Top 10 AssessFirst Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why the Hunt for AssessFirst Alternatives?

I've done a bit of digging to understand what's making hiring teams peek at other options besides AssessFirst. Turns out, there are a few common sticking points that keep popping up.

Limited assessment types can be a deal-breaker for some. AssessFirst primarily focuses on personality and aptitude assessments. If your roles require skills testing in areas like coding, finance, or AI, you might need to look elsewhere to get a complete picture of your candidates' abilities.

A lack of customization options can be frustrating. While AssessFirst offers ready-to-use tests, the inability to add custom questions or tailor assessments to specific job descriptions limits the depth of evaluation. Some recruiters might want to create tests that accurately reflect the nuances of a role and their company's culture.

The absence of strong proctoring features can be a concern. In today's remote hiring landscape, ensuring test integrity is more important than ever. AssessFirst lacks advanced proctoring features like webcam monitoring, screen recording, and copy-paste disabling, which may leave some hiring teams wanting more assurance that candidates are completing tests fairly. Companies are assessing skills to be certain of candidate skill and this will be effective with strong anti-cheating measures.

1. Adaface

Best for: Skills assessments for roles ranging from accounting to AI

Looking for a strong alternative to AssessFirst? Adaface offers a versatile assessment platform tailored to meet diverse hiring needs.

AssessFirst's focus on personality assessments may leave gaps in skills evaluation. Adaface bridges this gap with a wide array of skill-based assessments, including coding, aptitude, and business skills, all within a single platform. This ensures a thorough evaluation of candidates' capabilities, aligning with the specific requirements of each role. It allows you to create a better candidate profile for hiring decisions.

Adaface stands out with its library of 500+ tests and features tailored to make screening seamless:

Extensive Test Library Across Verticals

Adaface boasts a rich library of over 500 skills tests, ensuring you can assess candidates across diverse roles and industries. Unlike AssessFirst, which primarily focuses on personality assessments, Adaface covers a wide spectrum, including:

• Technical skills (Coding Tests)
• Aptitude (Aptitude Tests For Employment | Adaface)
• Business skills
• Finance and Accounting
• Typing
• Language proficiency
• AI and Data Science

This wide coverage ensures you have the right tools to evaluate candidates, regardless of the role you're hiring for. With Adaface, find right candidates with the Pre-Employment Assessment Test Library For 500+ Skills | Adaface

Robust Proctoring for Fair Assessments

Adaface provides an array of proctoring features to maintain test integrity and ensure a fair assessment process. Unlike AssessFirst, which lacks certain proctoring capabilities, Adaface offers features such as:

• Webcam proctoring
• Window and tab tracking
• IP address logging
• Device fingerprinting
• Copy-paste protection
• Full-screen enforcement
• Chat GPT protection

These tools help to ensure that candidates are completing the tests fairly and without outside assistance, giving you confidence in the reliability of your results. Learn more about how we ensure test integrity with Webcam, window, tab, IP proctoring for cheating detection.

Adaface vs AssessFirst Attributes

Adaface Pros

• Wide range of skill assessments beyond personality
• Extensive test library with 500+ tests across verticals
• Strong proctoring features to prevent cheating
• Customizable assessments tailored to job descriptions
• Public API for enterprise users
• Transparent and easy-to-understand pricing
• Used by clients from 70+ countries

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing plans to suit different hiring volumes. You can start with a Adaface Assessments Pricing that includes all proctoring features and access to the complete test library. All tests are available for all the plans

• Free trial: Check out the platform with 2 sample tests and 5 free credits. No credit card required to start.
• Individual: $180/year
• Starter: $500/year
• Pro: $900/year
• Scale: $3000/year
• Growth: $5500/year
• Enterprise: $20,000/year
• Unlimited: $50,000/year

2. Hackerrank

Best for: Technical skill screening at scale

HackerRank provides a platform primarily focused on assessing the coding skills of developers. With a strong emphasis on technical roles, it offers a range of coding challenges and assessments to evaluate candidates.

HackerRank shines when you need to assess coding abilities, offering a functional IDE for live coding interviews and automated scoring. This provides a deeper dive into a candidate's practical skills, something that AssessFirst, with its focus on personality assessments, doesn't cover.

