Top 10 Brillium Alternatives & Competitors

Why Might Recruiters Seek a Brillium Competitor?

I've taken a good look at Brillium and its competitors to understand what makes recruiters explore other options. I looked at features, how easy it is to use, what users say, and how much it costs to understand why HR professionals and hiring managers might consider alternatives.

Limited test library. Brillium primarily offers the platform to conduct assessments, requiring users to source or create their own question banks. This can be time-consuming and challenging for teams without dedicated resources to develop and maintain a library of relevant, high-quality questions.

Lack of built-in proctoring. Brillium's website doesn't mention any built-in proctoring or anti-cheating features. Without these, recruiters might find it difficult to ensure test integrity and prevent candidates from cheating during assessments. Consider solutions that offer webcam, window, and IP proctoring features to maintain a fair and secure testing environment.

Scalability concerns with user-based pricing. Brillium's pricing structure is based on the number of users, which might become costly as your team grows. Platforms with credit-based pricing, like Adaface, can offer a more scalable and budget-friendly approach, especially for larger organizations or those with fluctuating hiring needs.

1. Adaface

Best for: Evaluate candidates across business, aptitude, and technical roles with a single platform.

Looking for a strong alternative to Brillium? Adaface offers a modern assessment platform designed to streamline your hiring process and provide accurate candidate insights.

One major drawback of Brillium is its lack of a built-in test library. You have to bring your own questions, which can be time-consuming and require skill-based knowledge. Adaface solves this with its extensive library of 500+ tests, covering a wide range of skills and roles, ready to use out of the box.

Beyond the test library, Adaface addresses another challenge with Brillium: the lack of strong proctoring features. Adaface offers a suite of anti-cheating measures including:

• Webcam proctoring
• Window and tab tracking
• IP address logging
• Device fingerprinting
• Copy-paste protection.

Robust Proctoring for Test Integrity

Adaface's proctoring suite is designed to ensure fair and reliable assessment results. We understand that test integrity is paramount. That's why we've incorporated multiple layers of protection.

Our platform uses webcam proctoring, along with window and tab tracking. It also has IP and device fingerprint logging. We even have copy-paste protection. This helps create a secure testing environment and minimize the risk of cheating. This suite comes included in all our pricing plans. No extra add-ons are needed!

Extensive Library for Business Roles

Adaface isn't just for tech roles. We have a wide range of assessments for business skills. This includes Excel, finance, accounting, and proficiency with software like Google Sheets.

Our tests can be tailored to match the job description. This allows a single assessment to evaluate all must-have skills from the JD. It saves time for both recruiters and candidates, and improves accuracy.

Adaface vs Brillium Attributes

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests on technical skills, cognitive abilities, language proficiency, and more
• Extensive ATS integrations and the possibility to build custom integrations
• Customizable assessments
• Excellent anti-cheating measures
• Bulk candidate management
• Tests available in multiple languages
• Regular updates and quality checks on tests

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing. A free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits lets you explore the platform before subscribing. No credit card required to start.

Available plans include: Individual ($180/yr), Starter ($500/yr), Pro ($900/yr), Scale ($3000/yr), Growth ($5500/yr), Enterprise ($20,000/year), and Unlimited ($50000/yr). All plans include all proctoring features and 500+ tests.

2. TestDome

Best for: Skills testing for various roles

TestDome offers a platform to assess candidates across diverse skill sets, ranging from programming and data science to aptitude and personality. It provides a wide range of ready-made tests, which can be a good starting point for evaluating candidates.

Unlike Brillium, TestDome provides a library of ready-to-use tests, saving you the hassle of creating your own from scratch. This can be useful if you need to quickly assess candidates for common skills. However, this also means you're stuck with their questions.

While TestDome offers a decent selection of tests, it lacks the ability to deeply customize assessments to match specific job descriptions. This is where platforms like Adaface shine, allowing you to tailor assessments for better accuracy.

How TestDome compares to Brillium?

