Top 10 Central Test Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why the Hunt for Central Test Alternatives?

I've done a deep dive into why HR folks, recruiters, and hiring managers like you are looking beyond Central Test. I've looked at features, how easy it is to use, what other users say, and of course, the price. Here’s the lowdown on some common pain points.

Limited test types can be a bottleneck. Central Test might not have tests for every skill or role you need to assess. This can be frustrating when you're trying to build a truly tailored pre-employment assessment test strategy. For instance, they lack tests for accounting, finance, AI, and other business skills like project management.

Lack of flexibility and customization. One potential drawback is the inability to add your own custom questions or tailor tests to match specific job descriptions. This limits your ability to assess candidates on the exact skills and knowledge required for the role, leading to a less precise evaluation.

Pricing transparency can be an issue. Central Test does not readily display pricing details on their website, requiring potential users to contact their team for a quote. This lack of transparency can make it harder to compare costs with other solutions and quickly determine if it aligns with your budget.

1. Adaface

Best for: Best for aptitude, finance, personality, business roles, typing, AI, technical and coding roles

Central Test offers a range of assessments, but if you're seeking a more versatile and candidate-friendly solution, Adaface emerges as a compelling alternative.

One common pain point with Central Test is its limited ability to create custom questions or tailor assessments to specific job descriptions. This can lead to generic evaluations that don't accurately gauge a candidate's suitability. Adaface solves this by allowing you to design custom tests, analyze the job description, and create a test that accurately tests for all skills relevant to the JD - all in one single test.

Adaface enhances your hiring process with a variety of features that address common limitations found in other platforms:

• Extensive test library with 500+ skills tests
• Strong proctoring suite, including webcam and window proctoring
• Questions that are hard to google or solve with GPT
• Focus on candidate experience and company branding
• Detailed scorecards for reporting and analytics
• Transparent pricing with a free trial

Robust Anti-Cheating Measures

Central Test's proctoring capabilities are not well known. Adaface takes test integrity seriously, offering a robust suite of anti-cheating measures. We want to make sure your assessments are reliable.

Our platform employs a multi-pronged approach, including webcam proctoring, window and tab tracking, copy-paste prevention, and IP address logging. We also use device fingerprinting and Chat GPT protection to identify suspicious activity. Combined with time limits and question randomization, Adaface proctoring helps ensure a fair and accurate evaluation of each candidate.

Extensive Test Library with 500+ Tests

Adaface boasts a rich assessment test library covering a wide array of skills and roles. Unlike Central Test, which has limited business tests, we have tests for Excel, Finance, Accounting and several software and business skills.

Whether you're hiring for coding tests, aptitude, finance, personality or psychometric tests , Adaface has you covered. We are constantly adding new tests and questions to make sure you have access to the most up-to-date and relevant assessments.

Adaface vs Central Test Attributes

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests on technical skills, cognitive abilities, language proficiency, and more
• Customizable assessments based on job descriptions
• Excellent anti-cheating measures including webcam and window proctoring
• Questions that are hard to google or solve with GPT
• Detailed scorecards for reporting and analytics
• Transparent pricing with a free trial
• Used by clients from 70+ countries

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and straightforward Adaface Assessments Pricing plans. You can explore the platform with a free trial, which includes 2 sample tests and 5 credits. No credit card is required to get started. We have following pricing plans: Individual (180$/yr). Starter (500$/yr). Pro (900$/yr). Scale (3000$/yr). Growth (5500$/ yr). Enterprise (20,000$/ year). Unlimited (50000$/ yr). All pricing plans include all proctoring features and access to all 500+ tests.

2. Evalart

Best for: Skills-based assessments with coding

Evalart offers a platform for creating and deploying various assessments, including psychometric and skills-based tests. It aims to help organizations streamline their hiring process.

Central Test offers limited support for coding assessments, without scenario-based questions. Evalart supports coding questions, but lacks scenario-based MCQs, which are a quick way to evaluate. For roles requiring a mix of coding expertise and the ability to understand code in different scenarios, Evalart might fall short.

Platforms like Adaface combine coding questions with scenario-based MCQs that allow recruiters to gauge a candidate's hands-on coding skills efficiently.

How Evalart compares to Central Test?

Key Features

• Ready to use test library
• Option to add your own questions
• Webcam Proctoring

Evalart Pros

• Supports coding questions.
• Offers a free trial.
• Provides email and live chat support.
• Allows multiple invite options.
• Has a ready-to-use test library.