However, if you need a broader range of assessments beyond coding, like aptitude, business acumen, or even typing skills, HackerRank might leave you wanting more. For a solution that provides a more well-rounded view of a candidate, consider a platform like Adaface.

How Hackerrank compares to AssessFirst?

Key Features

• Candidate Screening: Structured assessments for consistent evaluation.
• Live Coding Interviews: Functional IDE for real-time coding assessments.
• SkillUp: AI-powered talent directory for skill-based candidate filtering.

Hackerrank Pros

• Developer Community: Trusted platform popular among developers.
• Certified Assessments: Role-based tests for in-demand tech skills.
• Plagiarism Detection: Systems to ensure assessment integrity.
• Real-World Coding Questions: Sandboxed environment mirroring job conditions.
• ATS Integrations: Integrates with most ATS systems.

Hackerrank Cons

• No Emotional Intelligence Screening: Lacks assessments for soft skills.
• Limited Business Skill Tests: Primarily focuses on technical skills, missing the boat on other important areas.
• Test Integrity Issues: Default questions are easily googleable, coding questions are solveable by GPT. So there's that.
• Lengthy Tests: Typical assessment can be 2 hours long, reducing candidate experience.

Hackerrank Pricing

HackerRank offers different pricing tiers, starting at $100 per month (billed annually). For enterprise solutions and custom requirements, you'll need to contact HackerRank directly. Note that there's no easy signup or a way to explore all features before getting in touch with sales.

3. TalView

Best for: End-to-end talent lifecycle management

TalView offers a unified platform covering the entire talent lifecycle, from sourcing to onboarding, performance management, and even learning. It aims to streamline processes and offer insights at every stage.

AssessFirst focuses primarily on personality and aptitude assessments. TalView, on the other hand, expands beyond assessments into a full suite of talent management tools. If you're looking for a platform that handles more than just pre-employment testing, TalView may be a better fit.

While AssessFirst has ready-to-use tests, TalView offers a wider array of solutions. However, if you need custom tests designed per job description, Adaface is a better alternative. Adaface creates custom tests by analyzing the job description, to create the best matching test with questions of different typing and testing all skills relevant for the JD, all in one single test.

How TalView compares to AssessFirst?

Key Features

• Video Interviewing: Conduct asynchronous and live video interviews.
• Assessment Platform: Evaluate candidates using coding, aptitude, and personality tests.
• Talent Analytics: Leverage data to understand workforce trends and improve decision-making.

TalView Pros

• Unified Platform: Integrates various HR functions into one system.
• Video Interview Capabilities: Strong video interviewing features for remote hiring.
• Customizable Workflows: Adaptable to different organizational needs.

TalView Cons

• Mobile Unfriendly: Secure browser requires desktop environment. which reduces candidate experience.
• Lacks focus on question quality: Doesn't seem to have proprietary algorithms to improve the quality of questions like Adaface.
• No Free Trial: No free trial to test the platform before commiting to it.
• Limited Transparency: Pricing isn't readily available; you need to contact sales.

TalView Pricing

TalView does not publicly list its pricing. You'll need to fill out a form on their website and speak with their sales team to get a quote. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to quickly assess if it fits your budget. There is no free trial available.

4. Pymetrics

Best for: Bias-free talent discovery

Pymetrics uses gamified assessments powered by AI to predict candidate potential and ensure unbiased hiring decisions. By focusing on cognitive and personality traits, Pymetrics aims to match candidates with roles where they are most likely to succeed.

While AssessFirst relies on self-reported questionnaires, Pymetrics utilizes a series of games that measure cognitive and emotional attributes. This approach can reduce bias and offer a more objective view of a candidate's potential.

However, Pymetrics, like AssessFirst, lacks skills testing. This is where you might want to consider a platform like Adaface, which combines personality and aptitude assessments with skill-based evaluations.

How Pymetrics compares to AssessFirst?

Key Features

• Gamified assessments for cognitive traits
• AI-driven candidate matching
• Bias mitigation in hiring
• Personality assessments

Pymetrics Pros

• Claims to reduce bias in hiring decisions.
• Gamified assessments can improve candidate engagement.
• Focuses on potential, not just past experience.
• Integrates with various ATS platforms.
• Provides data-driven insights into candidate fit.

