Top 10 CodeSignal Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why the hunt for platforms similar to CodeSignal, you ask?

Well, you're in luck! I've done the digging to figure out why recruiters and hiring managers are peeking over the fence at CodeSignal alternatives. Turns out, there are a few common threads.

Limited Assessment Types. CodeSignal primarily focuses on coding assessments. This can be a roadblock if you need to assess a broader range of skills like aptitude, personality, or even typing speed, especially for non-technical roles.

Lack of Test Customization. While CodeSignal offers ready-to-use tests, tailoring assessments to fit specific job descriptions can be tricky. This can impact the accuracy of your results, as a generic test might not effectively evaluate the skills needed for a specialized role. Creating customized assessments ensures you're targeting the right skills.

Pricing Structure. CodeSignal's pricing can be a hurdle for some. The lack of transparent pricing and the need to contact sales for a quote might be a deterrent for smaller companies or those who prefer a self-service approach. Plus, some users find the lack of clarity around team seats and usage-based billing less than ideal.

1. Adaface

Best for: Assess candidates across both business and technical roles, all on one platform.

If you're seeking a CodeSignal alternative that offers a broader range of assessment options and a more candidate-friendly experience, Adaface is a platform worth considering.

CodeSignal primarily focuses on coding assessments, neglecting the need for evaluating other skills. Adaface bridges this gap by offering a wide array of tests, including aptitude, personality, and role-specific skills, ensuring a complete candidate profile. This helps you make well-informed hiring decisions beyond just coding proficiency.

Adaface helps you create a seamless screening experience with:

Robust Proctoring to Ensure Test Integrity

Adaface incorporates a suite of proctoring features to maintain the integrity of assessments. This includes webcam proctoring, which records the candidate's video feed, along with screen recording to monitor their activity during the test.

Additionally, Adaface employs measures like IP address tracking, device fingerprinting, and copy-paste protection to deter cheating. Real-time monitoring for the use of tools like ChatGPT adds another layer of security.

Transparent and Flexible Pricing

Unlike many platforms with complex pricing structures, Adaface Assessments Pricing offers clear and flexible options. Our pricing depends on the number of credits you consume, not the number of seats, making it cost-effective for teams of all sizes.

Every plan covers all proctoring features and access to our entire test library of 500+ skills. Plus, you can start with a free trial (2 sample tests, 5 credits) to explore the platform before committing. No credit card required to get started!

Adaface vs CodeSignal Attributes

Adaface Pros

• Wide range of tests: technical skills, aptitude, business skills, personality, language proficiency and more.
• Customizable assessments tailored to job descriptions.
• Pro features for test integrity: webcam proctoring, IP tracking, and more.
• Transparent and flexible pricing based on credits, not seats.
• Free trial with full feature access.
• Excellent candidate experience.
• Used by clients from 70+ countries

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and affordable pricing plans to suit various needs. A free trial lets you try out 2 sample tests and provides 5 credits to explore the platform. No credit card is required to start.

Plans include Individual ($180/year), Starter ($500/year), Pro ($900/year), Scale ($3000/year), Growth ($5500/year), Enterprise ($20,000/year), and Unlimited ($50,000/year). All plans include all proctoring features and access to all 500+ tests.

2. Codility

Best for: Developer skills assessment platform

Codility is a platform designed to help tech recruiters and hiring managers assess developers' skills. It provides tools for creating and administering coding tests, as well as evaluating candidates' performance. It's like a virtual coding playground where you can see if someone can actually code, and not just talk about it.

One major area where Codility offers an edge over CodeSignal is the ability to add your own custom coding questions. While CodeSignal offers a library of ready-made tests, Codility lets you tailor the assessment to your specific needs. This is super useful when you're looking for niche skills or have very specific problems you want candidates to solve.

However, Codility, similar to CodeSignal, focuses mainly on coding skills. If you're looking to assess a broader range of skills like aptitude, personality, or even typing speed, you might need to look elsewhere. Platforms like Adaface cover a wider range of skills beyond just coding. This helps you create a more well-rounded picture of a candidate's abilities.

How Codility compares to CodeSignal?