Key Features

• Wide range of skill tests available
• Video interviews for candidate evaluation
• Automated scoring for faster results

TestDome Pros

• Large library of pre-made tests
• Supports coding questions in various languages
• Offers video interview capabilities
• Automated scoring saves time
• Mobile-friendly assessments

TestDome Cons

• No option for creating custom questions
• Lacks custom data location support
• No custom API is available for integrations
• Does not provide candidate benchmarking

TestDome Pricing

TestDome's pricing starts at $100, which gives you credits for assessing candidates. They charge on a per-candidate basis, so the cost depends on how many people you test. There is a free trial available to test the platform, but no unlimited plans for high-volume hiring. For detailed pricing, it's best to visit their website.

3. CodeSignal

Best for: Technical skills assessment platform

CodeSignal specializes in evaluating technical skills, offering a range of assessments primarily focused on coding and development roles. Unlike Brillium, which provides a platform for assessments but requires you to bring your own questions, CodeSignal offers a library of ready-to-use tests focused on technical skills.

CodeSignal's main strength lies in assessing coding skills. While Brillium lets you add your own questions, it doesn't offer a built-in library of coding challenges or an IDE for candidates to demonstrate their abilities. This makes CodeSignal a stronger choice for companies specifically looking to evaluate coding proficiency.

However, CodeSignal's focus is primarily on technical skills. If you need to assess a broader range of skills beyond coding, such as aptitude, personality, or job-specific knowledge, you might find it limiting compared to a more versatile platform or using a skills assessment platform like Adaface that can create custom assessments for any role.

How CodeSignal compares to Brillium?

Key Features

• Candidate Screening: Helps screen talent with structured assessments for consistent hiring.
• Live Coding Interviews: Provides a functional IDE for developers to showcase skills.
• SkillUp: Uses AI to filter candidates by skills and certifications.

CodeSignal Pros

• Strong focus on coding assessments.
• Offers a platform for live coding interviews.
• Integrates with popular ATS systems.
• Automated scoring for coding questions.
• Provides candidate benchmarking.

CodeSignal Cons

• Lacks assessments for non-technical skills like aptitude or personality.
• No support for custom coding questions.
• Doesn't offer custom data location support.
• No custom API available to integrate with other systems.

CodeSignal Pricing

CodeSignal does not publicly display its pricing. You need to contact their sales team to get a quote. Also, CodeSignal does not offer a free trial to explore the platform before committing.

4. TestGrid

Best for: Aptitude, Personality Assessments

TestGrid offers a platform for conducting aptitude and personality assessments. It aims to help businesses evaluate candidates based on various skills and traits.

Unlike Brillium, which primarily provides the software for assessments and requires you to bring your own content, TestGrid offers pre-built aptitude and personality tests. This can save you time and effort in creating assessments from scratch.

However, TestGrid lacks the flexibility to create custom questions or coding tests. If you need tailored assessments specific to your company's needs, or if you're hiring for technical roles and need to assess coding skills, a platform like Adaface would be a better fit.

How TestGrid compares to Brillium?

Key Features

• Aptitude Tests: Evaluate candidates' cognitive abilities.
• Personality Tests: Assess personality traits and fit.
• ATS Integrations: Connect with your existing hiring systems.

TestGrid Pros

• Decent ATS integration capabilities.
• Tests for Aptitude and Personality
• Provides PDF Reports for easy sharing.
• Offers email support and a help center for users.
• User authentication is available

TestGrid Cons

• Lacks coding assessments for technical roles. You won't be able to test a developer's coding abilities directly.
• No custom question creation. This limits your ability to tailor assessments to unique job requirements.
• Limited test types overall. They don't offer tests for skills like typing, language proficiency, finance, AI, or cloud computing.
• Pricing isn't transparent. You have to sign up to get the details.

TestGrid Pricing

TestGrid doesn't publicly display its pricing. You'll need to sign up to receive pricing details. There is no mentioned free trial.

