Top 10 Alva Labs Alternatives & Competitors to Consider

Why are companies seeking alternatives to Alva Labs?

I've done some digging to understand the reasons why HR professionals, recruiters, and hiring managers might be exploring options beyond Alva Labs. Here's what I learned:

Limited test types can be a constraint. Alva Labs concentrates primarily on aptitude and personality assessments, which might leave you wanting if you need to assess job-specific skills across a wider range of roles like finance, customer service or even typing skills. Companies hiring for diverse roles might need a more diverse assessment library.

Assessments can be time-consuming for candidates. With assessment durations stretching to 2 hours, candidates may experience fatigue, potentially impacting completion rates and the quality of results. Shorter, focused assessments often lead to a better candidate experience and more reliable data.

Limited proctoring capabilities raise concerns about test integrity. Without features like webcam proctoring, IP tracking, or copy-paste disabling, ensuring a fair and cheat-proof assessment process can be challenging. A strong proctoring suite is important for maintaining the validity of assessment results.

1. Adaface

Best for: Unleash skill-based hiring for both technical and non-technical roles.

Looking for a strong alternative to Alva Labs? Adaface offers a compelling solution for businesses seeking to streamline their hiring process and identify top talent.

Alva Labs' assessment length can be a significant drawback, often exceeding 2 hours. Adaface solves this by providing assessments that average just 40 minutes. This shorter duration improves candidate experience and completion rates, without sacrificing assessment accuracy. By keeping tests concise and focused, Adaface helps you respect candidates' time while still gaining a insightful view of their abilities.

Adaface stands out by addressing the need for comprehensive skill assessment and robust proctoring. Here's how Adaface improves your screening process:

• Extensive test library with 500+ skills tests.
• Support for diverse roles, including business, technical, and aptitude.
• Advanced proctoring features to maintain test integrity.
• Focus on candidate experience and company branding.
• Scorecards with detailed reporting and analytics.
• Flexible and transparent pricing.
• Enterprise-ready features.

Extensive Test Library with 500+ Skills

Adaface boasts a rich test library covering over 500 skills, going beyond basic aptitude and personality evaluations. Whether you need to assess skills in finance, aptitude, typing, AI, or specific software proficiency, Adaface has you covered. Our tests are designed to evaluate role-specific knowledge, cognitive abilities, language proficiency, and more.

This extensive coverage ensures that you can assess candidates across multiple dimensions, creating a more complete profile of their capabilities. With Adaface, you can confidently evaluate candidates for a wide array of roles and industries, all from a single platform. Explore our Pre-Employment Assessment Test Library today!

Advanced Proctoring Suite

Maintaining test integrity is of utmost importance, and Adaface offers a suite of advanced proctoring features to minimize cheating and ensure score accuracy. We employ measures such as webcam proctoring, which requires candidate permission, to get regular snapshots during the test. This helps verify the candidate's identity and ensures they're not receiving outside assistance.

Our system also includes IP address tracking, device fingerprinting, copy-paste protection, full-screen enforcement, and even Chat GPT detection. With Adaface's proctoring, you can rest assured that your assessments are fair, reliable, and truly reflect the candidate's abilities.

Adaface vs Alva Labs Attributes

Adaface Pros

• More than 500 skills tests for technical skills, cognitive abilities, language proficiency, and more
• Extensive ATS integrations and the possibility to build custom integrations
• Customizable assessments
• Excellent anti-cheating measures
• Tests available in multiple languages
• Regular updates and quality checks on tests
• Used by clients from 70+ countries

Adaface Cons

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support

Adaface Pricing

Adaface offers transparent and flexible pricing options. A free trial with 2 sample tests and 5 credits is available to explore the platform before purchasing, no credit card required. Our self-serve platform includes all proctoring features and 500+ tests in every plan. Pricing plans include: Individual ($180/yr), Starter ($500/yr), Pro ($900/yr), Scale ($3000/yr), Growth ($5500/yr), Enterprise ($20,000/yr), and Unlimited ($50,000/yr).

