論理推論テスト

Q: What topics are covered in the 論理推論テスト?

帰納的推理 図式的推論 抽象的な推論 演ductive的な推論 批判的思考

About the test:

論理的推論テストは、シナリオベース、口頭、画像ベース、パズル、およびシーケンスの質問を使用して、候補者の論理的推論、批判的思考、および適性スキルを評価します。

Covered skills:

帰納的推理
抽象的な推論
批判的思考

図式的推論
演ductive的な推論

Preview this test

サンプルスコアカードを表示します

9 reasons why

Adaface 論理推論テスト is the most accurate way to shortlist データアナリストs

Reason #1

Tests for on-the-job skills

The 論理推論テスト helps recruiters and hiring managers identify qualified candidates from a pool of resumes, and helps in taking objective hiring decisions. It reduces the administrative overhead of interviewing too many candidates and saves time by filtering out unqualified candidates at the first step of the hiring process.

The test screens for the following skills that hiring managers look for in candidates:

パターンを識別し、論理的な接続を作成する機能
複雑なデータを分析および解釈する能力
抽象的かつ概念的に考える能力
問題を解決するために演ductive的推論を適用する能力
議論と主張を批判的に評価する能力
体系的かつ分析的に考える能力
図のパズルを理解して解決する能力
結論を引き出すために帰納的推論を適用する能力
論理的な矛盾を特定する能力
仮定を認識して評価する能力
論理的な予測を行う能力
論理的な誤症を特定する能力

Reason #2

No trick questions

Traditional assessment tools use trick questions and puzzles for the screening, which creates a lot of frustration among candidates about having to go through irrelevant screening assessments.

View sample questions

The main reason we started Adaface is that traditional pre-employment assessment platforms are not a fair way for companies to evaluate candidates. At Adaface, our mission is to help companies find great candidates by assessing on-the-job skills required for a role.

Why we started Adaface

Preview this test

サンプルスコアカードを表示します

Reason #3

Non-googleable questions

We have a very high focus on the quality of questions that test for on-the-job skills. Every question is non-googleable and we have a very high bar for the level of subject matter experts we onboard to create these questions. We have crawlers to check if any of the questions are leaked online. If/ when a question gets leaked, we get an alert. We change the question for you & let you know.

How we design questions

これらは、10,000以上の質問のライブラリからのわずかなサンプルです。これに関する実際の質問論理推論テストグーグルできません.

🧐 Question
Medium Tennis Players	Solve
A tennis coach was trying to put together a team of 4 players for a tennis championship out of 7 players. R, S, T are the male players, and W, X, Y, Z are the female players. Note that all players have equal ability, and the team needs to have atleast 2 male players. While selecting the team we need to keep in mind that all 4 players should be able to play with each other. We also need to keep the following restrictions in mind: - R cannot play with Y - S cannot play with W - T cannot play with Z Which of the following are true: A: S and Z cannot be in the team together. B: T and Y cannot be in the team together. C: T and X cannot be in the team together.
Hard CID Agent Logical Deduction Pattern Recognition	Solve
A code ("EIG AUC REO RAI COG") was sent to the criminal office by a CID agent named Batra. However, four of the five words are fake, with only one containing the information. They also included a clue in the form of a sentence: "If I tell you any character of the code word, you will be able to tell how many vowels there are in the code word." Are you able to figure out what the code word is? A: RAI B: EIG C: AUC D: REO E: COG F: None
Medium Positive correlation Correlation vs. Causation	Solve
Myra is working on her thesis for which she created a scatter plot of the number of teachers and the number of college graduates for cities in Australia. She noticed a positive correlation. Which of these do you think is the probable explanation for this correlation? A: Teachers encourage people to go to college, so an increase in the number of teachers leads to an increase in the number of college graduates. B: Some college graduates choose teaching as a profession after graduating, so an increase in the number of college graduates also leads to an increase in the number of teachers. C: There are more college graduates and teachers in higher income cities, so income is a confounding variable here, make it difficult to prove causation between number of teachers and number of college graduates. D: Cities with a higher population have more teachers and more college graduates, so the correlation is due to a third variable (population of city). E: The provided data is insufficient, so it is extremely difficult to establish the reason for the correlation. F: Most college students choose non-teaching professions after graduating, which explains the correlation. G: In Australia, college students are encouraged by their teachers to choose teaching as a profession after graduating.