5. Xobin

Best for: Versatile skill assessment platform

Xobin offers a platform for conducting skill assessments across various domains, including coding, aptitude, and job-specific skills. It aims to help recruiters identify qualified candidates through a range of tests and features.

Brillium primarily provides the software to conduct assessments but leaves you to source or create your own question bank. Xobin, on the other hand, provides a ready-to-use test library covering a spectrum of skills. This includes programming, aptitude, business acumen, and even typing tests. This makes Xobin a more complete solution for companies looking to quickly deploy assessments.

Xobin offers programming tests, situational judgment tests, aptitude tests, business skills tests, typing tests and personality tests. This is a wider coverage than what Brillium offers. This breadth allows for a more thorough evaluation of candidates, ensuring a better fit for the role. Consider exploring Adaface's pre-employment assessment test library for an even more comprehensive solution.

How Xobin compares to Brillium?

Key Features

• Coding assessments with automated scoring.
• Library of ready-to-use tests for various roles.
• Webcam proctoring and copy-paste protection.

Xobin Pros

• Supports a wide range of assessment types.
• Includes coding assessments with automated scoring, reducing manual effort.
• Offers customizable invitation, shortlist, and rejection templates for branding.
• Integrates with various ATS platforms for streamlined workflows.
• Provides multiple question sets to minimize question leakage.

Xobin Cons

• Lacks custom coding question support, limiting the ability to assess specific technical skills.
• No custom API which limits its integration with niche HR systems.
• No support for location or IP proctoring.
• Lacks AI and cloud skill assessments.

Xobin Pricing

Xobin does not offer transparent pricing or a free trial. To get a quote, you have to sign up for a demo and speak with their sales team. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly evaluate whether Xobin fits your budget. Consider Adaface Assessments Pricing for transparent and flexible pricing options.

6. Coderbyte

Best for: Coding skill based hiring

Coderbyte focuses on assessing coding skills, offering a range of coding challenges and courses. Think of it as a playground for developers, where they can show off their coding prowess, and recruiters get to see if they're any good! It's a good start to see how Coderbyte fares against Brillium

Brillium, on the other hand, is more of a general testing platform where you bring your own questions. It doesn't offer a built-in library of coding challenges.

Coderbyte has code playback, automated scoring, and the ability to add custom coding questions. So, if you're looking to test coding skills specifically, Coderbyte might be a better bet than Brillium's bring-your-own-content approach.

How Coderbyte compares to Brillium?

Key Features

• Coding challenges in various languages
• Assessment reports with code playback
• Custom coding questions

Coderbyte Pros

• Large library of coding challenges.
• Supports code playback for better analysis.
• Offers a free trial to test the platform.
• Has webcam proctoring and copy paste protection features.
• Offers coding challenges in various languages

Coderbyte Cons

• Lacks aptitude, business, and role-specific tests beyond software roles.
• No custom branding options for assessments.
• Doesn't provide detailed skills analysis in reports.
• Integrates with fewer ATS platforms compared to alternatives.

Coderbyte Pricing

Coderbyte offers both subscription and pay-as-you-go plans. The subscription plan costs $1,699/year, while the pay-as-you-go plan starts at $350 for 30 candidates. Contact them directly for enterprise pricing. There is a free trial available to test the platform out.

7. Testgorilla

Best for: Skills assessment, volume hiring

TestGorilla is a platform designed to streamline the hiring process by offering a wide range of pre-employment tests. It aims to help businesses quickly and accurately assess candidates' skills and personality traits.

Brillium focuses on providing the software to conduct tests, requiring you to bring your own question bank. TestGorilla, however, offers a library of ready-to-use tests, allowing recruiters to immediately assess candidates without creating custom questions.

While Brillium allows you to add your own questions, TestGorilla provides a more comprehensive solution with coding questions, situational judgment tests, and even tests for typing skills. This makes TestGorilla a better alternative for businesses seeking a complete assessment solution.

How Testgorilla compares to Brillium?