2. TestGrid

Best for: Aptitude and personality assessments

TestGrid offers a platform for conducting aptitude and personality assessments. It aims to help businesses evaluate candidates based on a variety of standardized tests.

TestGrid shines when you need to quickly gauge a candidate's aptitude or personality traits. However, unlike Adaface, it lacks the capability to create custom questions or tailor tests to specific job descriptions, meaning you might not be able to assess role-specific skills effectively.

Moreover, TestGrid doesn't support coding questions or scenario-based questions. This limits its usefulness for technical roles where practical skills are paramount, a gap Adaface readily fills.

How TestGrid compares to Alva Labs?

Key Features

• Aptitude Testing: Standardized tests to measure cognitive abilities.
• Personality Assessments: Evaluate personality traits relevant to job performance.
• ATS Integration: Connect with your existing Applicant Tracking System.

TestGrid Pros

• Large question bank ensures different tests.
• Offers role-based access for teams.
• Provides email support.
• Integrates with ATS systems.
• Compliant with GDPR standards.

TestGrid Cons

• Lacks coding questions and scenario-based assessments.
• No support for custom question creation.
• Does not support multiple test sets.
• Limited proctoring features compared to more robust solutions like Adaface.

TestGrid Pricing

TestGrid does not publicly display its pricing. You need to sign up to receive pricing information. This lack of transparency can make it harder to quickly evaluate if it fits your budget.

3. HireVue

Best for: Video Interviewing and Assessments

HireVue is a platform primarily known for its video interviewing capabilities, but it also offers a suite of assessment tools. These tools aim to help companies streamline their hiring process by using video technology to evaluate candidates.

Unlike Alva Labs, HireVue leverages video interviews extensively. This can be a game-changer if you want to assess a candidate's communication skills and personality early in the process. It's like getting a sneak peek of how they'd perform in a real-world scenario.

However, if you need a wide range of skills tested beyond what video can capture, like accounting, language proficiency, or even typing speed, HireVue might leave you wanting more. Adaface's pre-employment assessment tests could be a better fit for those specific needs.

How HireVue compares to Alva Labs?

Key Features

• On-Demand Video Interviews: Candidates record answers to pre-set questions.
• Live Interviewing: Conduct real-time video interviews with candidates.
• Coding Assessments: Evaluate a candidate's coding skills.

HireVue Pros

• Streamlines initial screening with video interviews.
• Helps assess soft skills and communication abilities.
• Integrates with popular ATS systems.
• Offers structured interview formats for consistency.
• Automated scoring for certain assessments.

HireVue Cons

• Limited scope of skills assessed beyond video.
• Lacks custom question creation.
• Doesn't offer custom data location support.
• No support for multiple question sets.

HireVue Pricing

HireVue doesn't publicly list its pricing. You'll need to contact them directly for a quote. This can be a bit of a hassle if you prefer transparent pricing upfront, unlike Adaface Assessments Pricing. Considering they don't have a free trial either, you're going in blind until you speak with their sales team.

4. Codility

Best for: Technical skills focused roles

Codility is a platform primarily designed for assessing the coding skills of developers and engineers. It provides a range of coding tests and challenges to evaluate candidates' abilities.

Unlike Alva Labs, which incorporates personality assessments, Codility hones in on the practical coding skills that are needed for technical roles. This makes it ideal if you're laser-focused on evaluating coding proficiency.

However, if you're looking for a more rounded view of a candidate that includes aptitude and personality, you might want to consider a platform like Adaface, which provides a wider range of assessments.

How Codility compares to Alva Labs?

Key Features

• Coding skill assessment
• Real-time collaboration IDE
• Plagiarism detection

Codility Pros

• Large coding question library.
• Supports many programming languages.
• Automated scoring saves time.
• Code playback feature for detailed review.
• Integrates with popular ATS systems.

Codility Cons

• Lacks assessments beyond coding skills.
• No support for assessing business acumen or soft skills.
• No support for custom questions in all plans.
• Limited proctoring features compared to some alternatives.