	🧐 Question	🔧 Skill
	Medium Tennis Players	3 mins Logical Reasoning	Solve
A tennis coach was trying to put together a team of 4 players for a tennis championship out of 7 players. R, S, T are the male players, and W, X, Y, Z are the female players. Note that all players have equal ability, and the team needs to have atleast 2 male players. While selecting the team we need to keep in mind that all 4 players should be able to play with each other. We also need to keep the following restrictions in mind: - R cannot play with Y - S cannot play with W - T cannot play with Z Which of the following are true: A: S and Z cannot be in the team together. B: T and Y cannot be in the team together. C: T and X cannot be in the team together.
	Hard CID Agent Logical Deduction Pattern Recognition	3 mins Logical Reasoning	Solve
A code ("EIG AUC REO RAI COG") was sent to the criminal office by a CID agent named Batra. However, four of the five words are fake, with only one containing the information. They also included a clue in the form of a sentence: "If I tell you any character of the code word, you will be able to tell how many vowels there are in the code word." Are you able to figure out what the code word is? A: RAI B: EIG C: AUC D: REO E: COG F: None
	Medium Positive correlation Correlation vs. Causation	2 mins Logical Reasoning	Solve
Myra is working on her thesis for which she created a scatter plot of the number of teachers and the number of college graduates for cities in Australia. She noticed a positive correlation. Which of these do you think is the probable explanation for this correlation? A: Teachers encourage people to go to college, so an increase in the number of teachers leads to an increase in the number of college graduates. B: Some college graduates choose teaching as a profession after graduating, so an increase in the number of college graduates also leads to an increase in the number of teachers. C: There are more college graduates and teachers in higher income cities, so income is a confounding variable here, make it difficult to prove causation between number of teachers and number of college graduates. D: Cities with a higher population have more teachers and more college graduates, so the correlation is due to a third variable (population of city). E: The provided data is insufficient, so it is extremely difficult to establish the reason for the correlation. F: Most college students choose non-teaching professions after graduating, which explains the correlation. G: In Australia, college students are encouraged by their teachers to choose teaching as a profession after graduating.

	🧐 Question	🔧 Skill	💪 Difficulty	⌛ Time
	Tennis Players	Logical Reasoning	Medium	3 mins	Solve
A tennis coach was trying to put together a team of 4 players for a tennis championship out of 7 players. R, S, T are the male players, and W, X, Y, Z are the female players. Note that all players have equal ability, and the team needs to have atleast 2 male players. While selecting the team we need to keep in mind that all 4 players should be able to play with each other. We also need to keep the following restrictions in mind: - R cannot play with Y - S cannot play with W - T cannot play with Z Which of the following are true: A: S and Z cannot be in the team together. B: T and Y cannot be in the team together. C: T and X cannot be in the team together.
	CID Agent Logical Deduction Pattern Recognition	Logical Reasoning	Hard	3 mins	Solve
A code ("EIG AUC REO RAI COG") was sent to the criminal office by a CID agent named Batra. However, four of the five words are fake, with only one containing the information. They also included a clue in the form of a sentence: "If I tell you any character of the code word, you will be able to tell how many vowels there are in the code word." Are you able to figure out what the code word is? A: RAI B: EIG C: AUC D: REO E: COG F: None
	Positive correlation Correlation vs. Causation	Logical Reasoning	Medium	2 mins	Solve
Myra is working on her thesis for which she created a scatter plot of the number of teachers and the number of college graduates for cities in Australia. She noticed a positive correlation. Which of these do you think is the probable explanation for this correlation? A: Teachers encourage people to go to college, so an increase in the number of teachers leads to an increase in the number of college graduates. B: Some college graduates choose teaching as a profession after graduating, so an increase in the number of college graduates also leads to an increase in the number of teachers. C: There are more college graduates and teachers in higher income cities, so income is a confounding variable here, make it difficult to prove causation between number of teachers and number of college graduates. D: Cities with a higher population have more teachers and more college graduates, so the correlation is due to a third variable (population of city). E: The provided data is insufficient, so it is extremely difficult to establish the reason for the correlation. F: Most college students choose non-teaching professions after graduating, which explains the correlation. G: In Australia, college students are encouraged by their teachers to choose teaching as a profession after graduating.