Key Features

• Wide range of tests: Includes cognitive ability, personality, job-specific skills, and language proficiency.
• Ready-made assessments: Offers a library of pre-built tests for various roles and skills.
• Candidate ranking: Ranks candidates based on their test performance.

Testgorilla Pros

• Extensive test library covers a broad range of skills and roles.
• Good for volume hiring with features to assess many candidates quickly.
• Offers webcam proctoring and other measures to prevent cheating.
• Provides a structured and standardized assessment process.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.

Testgorilla Cons

• Lacks the ability to create custom coding questions.
• Does not support assessments for AI related roles.
• Limited options for customizing the look and feel of the platform with company branding.
• Doesn't have custom data location support for enhanced data security.

Testgorilla Pricing

TestGorilla's pricing scales with the size of your company. For a company with 31-50 employees, the plans start from $208 USD per month ($2,496 per annum). Contact TestGorilla for enterprise pricing. They don't have an unlimited plan, and the unlimited invites have fair use policy restrictions.

8. Canditech

Best for: Job simulation-based assessments

Canditech offers a skills assessment platform focusing on job simulation assessments. Their approach aims to mirror real-world job tasks, offering candidates a practical experience during the evaluation process.

Unlike Brillium, which offers the software to conduct tests where you bring your own question bank, Canditech offers a library of ready-to-use tests. This means you can start assessing candidates immediately without investing time in creating assessments from scratch.

While Canditech offers ready-made tests, they don't support custom questions. This can be a limitation if you need to assess candidates on very specific skills or use cases unique to your organization. If you are looking for custom questions that are also scenario-based you might want to explore other alternatives like Adaface.

How Canditech compares to Brillium?

Key Features

• Job Simulation Assessments: Candidates complete tasks mirroring day-to-day job responsibilities.
• Ready-to-use Tests: Access a library of pre-built assessments for various roles.
• Automated Scoring: Receive automated scores and reports to speed up the hiring process.

Canditech Pros

• Simulates Real Job Scenarios: Provides candidates with a realistic preview of the job.
• Variety of Assessments: Covers multiple job roles and industries.
• Integration with ATS: Streamlines the hiring process.
• Candidate Experience: Offers a more engaging assessment experience.
• Benchmarking: Compare candidate performance against others in the pool.

Canditech Cons

• Lacks Custom Questions: Cannot create or add your own questions.
• No Custom API: No custom API integrations
• Limited Test Types: Doesn't offer Typing tests and Language tests.
• No Mobile Framework Questions: Limits testing for Mobile developer positions.

Canditech Pricing

Canditech provides a free trial to explore the platform. Their starter plan begins at $150 per month ($1800 billed annually). For scale, growth, and enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact their sales team.

9. AssessFirst

Best for: Predicting candidate's job performance

AssessFirst offers a suite of assessments designed to predict a candidate's potential job performance and fit within an organization. It focuses on personality, motivation, and cognitive abilities to provide a holistic view of the individual.

Unlike Brillium, which primarily provides the software to conduct assessments with a bring-your-own-questions approach, AssessFirst offers pre-designed assessments. This is particularly useful for recruiters who want to quickly gauge a candidate's potential without spending time crafting questions.

However, AssessFirst doesn't allow for custom questions or customized tests per job description. If you are looking for a solution that creates custom tests based on a job description, consider Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests that analyzes the job description and creates a best matching test with questions of different typing and testing all skills relevant for the JD, all in one single test.

How AssessFirst compares to Brillium?

Key Features

• Personality assessments to understand candidate traits.
• Aptitude tests to evaluate cognitive skills.
• Motivation questionnaires to identify drivers and values.

AssessFirst Pros

• Ready-to-use tests for immediate assessment.
• Mobile-friendly assessments.
• ATS integrations for seamless workflow.
• Skills profile in scorecards for quick insights.
• Benchmarking candidates against others.

AssessFirst Cons

• Lacks coding assessments for technical roles.
• No custom question creation.
• No custom data location support.
• No plagiarism detection.