Codility Pricing

Codility's pricing starts at $1200 per year. To explore growth plans, you need to contact their team. They do provide a free trial but you need to fill a form and wait for approval. No direct sign up. This can be a bummer if you want to quickly test the platform.

5. Testgorilla

Best for: Versatile Skill Screening Solution

TestGorilla is an assessment platform that offers a wide library of pre-made tests. It's designed to help businesses quickly assess candidates across various skills, from coding to cognitive abilities. Think of it as a buffet of tests, ready for you to pick and choose!

One of Alva Labs' limitations is the lack of custom question support. TestGorilla addresses this gap by allowing you to add your own questions, giving you more control over the assessment process. However, it does not design custom questions for you like Adaface does.

While Alva Labs focuses on personality and aptitude, TestGorilla expands its offerings to include a broader range of skills. This makes it suitable for companies seeking to assess a wider array of capabilities beyond just the core areas.

How Testgorilla compares to Alva Labs?

Key Features

• Extensive Test Library: Access a wide range of tests covering various skills and job roles.
• Add Custom Questions: Include your own questions to tailor assessments.
• Video Interviews: Conduct and record video interviews for a more personal candidate evaluation.

Testgorilla Pros

• Wide range of tests available.
• Supports custom questions.
• Offers video interview functionality.
• Good for companies of all sizes.
• Reporting features.

Testgorilla Cons

• No custom question design: Unlike Adaface, TestGorilla does not design custom questions for you.
• Lacks AI assessments: It doesn't offer specialized AI tests.
• No custom data location support: Unlike Adaface, it doesn't provide custom data location support.
• No plagiarism detection for code: This makes it less useful in screening developer roles.

Testgorilla Pricing

TestGorilla's pricing depends on your company size and the number of employees. Pricing starts at $208 USD per month ($2,496 per annum) for a 31-50 person company on the starter plan. For enterprise pricing, you'll need to contact TestGorilla directly. Remember, it scales w.r.t your employee size.

6. Xobin

Best for: Skills tests with business acumen

Xobin offers a platform for conducting skills assessments, covering a wide range of domains from aptitude to job-specific skills. It aims to help recruiters identify the right candidates by evaluating their abilities across various parameters.

Alva Labs primarily focuses on personality and aptitude assessments, which may not fully cover the breadth of skills required for certain roles. Xobin, on the other hand, provides assessments for business skills, aptitude tests, and even typing tests, offering a more versatile solution for evaluating candidates.

While Alva Labs offers ready-to-use tests, it lacks the option to create custom questions, limiting the ability to tailor assessments to specific needs. Xobin allows adding your own questions, enabling recruiters to assess candidates on the specific skills and knowledge relevant to their organization.

How Xobin compares to Alva Labs?

Key Features

• Wide range of assessments including aptitude, technical, and behavioral skills.
• Job-specific assessments to evaluate candidates for different roles.
• Option to add custom questions to tailor assessments.

Xobin Pros

• Covers a broad spectrum of skills, including aptitude, technical, and behavioral.
• Offers job-specific assessments for various roles.
• Allows customization by adding own questions.
• Provides integrations with popular ATS systems.
• Offers webcam and window proctoring to prevent cheating.

Xobin Cons

• Does not offer custom data location support.
• Lacks a public API for custom integrations.
• No support for conversational assessments to improve candidate experience.
• Doesn't provide code playback for reviewing coding assessments.

Xobin Pricing

Xobin doesn't publicly list its pricing. You'll need to sign up for a demo and contact their sales team to get a quote. This lack of transparency might be a hurdle for companies who prefer clear, upfront pricing. No free trial is available.

7. Ensize

Best for: Personality focused talent insights

Ensize specializes in personality assessments, delivering insights into a candidate's potential fit within an organization. They aim to predict job performance and team compatibility using psychometric data. While Alva Labs focuses on a broader range of skills, Ensize carves a niche in understanding the human element.

Ensize emphasizes personality profiling. However, unlike Alva Labs, it lacks aptitude, business, and coding assessments. This makes Ensize less suitable for roles needing skills verification.