Pymetrics Cons

• Lacks the ability to assess specific technical or job-related skills, unlike pre-employment assessment tests platforms.
• Limited customization options for assessments.
• Relies heavily on AI, which may raise concerns about transparency and explainability.
• Does not offer coding or situational judgement tests.
• Pricing is not readily available and requires contacting sales.

Pymetrics Pricing

Pymetrics does not publicly list its pricing. You need to contact their sales team for a custom quote, which can be a hurdle for companies seeking quick and transparent pricing information. Unlike some alternatives, Pymetrics does not offer a free trial or a self-service signup option.

5. TestGrid

Best for: Aptitude and Personality Testing

TestGrid offers a platform focused on aptitude and personality assessments, aiming to help recruiters identify candidates who fit the desired profile. While AssessFirst emphasizes personality traits, TestGrid provides a broader approach with aptitude tests.

AssessFirst leans heavily on personality assessments, which can be limiting if you need to evaluate a broader range of skills. TestGrid includes aptitude tests, offering a more rounded view of a candidate's abilities.

However, TestGrid doesn't provide coding tests, situational judgment tests, or the ability to create custom questions, which means it might not suit companies needing to assess specific job-related skills or tailor assessments to their unique requirements. For a more complete solution, consider using Adaface to create customized assessments for skills based hiring.

How TestGrid compares to AssessFirst?

Key Features

• Aptitude Tests: Evaluates cognitive abilities with numerical reasoning, verbal reasoning, and logical reasoning tests.
• Personality Assessments: Gauges personality traits, work styles, and behavioral tendencies.
• ATS Integration: Connects with applicant tracking systems for a streamlined hiring process.

TestGrid Pros

• User-friendly interface for easy navigation.
• Offers both aptitude and personality assessments.
• Provides candidate reports with detailed insights.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.
• Good customer support.

TestGrid Cons

• No coding tests for technical roles.
• Lacks situational judgment tests to evaluate practical decision-making.
• No custom question creation, limiting test personalization.
• Limited information available about security and proctoring features.
• Smaller question bank compared to other platforms.

TestGrid Pricing

TestGrid does not publicly display its pricing. You need to sign up to receive pricing information. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to compare TestGrid with other assessment platforms directly. Without a free trial, exploring the platform's features before committing is also not possible.

6. Codility

Best for: Technical skills assessment platform

Codility is a technical assessment platform primarily designed to evaluate the coding skills of software engineering candidates. It offers a range of coding tests and challenges to assess a candidate's proficiency in various programming languages and frameworks.

AssessFirst focuses on personality and aptitude assessments. If you need to assess coding skills, especially with practical coding challenges, Codility is better against AssessFirst.

Codility lets candidates demonstrate skills through coding, which helps identify top technical talent. Unlike AssessFirst, it helps evaluate coding proficiency which is key for software engineering roles.

How Codility compares to AssessFirst?

Key Features

• Coding Challenges: Candidates solve real-world coding problems in a browser-based IDE.
• Language Support: Supports many programming languages.
• Automated Scoring: Code is scored automatically, saving time.

Codility Pros

• Real Coding Environment: Candidates code in a realistic setting.
• Automated Assessments: Saves time with automatic scoring and reporting.
• Skill-Based Evaluation: Focuses purely on coding skills.
• Plagiarism Detection: Helps maintain the integrity of the assessments.
• Multiple Question sets: Offers a way to have multiple test sets for hiring at scale.

Codility Cons

• Lacks Holistic Assessments: Doesn't cover personality or behavioral traits, unlike solutions like Adaface.
• No Business, aptitude or role specific questions: Focuses only on coding skills, neglecting other areas.
• Lengthy Tests: Tests are long and can be time consuming, which can effect candidate test taking rate. Codility tests can take upto 2 hours.
• No Excel Simulation: No support for excel workbook questions to test excel skills.

Codility Pricing

Codility's pricing includes a Starter plan at $1200 per annum, and a Scale plan at $5000 per annum. For Growth plans, you'll need to contact the Codility team for a quote. While they offer a free trial, direct sign-up isn't available; you'll need to fill out a form and wait for their team to grant access.

7. Testgorilla

Best for: Skills-based talent screening

TestGorilla is an assessment platform that provides a wide library of tests to assess candidates across various skills and competencies. It aims to help businesses make data-driven hiring decisions by evaluating candidates' abilities through pre-employment assessments. This helps teams improve their online assessment platform.

