10 Ensize Alternatives: Top Picks by Features, Usability, and Pricing

Why the Hunt for Ensize Alternatives?

So, I put on my detective hat and dug around to figure out why recruiters and hiring managers might be peeking over the fence at other options. Turns out, there are a few common themes.

Limited Test Variety. Ensize primarily focuses on personality assessments, which means if you're looking to assess coding skills, aptitude, or even something like typing speed, you might need to juggle multiple platforms. Hiring teams often need a diverse toolkit to accurately gauge a candidate's abilities across different roles.

Lack of Customization. Sometimes, off-the-shelf assessments just don't cut it. Hiring teams may want the ability to tweak questions or create their own to assess specific skills or scenarios relevant to their company. The inability to add custom questions or tailor tests to match specific job descriptions can be a real pain point.

Limited insights into candidate skills. While personality tests are valuable, they don't always tell the whole story. Recruiters might want a platform that offers skill-wise analysis and detailed reporting, helping them to pinpoint strengths and areas where candidates might need some development. These detailed reports, along with features like benchmarking, help in making informed hiring decisions.

1. Adaface

Best for: Screen candidates across business, aptitude, and technical roles with ease.

Looking for a strong alternative to Ensize? Adaface offers a skills assessment platform designed to help you identify top talent quickly and reliably.

One major drawback of Ensize is the lack of clear pricing information and easy signup. Adaface addresses this by offering transparent pricing plans and a free trial. You can sign up and explore the platform without needing to contact sales or enter credit card details.

Adaface stands out with a wide range of features designed for modern hiring:

• A test library of 500+ skills tests
• Support for technical, aptitude, finance, typing, and personality assessments
• Strong proctoring features to prevent cheating
• Candidate-friendly assessments that boost engagement
• Detailed scorecards and reporting for data-driven decisions
• Enterprise-ready features for large-scale hiring
• Easy to get started with transparent pricing and a free trial

Robust Proctoring Suite

Adaface provides a suite of proctoring features to maintain test integrity and ensure a fair evaluation for all candidates.

Our platform includes webcam proctoring, which records the candidate's video feed during the test. Additionally, we track browser tab and window activity, log IP addresses, and use device fingerprinting to identify suspicious behavior. We also have copy-paste protection and the option to enforce full-screen mode. Adaface even detects if a candidate switches to tools like Chat GPT during the assessment.

Extensive Test Library for Diverse Roles

Adaface boasts a test library of over 500 skills tests, covering a broad range of roles and skills. Unlike Ensize, which lacks support for many assessment types, Adaface supports business, aptitude, finance, personality, typing, AI, technical and coding roles.

Whether you're assessing a candidate's proficiency in Excel, their coding abilities, or their aptitude for a specific role, Adaface has you covered. We even offer custom question design services to tailor assessments to your specific needs.

Adaface vs Ensize Attributes

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests available
• Supports technical, aptitude, business, and personality assessments
• Strong anti-cheating measures, including webcam and window proctoring
• Used by clients in 70+ countries
• Transparent pricing with no seat-based fees
• Customizable assessments with company branding options
• Detailed scorecards and reporting

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit different hiring needs. You can choose from Individual, Starter, Pro, Scale, Growth, Enterprise and Unlimited plans. All plans include all proctoring features and access to all 500+ tests. Adaface Assessments Pricing is based on credits, not seats. Check out our free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits to explore the platform. No credit card is required to get started!

2. Testgorilla

Best for: Skills-based candidate screening

TestGorilla provides a wide range of pre-employment assessments to evaluate candidates across various skills and personality traits. It aims to help companies make data-driven hiring decisions, similar to how Adaface can help you.

Unlike Ensize, TestGorilla offers a broader range of test types, including coding assessments and situational judgment tests, allowing for a more versatile evaluation of candidates.

However, TestGorilla doesn't offer the ability to create fully customized questions tailored to specific job descriptions. While it allows adding your own questions, it misses the mark on truly custom assessments that adapt to specific roles, something crucial for accurate skill evaluation and that Adaface excels at.

How Testgorilla compares to Ensize?

Key Features

• Skills Assessment: Offers a library of pre-built tests covering cognitive ability, programming, personality, and more.
• Video Interviews: Integrated video interviewing to assess soft skills and cultural fit.
• Reporting and Analytics: Provides detailed reports on candidate performance.

Testgorilla Pros

• Wide range of tests available covering various skills and domains.
• Includes video interviewing capabilities.
• Integrates with several popular ATS platforms.
• Offers a free plan with limited features.
• Easy to use and navigate.

Testgorilla Cons

• Lacks custom question creation for bespoke assessments.
• No AI skills tests are available.
• Limited social listening.
• No custom data location support.