Key Features

• Coding Challenges: Evaluate programming skills with coding tasks in various languages.
• Custom Tasks: Add your own coding questions to tailor assessments.
• Automated Scoring: Save time with automated evaluation of coding tests.

Codility Pros

• Wide Range of Languages: Supports many popular programming languages.
• Customization: Ability to add your own tasks is a plus.
• ATS Integrations: Integrates with various Applicant Tracking Systems for streamlined workflow.
• Code Playback: Review candidate's coding process step-by-step.
• Benchmarking: Compare candidate performance against others (available in premium plans).

Codility Cons

• Limited Skill Coverage: Focuses mostly on coding, missing out on other skills like aptitude or personality.
• No Situational Judgment Tests: Lacks assessments for evaluating decision-making in real-world scenarios.
• No Ready to use tests beyond tech skills: You can't assess skills like Sales, Marketing, Finance etc. So the screening is not holistic.
• No public API access: So integrations could be brittle and not custom.

Codility Pricing

Codility's pricing isn't a one-size-fits-all deal. They offer a free trial to get you started, but you'll need to contact their sales team for a quote tailored to your specific needs. Starter plans begin at $1200 per annum, and scale plans start at $5000 per annum. If you're looking for transparent pricing upfront, you might want to check out Adaface Assessments Pricing.

3. Hackerrank

Best for: Coding skill assessment at scale

HackerRank is a platform designed for technical skill assessment, catering primarily to coding roles. It offers a wide range of coding challenges and contests, making it a popular choice for companies focused on hiring developers and programmers.

Unlike CodeSignal, HackerRank allows you to add your own custom questions, giving you more control over the assessment process. This is useful if you want to test candidates on specific technologies or scenarios relevant to your company.

While CodeSignal's tests often run long, HackerRank helps streamline your hiring process with shorter tests. It also provides the ability to assess across a wider range of programming languages and skills, which is useful when you have varied tech roles.

How Hackerrank compares to CodeSignal?

Key Features

• Coding Challenges: Offers a library of coding problems across various languages and difficulty levels.
• Skill Certification: Provides candidates with certifications to demonstrate their proficiency.
• Plagiarism Detection: Includes features to detect plagiarism in coding submissions.

Hackerrank Pros

• Large Developer Community: Widely recognized and used by developers, providing a large pool of potential candidates.
• Wide Range of Skills: Supports assessment across 40+ programming languages and in-demand tech skills.
• Plagiarism Detection: Advanced machine learning systems help maintain the integrity of assessments.
• Real-World Coding Questions: Evaluates candidates in a sandboxed environment that mirrors real job conditions.
• ATS Integrations: Offers integrations with applicant tracking systems.

Hackerrank Cons

• Lacks Versatility: Doesn't support aptitude, personality, or business skill assessments.
• No Emotional Intelligence Screening: Doesn't offer tailored assessments for soft skills.
• Googleable Questions: Default questions are easily available on search engines.
• Custom API: No Custom API.

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank offers different pricing plans. They have a Starter plan for $100 per month (1200$ per annum) and Scale plan for $250 per month (3000$ per annum). For larger enterprises, they offer custom plans that require contacting their sales team for a quote. There's no straightforward way to sign up and explore all features without talking to sales.

4. iMocha

Best for: Versatile skill assessment platform

iMocha provides skill assessments and skill insights to help companies evaluate current workforce skills, plan for future skill needs, and bridge skill gaps through hiring. Unlike CodeSignal, iMocha covers a wider range of skills beyond just coding.

CodeSignal mainly focuses on coding skills, often using lengthy coding challenges. iMocha expands beyond this by offering a broader range of skills assessment tools, including aptitude, business skills, and even language proficiency tests. This makes iMocha suitable for diverse hiring needs.

iMocha also provides situational judgment tests, personality assessments, and typing tests, which CodeSignal lacks. So, if you're looking for a platform that can assess a wider range of skills, iMocha could be a better bet.

How iMocha compares to CodeSignal?