Unlike AssessFirst, which primarily focuses on personality assessments and aptitude, TestGorilla offers a broader range of skills assessments, including coding tests, language proficiency tests, and role-specific tests. This makes TestGorilla a more versatile option for companies looking to evaluate a wider array of skills beyond just personality traits.

TestGorilla's focus on skills assessment helps recruiters identify candidates who possess the specific abilities required for a job role. While AssessFirst provides insights into candidate potential, TestGorilla emphasizes current skill levels, which is useful for roles where immediate competence is needed.

How Testgorilla compares to AssessFirst?

Key Features

• Diverse Test Library: Offers a wide range of pre-employment tests covering cognitive ability, programming, personality, and more.
• Candidate Ranking: Ranks candidates based on their test performance, helping recruiters quickly identify top performers.
• Custom Test Creation: Allows businesses to create custom tests by combining different test modules.
• Video Interviews: Integrated video interviewing feature to assess soft skills and communication abilities.

Testgorilla Pros

• Wide Variety of Tests: Covers a broad spectrum of skills and competencies.
• User-Friendly Interface: Easy to navigate and set up assessments.
• Integrated Video Interviews: Streamlines the hiring process.
• Data-Driven Insights: Provides data to support better hiring decisions.
• Customizable Assessments: Offers flexibility in creating tests.

Testgorilla Cons

• Limited Customization: The platform does not support custom questions for specific use cases.
• No AI Tests: Lacks tests for evaluating candidates in artificial intelligence and data science domains. While they do have Data Science tests, it's not comprehensive.
• Test Length: Tests can be lengthy (30-60 mins) and may create candidate drop off. Shorter tests improve candidate experience. Adaface tests are typically 40 minutes.
• No Plagiarism Detection: Lacks plagiarism detection for coding assessments. Tests integrity may be compromised.

Testgorilla Pricing

TestGorilla's pricing scales with company size. They offer different plans depending on the number of employees in your organization. For example, for a company with 31-50 employees, the plans start at $208 USD per month (billed annually). Contact TestGorilla for enterprise pricing. Unlimited invites has fair use policy restrictions.

8. Equip

Best for: Affordable Technical Skill Assessments

Equip offers a platform focused on assessing technical skills, primarily targeting developers. It provides a range of tests, including coding challenges, to evaluate candidates' practical abilities. Equip aims to streamline the technical hiring process by offering standardized assessments.

Unlike AssessFirst, Equip provides coding questions, making it suitable for roles requiring hands-on technical skills. However, Equip's question bank is not very large.

If you need a broader assessment solution that covers not just technical skills but also aptitude, business acumen, and personality, a platform like Adaface would be a better fit. Adaface also provides custom questions and custom test design based on job description for highly accurate assessments.

How Equip compares to AssessFirst?

Key Features

• Coding Assessments: Evaluate candidates with coding challenges in various languages.
• Skills Library: Access a pre-built library of technical skill tests.
• Automated Scoring: Get coding assessments scored automatically.

Equip Pros

• Affordable pricing, starting at $1 per candidate.
• Supports coding assessments, which AssessFirst lacks.
• Offers a free trial with 10 free invites.
• Customizable invitation templates for branding.
• Integrates with popular ATS platforms.

Equip Cons

• Lacks comprehensive test coverage beyond technical skills. No support for personality, situational judgment, or business skills tests.
• Questions easily searchable on the internet, impacting test integrity.
• No custom question creation, limiting adaptability to specific needs.
• Does not offer skill-wise analysis in reports for detailed candidate insights.

Equip Pricing

Equip's pricing is structured around a pay-per-candidate model, starting at $1 per candidate. They offer a free trial with 10 free invites. There are no tiered plans or unlimited options available.

9. TestWe

Best for: Bring your own questions

TestWe offers a platform to conduct assessments, but unlike many others, it doesn't provide a pre-built question library. Think of it as a digital exam hall - you bring the questions, and TestWe provides the space and tools to administer the test.

AssessFirst focuses on personality assessments and aptitude, but lacks the ability to test specific skills or knowledge areas directly. TestWe lets you assess candidates on your own criteria. You have complete control over the assessment content.

However, this also means you're responsible for creating and maintaining your own question bank, which can be time-consuming. Unlike Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests, TestWe doesn't give you a library of questions to use.