For companies valuing a deep dive into personality traits and team dynamics, Ensize may be useful. But, if you're seeking a more skills-focused pre-employment assessment, solutions like Adaface offer a wider spectrum of assessment types.

How Ensize compares to Alva Labs?

Key Features

• Personality Questionnaires: Measures traits linked to job success.
• Team Role Assessments: Identifies ideal roles within a team.
• Culture Fit Analysis: Gauges alignment with company values.

Ensize Pros

• Focus on personality and team roles.
• Integration with existing HR systems (unverified).
• Helps improve team dynamics.
• Provides insights into leadership potential.
• Supports data-driven talent decisions.

Ensize Cons

• No aptitude or skills testing, limiting scope.
• Lacks coding or technical assessments.
• Customization options are limited.
• Doesn't offer features to prevent cheating like webcam proctoring.

Ensize Pricing

Ensize does not offer transparent pricing on their website. You need to contact them directly for a quote, which may involve a sales call to discuss your specific needs. Unlike solutions with clear, tiered pricing, budgeting for Ensize requires a direct conversation.

8. Sova

Best for: Assessments for graduate hiring

Sova offers a platform for assessing candidates, primarily focusing on psychometric and aptitude evaluations. While Alva Labs also provides assessments, Sova aims to deliver insights into a candidate's potential and cultural fit, with a shorter assessment completion time.

Sova excels in graduate recruitment by offering shorter assessments (5-25 minutes) to evaluate a broader range of candidates quickly. This allows recruiters to efficiently filter applicants based on aptitude, situational judgment, and personality traits.

Unlike Alva Labs, which might have longer assessment times, Sova's concise format ensures higher completion rates and a better candidate experience, making it ideal for high-volume graduate hiring.

How Sova compares to Alva Labs?

Key Features

• Psychometric assessments to evaluate personality traits.
• Aptitude tests for logical and numerical reasoning.
• Situational judgment tests to understand candidate behavior.

Sova Pros

• Suitable for early talent screening.
• Integrates with existing ATS systems.
• Offers a range of psychometric tests.
• Automated scoring to save time.
• Helps assess candidate's potential.

Sova Cons

• Lacks programming skill assessment capabilities.
• No coding questions or coding playback features.
• Limited customization options for branding.
• No webcam or window proctoring features.

Sova Pricing

Sova's pricing starts at £833 per month for the 'Sova' plan. They also offer 'Sova Plus' at £1667 per month and 'Sova Pro' at £2500 per month. Unlike Adaface Assessments Pricing, Sova does not offer a free trial, and you need to contact their sales team to get a detailed quote for enterprise plans.

9. Mercer | Mettl

Best for: Versatile skill assessment platform

Mercer | Mettl offers a broad suite of assessments, covering aptitude, technical skills, and personality traits. They aim to provide a 360-degree view of a candidate's potential, making them a strong contender in the assessment landscape.

Unlike Alva Labs, Mercer | Mettl offers a wider range of tests, including situational judgment, business skills, finance, and AI. If you are looking to test for these skills, Mercer | Mettl could be a better fit.

Mercer | Mettl also allows you to add your own questions to assessments, which isn't supported by Alva Labs. This can be helpful if you want to test for very specific knowledge or skills that aren't covered in their existing test library. For creating custom questions to tailor to use cases, check out Adaface.

How Mercer | Mettl compares to Alva Labs?

Key Features

• Diverse Assessment Library: Access a large variety of tests, from coding to cognitive ability.
• Proctoring Features: Includes webcam and window proctoring to maintain test integrity.
• Reporting and Analytics: Offers skills profile and skill-wise analysis of candidates.

Mercer | Mettl Pros

• Wide range of assessment types available.
• Supports webcam and window proctoring.
• Offers skill-wise analysis in reports.
• Integrates with various ATS platforms.
• Bulk actions for candidate management.

Mercer | Mettl Cons

• No custom coding questions allowed.
• Lacks device fingerprint proctoring for enhanced security.
• No free trial, limiting initial exploration.
• No custom data location support available.