Key Features

• Extensive skill library: Covers coding, aptitude, business skills, and more.
• Skill intelligence: Provides insights into your workforce's skill gaps.
• Live coding interviews: Facilitates real-time assessment of coding skills.

iMocha Pros

• Wide range of assessments: Covers a broader spectrum of skills than CodeSignal.
• Integrations: Integrates with popular ATS platforms for workflow streamlining.
• Mobile-friendly: Candidates can take assessments on their mobile devices.
• Custom branding: You can add your company logo and colors to the platform.
• Skill-wise analysis: Provides breakdown of candidate scores by skill.

iMocha Cons

• No custom questions: You cannot create custom questions for usecases.
• Question quality concerns: Some questions are easily searchable on Google.
• Lacks social listening: Does not monitor for test leaks on social media.
• No free trial: You can't explore the platform freely before purchasing. You need to contact sales team.

iMocha Pricing

iMocha doesn't publicly display its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. They don't offer a free trial, so you can't try before you buy.

5. TestDome

Best for: Skill-based hiring across departments

TestDome is a skills assessment platform that helps you screen candidates across various roles. It offers a library of pre-made tests covering programming, aptitude, personality, and more. While CodeSignal mainly focuses on coding skills, TestDome extends its reach to assess a broader range of abilities.

TestDome shines when you need to evaluate candidates on a wider spectrum of skills beyond just coding. Unlike CodeSignal, which primarily caters to technical roles, TestDome offers assessments for business skills, aptitude, and even personality traits. This makes it a more versatile option for organizations looking for a one-stop shop for pre-employment testing.

Furthermore, TestDome allows you to add your own questions, giving you greater flexibility to tailor assessments to your specific needs. While it lacks the ability to fully customize tests per job description like Adaface, this feature allows more control compared to CodeSignal's ready-to-use tests.

How TestDome compares to CodeSignal?

Key Features

• Wide range of tests: Covers programming, aptitude, personality, and business skills.
• Add your own questions: Supplement the existing library with your own custom content.
• Video and live coding interviews: Facilitates deeper evaluation for technical roles.

TestDome Pros

• Large question library for diverse skill assessment.
• Offers both coding and situational judgement questions.
• Supports web, mobile and desktop.
• Integrates with popular ATS systems.
• Provides public reports.

TestDome Cons

• Lacks test customization per job description.
• Doesn't offer skills-wise analysis, limiting insight into candidate strengths.
• No custom API for deeper integration with existing systems.
• Benchmarking is not available, making it harder to compare candidates against each other.

TestDome Pricing

TestDome uses a credit-based pricing model, starting at $100 for a pack of credits. The cost per candidate varies depending on the plan you choose. They offer a free trial so you can test out the platform, but no unlimited plans are available. Check their website to know more on assessment pricing.

6. Testgorilla

Best for: Skills based screening platform

TestGorilla offers a wide library of pre-employment assessment tests to evaluate candidates on skills, personality, and culture fit. It aims to help businesses make data-driven hiring decisions, faster. Think of it as a buffet of tests, ready for you to pick and choose!

One area where TestGorilla attempts to outshine CodeSignal is in the breadth of its testing capabilities. While CodeSignal primarily focuses on coding skills, TestGorilla aims to offer a more varied selection, including personality, aptitude, and even language tests. This makes it a potentially useful tool for companies looking for a broader assessment spectrum.

However, unlike Adaface, TestGorilla doesn't provide custom questions, so tailoring assessments to your specific needs might be a bit challenging. If you want assessments as unique as your company's secret sauce, you might want to consider other options.

How Testgorilla compares to CodeSignal?

Key Features

• Skills Assessment: Wide library of tests covering cognitive ability, programming skills, personality, and more.
• Candidate Ranking: Automatically ranks candidates based on their test performance.
• Video Interviews: Integrated video interview feature for further evaluation.

Testgorilla Pros

• Wide range of tests: Covers various skills and personality traits.
• User-friendly interface: Easy to navigate and set up assessments.
• Good for general skills screening: Helps filter candidates based on a broad range of abilities.
• ATS integrations: Integrates with popular Applicant Tracking Systems.
• Multiple invite options: Recruiters can invite users via multiple channels like email invites, public links etc.

Testgorilla Cons

• Limited customization: Lacks the ability to create fully custom questions.
• No custom data location support: Data has to stay in their location and no option to have it in your own country.
• Shorter tests: Tests can be GPT-able since they are not scenario based.
• Lacks plagiarism detection: Coding answers are not checked for plagiarism.