Evalart Cons

• Does not have scenario-based MCQs.
• Lacks custom question creation, limiting the ability to tailor tests to specific needs.
• Doesn't offer company branding on the platform.
• No custom API for integrations.

Evalart Pricing

Evalart does not publicly display its pricing. Interested users need to contact their sales team to get a quote. This lack of transparent pricing can make it difficult for potential customers to quickly assess whether Evalart fits their budget.

3. DevSkiller

Best for: Coding skill assessment platform

DevSkiller focuses on assessing tech skills, offering features to evaluate coding abilities. It's designed to help you identify candidates who can actually code, setting it apart from platforms like Central Test that may offer a broader, but shallower, skill assessment range.

Unlike Central Test, DevSkiller emphasizes hands-on coding assessments. This means candidates are evaluated based on their practical coding skills, not just theoretical knowledge. If you're looking for developers who can hit the ground running, DevSkiller might be a better bet.

Central Test offers a more generalized assessment approach. While it includes programming tests, they lack the depth of DevSkiller's coding-focused evaluations. This can make it challenging to accurately gauge a candidate's coding proficiency, potentially leading to mismatches in hiring decisions. Consider leveraging Adaface's skills assessment tools for a more balanced approach.

How DevSkiller compares to Central Test?

Key Features

• Online code editor for real-time testing.
• Task-based coding challenges.
• Automated evaluation of code.

DevSkiller Pros

• Supports a wide range of programming languages.
• Provides a realistic coding environment.
• Automated scoring saves time.
• Strong focus on practical skills.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.

DevSkiller Cons

• Lacks assessments for soft skills.
• No support for mobile-friendly assessments which limits test taking rates.
• Limited features for candidate engagement.
• No custom data location support for sensitive data.

DevSkiller Pricing

DevSkiller does not publicly display pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote. They also do not offer free trials.

4. HireVue

Best for: Video interviews at scale

HireVue is primarily known for its video interviewing platform, but also offers assessments. It's designed to help companies screen candidates quickly using pre-recorded or live video interviews.

Central Test lacks strong video interviewing capabilities. HireVue shines here, allowing recruiters to conduct and analyze video interviews at scale. This is a great way to quickly get a feel for a candidate's personality and communication skills, something that's harder to gauge with traditional assessments.

However, if you're looking for highly customizable assessments across a wide range of skills, including coding and role-specific scenarios, you might find HireVue's assessment capabilities limiting.

How HireVue compares to Central Test?

Key Features

• On-demand video interviews: Candidates record answers to pre-set questions.
• Live video interviews: Conduct real-time interviews with candidates.
• AI-driven insights: Analyzes video interviews for non-verbal cues and sentiment.

HireVue Pros

• Streamlines initial screening process using video.
• Helps assess soft skills and communication abilities.
• Integrates with many ATS platforms.
• Provides a structured interview process for consistency.
• Offers AI-powered analysis of candidate responses.

HireVue Cons

• Limited assessment types compared to specialized platforms. They don't cover situational judgment or business skills tests, which are helpful for hiring for a variety of roles.
• Lacks custom question creation capabilities. You can't fully tailor the assessment to your specific needs unlike Adaface's assessment platform.
• No support for custom data locations. Data residency is an important factor when choosing assessment platforms.
• Limited plagiarism detection features.

HireVue Pricing

HireVue doesn't list pricing details publicly. You'll need to contact their sales team for a quote. They do not offer a free trial, so it's hard to test before you buy.

5. iMocha

Best for: Skills validation at scale

iMocha offers a platform focused on skills assessments and skills intelligence, helping companies understand their workforce's abilities and plan for future needs. While Central Test provides a range of assessments, iMocha goes further by offering tools to manage and develop skills within your organization.

Central Test's limited options for custom questions and coding assessments can be restrictive. iMocha allows users to add their questions and offers coding assessments, potentially providing a more tailored evaluation experience.

However, iMocha does not allow for customized tests per job description. If you want a platform that analyzes a job description and creates a matching test, Adaface would be a better fit.

How iMocha compares to Central Test?

Key Features

• Skills assessment library covering various domains.
• Live coding interviews with a functional IDE.
• Skills intelligence features for workforce planning.

iMocha Pros

• Wide range of skills assessments.
• Supports coding assessments and live interviews.
• Offers skill benchmarking against other candidates.
• Has integrations with applicant tracking systems (ATS).
• Provides skill-wise analysis in reports.

iMocha Cons

• Doesn't support custom tests per job description.
• No custom coding questions can be added.
• Lacks conversational assessments for better candidate experience. Conversational Assessments are a better method to increase candidate experience.
• Doesn't reveal pricing unless you contact them.

iMocha Pricing

iMocha does not openly display pricing on their website. You'll need to contact iMocha directly to get a custom quote. They also do not offer a free trial. This lack of transparency can make comparing costs against alternatives like Adaface Assessments Pricing difficult.