Testgorilla Pricing

TestGorilla's pricing scales with company size, with plans starting from $75 per month (billed annually) for small teams. They also offer a free plan with limited features. Contact TestGorilla for enterprise pricing. Note that there are fair use restrictions on unlimited invites.

3. CodeSignal

Best for: Technical skills screening platform

CodeSignal is a technical assessment platform designed to help companies evaluate developer skills. It's known for its focus on coding skills and offers a range of coding challenges and assessments.

Unlike Ensize, CodeSignal emphasizes coding assessments. This makes it suitable for roles requiring strong coding proficiency. However, if you're seeking a broader range of assessments beyond just coding, especially for roles needing aptitude, business acumen, or even typing skills, CodeSignal might leave you wanting more.

While CodeSignal offers coding assessments, it lacks support for custom questions, which is essential when hiring for niche roles.

How CodeSignal compares to Ensize?

Key Features

• Coding Tests: Evaluate candidates' coding skills with challenges in various languages.
• Integrated IDE: Candidates code in a real-time environment during assessments.
• Skill Certification: Offers certifications to validate developers' skills.

CodeSignal Pros

• Strong focus on coding skills assessment.
• Real-time coding environment for candidates.
• Automated scoring for coding tests saves time.
• Integrates with popular ATS systems for seamless workflow.
• Benchmarking allows comparison against other candidates.

CodeSignal Cons

• Limited assessment types beyond coding skills.
• Lacks custom question creation, restricting flexibility.
• Tests typically longer, which can impact candidate experience.
• No support for assessing personality or soft skills.
• Does not provide detailed audit timelines for proctoring logs.

CodeSignal Pricing

CodeSignal doesn't openly share pricing details. You need to contact their sales team for a quote. They do not offer a free trial. If you prefer transparent pricing and the ability to explore a platform before committing, consider alternatives like Adaface.

4. Coderbyte

Best for: Skill-based coding assessment needs

Coderbyte is a platform primarily focused on assessing coding skills. It offers a range of challenges and assessments geared toward evaluating developers' abilities. It allows for custom tests based on job description.

Unlike Ensize, Coderbyte offers coding challenges. This allows you to assess candidates on practical coding skills, not just personality.

However, Coderbyte primarily caters to technical roles. If you're looking for a platform that can assess a wider range of skills beyond coding, like aptitude, business acumen, or even typing speed, you might need a more versatile solution.

How Coderbyte compares to Ensize?

Key Features

• Coding challenges in various languages
• Assessment of web framework knowledge
• Code playback for review

Coderbyte Pros

• Large question bank for varied assessments.
• Supports multiple question sets to minimize cheating.
• Offers automated scoring, saving time for hiring teams.
• Provides code playback for detailed analysis.
• Caters to both front-end and back-end roles.

Coderbyte Cons

• Lacks assessments for aptitude, business skills, and other non-technical roles.
• Does not offer custom question creation.
• No integrations with ATS systems for streamlined workflows.
• Tests can be time consuming for the candidate.

Coderbyte Pricing

Coderbyte offers a subscription plan at $1,699/year and a pay-as-you-go plan for $500 (50 candidates). They also have a free trial so you can check it out. They also have a starter plan priced at $199/month.

5. Maki People

Best for: Skills-based hiring simplified

Maki People offers a skills-based assessment platform designed to help companies identify top talent. With a focus on evaluating candidates' abilities through practical tests, Maki People aims to provide insights into a candidate's potential fit.

Ensize lacks in-depth skill assessment across a wider range of roles. Maki People, on the other hand, provides a variety of tests, including programming, aptitude, business, and language assessments. This broader scope allows for a more informed hiring decision.

Maki People supports custom questions enabling companies to tailor assessments for specific roles or scenarios. While Ensize offers ready-to-use tests, the ability to add custom questions in Maki People provides a more personalized and relevant evaluation process.

How Maki People compares to Ensize?

Key Features

• Skills Assessment: Evaluate candidates using a variety of ready-made tests, covering areas like programming, aptitude, and languages.
• Custom Questions: Add your own questions to tailor the assessment process to your specific needs.
• Reporting & Analytics: Gain insights into candidate performance with detailed reports and analytics.

Maki People Pros

• Good range of skills assessments including programming and language tests.
• Supports custom questions for tailoring assessments.
• Provides a candidate tracking system to manage the hiring pipeline.
• Offers integrations with popular ATS systems.
• Provides skill-wise analysis.

Maki People Cons

• Lacks coding question playback, making it hard to review coding answers.
• Does not offer a free trial, making it difficult to test the platform before committing.
• Lacks custom data location support.
• The platform does not offer telephone assistance.

Maki People Pricing

Maki People does not offer readily available pricing on their website. To get a quote, you will need to contact their sales team. They do not offer a free trial.