Testgorilla Pricing

TestGorilla's pricing depends on company size and chosen features. They offer several plans, with the cheapest individual plan starting from $75 per month (billed annually). They have different pricing tiers for different company sizes. Contact TestGorilla for enterprise pricing. Note that there are fair usage restrictions applied on all plans, so if you want a plan with no restrictions, then this might not be the assessment platform for you.

7. AccuRecruiter

Best for: Sales skills and aptitude

AccuRecruiter, by AlignMark, offers skills assessments, primarily geared towards aptitude and sales roles. It helps identify candidates who possess the aptitude and sales acumen for specific positions.

Unlike CodeSignal, which focuses heavily on coding assessments, AccuRecruiter carves a niche in aptitude and sales skills. If your hiring needs extend beyond technical roles, AccuRecruiter brings assessments tailored to other functions.

However, if you need a platform to assess a broader range of skills, including programming, aptitude tests, personality tests, and other business skills, a more versatile solution like Adaface might be a better fit.

How AccuRecruiter compares to CodeSignal?

Key Features

• Aptitude Testing: Assesses candidates' problem-solving and reasoning skills.
• Sales Skills Assessment: Evaluates sales-related abilities and competencies.
• Customizable Branding: Incorporate company logo and colors.

AccuRecruiter Pros

• Focus on aptitude and sales skills.
• Ready-to-use tests for various roles.
• Option to add custom questions.
• GDPR compliant.
• Company logo and brand colors customization.

AccuRecruiter Cons

• Lacks coding assessments.
• No ATS Integrations.
• No webcam or web proctoring.
• No custom API for integrations.

AccuRecruiter Pricing

AccuRecruiter does not provide pricing details upfront. Interested users need to contact their sales team for a quote, which may not be ideal for companies seeking transparent and readily available pricing information.

8. Crystal

Best for: Personality and Communication Assessments

Crystal offers personality assessments focused on understanding communication styles. It uses a personality framework to provide insights into how people prefer to communicate, aiming to improve team collaboration and interpersonal interactions.

Unlike CodeSignal, which primarily focuses on coding skills, Crystal zeroes in on the human side of hiring and team dynamics. CodeSignal helps you determine if a candidate can code. Crystal helps you understand how they communicate.

This is valuable when you're aiming to build well-rounded teams where effective communication is key. While technical skills are important, understanding personality and communication styles can lead to better team cohesion and reduced interpersonal friction, something often overlooked in tech hiring.

How Crystal compares to CodeSignal?

Key Features

• Personality Assessments: Identifies candidates' communication preferences.
• Team Compatibility Analysis: Evaluates how well team members might work together.
• Communication Style Guidance: Offers tips for interacting with different personality types.

Crystal Pros

• Integrates with LinkedIn for quick personality assessments.
• Provides insights into communication styles.
• Offers guidance on how to interact with different personalities.
• Helps build self-awareness about communication preferences.
• Offers a free trial to explore the platform.

Crystal Cons

• Lacks technical skill assessments.
• No coding or aptitude tests.
• Limited features beyond personality analysis.
• No ATS integrations to streamline hiring workflows.

Crystal Pricing

Crystal offers a basic plan at $49/month. For more advanced features and team-based solutions, you'll need to contact their team for custom pricing.

9. The Predictive Index

Best for: Behavioral assessments for team building

The Predictive Index (PI) offers behavioral assessments, aptitude tests, and a suite of tools aimed at understanding workforce dynamics. PI focuses on helping businesses align talent strategy with business strategy. It's about understanding people to predict performance and drive results.

Unlike CodeSignal, which mainly focuses on coding skills, The Predictive Index dives deep into behavioral analysis and cognitive aptitude. This means PI can help you understand how candidates will fit into your company culture and perform in roles that require specific personality traits.

While CodeSignal gives you a peek at coding abilities, PI aims to provide a fuller picture of a candidate's potential beyond technical skills. For example, you can identify if they are a good leader or a team player.

How The Predictive Index compares to CodeSignal?

Key Features

• Behavioral Assessments: Understand a candidate's workplace behavior and motivations.
• Cognitive Assessment: Evaluate a candidate's learning ability and problem-solving skills.
• Job Matching: Match candidates to roles based on behavioral and cognitive requirements.