Reason #4

1200+ customers in 75 countries

Adaface を使用することで、最初の選考プロセスを 75% 以上最適化することができ、採用担当マネージャーと人材獲得チームの両方にとって貴重な時間を同様に解放することができました。

Brandon Lee, 人々の責任者, Love, Bonito

Preview this test

サンプルスコアカードを表示します

Reason #5

Designed for elimination, not selection

The most important thing while implementing the pre-employment 論理推論テスト in your hiring process is that it is an elimination tool, not a selection tool. In other words: you want to use the test to eliminate the candidates who do poorly on the test, not to select the candidates who come out at the top. While they are super valuable, pre-employment tests do not paint the entire picture of a candidate’s abilities, knowledge, and motivations. Multiple easy questions are more predictive of a candidate's ability than fewer hard questions. Harder questions are often "trick" based questions, which do not provide any meaningful signal about the candidate's skillset.

Science behind Adaface tests

Reason #6

1 click candidate invites

Email invites: You can send candidates an email invite to the 論理推論テスト from your dashboard by entering their email address.

Public link: You can create a public link for each test that you can share with candidates.

API or integrations: You can invite candidates directly from your ATS by using our pre-built integrations with popular ATS systems or building a custom integration with your in-house ATS.

Reason #7

Detailed scorecards & benchmarks

サンプルスコアカードを表示します

Preview this test

サンプルスコアカードを表示します

Reason #8

High completion rate

Adaface tests are conversational, low-stress, and take just 25-40 mins to complete.

This is why Adaface has the highest test-completion rate (86%), which is more than 2x better than traditional assessments.

Reason #9

Advanced Proctoring

Learn more

Preview this test

サンプルスコアカードを表示します

About the 論理推論テスト

Why you should use 論理推論テスト?

The 論理推論テスト makes use of scenario-based questions to test for on-the-job skills as opposed to theoretical knowledge, ensuring that candidates who do well on this screening test have the relavant skills. The questions are designed to covered following on-the-job aspects:

帰納的推論の習熟度
図式的推論を使用して問題を効果的に分析および解決する能力
パターンと関係を特定するための抽象的な推論のスキル
論理的思考と問題解決のための強力な演ductiveな推論スキル
情報を評価し、健全な決定を下すための批判的思考機能
データ分析と解釈の知識
分析的思考の経験
数学的推論の能力
論理的議論と命題のしっかりした理解
データ構造の分析と解釈の機能

Once the test is sent to a candidate, the candidate receives a link in email to take the test. For each candidate, you will receive a detailed report with skills breakdown and benchmarks to shortlist the top candidates from your pool.

What topics are covered in the 論理推論テスト?