6. Coderbyte

Best for: Coding challenges, skill improvement

Coderbyte is a platform designed to help individuals improve their coding skills through challenges and courses. It also offers assessment tools for companies to evaluate candidates, but their primary focus is individual skill enhancement.

Central Test offers personality and aptitude assessments, but falls short in coding skill assessment depth. Coderbyte steps in to fill this gap by providing coding challenges. However, Coderbyte's assessments can be time consuming at 2 hours, potentially leading to candidate drop-off.

Unlike Central Test, Coderbyte also provides a code playback feature which helps you see candidates code in a timeline for accurate evaluation. For companies specifically seeking to assess coding skills, Coderbyte may be a consideration.

How Coderbyte compares to Central Test?

Key Features

• Coding challenges across multiple languages
• Company assessments based on challenges
• Code playback during assessments

Coderbyte Pros

• Large library of coding challenges for skill development.
• Supports multiple programming languages.
• Offers a platform for companies to create and administer coding assessments.
• Provides code playback feature for evaluating coding assessments.
• Caters to both individual learning and company hiring needs.

Coderbyte Cons

• Lacks breadth beyond coding skills; no aptitude, business, or situational judgment tests.
• Limited features for enterprise clients like custom APIs and dedicated support.
• No support for custom question creation or question customization during tests like Adaface.
• No Excel or SQL Workbook questions to evaluate candidates on these topics.
• Assessments can be lengthy, leading to candidate fatigue. Adaface assessments are typically 40 minutes long.

Coderbyte Pricing

Coderbyte offers both subscription and pay-as-you-go plans. The Starter plan begins at $199/month. The Subscription plan is $1,699/year. The Pay as you go plan starts at $500 for 50 candidates or $350 for 30 candidates. For custom pricing or enterprise plans, it's best to contact Coderbyte directly.

7. Harver

Best for: High-volume candidate pre-selection

Harver offers a platform focused on automating initial candidate screening, particularly for high-volume hiring scenarios. It uses pre-employment assessments, including situational judgment tests and personality questionnaires, to help companies quickly filter applicants.

Unlike Central Test, Harver emphasizes workflow automation to streamline the early stages of recruitment. This is achieved through configurable workflows and integrations with various Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS).

However, Harver lacks the depth of skills assessment found in platforms like Adaface. While Harver covers aptitude and personality, it misses out on coding tests, AI tests, and finance tests.

How Harver compares to Central Test?

Key Features

• Workflow Automation: Design custom workflows to manage candidate flow.
• Realistic Job Previews: Give candidates a glimpse into the role with simulations.
• Culture Fit Assessments: Determine if candidates align with company values.

Harver Pros

• Automates initial screening processes.
• Offers candidate-facing simulations for realistic job previews.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.
• Includes tools for assessing culture fit.
• Supports multiple languages.

Harver Cons

• Lacks coding assessments for technical roles.
• Does not offer AI or finance-specific assessments.
• No custom API for deeper integrations.
• Limited proctoring capabilities compared to some alternatives.

Harver Pricing

Harver does not publicly display its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team for a custom quote. There is no mention of a free trial on their website.

8. Humantelligence

Best for: Personality-based team role assessment

Humantelligence is a platform focusing on personality assessments to help companies understand team dynamics and individual work styles. They aim to improve team collaboration and employee engagement through understanding behavioral traits.

Central Test offers a broad range of assessments, but lacks the depth in personality-focused team role analysis that Humantelligence provides. If your primary goal is to understand how personalities interact within teams, Humantelligence offers a more specialized approach.

However, if you need a solution that goes beyond personality and can assess a broader range of skills, including coding and other job-specific abilities, consider how solutions like Adaface's skills tests can provide a more rounded evaluation.

How Humantelligence compares to Central Test?

Key Features

• Personality-based job matching
• Team dynamics visualization
• Culture fit analysis

Humantelligence Pros

• Focus on personality and team roles.
• Insights into team dynamics.
• Can improve team collaboration.
• Integrates with existing ATS systems.
• Offers candidate tracking.

Humantelligence Cons

• Lacks skills-based assessments like coding tests.
• No built-in proctoring features.
• Limited question bank compared to broader assessment platforms.
• Does not offer custom question creation.

