Top 10 Eva AI Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why are companies scouting for alternatives to Eva AI, you ask? Well, let's just say that in the world of talent assessment, one size doesn't always fit all. Different strokes for different folks, or in this case, different tools for different roles.

Having done my homework, I've taken a deep dive into the reasons HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers are looking beyond Eva AI. It's not about bashing one platform, but more about understanding specific needs and whether a tool aligns with them.

Limited test types. While Eva AI offers personality and language assessments, it lacks tests for critical areas like programming, aptitude, finance, and AI. This can be a deal-breaker for companies hiring for roles that require these skills, forcing them to seek other solutions to build a complete candidate profile.

Lack of Customization. Eva AI does not allow for custom questions or tailored tests per job description. This can be restrictive for companies needing to assess candidates on specific skills or scenarios unique to their organization. For businesses that value a personalized approach to candidate screening, this lack of flexibility can be a significant drawback. Some platforms like Adaface let you design custom assessments, ensuring you're evaluating candidates on the precise skills needed for success in the role.

Limited Proctoring Features. A robust proctoring suite is more important than ever. Without features like webcam proctoring, IP tracking, and copy-paste protection, maintaining test integrity becomes a challenge. Companies need to be confident that the assessment results accurately reflect a candidate's abilities, and a lack of proctoring features can undermine that confidence.

1. Adaface

Best for: Assess candidates across business, aptitude, AI, and coding skills in one platform.

Looking for a strong alternative to Eva AI? Adaface offers a wide range of assessment capabilities to help you screen candidates effectively. With a focus on skills-based hiring, Adaface provides a robust platform for evaluating talent across various roles and industries.

One challenge with Eva AI is the lack of transparent pricing. Getting a quote requires contacting them directly, which can be time-consuming. Adaface addresses this by providing clear and upfront pricing on its website. You can easily explore different plans and features to find the best fit for your hiring needs without the need for a sales call.

Adaface addresses another limitation of Eva AI: the breadth of skills assessed. Adaface provides:

• A test library with 500+ tests
• Assessments for business, aptitude, personality, and technical roles
• Coding questions and scenario-based MCQs
• Stringent proctoring features to ensure test integrity
• Reporting and analytics to help you make data-driven hiring decisions
• Customizable company branding to deliver a great candidate experience

Extensive Test Library for Diverse Roles

Adaface's standout feature is its test library with 500+ skills tests. This library covers a wide array of domains, including programming, IT, aptitude, business, and language skills. You can assess candidates for various roles from developers to business analysts, all within a single platform.

Unlike platforms with limited test options, Adaface offers tests tailored to specific job functions. This helps you assess job-readiness and reduces the risk of mis-hires. With Adaface, you can create skill-based assessments for every role, ensuring you get the best talent.

Robust Proctoring Suite

Maintaining test integrity is a top priority in talent assessment. Adaface offers a suite of proctoring features, including webcam, window, and tab proctoring, to prevent cheating during assessments. The platform also logs IP addresses and device fingerprints to identify suspicious activity.

By combining multiple anti-cheating measures, Adaface ensures accurate and reliable results. Recruiters can have peace of mind knowing that candidates are evaluated fairly and without outside assistance. This helps in making confident hiring decisions based on candidate skills.

Adaface vs Eva AI Attributes

Adaface Pros

• Wide range of skills tests (500+)
• Strong support for business roles
• Aptitude, personality, AI, and coding tests available
• Robust proctoring suite
• Used by clients from 70+ countries
• No seat-based pricing, only credit-based
• Customizable company branding

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit different hiring needs. All plans include all proctoring features and access to all 500+ tests. You can choose from Individual ($180/yr), Starter ($500/yr), Pro ($900/yr), Scale ($3000/yr), Growth ($5500/yr), Enterprise ($20,000/yr), and Unlimited ($50,000/yr) plans.

You can start with a free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits to explore the platform. No credit card is required to sign up and get started. Check out the Adaface Assessments Pricing page for details.