帰納的推論
誘導性推論は、限られた情報または観察に基づいてパターンまたは結論を推定する能力です。このテストでは、問題解決と意思決定において重要なパターンまたは傾向に基づいて論理的推論を描き、予測を行う候補者の能力を評価するために測定されます。 p>図の推論には、図やフローチャートなどの視覚表現を通じて問題を理解し、解決することが含まれます。このスキルは、視覚情報を分析し、論理的な関係を特定する候補者の能力を評価するために測定されます。これは、エンジニアリング、設計、問題解決タスクなどの分野で役立ちます。
抽象的な推論
抽象的な推論とは、具体的な詳細や特定の例に依存することなく、根本的なパターンまたは概念を識別および分析する能力を指します。このスキルは、論理的思考、問題解決スキル、複雑な情報を知覚および分析する能力を評価するのに不可欠であり、抽象的な思考が重要なさまざまな分野で価値があります。 P>演ductive控除推論には、一般原則または施設から特定のインスタンスへの結論を導き出すことが含まれます。このテストでは、候補者の論理ルールと原則を適用する能力を評価し、与えられた情報または声明から正確な結論を引き出すために測定されます。このスキルは、法律、数学、科学研究などの分野で特に重要です。特定の事実やルールに基づいた推論が重要です。
批判的思考
批判的思考は、情報、議論、または状況を客観的に分析して評価し、根拠のある論理的な結論に達します。このテストでは、候補者が独立して考え、合理的な判断を下す能力を評価するために測定されます。このスキルは、特に問題解決、意思決定、分析能力を必要とする役割の幅広い専門的な設定で価値があります。
Full list of covered topics
The actual topics of the questions in the final test will depend on your job description and requirements. However, here's a list of topics you can expect the questions for 論理推論テスト to be based on.
番号シーケンス
アナロジー
三段論法
論理的な控除
分析的推論
バイナリロジック
重要な推論
条件付き推論
論理パズル
演ductive的な推論
帰納的推理
抽象的な推論
図式的推論
議論の妥当性
論理的等価
数量詞
論理的なコネクティブ
演ductive的な証拠
条件付きステートメント
論理的な一貫性
引数評価
論理演算子
論理的な問題解決
認知的柔軟性
意思決定
パターン認識
抽象的な思考
分析的思考
統計的推論
問題解決技術
批判的思考スキル
概念的推論
データの分析
証拠の評価
仮定の識別
論理エラーの識別
論理的な関係を特定します
推理する
パターンの認識
矛盾を検出します
引数の評価
クレームの評価
確率を伴う推論
結論の評価
論理的な結論を描く
論理的な誤りを認識します
有効で無効な引数を特定します
論理原則の適用
論理的妥当性の評価
推論プロセスの説明
論理ギャップの検出
パターンの類似性の識別
論理的な一貫性の評価
複雑なパターンの認識
論理的な問題の分解
論理ルールの適用
原因と結果を認識します

Preview this test

サンプルスコアカードを表示します

What roles can I use the 論理推論テスト for?

データアナリスト
卒業生
新鮮
マネージャー
システム管理者
フロントオフィスの役割

How is the 論理推論テスト customized for senior candidates?

For intermediate/ experienced candidates, we customize the assessment questions to include advanced topics and increase the difficulty level of the questions. This might include adding questions on topics like

論理パターンの認識と適用の習熟度
概念的に考え、ソリューションを戦略化する能力
類似の推論に精通しています
有効で無効な引数を特定するスキル
因果的推論のしっかりした理解
議論を評価し、論理的な結論を出す経験
条件付き推論の知識
論理的結果を評価する能力
三段論法の推論のしっかりした理解
論理的な誤症を特定する能力
複雑な推論シナリオを評価する習熟度

Preview this test

サンプルスコアカードを表示します

採用担当者は、パネル面接中に尋ねる専門的な質問を通じて、どの候補者がより良いスコアを持っているかを判断し、スコアが低い候補者と区別できると感じました。彼らです非常に満足 Adaface のスクリーニングで最終候補者リストに選ばれた候補者の質を重視します。

85%

スクリーニング時間の短縮

完全なケーススタディを表示します

論理推論テストよくある質問

論理的思考テストとは何ですか?

論理的推論テストでは、受験者が混乱したりストレスを感じたりすることなく、論理的に考え、分析し、問題を解決する能力を評価します。このテストでは、受験者が問題を解決し、その解決策がなぜどのように機能するかを理解する能力を測定します。

複数のスキルを1つのカスタム評価に組み合わせることはできますか？

そのとおり。カスタム評価は、職務内容に基づいて設定され、指定したすべての必須スキルに関する質問が含まれます。

アンチチートまたは監督の機能はありますか？

次のアンチチート機能があります。

グーグル不可能な質問
IP監督
Webの提案
ウェブカメラの監督
盗作の検出
安全なブラウザ

[プロクチャリング機能]（https://www.adaface.com/proctoring）の詳細をご覧ください。

テストスコアを解釈するにはどうすればよいですか？

留意すべき主なことは、評価が選択ツールではなく排除ツールであることです。スキル評価が最適化され、技術的にその役割の資格がない候補者を排除するのに役立ちます。これは、役割の最良の候補者を見つけるのに役立つために最適化されていません。したがって、評価を使用する理想的な方法は、しきい値スコア（通常は55％、ベンチマークを支援します）を決定し、インタビューの次のラウンドのしきい値を超えてスコアを上回るすべての候補者を招待することです。