The Predictive Index Pros

• Integrates with applicant tracking systems for streamlined hiring.
• Provides insights into team dynamics and potential conflicts.
• Offers a data-driven approach to talent management.
• Helps reduce employee turnover by improving job fit.
• Aids in leadership development by identifying potential leaders.

The Predictive Index Cons

• Lacks technical skills assessments like coding tests, limiting its use for tech roles. This is where a platform like Adaface can help.
• Focuses heavily on personality and aptitude, potentially overlooking experience.
• Customization options for assessments may be limited.
• The insights are dependent on candidates answering honestly and accurately.
• Doesn't offer webcam proctoring for enhanced test security.

The Predictive Index Pricing

The Predictive Index doesn't publicly list pricing details. You'll need to contact their sales team for a custom quote based on your organization's size and needs. There is no free trial. Prepare for a sales call to understand your options.

10. 123test

Best for: Quick personality, aptitude assessment

123test offers a variety of assessments, focusing on personality and aptitude. It's designed for quick insights into candidates, providing a broad overview of their potential.

While CodeSignal primarily targets technical skills with coding challenges, 123test broadens the scope. It provides aptitude and personality tests that CodeSignal lacks.

This makes 123test a better fit if you need to evaluate a candidate's cognitive abilities or personality traits in addition to, or instead of, their coding skills.

How 123test compares to CodeSignal?

Key Features

• Personality assessments.
• Aptitude tests.
• Mobile-friendly interface.

123test Pros

• Offers free tests for basic assessment needs.
• Mobile-friendly, improving candidate accessibility.
• Provides quick insights with relatively short tests.
• Covers a range of aptitude areas.
• Straightforward and easy to use.

123test Cons

• Lacks coding assessments for technical roles. For that, you can use Adaface.
• No custom question creation.
• No ATS integrations for streamlined workflow.
• Limited proctoring capabilities, raising concerns about test integrity.

123test Pricing

123test's pricing varies depending on the specific tests and the number of assessments needed. While they offer some free tests, more detailed reports and access to a wider range of assessments require a paid subscription, with starter plans beginning from $8.99-$17.99 per test. They do not offer unlimited plans.

Found Your Perfect CodeSignal Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface: Boasts a high test library with 500+ tests, covering everything from aptitude and personality to finance and coding. Clients in 70+ countries use Adaface for its strong proctoring suite and pricing that depends only on credits with no seat based pricing.
• Codility: Strong for coding assessments, allowing you to add your own coding questions.
• HackerRank: Well-known for technical skill evaluation, it also provides the ability to track candidate stages.
• iMocha: Offers a broad assessment range including aptitude, business skills, and even AI, but lacks custom question capabilities.
• TestDome: Wide array of tests, TestDome offers programming, aptitude, and personality assessments, and is known for providing public reports.
• TestGorilla: Covers a wide range of skills, including programming and personality, but lacks the ability to create custom questions.
• AccuRecruiter: Provides aptitude and sales-specific business skills assessments, but lacks coding tests.
• Crystal: Focuses on personality assessments, offering insights into candidate behavior but missing technical skill evaluation.
• The Predictive Index: Emphasizes aptitude and personality assessments to predict job fit, but doesn't offer coding evaluations.
• 123test: Provides aptitude and personality tests, but doesn't support coding assessments or custom questions.

Navigating the world of candidate assessment tools can feel like searching for a needle in a haystack. We've explored a range of CodeSignal alternatives in detail, each with its own strengths and weaknesses.

CodeSignal shines with its focus on coding skills but might leave you wanting if you're hiring for roles beyond tech. Its emphasis on coding challenges means longer test times, potentially impacting candidate experience and completion rates.

The good news? There are strong contenders ready to step up. Platforms like Adaface offer a broader range of tests, covering aptitude, personality, and even finance, alongside technical skills. These alternatives help you paint a more complete picture of your candidates.

No matter your specific hiring needs – whether it's assessing technical prowess or evaluating overall suitability – there's a CodeSignal alternative ready to help you find the perfect fit. You can definitely rely on alternatives such as Adaface.

Ready to elevate your hiring game? Explore Adaface's online assessment platform today and screen candidates with a diverse range of skills!