2. Hackerrank

Best for: Coding skill screening for developers

HackerRank is a platform primarily used for assessing technical skills, particularly in coding. It provides a range of coding challenges and assessments to evaluate a candidate's programming abilities. It is widely adopted in the tech industry for screening and ranking developers.

Unlike Eva AI, HackerRank specializes in evaluating coding skills with a strong emphasis on practical coding challenges. It offers a coding environment where candidates can write and execute code, which is then automatically scored. This hands-on approach provides a more accurate assessment of a candidate's coding proficiency.

HackerRank's main focus is on technical roles. It has limited coverage of non-technical roles. If your primary need is to evaluate coding skills and you want a platform that can test candidate with coding assessments, HackerRank is a solid choice. For a broader skills assessment including aptitude, personality, and job-specific skills, you might want to look at other options or customize assessments.

How Hackerrank compares to Eva AI?

Key Features

• Coding Challenges: Evaluate candidates with coding problems in various programming languages.
• Live Coding Interviews: Conduct real-time coding interviews with a collaborative coding environment.
• Plagiarism Detection: Ensure the integrity of assessments with plagiarism detection tools.

Hackerrank Pros

• Large Developer Community: Widely used by developers, making it a familiar platform for candidates.
• Wide Range of Coding Languages: Supports a wide array of programming languages and frameworks.
• Real-World Coding Questions: Assesses candidates with challenges that mirror real job scenarios.
• Automated Scoring: Provides automated scoring for coding assessments, saving time for recruiters.
• Web and webcam proctoring.

Hackerrank Cons

• Limited Scope Beyond Tech: Primarily focused on technical skills, lacking support for other types of assessments.
• No support for excel questions
• Test questions are easily googleable.
• Lacks Emotional Intelligence Screening: Does not offer assessments for soft skills or emotional intelligence.

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank offers different pricing tiers. The starter plan is $100 per month (1200$ per annum). For enterprise plans, you'll need to contact HackerRank directly for a custom quote. They provide a free trial.

3. TalView

Best for: Enterprise talent assessment platform

TalView offers a suite of solutions focused on talent acquisition and management. It aims to streamline the hiring process, from initial screening to interviews and onboarding.

TalView stands out by offering a wider breadth of assessment types compared to Eva AI. While Eva AI focuses on personality and language skills, TalView includes aptitude, business, finance, IT and cloud skills. This allows for a more thorough evaluation of candidates across various roles.

Also, TalView provides coding questions and web/mobile framework questions, which are completely absent in Eva AI. This makes TalView a more suitable choice for tech-focused roles requiring practical skill validation. Consider pairing TalView with a tool like Adaface for a well rounded assessment.

How TalView compares to Eva AI?

Key Features

• Video Interviewing: Conduct remote interviews with features like automated scheduling and recording.
• Assessment Platform: Evaluate candidates using a variety of tests, including coding, cognitive ability, and personality.
• Remote Proctoring: Monitor assessments remotely to prevent cheating.

TalView Pros

• Wide range of assessment types are supported.
• Strong focus on video interviewing capabilities.
• ATS integrations are available.
• Offers a custom API for integrations.
• Has coding questions.

TalView Cons

• Lacks typing tests.
• No mobile-friendly assessments (desktop only).
• No customisable invitation templates.
• The absence of device fingerprint proctoring raises concerns about security.

TalView Pricing

TalView's pricing isn't publicly available. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. There is no mention of a free trial, so exploring the platform before committing might be difficult.

4. TestGrid

Best for: Aptitude and Personality assessments

TestGrid offers a platform focused on aptitude and personality assessments. It aims to provide tools for evaluating cognitive abilities and behavioral traits of candidates during the hiring process.

Unlike Eva AI, which lacks aptitude tests, TestGrid covers aptitude tests. This enables recruiters to assess logical, numerical, verbal, data interpretation and abstract reasoning skills.