Humantelligence Pricing

Humantelligence offers different pricing plans, with the starter plan beginning at $120/month ($2440/annum). For enterprise pricing that reflects your company's individual needs, it's best to contact their sales team for a custom quote.

9. Sprockets

Best for: AI-powered talent matching

Sprockets utilizes AI to help recruiters find the best candidates. It focuses on sourcing and initial screening, aiming to speed up the early stages of the hiring process.

Central Test offers a range of assessments, but doesn't leverage AI for matching candidates to jobs. Sprockets shines in identifying potential fits from a large pool of applicants, which saves recruiters time.

However, it's important to note that Sprockets focuses primarily on sourcing and initial screening, and doesn't offer the depth of skills assessment that a platform like Adaface provides with its detailed skills tests.

How Sprockets compares to Central Test?

Key Features

• AI-powered candidate matching
• Resume parsing and data extraction
• Talent pool management
• Automated outreach

Sprockets Pros

• Simplifies initial candidate sourcing.
• Speeds up the screening process.
• Helps identify passive candidates.
• Integrates with some ATS systems.
• Offers a user-friendly interface.

Sprockets Cons

• Lacks custom assessment creation.
• Limited skill assessment capabilities beyond resume analysis.
• No proctoring features to prevent cheating.
• Doesn't offer coding or Excel simulation-based tests to assess practical skills.

Sprockets Pricing

Sprockets doesn't publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact them for a quote based on your specific needs. Since there is no free trial to explore, you'll be going in blind.

10. Pixonality

Best for: Personality and culture fitment tests

Pixonality focuses on evaluating candidates through personality and culture fit assessments. They aim to help companies understand if a candidate's values align with the organization's culture and team dynamics.

While Central Test offers a broader range of assessments, including aptitude and skills, it lacks the depth of Pixonality's personality assessments. Pixonality utilizes sophisticated algorithms to gauge culture fitment, which can be invaluable for companies prioritizing workplace harmony.

However, if you need a platform that covers a wider spectrum of skills and aptitude alongside personality, a solution like Adaface might be more suitable, offering both breadth and depth in candidate evaluation.

How Pixonality compares to Central Test?

Key Features

• Personality questionnaires and reports
• Culture fit assessment tools
• Team role compatibility analysis

Pixonality Pros

• Focus on soft skills and team dynamics.
• Provides insights into candidate's work style.
• Can improve employee retention by identifying culture fit.
• Offers a personality test as a pre-employment personality tests.
• Decent support for email and phone.

Pixonality Cons

• Limited scope beyond personality and culture fit.
• No coding assessments or in-depth skills testing.
• Lacks integrations with major ATS platforms.
• No proctoring features to prevent cheating.

Pixonality Pricing

Pixonality offers tests individually priced on their website, ranging from $22 to $2,100 per test. There is no free trial, preventing users from exploring the platform before committing to a purchase. For detailed pricing and customized solutions, reaching out to their sales team directly is necessary.

Found Your Perfect Central Test Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface stands out with its high test library of 500+ tests, aptitude, finance, personality, business roles, typing, AI, technical and coding roles, strong proctoring suite, clients from 70+ countries and no seat based pricing.
• Evalart offers coding questions and a free 1-month trial, though pricing details require a sales call.
• Devskiller focuses on tech skills with coding questions and code playback, but lacks aptitude and personality tests.
• HireVue provides AI-driven insights and video interviews, but no custom questions.
• iMocha covers a wide range of skills, including AI and business, but questions are easily googleable.
• Coderbyte is tailored for technical roles, offering coding challenges and assessments.
• Harver focuses on cultural fit and offers pre-employment screening with assessments, but does not offer coding tests.
• Humantelligence emphasizes personality and team dynamics, though lacking coding skill assessment.
• Sprockets streamlines hiring with AI-driven tools, focusing on culture and skills but not on coding skills.
• Pixonality provides personality assessments, offering tests individually priced on their website, but has limited languages.

Navigating the world of candidate assessment tools can feel like finding a needle in a haystack.

While Central Test has its strengths, like offering personality and aptitude tests, it lacks coding questions, finance tests, and AI tests. Plus, you can't even add your own questions or customize tests based on job descriptions!

Thankfully, there are plenty of alternatives to consider, with Adaface leading the pack. Adaface offers a vast test library, strong proctoring, and caters to diverse roles, from aptitude to coding.

No matter your specific hiring needs, remember that numerous assessment solutions can empower you to make smarter, faster, and fairer hiring decisions. Adaface is here to help!

Ready to supercharge your hiring process? Give Adaface a try today!