6. TestDome

Best for: Skills tests for various roles

TestDome provides a platform to assess candidates across diverse skill sets, spanning from programming and data science to general cognitive abilities. While Ensize provides limited coverage, TestDome offers a broader range of assessment options.

TestDome helps evaluate candidates' abilities in many areas. Unlike Ensize, TestDome covers a wide array of skills, making it suitable for different hiring needs.

However, TestDome does not let you create custom questions. If you need to assess candidates on specific skills unique to your company, you might need a solution like Adaface that offers custom question creation.

How TestDome compares to Ensize?

Key Features

• Ready-to-use tests: Offers a library of pre-built tests for various skills.
• Live coding interviews: Provides a platform for conducting live coding interviews.
• Automated Scoring: Automatically scores coding questions, saving time.

TestDome Pros

• Wide range of skills assessed.
• Affordable pricing options.
• Includes video and live coding interview features.
• Supports programming language coding questions.
• Offers web and webcam proctoring for added security.

TestDome Cons

• No custom questions: You cannot create your own questions.
• No role-based access control.
• Lacks detailed reporting features like skill-wise analysis and audit timelines.
• No custom data location support.

TestDome Pricing

TestDome offers several pricing tiers, starting from $100 for 5 candidates ($20 per candidate). They offer a free trial, allowing you to explore the platform before committing to a paid plan. They also have plans for $400 and $4200. They do not provide Growth plans.

7. Alva Labs

Best for: Assess Personality and Aptitude

Alva Labs offers personality and aptitude assessments to help you predict candidate success. It's designed to give you insights into a candidate’s potential, complementing skills-based evaluations.

Alva Labs focuses on personality and cognitive ability, which is useful, but it might miss out on assessing job-specific and technical skills that are key for many roles. Unlike Ensize, Alva Labs offers programming tests. However, it lacks situational judgment, business, typing, language, finance, AI, and cloud tests.

Compared to a platform like Adaface, Alva Labs may require you to use additional tools to get a full picture of a candidate's abilities.

How Alva Labs compares to Ensize?

Key Features

• Personality Assessments: Evaluate candidates based on personality traits.
• Cognitive Ability Tests: Measure problem-solving and learning potential.
• Candidate Management: Track candidates through the hiring process.

Alva Labs Pros

• Measures personality and cognitive skills.
• ATS integrations.
• Customizable invitation templates.
• Automated scorecards.
• Benchmarking capabilities.

Alva Labs Cons

• Lacks assessments for a broad range of skills like business, finance, AI, cloud, and language skills.
• No custom question creation.
• Tests can be lengthy, around 2 hours.
• Limited proctoring features for preventing cheating.

Alva Labs Pricing

Alva Labs' pricing starts at $289 per month for the starter plan and $799 per month for the scale plan. For Growth and Enterprise plans, you'll need to contact Alva Labs directly. They do offer a free trial, so you can test the waters before committing.

8. Reveal by Hiring Indicators

Best for: Aptitude focused skills testing

Reveal by Hiring Indicators offers a straightforward approach to assessing candidates, focusing primarily on aptitude and personality traits. It aims to give recruiters a basic understanding of a candidate's potential fit.

Unlike Ensize, Reveal by Hiring Indicators does offer aptitude tests. However, it lacks in-depth skill assessments like coding, finance, or AI. If you need to evaluate candidates on a wider range of job-specific skills, you might find it limiting.

While Reveal by Hiring Indicators has personality assessments which Ensize also has, it doesn't offer customized tests based on job descriptions. This means you might not be able to tailor the assessment to the specific requirements of each role.

How Reveal by Hiring Indicators compares to Ensize?

Key Features

• Aptitude Testing: Evaluate candidates on core aptitude skills.
• Personality Assessments: Understand personality traits.
• ATS Integrations: Connects with applicant tracking systems.

Reveal by Hiring Indicators Pros

• Straightforward aptitude assessments.
• Personality insights.
• ATS integrations for streamlined workflow.
• Provides PDF reports.
• Offers email support.

Reveal by Hiring Indicators Cons

• No coding, finance or AI tests, unlike Adaface.
• Lacks custom test creation.
• No coding assessments.
• No help documentation.

Reveal by Hiring Indicators Pricing

Reveal by Hiring Indicators offers tiered annual plans. The Starter plan begins at $2,750/year for 50 candidates, the Scale plan is $5,500/year for 100 candidates, and the Growth plan is $9,500/year for 200 candidates. Enterprise pricing is available upon request.

9. Symphony Talent

Best for: Full-suite talent lifecycle management

Symphony Talent offers a platform designed to manage the entire talent lifecycle, from attracting candidates to nurturing employee growth. It aims to provide a connected experience for both recruiters and candidates, streamlining the hiring process.