However, TestGrid doesn't offer coding assessments, situational judgment tests, or custom questions. If you need to assess technical skills or create custom evaluations, you might need to look elsewhere.

How TestGrid compares to Eva AI?

Key Features

• Aptitude Testing: Evaluate candidates on various aptitude skills.
• Personality Assessments: Determine behavioral traits and cultural fit.
• ATS Integration: Integrates with applicant tracking systems.

TestGrid Pros

• Wide range of aptitude tests.
• Assesses personality traits.
• Integrates with existing ATS.
• Provides PDF and Excel reports.
• Offers customer support.

TestGrid Cons

• Lacks coding assessments.
• No custom question creation.
• Limited test types compared to Adaface.
• No support for mobile-friendly assessments for all test types.

TestGrid Pricing

TestGrid doesn't publicly list its pricing. You'll need to sign up to receive pricing details. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly compare costs with other assessment platforms. No free trial is available either.

5. Alva Labs

Best for: Data-driven talent acquisition

Alva Labs offers a platform that combines behavioral science and data to help companies make better hiring decisions. They provide assessments that measure personality and cognitive abilities, aiming to predict job performance and cultural fit. It's like using science to find the right puzzle piece for your team.

Unlike Eva AI, Alva Labs uses coding tests to help tech companies assess developers’ hard skills, and also personality tests for soft skills. This makes Alva Labs a strong choice for evaluating technical roles, a gap where Eva AI falls short.

However, Alva Labs doesn't offer the breadth of tests that some companies need. For instance, if you're looking for aptitude, business, or language assessments, you might need to look elsewhere. This is where companies like Adaface, which offer a wider range of pre-employment assessment tests, come into play.

How Alva Labs compares to Eva AI?

Key Features

• Cognitive and personality assessments
• Automated scoring and reports
• Candidate ranking and comparison

Alva Labs Pros

• Structured and data-driven hiring process
• Focus on predicting job performance
• Integrates with various ATS platforms
• Helps reduce hiring bias
• Good for tech roles

Alva Labs Cons

• Lacks situational judgment tests
• Does not have typing tests
• No custom question creation
• Tests are not mobile friendly

Alva Labs Pricing

Alva Labs offers a free trial to let you test the waters. Their starter plan begins at $289 per month, while the scale plan costs $799 monthly. For larger organizations, you'll need to contact Alva Labs directly to discuss enterprise pricing. No pricing is available for individuals.

6. iMocha

Best for: Skills intelligence for workforce

iMocha offers skill assessments and skills intelligence, assisting employers in understanding their workforce's capabilities. Unlike Eva AI, which focuses primarily on conversational AI, iMocha helps manage and cultivate skills within your organization through its skill intelligence system.

Eva AI lacks comprehensive testing for a wide array of roles, especially those requiring coding or specific technical skills. iMocha steps in to bridge this gap by offering coding assessments, IT skill tests, and aptitude evaluations, something Eva AI doesn't offer.

Furthermore, iMocha supports web and mobile framework questions, along with data structures and algorithm assessments – areas where Eva AI falls short. If your hiring needs extend beyond basic personality and language proficiency, iMocha presents a more versatile solution. For a broad range of pre-employment skill assessment tests, you might want to consider exploring other options.

How iMocha compares to Eva AI?

Key Features

• Candidate Screening: Assesses your talent pool with structured evaluations, ensuring consistency.
• Live Coding Interviews: Provides a fully functional IDE for evaluating developers in a real-world setting.
• Skill Inventory: Provides data on what skills your company has and is missing.

iMocha Pros

• Large skill library across different job roles.
• Offers coding assessments with code playback feature.
• Provides detailed reporting and analytics.
• Integrates with major ATS platforms.
• Has proctoring capabilities

iMocha Cons

• Doesn't allow custom question creation in assessments.
• Lacks conversational assessments for improved candidate experience.
• Doesn't offer custom data location support for enhanced security.
• Questions on the platform are easily googleable.

iMocha Pricing

iMocha doesn't publicly display pricing; you'll need to contact them for a quote. They don't offer a free trial, so exploring the platform beforehand isn't possible.