Mercer | Mettl Pricing

Mercer | Mettl does not offer transparent pricing on their website. You'll need to contact them for a custom quote, which might not be ideal if you're looking for a quick and straightforward solution. There is also no free trial available.

10. Kolbe

Best for: Understand conative candidate strengths

Kolbe Corp offers assessments focusing on conation – the instinctive way someone takes action. Unlike Alva Labs, which focuses on cognitive ability and personality, Kolbe zeroes in on how a candidate will instinctively approach problem-solving and decision-making.

Kolbe assessments are particularly useful when you need to understand how a candidate's natural problem-solving style aligns with a specific role or team dynamic. Alva Labs provides insights into what a candidate can do and what they are like, while Kolbe indicates what a candidate will do instinctively.

Kolbe's focus on conation offers a unique perspective that Alva Labs doesn't cover. For example, understanding whether a candidate is naturally inclined to initiate, implement, follow through, or research can be valuable for team placement and project assignments. However, if you need a broader view of skills, including coding, aptitude, or job-specific knowledge, you might need to look at solutions like Adaface for a skill based hiring.

How Kolbe compares to Alva Labs?

Key Features

• Measures instinctive problem-solving methods.
• Provides insights into individual action modes.
• Offers team dynamic assessments.

Kolbe Pros

• Identifies natural strengths for specific tasks.
• Improves team collaboration by understanding individual approaches.
• Offers insights beyond skills and personality.
• Helps in predicting job performance based on instinctive behaviors.
• Provides a different dimension compared to typical skills based assessment providers.

Kolbe Cons

• Limited scope, focusing solely on conative abilities.
• Doesn't assess skills, aptitude, or job-specific knowledge.
• Lacks coding assessments, making it unsuitable for technical roles.
• Doesn't offer options to add custom questions or cater to customer specific usecases.

Kolbe Pricing

Kolbe offers tests individually priced on their website (around $45 for Kolbe A and $55 for Kolbe B). They don't provide a free trial or monthly subscription plans, so you'll need to contact Kolbe directly for a personalized quotation.

Found Your Perfect Alva Labs Alternative?

Here's a quick rundown of the alternatives we've covered:

• Adaface boasts a vast test library covering everything from aptitude tests to AI assessments, plus a strong proctoring suite and transparent, credit-based pricing. Used by clients from 70+ countries, Adaface supports multiple invite options, bulk actions and more.
• TestGrid offers ATS integration and GDPR compliance, focusing on aptitude and personality assessments.
• HireVue uses video intelligence and offers coding assessments, excelling in remote hiring solutions.
• Codility is a coding assessment platform that helps recruiters filter and hire tech talent but is heavily focused on technical skills, lacking situational judgment and business skills tests.
• TestGorilla offers a wide range of tests, including aptitude, personality, and job-specific skills, but lacks custom questions and AI assessments.
• Xobin provides assessments for programming, aptitude, and business skills, with ATS integration and custom branding options.
• Ensize focuses on personality assessments but lacks coding and technical skill evaluations.
• Sova combines aptitude and personality tests with customizable questions, focusing on a shorter assessment time.
• Mercer | Mettl offers a range of assessments, including coding, aptitude, and personality, with webcam proctoring and reporting features.
• Kolbe specializes in conative assessments, measuring a candidate's natural problem-solving style, with individual test pricing available.

We've unpacked a heap of Alva Labs alternatives, each with its own flavor. So, what did we learn?

Alva Labs shines with its focus on personality and logical reasoning assessments. However, its limited scope in areas like finance, language, and AI testing might leave you wanting more.

The good news? Plenty of platforms can fill those gaps! Adaface stands out with its broad test library and focus on candidate experience, but it's not the only option.

Ultimately, the best Alva Labs alternative depends on your specific hiring needs. Whether it's coding skills, aptitude, or personality, there's a tool ready to help you build a better team. Consider what you need and pick accordingly!

Ready to supercharge your hiring process? Give Adaface a try and see the difference!