a specific niche compared to broader platforms.

We've explored a range of alternatives to Evalart, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Evalart does offer a platform with personality, aptitude and programming tests and webcam proctoring, but its lack of business, finance, and typing tests and custom branding options may leave some users wanting more.

Fortunately, the assessment landscape is rich with options that cater to diverse needs. Many platforms offer specialized features and broader test libraries to help you make informed hiring decisions.

For instance, Adaface stands out with its vast test library covering aptitude, finance, personality, business roles, and coding skills. Plus, it boasts a robust proctoring suite and serves clients in over 70 countries, all without seat-based pricing.

No matter your specific requirements, there's an Evalart alternative ready to help you streamline your hiring process and identify top talent.

Ready to elevate your hiring process? Check out Adaface for a free trial and discover how skills-based assessments can transform your talent acquisition.