7. Vervoe

Best for: Skills-based hiring assessments

Vervoe offers a platform for skills-based hiring, aiming to help companies identify the best talent through assessments. They provide a range of tests across various skills and job roles to streamline the hiring process.

Vervoe's focus on skills assessment across diverse areas like programming, aptitude, and business contrasts with Eva AI's limitations, particularly in programming and aptitude. If you're aiming to evaluate candidates on coding skills, Vervoe provides coding questions and automated scoring, unlike Eva AI.

While Vervoe has custom question support, it doesn't create customized tests per job description which can be a drawback for companies seeking highly relevant assessments. With Adaface, you can get a custom test designed by analysing the job description for a best matching test.

How Vervoe compares to Eva AI?

Key Features

• Skills Assessments: Offers a range of pre-built assessments for various skills and roles.
• Automated Scoring: Automates the scoring process for certain question types, like coding.
• ATS Integration: Integrates with popular Applicant Tracking Systems.

Vervoe Pros

• Wide range of skills tests available.
• Automated scoring for faster results.
• Integrates with existing ATS.
• Good for assessing technical skills.
• Provides candidate ranking and reporting.

Vervoe Cons

• Lacks situational judgment assessments.
• No support for personality assessments to measure soft skills.
• Doesn't create customized tests per job description.
• Limited proctoring capabilities compared to solutions offering webcam and window proctoring.

Vervoe Pricing

Vervoe offers different pricing plans, including a free trial to explore the platform. Paid plans start around $300 for 10 candidates. For larger volumes or enterprise needs, you'll need to contact Vervoe directly for custom pricing. This can make it hard to know which plan to choose without talking to sales.

8. Kryterion

Best for: High stakes certification testing

Kryterion offers a platform primarily focused on secure, high-stakes exam delivery. Think professional certifications and academic admissions. They provide the tools; you bring the content.

Unlike Eva AI, which provides a library of ready-to-use assessments, Kryterion is more of a blank canvas. You'll need to create or source your own questions, which can be both a blessing and a curse.

For organizations with highly specific testing needs or a desire for total control over assessment content, Kryterion's framework can be a good fit. However, this also means a much higher upfront investment in terms of time and resources for question development.

How Kryterion compares to Eva AI?

Key Features

• Secure test delivery via a global network of testing centers.
• Exam development tools to create and manage your own assessments.
• Proctoring options, including live and remote proctoring.

Kryterion Pros

• Extensive security measures for high-stakes testing.
• Customizable branding options.
• Scalable platform for large-volume testing.
• Good support for remote proctoring.
• API access for custom integrations.

Kryterion Cons

• No pre-built skills assessment library like Adaface.
• Requires significant upfront investment in content creation.
• Limited integrations with popular ATS platforms.
• Not suitable for quick skills screening or early-stage candidate assessment.

Kryterion Pricing

Kryterion's pricing isn't publicly available. You'll need to contact them directly for a quote, which typically involves a discussion of your specific testing needs and volume. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly assess whether Kryterion fits your budget.

9. HiPeople

Best for: Skill-based hiring assessments

HiPeople offers a platform for skill-based hiring assessments. They aim to help companies identify the best candidates using a range of tests and tools. Let's see how it stacks up against Eva AI.

Eva AI lacks coding questions. HiPeople offers coding questions in their assessments. However, note that it does not have coding challenges.

If you need to assess candidates on various business skills, HiPeople has you covered. Eva AI does not provide business skills assessments at all, so you need HiPeople for that particular usecase. For more diverse testing options, consider exploring Adaface's pre-employment assessment test library.

How HiPeople compares to Eva AI?

Key Features

• Custom question creation for tailored assessments.
• Ready-to-use tests for quicker setup.
• ATS integrations to streamline workflows.