AssessFirst Pricing

AssessFirst doesn't publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact their sales team to get a quote, which might not be ideal if you prefer transparent and readily available pricing information. Also, there is no free trial available.

10. Evalart

Best for: Skills assessment, quick setup

Evalart provides a platform for creating and conducting online assessments, offering a library of ready-to-use tests and the ability to add custom questions. It aims to help businesses evaluate candidates across various skills.

Unlike Brillium, which primarily offers the software to conduct assessments using your own questions, Evalart provides both the platform and a question library. This means you can get started faster without needing to build your tests from scratch.

However, Evalart lacks scenario-based questions for specific roles. If you need tests that closely mimic real-world job situations, a platform like Adaface, which designs custom tests based on job descriptions, might be a better fit.

How Evalart compares to Brillium?

Key Features

• Ready-made test library for quick assessments.
• Option to add your own custom questions.
• Webcam proctoring to monitor candidates.

Evalart Pros

• Offers a free trial to explore the platform.
• Provides email and live chat support.
• Has coding questions and aptitude tests.
• Allows candidates to authenticate before starting the test.
• Generates PDF, Excel, and CSV reports.

Evalart Cons

• Lacks situational judgment tests.
• Doesn't offer custom-branded assessments.
• No custom API for integrations.
• Limited anti-cheating features compared to platforms like Adaface. No IP or device fingerprint tracking and no Chat GPT detection.

Evalart Pricing

Evalart doesn't publicly display its pricing. You need to contact their sales team to get a quote, which might not be ideal if you prefer transparent pricing upfront. They do offer a 1-month free trial.

Found Your Perfect Brillium Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface offers a vast library of 500+ tests, covering aptitude, finance, personality, technical and coding roles, backed by a strong proctoring suite. It's trusted by clients in 70+ countries and stands out with its credit-based pricing that includes all proctoring features.
• TestDome provides skill assessment across programming, aptitude, business roles with web and webcam proctoring, but lacks custom question creation and doesn't offer company branding.
• CodeSignal focuses on technical assessments with coding questions and automated scoring. However, it lacks aptitude and business skill tests, and its assessments can be quite lengthy.
• TestGrid offers aptitude and personality assessments, but lacks programming tests and the ability to add custom questions. They do offer email and chat support along with GDPR compliance.
• Xobin offers programming, aptitude, business skill tests and support for typing tests. It allows customizable invitation, shortlist, and rejection templates for company branding and has multiple question sets to prevent cheating.
• Coderbyte is tailored for software-related roles and provides custom coding questions. However, it lacks ATS integrations and doesn't offer aptitude or business skill tests.
• TestGorilla offers a wide range of tests, including programming, aptitude, and personality assessments. However, it doesn't allow custom questions and lacks plagiarism detection for code.
• Canditech provides assessments in programming, aptitude, finance, and AI, offering good insight into candidate skills, but has no custom questions and doesn't offer CSV reports.
• AssessFirst focuses on aptitude and personality assessments with a short 10-minute assessment length. However, it doesn't offer programming tests, custom questions, or a help documentation for candidates.
• Evalart offers programming and aptitude tests with multiple language support, but lacks business skill tests and the ability to customize invitation templates.

We've journeyed through a landscape of candidate assessment tools, each with its own strengths. Now, let's bring it all together.

Brillium shines with its flexibility, letting you add your own questions and integrate with your ATS. However, it lacks a built-in test library, meaning you'll need to source or create your own content. This can be time-consuming and may not suit everyone.

Fortunately, you have a lot of strong alternatives to consider, each offering unique features and benefits. Among them, Adaface stands out with its extensive test library, proctoring capabilities, and client base across 70+ countries.

No matter your specific needs – whether it's aptitude, coding, or personality assessments – there's a Brillium alternative ready to step up. Consider your priorities, and you'll surely discover the perfect fit. Adaface is a great place to start!

Ready to transform your hiring process? Give Adaface a try and see the difference!