Unlike Ensize, which has limited testing capabilities, Symphony Talent provides tools to create custom questions and job-specific assessments. This allows for evaluations tailored to your specific needs.

While Symphony Talent offers customizable assessments, it still lacks the ability to assess programming skills or use coding questions. If you need to evaluate technical abilities, you might need to consider a platform that offers coding assessments like Adaface.

How Symphony Talent compares to Ensize?

Key Features

• Talent Acquisition: Tools for employer branding, recruitment marketing, and candidate relationship management.
• Assessment Capabilities: Includes aptitude, business, personality, and typing tests.
• Employee Experience: Features to foster engagement and growth within the organization.

Symphony Talent Pros

• Offers a wide array of assessments, including aptitude, business, personality, and typing tests.
• Provides tools to create custom questions, which allows for specific evaluations.
• Facilitates communication and collaboration between recruiters and hiring managers.
• Helps build and maintain a strong employer brand to attract top talent.
• Centralizes talent data for better decision-making.

Symphony Talent Cons

• Lacks coding assessments, limiting its effectiveness for technical roles.
• No support for language, AI, finance, or cloud-based skills assessment.
• Doesn't offer data driven insights to improve test quality.
• No free trial or straightforward signup process for immediate access.

Symphony Talent Pricing

Symphony Talent's pricing isn't readily available. You'll need to contact them directly for a quote. The pricing structure is often based on company size and the specific modules required, so there's no one-size-fits-all answer. Be prepared to engage in a sales call to get a clear understanding of the costs.

10. DevSkiller

Best for: Tech skill assessment platform

DevSkiller is a platform focused on evaluating tech skills through coding tests and project-based assessments. It aims to provide a practical way to gauge a candidate's coding abilities, but lacks some of the breadth you might need.

While Ensize offers a broad range of assessments, it notably lacks programming tests and coding questions, a gap DevSkiller aims to fill. DevSkiller focuses on evaluating a candidate’s practical coding skills, which is useful for technical roles.

However, DevSkiller doesn't provide assessments for aptitude, business acumen, or personality traits. If you're looking for a holistic view of a candidate, you might need additional tools. For a broader range of skills, including aptitude and personality, consider exploring Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests.

How DevSkiller compares to Ensize?

Key Features

• Online code editor with real-time collaboration
• Library of coding tasks and challenges
• Automated evaluation and scoring

DevSkiller Pros

• Supports multiple programming languages.
• Offers practical coding tests that simulate real-world scenarios.
• Provides automated scoring, saving time for recruiters.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.
• Includes webcam and screen recording for proctoring

DevSkiller Cons

• Lacks assessments for non-technical skills like aptitude or behavioral traits.
• Does not offer mobile-friendly assessments.
• Limited customization options for branding.
• No support for excel or workbooks questions.
• Tests tends to take longer to complete (60 min)

DevSkiller Pricing

DevSkiller does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their team directly to get a quote that suits your specific needs. This lack of transparency can make it a bit challenging to quickly compare costs with other platforms.

Found Your Perfect Ensize Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface stands out with its vast test library of 500+ tests covering aptitude, finance, personality, and technical skills. It is used by clients from 70+ countries and does not have seat based pricing. Pricing only depends on credits and covers all proctoring features.
• TestGorilla provides a range of tests, but its pricing scales with company size, potentially costing more for larger organizations.
• CodeSignal focuses on technical assessments but lacks aptitude and business skills tests.
• Coderbyte offers coding challenges and assessments, but it does not offer integrations with ATS systems.
• Maki People offers custom questions and ready to use tests but does not have AI tests.
• TestDome provides a wide range of tests, including AI, but lacks company branding options.
• Alva Labs provides customizable invitation templates and ready to use tests, but its tests take longer.
• Reveal by Hiring Indicators focuses on personality and aptitude assessments and offers email support, but it does not offer help documentation.
• Symphony Talent provides business and job-specific tests, but its ATS integrations and GDPR compliance are not specified.
• DevSkiller is focused on coding and technical skills, offering custom questions and project-based assessments.

We've explored a range of Ensize alternatives, each offering unique features and benefits.

Ensize shines with its personality assessments and company branding, but it lacks in crucial areas like coding assessments, custom questions, and detailed proctoring features, making it unsuitable for many businesses. These gaps can lead to inaccurate evaluations and increased risk of cheating.

Fortunately, numerous alternatives address these limitations. Consider options like Adaface, which offers a wide test library and robust proctoring, ensuring accurate and secure candidate evaluations.

No matter your specific requirements, from assessing technical skills to evaluating personality traits, there's an Ensize alternative that can empower you to make data-driven hiring decisions. You can rely on these alternatives for aptitude, finance, personality, business roles, typing, AI, technical and coding roles.

Ready to elevate your hiring process? Explore Adaface today and discover the power of data-driven candidate screening.