HiPeople Pros

• Offers a free trial to explore the platform.
• Provides web proctoring to maintain test integrity.
• Includes custom branding options.
• Has email support available for candidates.
• Offers multiple invite options for candidates.

HiPeople Cons

• No webcam proctoring. This is a big missing point since recruiters can't track candidate's face real time.
• Lacks plagiarism detection. This is a big missing point since candidates can easily copy answers during test.
• Doesn't offer Excel or CSV reports for in-depth data analysis.
• No custom API for integrations. For a deeper integration, you will be needing that.

HiPeople Pricing

HiPeople's pricing varies based on company size. For example, a company with 16-25 employees starts at $96/month billed annually. For larger companies with 51-100 employees and ATS integrations, it's $448/month billed annually. For enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact their sales team. If you are looking for transparent pricing, Adaface Assessments Pricing might be what you need.

10. Cangrade

Best for: Predictive talent selection platform

Cangrade uses predictive analytics to help companies make better hiring decisions. It analyzes candidate data to predict job performance and cultural fit. Think of it as a crystal ball, but for hiring!

Eva AI offers personality and language tests, but if you need deeper insights, Cangrade might be a better bet. Cangrade analyzes a wider range of factors, including cognitive ability and job-specific skills, to provide a more predictive assessment.

While Eva AI has ready-to-use tests, Cangrade goes a step further by offering customized tests based on job descriptions. This ensures that you're evaluating candidates on the skills that truly matter for the role. If you want to test coding skills, Cangrade can help - Eva AI doesn't offer that!

How Cangrade compares to Eva AI?

Key Features

• Predictive Index: Uses AI to predict candidate success.
• Job Fit Scoring: Matches candidates to specific roles.
• Personality Assessments: Evaluates personality traits and cultural fit.

Cangrade Pros

• Measures cognitive ability.
• Assesses job-specific skills.
• Offers personality assessments.
• Provides job fit scoring.
• Has programming tests.

Cangrade Cons

• No typing tests.
• Lacks excel workbook questions.
• Doesn't provide a conversational interface.
• No custom API for deeper integrations.

Cangrade Pricing

Cangrade doesn't publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact them for a quote. If you like transparent pricing and exploring features on your own, you might want to check out Adaface's assessments pricing.

Found Your Perfect Eva AI Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface offers 500+ tests for aptitude, finance, personality, technical, and coding roles, complete with strong proctoring and pricing that depends only on credits, regardless of the features you use.
• HackerRank is tailored for tech roles with coding assessments, offering automated scoring and code playback, but tests can be time-consuming.
• Talview supports a range of tests including aptitude and coding, with a custom API for integrations, but lacks mobile-friendliness.
• TestGrid provides aptitude and personality tests, integrating with ATS systems, but does not offer coding tests.
• Alva Labs focuses on IT roles, offering coding assessments with automated scoring, but lacks custom questions.
• iMocha includes tests for AI and cloud skills, along with proctoring features, but candidate feedback isn't used to improve tests.
• Vervoe uses GenAI and supports coding assessments, offering public reports, but does not offer code playback.
• Kryterion provides software for conducting tests, but requires you to bring your own question bank.
• HiPeople provides customizable tests and company branding, but no coding challenges.
• Cangrade offers coding and situational judgment tests, but does not offer business tests.

Choosing the right assessment platform is a big deal for hiring. We've looked at a bunch of options to help you make the best pick for your needs.

Eva AI shines with its personality and language tests, but it lacks the breadth of assessments needed for many roles. Without support for coding, aptitude, finance, and other skill-based tests, you might find it limiting.

Good news! There are plenty of alternatives ready to step up. Platforms like Adaface offer a wide range of tests to cover all your bases. You will find something that fits, whether you're a small startup or a big enterprise.

No matter your hiring goals, there's an Eva AI alternative out there to help you. So explore your options and find the perfect match!

Ready to see how Adaface can transform your hiring? Explore our platform today!