How TestWe compares to AssessFirst?

Key Features

• Exam creation and delivery
• Live proctoring via webcam (supervisor needed)
• Question versioning

TestWe Pros

• Complete control over assessment content.
• Suitable for niche skills or knowledge areas.
• Email support.
• Help Center access.
• GDPR compliant

TestWe Cons

• No pre-built question library.
• Requires manual question creation and maintenance.
• Lacks automated scoring.
• No ATS Integrations

TestWe Pricing

TestWe doesn't offer transparent pricing on their website. You'll need to contact them directly for a quote. Unlike Adaface Assessments Pricing, there are no readily available plans to explore.

10. CodeSignal

Best for: Tech Hiring, Coding skills

CodeSignal focuses on technical assessment, particularly for coding skills. It provides a platform to evaluate candidates' coding abilities through challenges and real-world coding scenarios.

AssessFirst primarily targets personality and aptitude, often missing the mark when hands-on coding skills are the focus. CodeSignal, on the other hand, dives deep into code, offering coding tests and challenges that mirror real-world development tasks.

Where AssessFirst offers a general overview, CodeSignal provides a granular view of a candidate's coding expertise. If you're seeking developers who can actually code, CodeSignal provides specialized tools for the job. Consider platforms like Adaface for a blend of coding questions and scenario-based questions for a holistic assessment.

How CodeSignal compares to AssessFirst?

Key Features

• Coding challenges in multiple languages
• Integrated development environment (IDE) for assessments
• Skill certification and badging

CodeSignal Pros

• Strong focus on coding skill assessment
• Wide range of coding languages and frameworks supported
• Automated scoring and reporting
• Code playback feature for detailed analysis
• Integrations with applicant tracking systems (ATS)

CodeSignal Cons

• Limited scope beyond technical skills; lacks personality or aptitude assessments.
• No support for assessing business skills like sales, marketing, or finance, unlike Adaface.
• Shorter tests for faster analysis are not provided.
• Doesn't offer custom coding questions to tailor assessments to specific roles or projects.

CodeSignal Pricing

CodeSignal's pricing isn't readily available; you'll need to contact their sales team for a custom quote. They don't offer a free trial, so exploring the platform before committing is not an option.

Found Your Perfect AssessFirst Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface boasts a rich test library with 500+ skills, from aptitude tests to coding tests, and offers a robust proctoring suite, all without seat-based pricing. Scale globally with clients across 70+ countries.
• HackerRank focuses on technical skill assessment, allowing you to add your questions, but tests can take upto 2 hours.
• Talview provides a wide range of assessments, from aptitude to business skills, but lacks customisable invitation templates and has unclear pricing.
• Pymetrics uses neuroscience-based games to assess cognitive and personality traits, but doesn't allow for custom questions and has limited branding options.
• TestGrid integrates with ATS systems, but has limited information available regarding its features and pricing, and the sample questions provided on its website are simple and easily googleable.
• Codility is known for coding assessments with code playback, but does not have business, aptitude, and finance tests, and does not have customisable shortlist or rejection templates.
• TestGorilla offers a variety of tests, but does not have custom questions or a custom API, and the questions are not GPT protected.
• Equip provides coding assessments and integrates with ATS, but has sample questions on their website that are easily googleable and has limited customisation.
• TestWe offers assessment software but requires you to bring your own question bank, making setup take weeks.
• CodeSignal focuses on coding assessments, but lacks custom questions, has no individual or free trial plan, and requires you to fill a form and speak with the sales team for sign up.

We've journeyed through a landscape of talent assessment solutions, each with its unique strengths. Now, let's wrap up our exploration of AssessFirst alternatives.

AssessFirst shines with its personality assessments, but its limited scope—lacking coding, business, or finance skill evaluations—can leave you wanting more. What if you need to assess a marketing guru's Excel skills or a developer's coding prowess?

Thankfully, there's a world of alternatives ready to step up. Among them, Adaface stands out with its wide range of skills assessments, strong proctoring, and flexible, credit-based pricing.

No matter your hiring puzzle – be it technical skills, aptitude, or personality fit – there's an online assessment platform to lean on. Adaface is one of them!

Ready to see how Adaface can transform your hiring? Check out Adaface Assessments Pricing.